White Feather in parliament. Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 7

1. The conduct of the speaker over the party hopping issue is ignominious. I thought that total disregard of public odium could never be surpassed until I heard the PM's comment on the issue .

2. When the PM said that it's the fault of Bersatu, that the seats occupied by the 6 Benedict Arnolds could not be declared vacant, I think that that was a not so clever statement.

3. The speaker can insert a white feather in the speakers songkok and Anwar can wear a bandana also with a white feather inserted .

4. The white feather is of course a symbol of cowardice and that is what it represents by the conduct of the ubi kayu speaker and Nana Non.

5. The gol dan gincu and the grandfather bicycle in the office rider can deny all he wants that it's not cowardice, but people can see the farce. It IS cowardice!

6. The idiocy of the statement by the ubi kayu speaker is superseded only by the lunacy of Nana Nons State. To the ordinary man, the literal intention of the anti hopping act is clear .

7. The intention of the act is to ensure that MPs who fundamentally disagree or don't toe party principles must resign their post. That will allow elections to take place

8. If a minister disagrees fundamentally with the PM, he ought to resign doesn't he? That's the principle of cabinet collective responsibility. Similarly if an MP doesn't toe party lines he ought to resign. Let's call it party collective responsibility.

9. It's not for the speaker or PM to frustrate the intention of the Act by verbal gymnastics or manipulations. If the oppose the act as parliamentarians, they ought to be referred to the rights and privileges committee. This is because they do so with malice aforethought

10. The only concussion we can deduce from their contumulious acts , is that want to avoid PH and PKR in particular from suffering a 6 telur trashing.

11. Are you not scornful of their cowardly conduct?

12. It's not the business of the ph government to interfere into the affairs of opposition parties using constitutional constructs. The act ought to be given its intention. It's not there to wash the speakers bottom .

13. If today, the UMNO presideng decides to expel it's maniacal youth head, we wouldn't care would we? Like Napoleon said, if the enemy makes mistakes we wouldn't interrupt. UMNO wants to implode , let's ease them!

14. Hip hip hooray, belts off , pants down, dicks out, isn't life's a scream?

15. If that were to happen to UMNO, I would do the mission impossible thing, walk away from the destructive tape

16. As to the infamous 6, the scoundrels, the urchins don't you be floating. Don't count your chickens before the eggs are hatched. Or the Malays say, don't pour water from the earthen jar upon hearing the thunder .

17. The betrayal to your party reveals your true nature. You are men with no honour, amour-propre and are a distrustful lot.

18. When you don't toe the line of your your party, you cease to be a member of your party. Effectively you have self expelled yourself. We say self expelled to stop these now proven degenerate people from saying they are expelled from the party by others . Stop them from saying they are passive victims .

19. Without the enabling structure which allows you to become MP no longer exists, it behooves you to vacate your position as MP.

20. Vacating their positions as MP is the right thing to do. Even an idiot knows to differentiate between what is right and wrong. Lets not talk about honour and dishonor. For by now, it's obvious that the infamous 6 have none.

21. Don't be saying your betrayal is justified because you put the welfare of the people in your constituency first. That doesn't make your betrayal any nobler. Besides the other MPs will say the same thing

22. Ali baba stole and perhaps helped destitutes. But he stole. Robbin hood stole from the rich and helped the poor. So, that is the myth. But he stole. Najib stole from SRC and claimed he helped orphans, widows and single mothers. The act of stealing does not become virtuous. Similarly he plundered through 1MDB and gave some to UMNO people and BN parties. These doesn't make his plundering any nobler , does it?

23. The same principle applies to the betrayal of the 6 scoundrels. Claiming they did what they do because of some gratuitous care of the people is so farcical. And securing such by declaring support for your opponent which is so fundamentally against your own party, is unconscionable and shameless.

24. In truth, these 6 idiots are privileged and entitled scumbags. They feel entitled to change party as and when they so feel like to. They view the services they provide as MPs as a privilege to the people. Plus they are dishonorable.

25. If they betrayed PN, they can also betray PH. In the end they are trusted by none. The people ought to be weary of them. Their loyalty is fluid, whimsical and ephemeral.

26. The 2 protagonists in the party hopping saga are PH and PN. PH is sending the wrong Message. It's encouraging and celebrating, not pragmatic support but opportunistic support secured through the acts of betrayal

27. The underhanded support for the acts of betrayal, shows that PH is an unprincipled, unscrupulous and an opportunistic political grouping. It shows that PH is an expert in turning over .

28. The party hopping episode is particularly scandalous to PKR in particular. It's not beneath using underhanded means to secure what turns out to be a phyrric victory. It damages the esteem of PKR more.

29. In securing that temporary triumph, pH and in particular PKR, shows its more into form than substance. A party doing that shows its incapable of delivering substantial's and instead focuses on image building to hide it's deficiencies.

30. PN of course will make political capital of PH's political faux pas, telling all sorry of unproven narratives and lies. The solution is to bring the matter to court. Admittedly they will profit from PH's faux pas.

31. The ubi kayu speaker has made an interpretation of the law. He may have erred. The final arbiter is the court. This is where PN should go , instead of gas lighting the public on this issue.

32. I used the term ubi kayu not as a symbol of people's resilience but a symbol bringing derogatory connotations. It means imbecilic, stupid, idiotic , useless and many more.

33. It pains me to speak ill against allies; I have been to ceramah at Sungai petani a few times as I did with the PM on a number of occasions. But this is something wrong I feel PKR has committed and I would be remiss in my duty to not speak honestly about this.

34. They may revile and despise me now but I don't give 2 hoots about it..it's no skin off my nose. In the words of a famous poet:- Aku ini binatang jalang Dari kumpulannya terbuang Biar peluru menembus kulitku Aku tetap neradang menerjang

Luka Dan duka kubawa berlari berlari

Hingga hilang pedih peri

Dan Aku akan lebih tidak peduli

Aku mau hidup seribu tahun lagi!

Tweet

Read more...

Sungai Bakap. PH's shattered dreams. Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 6

1. I interrupt my articles on the Najib issue. Here are my comments on the Sungai bakap election. I hasten to add that I don't give a damn as to how you see the comments. I'll be brutally Frank. The opinions expressed here are my own anyway.

2. Like Lee Kuan Yew said,' I am not interested to be politically correct, I want to be correct.

3. When someone said that Nana Non has got 3 years to avoid ending like mