Political prosecution, persecution and other fairy tales from grand wizard Din.

1. Like many others, I also know of mahiadin's arrest by sprm. He is out on bail. Therefore we are in no doubt, he was arrested .

2. 6 charges are proffered to him. 4 for abusing position inducing corruption. Or influence peddling. 2 for money laundering.

3. The amount involved is rm427.5 million. He is out on bail for rm 2million.

4. When he was arrested, we heard of the ubiquitous, moronic and thoughtless claim that this selective and a political prosecution. Pendakwaan.

5. The moron and the imbecile claimed, this prosecution does not diminish mahiadin's esteem as it did in the sodomy case. Obviously alluding to Anwar s former case .

6. Now I know, BUMIPUTRA rights entitle one to steal and that stealing does not result in injuring self worth and dignity. One who does that must have a Teflon skin

7. So stealing, pilfering, corruption and so on are emblems of respectability and self worth. It's the malay amour propre . Only sodomy is not .

8. What we are hearing now is political defense. Really,Mahiadin must offer legal or technical defense.

9. Political defense actually is an admission that the subject matter of the charges did take place. You try to cover them up by shouting political defense. It's a ploy and a ruse.

10. Because they are just political dust stirrings, you can say anything under the sun. They are diverse as much as they are ridiculous .

11. You can shout fight against tyranny, long live abah, down with Anwar, Anwar is vindictive, justice for tsmy, tsmy is innocent, rise o malays and Islam and so on you can shout all these until you are blue in the face. They won't change the outcome. If abah moo is guilty, he will be convicted and spend sabbatical leave in Kajang Hilton.

12. Ahh, the malays and Islam rise with corruption, do they? The malays must have gone mad!

13. Mahiadin, in particular may ventilate ceaselessly that his prosecution is politically motivated. He may accused all he wants about agencies being used by the government to embark on a McCarthy like corruption blitz. This run counter to the statements he made in the past.

14. Or to save his own neck, he may blame other equally tainted lackeys.

15. He may say that throughout his 75 years, he has never been charged. Well, that's because all previous governments, umno, his own and Ismail sabris were not serious about corruption by the big fishes. It's a case of crooks looking after their kind .

16. Mahiadin says he will have his day in court. So why does he rant about political motives, schemes and intrigues?

17. The truth is, the more he stirs up political dust, the truer are the dastardly acts he committed .

18. Now he's slapped with another charge of receiving a bribe of rm5million. The man on the Clapham omnibus or on the Malaysian commuter bus , would rush in to say ,this is polical vendetta. You may say so because you have imperfect knowledge.

19. Sprm or the procedural team may have access to a more complete information to press such a charge .

20. The looking stupid peja said the charges against mahiadin did not make sense. A thief would have hidden the monies stolen.

21. Mahiadin is a clever thief. He may have hid the monies with friends or because he think he is untouchable, in banks he thought couldn't be investigated. Only peja is a stupid thief .

22. An interesting thing that emerged from the mahiadin's case, is the careless revelation from the moss/lumut man .

23. He said he had possibly incriminating files on certain individuals but to be used when needed. At that material time, he was the home minister.

24. That would open him to 2 possible misdemeanors. One, the concealment of possible judicial material . Two, possible blackmailing . That's why I say, he is a careless idiot.

25. Mahiadin should stop taking refuge behind the political prosecution and persecution allegations. Of course he will stubbornly persist, but to his own peril.

26. The more political shit stirring he does, the more he is admitting that the allegations of abuse of power and corruption did take place .

27. This political persecution issue or political persecution thing is tiresome as it is a rancid outpouring. We all have heard that the ag and sprm boss were appointed by. Mahiadin. Suggesting that they wouldn't sabotage mahiadin. That didn't stop them doing the right thing

28. Are we asked to believe that just because some jokers label an action as being political, then we should stop legal actions? That would be ridiculous wouldn't it?
Then all crooks can see refuge behind political prosecution.

29. Political persecution is the last refuge of bloody crooks just as patriotism is the last refuge of scoundrels.

30. Is mahiadin prosecuted because he leads a civil disobedience movement? Certainly he is no martin Luther king or the fakir Gandhi. A faker perhaps.

31. Is he like the Christians being fed to the lions by the Romans? Is he prosecuted because he leads bersatu or on?
If the answers to all these are no, then he can't claim political prosecution and political persecution .

32. Are the charges against mahiadin too loose and open ended able to be lumped under political prosecution? Thus far the charges against him are very specific.

33. Is he denied the minimum legal safeguards?
He can have his day in court
He can have lawyers of his choosing
He can speak about anything under the sun
He can move freely domestically
He is not robbed of habeas corpus.

34. So mahiadin's claim, the the charges against him are politically motivated, is just a load of cow dung.
Before the legal and technical defense, he spins all sorts of nenek kebayan stories. The unthinking Malaysians will listen with jaws dropping.

Tweet

Read more...

The Sacking Of Mahiadin And The Interim PM.

1. Some people gleefully say that the king cannot sack the PM. It's not provided for in the constitution. Mahathir they further say, removed that right in the 1990s.

2. You can say no and feel smugly comforted because you have cited the coup de grâce that snuffed out the yes-Mahathir's 1992 constitutional amendments.

3. Then you can join the bandwagon and say padan muka ini semua mamak kutty punya hal.

4. He was the one who removed the right to sack. You think you have demolished the arguments that say, yes, the king CAN sack the PM. Blame it all on Mamu Mahathir for not being able to.

5. You are not wrong-if you are answering an academic exam paper in consti.

6. Similarly, if you had answered, YES the king CAN sack the PM, you are also not wrong. It all depends on how cogent are your reasoning.

7. In the end it's up to the examiner evaluating the cogency of your arguments.

8. Similarly, I say, it's up to the King to evaluate the noes and the yesses.

9. How do the two positions measure up to:-a) whether it's justiciable to sack or not sack. B) the reasons you adduced and C) the necessity of sacking or not.

10. In my mind, you are guided by the need to remove the source of the mess and the necessity to overcome the grim impasse.

11. Based on the need to remove and necessity arguments, you conclude that the source of this mess is Mahiadin.

12. In an earlier article, I have cited the cases of Gough Whitlam and Zambri Kadir. To show that sacking is justiciable and justifiable.

13. There is a more recent case. It involved Mahathir himself.

14. In April 2020, because of the clearest of vision, he resigned.

15. That event, should be treated as an object lesson. What happened?

16. First, when Mamu Mahathir resigned, the entire cabinet resigned as per the constitution.

17. Wan Azizah was the DPM then. She did NOT take over Mamu. As per the constitution.

18. So you landlubbers, banish the thought that 'il duce' Ismail Sabri will take over Din Pagoh. That thought exists in the mind of the primus inter pares man only. In others, it exists as a wet dream.

19. Secondly, the king appointed an interim PM. But the previous administration's PM must first resign.

20. That was what the king did. He persuaded Puff Abah to resign, but the latter stubbornly stuck to his guns. He refused to resign, believing that he can command majority support.

21. Mahiadin may not have majority support now,but I said he can. He can entice the froggies.

22. Persuasion it seems, is possible only with a reasonable person. With an unreasonable and bull headed person like Mahiadin, the only option is to sack him!

23. The King will be reluctant to sack Wak Din,unless there is universal condemnation and revulsion against Wak Din.

24. So continue to write to the King, demonstate and fly the black and white flags. Heeding the wishes of the rakyat, the King will sack Din Pagoh.

25. In theory, its possible fo appoint Ismail Sabri. But the fellow has to resign first. And continue the reign of a failed goverment.

26. But appointing Ismail is too far fetched of an idea. He is too associated with the PN goverment and must share some of the responsibilities of the failed government.

27. Especially in the management of the covid pandemic, despite the many hare brained strategies and plans of the Mahi government.

28. So eliminating Ismail the court cluster and the boisterous Mamu Anwar, the only person of interest,fit and able to lead this country as interim PM is Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah.

29. Then, choose him. The King should be guided only by one consideration. Is choosing Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah good for the people and the country?

Tweet

Read more...

Friday the 13th. Freddie Kruger Din's tv flick.

Apologies to readers. This is a rushed article.

 

1. Are we being made stupid or what? The blasted PM has the audacity to appear before TV and offer, essentially, bribes to those opposing him so that he can stay in power?

2. If he has conceded he has lost support of the majority of MPs, he has to resign immediately as per our constitution. No ifs or buts. He has to go. Pack your bags.

3. The country is not only his to save, but by all of us by lawful means. Through a democratically elected government. Definitely not through a backdoor government using rear means.

4. Appearing before TV and offering 300k allocations to all MPs is buying compromises from the MPs.

5. Don't we all see what he's doing? He's just asking for a reprieve and an outstretched hand to save him from drowning.

6. At what price? So that he stays on as PM and keeps his bloated cabinet?

7. If the opposition MPs cave in, it means that they are complicit in retaining a moron as PM. For that they must be punished too. At the GE.

8. Have they forgotten of the mess he created for the economy? The high unemployment figure, the flight of foreign investors the mess in the management of the COVID-19 pandemic, the suffering of the people, their haplessness etc?

9. For that, he and his bloated cabinet deserve the following :-

10. That is not an overture nor an olive branch. It's just naked bribery by a desperate man.

11. If he no longer has the majority support, he must quit immediately. He should have appeared before TV to announce he and his cabinet are resigning.

12. The Palace ought to just go ahead and appoint an interim PM. Hopefully the Pagoh ignoramus understands the implications.

13. Hes just doing the Pagoh shuffle buying time through naked bribery . The people of Pagoh are better off dumping him.

14. GE15 is not his to pledge. It will definitely come. When it comes, with or without his pledge, drive a stake through his behind.

Tweet

Read more...

What Must UMNO Do?

1. It will be interesting to see what Mr Thicky Zahid will do to the umno traitors-the umno Benedict Arnolds.

2. In case readers don't know, Benedict Arnold was initially a hero of the American war of Independence, but later turned infamous traitor and fought with the British.

3. Just like the umno driftwoods who fought for PN now.

4. That group is led by il duce Ismail Sabri, Anuar 'Budu' Musa, Hisham Aw Aw, the man who lied about his qualification, Zahidi 'sawadeekarp' and others.

5. What will umno do to them? The looked drunk KJ has problems with Zahid. Some say they istiqamah and will stay with, PN. Let them.

6. How will Zahid treat those who hunt with the hounds and run with the hare?

7. Zahid must remember:-

 

a. Size let them rule. If these people are out, umno will not be diminished at all. 

b. Betrayal must be avenged and 

c. Unity with the rest of umno, is strength. Without them.

8. Sure, only now Anuar Musa says that umno is an open party. Not so opened when he had a bone to pick with umno. Sure, open to reject him. He can still be friends with umno right?

9. Would umno consider an ustable political chameleon like this?

10. Najib once called him 'brother'. He now calls Najib, bastard. That may be right, but unbecoming of Nazri.

11. These people can read the writings on the wall. We can detect a mellowed tone from them. Soon they will sing a different tune about umno.

12. When Mahiadin resigns, the entire cabinet will gulung tikar it's not as if umno can just take over and form another back door government. There must be an interim government.

13. Umno must wait until the next GE. In the meantime, it must undertake reforms.

14. Expulsion of the umno traitors is one part of the equation. The other part, the more important one, is that the court cluster must volunteer to quit the party.

15. The destiny of umno is no longer in the hands of the elite and the neo feudals. It is in the hands of 3 million ordinary Malays and their right-thinking delegates.

16. Do what is right for our beloved country!

17. The right thing to do is to rally behind 'Gu Li'.

18. It's crazy if Puff Abah calls for the dissolution of parliament. The covid pandemic spread like wildfire because of the Sabah elections. Unless he doesn't care.

19. The most honourable thing for Puff Abah is to commit the ultimate political seppuku-resign

Tweet

Read more...

Don Mahi Makes An Offer Nobody Can Refuse.

1. Let's not underestimate Puff Abah. He will do anything to stay in power.

2. It's comforting to hear Mamu Anwar saying it's impossible for mahiadin to have a majority. The late AR Tompel was also fond of saying Impossible!

3. It pays not to underestimate the Javanese from Pagoh. Wasn't the 'impore-ssible' man the one who ousted the perennially make the wrong choice, 95-year-old man?

4. So guard your own house. Puff Abah knows there are many yahoo boys in the opposition.

5. He also knows there are many umno fellows with weak knees. He can buy them off or make legal problems go away.

6. The first to blink is the kleptocrat and former embezzler in chief 'baby face' Najib Amirul mukminin.

7. Sure, the response came as a result of the snide remarks Mahi made against the court cluster in umno, during his perutusan khas.

8. Not only does Mahi believed the umno court cluster was behind umnos 'unsupport' for PN, it is also umnos Achilles heel.

9. Maybe Najib thinks he can win his case, being defended by a hot shot lawyer. But the rest, who are suspiciously quiet, are thinking spending time at home is better than spending time at Bamboo River Resort or the Kajang Hilton. Maybe they can get some shopping money.

10. Hence, the snide remark was actually a hint saying the bookie is now open for bets. Mahi could easily pay off the not so shiny umno luminaries. I think their eyes will pop out of their sockets hearing RM20m. For those facing court cases, maybe RM10m plus their legal problems will go away miraculously.

11. And don't think the froggies are from umno only. MPs from PKR, Sabah and Sarawak are in the loop too. The pas mullahs are however missing the gravy train this time.

12. Come on! Why do you think Mahi wants to be tested in September? Bringing cash money and comfort girls take time, man.

13. So don't do an AR Tompel saying, 'impore- sibble'! The fact you are saying it means you are thinking maybe this chap has got something up in his sleeves.

14. What I find disturbing somewhat is the Stockholm syndrome admiration for Wak Mahi in some people. Wak Mahi's fighting spirit becomes attractive somewhat. Maybe an alluring sexual trait. I don't know.

15. Wak Mahi's stance is just brinkmanship and a confidence Don Mahi can make an offer nobody can refuse.

Tweet

Read more...

A Diarrhoea-ic Special Communique.

1. Puff Abah is a stubborn bloke. That's recalcitrant for you.

2. The King, in effect, is politely asking him to leave. Citing the relevant articles in the Constitution.

3. But Puff Abah is stubborn. He refuses to believe he has lost majority support. As leader of the Klingon tribe, he stays on as PM.

4. As a face-saving gesture, he'd rather take his chances in parliament. In September.

5. Just listen to his tone. That's the voice of a very defiant person trivialising what the King said.

6. It's as though the King and whatever the King represents do not exist

7. Might as, well abolish the monarchy. All hail Puff Abah. The Emperor!

8. What does the rebuff do to the King? He loses face among his brother rulers. He has failed to do what is expected of him by the people.

9. But his failure is not because of his doing. It's because Mahiadin refused to talk and listen as a civilised person.

10. Mahiadin has conducted his own rebellion. That's defiance and treasonous. Derhaka!

11. Perhaps he deserves this:-

12. The King, meantime, must be rolling on the floor pulling his hair. ROTFPHH. Lamenting how duff and stubborn the Wak Pagoh is.

13. But puff abah is not beneath doing all means necessary. He's sly, shyster, shylokian etc. He's calling parliament only in September. Even one day is a long time

14. Enough time for him and his under hands to buy off his detractors or make deals.

15. What's stopping him to start his bidding from RM20million? What if he promises to remove all the court cases? He has a useful idiot in the person of the AG, hasn't he?

 

16. Politics is the dark art of possibilities. 

JUST IN BREAKING NEWS!!!

Tan Sri Muhyiddin Yassin has agreed to step down as prime minister and has agreed to hand over all his powers immediately to Tan Sri Mahiadin Yassin.

17. He mocks the King. Having failed to persuade the King of his satanic machinations, he now wants to use parliament, which he has steadfastly avoided. He wants parliament to validate his position. Oh! I forgot, he has a lapdog there.

Tweet

Read more...

Part 2. Can the king sack Mahiadin?

1. Can the Agong sack the PM? It depends on on whether the agong wants to and bold enough to.

2. If the King does sack Mahiadin, we are not going to court, are we? We can't if we want to.
The king can do no wrong.

3. Of course, the king is controlled by our constitution. The above argument is to illustrate that Malaysians looked up to the King to clear the current impasse.

4. Therefore, we look at the constitution to clear the bloody jam. That requires more of the construction process of the provisions in the constitution. Rather than mere mechanical interpretation.

5. True, the constitution has no article or subsection that provided for the sacking of the PM by the head of state.

6. It only provided for the appointment of a PM. Meaning, the King has the ability to create a not being entity 'A' to a being entity 'B'. From A to B.

7. If the King has the ability to create 'B' from 'A' then he must be able to do the reverse. Create A from B. He can sack the PM.

8. It's unconscionable for us to put up semantical hurdles on the King's ability to sack the PM.

9. Perhaps this was what Lord Reid had in mind, when he drafted the article that the King can sack the PM when the latter can no longer command majority support from MPs.

10. Unfortunately, the drafted article was not inserted into the Constitution. To me, it remained a persuasive legal opinion which has relevance presently!

11. There were instances where a PM and a chief minister were asked to quit. These instances became legal precedents on which judgments and judicial decisions are made.

12. The Australian PM was sacked by the Governor General. The Perak Chief Minister in Malaysia was sacked by the late HRH Sultan Azlan Shah.

13. Hence, the sacking of the chief executive is both justiciable and justifiable.

14. Can the paucity of cases be used as a general rule? The paucity is because a sacking of a PM is not done lightly. It's not like buying fish in the market. It's never a joyful frolic in the countryside.

15. There must be extremely damaging reasons for the sacking. In the case of Puff Abah, there are many.

16. Lord Reid gave 2 reasons:- a) not having the support from majority of MPs and b) refusing to leave. Both reasons stuck out like sore thumbs on Puff Abah.

17. The fact that Puff Abah is not willing to test his majority in parliament, suggests that he does NOT in fact have the numbers.
That, despite the 'Voodoo' arithmetic of Mr 'Bojangles' Shahidan, 'mad dog' Nazri and Ismail.

18. Like the petulant child, Wak Din refuses to vacate the PMs seat. The refusal, produces a raging urge in the discipline teacher to whack the living daylights from the Pagoh Neanderthal.

19. And like Nero the mad emperor before him, Puff Abah plays the fiddle, while the country burns. The people ashed to the ground.

20. We now know, on fallacious grounds he managed to dupe the King, to declare a fake Emergency.

21. Under the emergency, despite the lockdowns and repeated restricted movement controls, the Covid cases rose. People are dying from the Covid pandemic and suicides. We have our own Gulag.

22. And the man responsible for our 'imprisonment', is il Duce Ismail Sabri, from umno . Of course, what he did, was supported by 'Führer' Puff Abah.

23. Note too, another umno guy, Kaiser Khairy is in charge of the lacklustre vaccination program. Right from the start it's a series of blunder and bungling.

24. With a, war chest of over RM5 billion, we don't know the budget is managed. The blasted mysejahtera application costs RM7 million. Some vaccines were donated by donor countries. Kaiser kJ allowed pharmaniaga to retail the sinovac vaccine, increasing the probability of contamination.

25. Perhaps because the rot is in the head as it is insidious, we have cases of vaccines being sold, people injected with empty vials frontliners getting infected and vac centres being swarmed.

26. It seems that imbecility is infectious. Puff Abah is the carrier- in- chief.

27. The notable aspect of the vaccination programme seems to be the song:-

28.

Saya cucuk, awak cucuk, kita cucuk
Haziq cucuk, Rawther kata kena cucuk,
Cucuuuklaah!

29. The whimsical proroguing of parliament has threatened and will threaten democracy in our country. It may be a joke to Wak Din, but we are not amused.

30. It endangers and threatens our democracy because the new normal is absolute despotism and dictatorship.

31. For that reason, Puff Abah uses any means necessary, to postpone the sitting of parliament.

32. That enables him to govern without being answerable to parliament. More damaging, his stooges can spend money as they wished.

33. The emasculation of parliament is no small matter and not to be taken lightly.

34. Parliament is the custodian of our democratic way of life. It debates government policies, holds it accountable, provides checks and balances and ensures spending is done responsibly. An emasculated government weakens all these.

35. An enlarged and uncontrolled government is an enlarged tyranny.

36. It's the unleashing of the 666 beast, just as Mamu Mahathir's resignation unleashed Wak Din.

37. That is why I say Puff Abahs proroguing of our parliament has threatened and will endanger our country.

38. To realise his devilish aims, Wak Din has 2 lapdogs to do his biddings. The Speaker and the invertebrate AG.

39. Mahiadin is an untrustworthy fellow, sly, shyster, Shylock kind of person. He lies to the rakyat, to parliament and to the King. But untrustworthy is more than just lying.

40. Untrustworthy means his whole being is an embodiment of a natural-born liar. There not an ounce of flesh that says you can trust him.

41. If it's occasionally lying, that's bad enough, and politicians lie all the time. But Din sembab is a 7-eleven lying machine. If he's talking, he must lie.

42. That disqualifies him as a person you can honestly deal. If he can lie to the King, what chances do the rakyat have?

43. What disturbs me most is his insistence that the King can only act on his and the cabinets' advice. It's treating the royal institution as non-existent. Is this a harbinger to the abolition of the monarcy? What's there to stop them?

44. Look at what's happening to our economy. It's imploding, caused by an incompetent and failed government helmed by Mein Führer, Puff Abah.

45. The income, reflected by our GDP, is now below that of Vietnam. There's high unemployment. People are losing jobs or cant find any. To me, that's a ripe recipe of stagflation. Investors are running away. They have no confidence in Puff Abah. Ours is long gone. The value of our currency is that belonging to a Banana Republic.

46. Perhaps the greatest reason and disapprobation that can justify the sacking of Mahiadin, is the universal suffering and haplessness of the rakyat. People are suffering. They have to beg for food. They want the sacking NOW!

47. But as usual, the celestial dictatorship tendencies of some mullahs forbid the flying of the white flag. While the government frowned upon the flying of the black flag.

48. It's a coincidence that the state, from which the King comes from, has a flag incorporating both colours. Shall we burn it?

49. The sacking of a PM is both justifiable and justiciable. We have had cases and precedents. We have given our reasons to justify the sacking.

50. So in my opinion it's both necessary and possible for the King to sack Wak Din.

Tweet

Read more...

Suanpan Arithmetic And Sacking The PM. Part 1.

1. I am baffled, and I think many are too. First, Ismail Sabri said be calm. The government is stable. We have 110 seats.
Then he says 40 umno MPs support Mahi.

2. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. Both statements are not proven. As the old lady in the Wimpy advert says, 'Where's the beef?

3. The statements remained unproven claims. Speaking with candour, they are just hot air and BS.

4. Sorry. I promised myself never to use expletives. I simply can't resist. However, I am comforted by the fact that almarhum Ustaz Nik Aziz said 'Tuhan pun mencarut'. I am sure He is all-forgiving.

5. The validity of Ismail's statement can only be tested in parliament. Go through the vote of no confidence. See how?

6. So when 'mad dog' Nazri Aziz insists that the statement about the 40 thieves is true, it probably is NOT.

7. As to the figure of 110, I am still puzzled. The simple majority in our parliament is 112. Is 110 greater than 112?

8. I am suspicious of the figure 110. Given the 30% Bumi discount, the figure, I believed, is only 77. At the most, PN has 80 votes.

9. But don't take my word for it. Test it in parliament. Like Russell Peters said-be a man. Test it.

10. If you patronize the Menate steak restaurant you will find its worker wearing T-shirts emblazoned with the motto 'be calm recite the selawat'. Ismail is giving free T-shirts saying be calm, we have 110.

11. Enter Shahidan Kassim with his imaginary 40. Umno has 37 MPs. MCA has 2. MIC has a kichimayung 1. PBRS has 1. Total BN is 41. Out of 41,7 will not support PN. That leaves 34. So where is the 40 shahidan?

12. Maybe I have to give our friend, a Chinese Abacus or Suanpan. Yes? To learn counting and maths.

13. Unless these claims about 110 votes or 40 BN supporters are tested and proven in parliament, to me, they are just empty talk and a load of BS.

14. For instance, why should we believe loose canon Nazri Aziz? He just came back from France -did he impose quarantine?
Wasn't he the feller who said the Emergency Ordinances need not be debated? That's an idiotic suggestion.

15. Here's why it's an idiotic suggestion. Readers take note, ya.

16. If the ordinances were cancelled on 21st July, on the ground, expenditures on them were still made weren't they? Meaning, the expenditures were illegal. Expenditures were made on illegal ordinances!

17. Why should we believe someone who insisted the number 40 is real woi, but doesn't care about spending government money illegitimately? That's why the EOs must be debated.

18. Now we come to the matter of what should the King do and can the King sack the PM?
I am not a lawyer and these are merely my opinions. But I will argue for them. You be the judge.

19. Last week we witnessed an unprecedented episode. The PMO rebutted the King. Publically. The King was shamed and had his face smeared with charcoal.

20. The rebuttal by the PMO was an open challenge to the King. As I have said it was a reflection of defiance, utter disrespect and even treasonous.

21. Cis! Pantang raja Melayu dihina!

22. The king has lost face among his brother rulers and to the rakyat!

23. The King can't remain indifferent and pretend to be stoic. 

 

24. The hands of Mahiadin, which had fondled Nika Gee at unmentionable places, are behind this political time bomb.

25. Mahiadin has lost the trust, confidence and whatever affection the king had for 'Puff Abah' Wak Din.

26. Accordingly, the King has no other choice but to ask 'Puff Abah' to leave.

27. There's no denying that Mahiadin has lost the confidence, trust and affection of the King. There must be brewing animosity. The King is human too, right?

28. You can't govern when there's festering animosity. You got to meet the king every week. Lock the gates. Let 'Puff Abah' park his car outside. Or let him wait for hours. Give him plain water only.

29. So the self respectful option for Wak Din is to leave, resign, be sacked, vamoos! Just go.

30. When Wak Din leaves, in accordance to our constitution which follows the Westminster model, the whole cabinet goes. No playing favourites here.

31. In this sense, I gritted my teeth when I heard Wak Maslan says umno is against Wak Din but not PN. Pray, explain the logic.

32. Can we separate the head of the snake from its body, or can the body exists separately from the head?

Tak faham aku. UMNO hanya tolak Muhyiddin tetapi tetap bersama PN.

Ini macam kari babi. Daging tak makan, kuah hirup licin.

😱🤷🏽‍♂️🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

33. Is umno not ashamed, wanting to align with a failed and despised government? Umno has no amour propre, is it? If it does that umno will inherit the people's hatred.

34. The King then invites a leader of a political party who has his confidence, trust and working affection and whom he thinks can command majority parliamentary support to be the PM.

35. The Agong's trust, confidence and working affection are the more important critera. Choose the one the Agong feels has these qualities and then go before parliament, and he will get the majority by the end of the session. That, to me, is how things work here.

36. Under ordinary situation and by convention, the King could invite the leader of the opposition, Mamu Anwar, to form the next government.

37. I said could and the situation isn't normal. And this is the part I differ from the DAP leadership. I just don't trust Mamu Anwar. Nothing personal against him. He may actually be a nice person. Only not as PM.

38. Under these extraordinary times, the King, I politely proffer, has to think outside the box.

39. His majesty must think unconventionally and with purpose. For what purpose does He appoint a PM?

40. Surely not to play marbles with HM? But to give direction to the country, rekindle the economy, invigorate it, bring back investors, reduce unemployment, provide infra, health, housing and educational facilities. To do what a leader normally does. But to do them extraordinarily.

41. And above all, to manage the Covid pandemic and save the people. People are dying, man.

42. The new PM must eradicate corruption and nepotism, is a nationalist but not a racist, strengthen the institutions etc

43. For these reasons, I would argue the appointment of a PM must be for a purpose. That is why the king must think unconventionally and outside the box.

44. Thinking conventionally and being technical got the King 'Puff Abah'. He must never repeat the same mistake.

45. Therefore, it is not necessary for the King to invite the leader of the opposition to form the next government.

46. In the next section, I will give my opinion whether the King can sack Wak Mahi.

Tweet

Read more...

Monday, Closed For Charkuat.

1. Wak Mahi is belabouring the obvious. He's only postponing the inevitable. He will have to resign eventually. The chickens will come home to roost. The cows will come home to the pen.

2. There is a Malay saying that says, as, clever as the squirrel is, it will fall to the ground eventually. Another says, the bird flies around but will land on the branch eventually. When that happens, let's apply elephant glue.

3. Joe Louis the boxer said he can run, but he cannot hide. The lyrics in a song say

You can run
But you cannot hide
We will always find
We will always seek.

4. Mahiadin is not beneath using all means necessary and satanic methods to postpone parliament. Which he did-for the Monday session, citing COVID-19 reasons. This was after 11 MPs tested positive for the disease.

5. But we know the actual reason is politics. It's to avoid a no confidence motion. Which will see him booted out!

6. He can run, but he cannot hide.

7. Using the Emergency as an analogy, how can when the deaths were 2000, you imposed the fake emergency but when the deaths are 7000, you annul the Emergency? Is that a Pagoh Javanese logic?

 

8. My friend Dr Zulkifli tweeted his unassailable logic thus:-

9. People going to Kayu Restaurant can now order roti canai Mahiadin-takde telur punya. Or as the mamak says tarak toolor.

10. Not only is it devoid of any scientific basis, it hasn't got an iota of sensible logic.

11. Even the following has got more logic. They are followed by pious Muslims. If Mahi washes his face, we get the same puffy face.

12. Is Mahiadin and his dullard cabinet blind to the following?

13.

You can run
But you cannot hide
We will always find
We will always seek

Tweet

Read more...

Parliament of Piffle. Part 1

1. The first we do, is let's kill all the lawyers. Dick the Butcher.

2. What do I, a layman, make of the statement 'the king must act on the advice of the cabinet'?

3. The PMO said it had acted in accordance with the constitution. Yeah, except actually advising the King. Which constitution, I would like to ask?

4. That's an admission that the PM nor the cabinet have not advised the King.

5. The Pagoh Neanderthal is inviting all of us to think the King a liar. That's treasonous.

6. It's logical to think the Emergency Ordinances(EO) have not been signed. Anuar Budu said it's a work-in-progress. Taqiyudin says he will answer on Monday. These people are running around covering their asses.

7. Of course, the clincher is the flat denial from the King. His Majesty has not given his consent nor signed any documents to that effect, i.e. annulment of the EO.

8. Just to humour Wak Mahiadin - let's say he has advised. The process can only be deemed completed when the King has signed, consented, and I might add gazetted. That is considered notice. Both direct and imputed.

9. When the PMO cited the ruling that the King only acts on the advice of the PM or cabinet, they are really digging their own grave.

10. They are using the constitutional provision to seek refuge because 

• A: They have not actually advised and 
• N: They think they are at liberty to withhold advice.

11. It's like saying the King cannot act because we have not advised and b) we don't want to advise, what can the King do? So what?

12. The king can respond in many ways. One, is to issue press releases which are enough to send Mahiadin scurrying like a headless chicken and causing the speaker and AG to have nightmares.

13. The point is Mahiadin says he has annulled the EO as of the 21st of July. Which implies he has advised the king, got consent, signature and gazetted the annulment. All of which he has not.

14. That makes Mahiadin a liar, nay- a congenital liar. Just as Najib is a serial pirate.

15. The particular provision that says the King can only act upon the advice of.... must be given its ordinary meaning.

16. To me, it does not mean the PM or cabinet is at liberty to withhold advice, but means MUST give the required advice. Its imperative, mandatory.

17. By default, the issuance of the statement was an admission of guilt. No advice was given and none taken. Mahiadin lied to everyone and the lie, was compounded by the PMO.

18. The response by the PMO was a naked display of arrogance, defiance, intransigence and treasonous. All the officers authoring the statement ought to be tried.

19. By now, people know that lying is second nature to Wak Mahi. He lied about Nika Gee. He lied to the king the first time. Now he's lying again. Would you trust him?

20. Don't trust someone hiding behind fake piety, but cant seem to hide his dick in his pants. The fake piety is a just a book cover hiding the real 'Shades Of Grey' contents. The same goes to all who use religion as a cover. Takbir!

21. But what puzzles me is how can Mahiadin think consent from the king is a fait accompli? It's as though he behaves like a King below whom all shall obey? Has he been Molly-codling the king?

22. Forgive my impertinence to the King. Whether he has been compromised or not, I have to read Tamrin Ghafar or Steady Aku 47.

23. The King won't sully his hands to sack Wak Mahi. Parliament will have to do a no confidence vote to unceremoniously remove this petulant Neanderthal.

24. Like I said earlier, the transition from this government to the next can never be a smooth one. There have to be consequences. Wak Mahi must face the music. Perhaps he can be buddies with 'Baby Face' Najib.

25. What can we charge Wak Mahi with?

• Lied to parliament
• Ordered Taqi to mislead parliament. Following orders does not absolve you. Hitler's underlings were following orders, but were still convicted. That is the ratio decidendi.
• Lied about annulment of EO.
• Lied having got consent.
• Lied about getting signature.
• Ordered PMO officers to behave treasonous
• Ordered PMO officers to issue treasonous statement
• Lied to the Malaysian people.
• Other charges not thinkable by me.

26. Wow! In memory of Pak Sako.

Tweet

Read more...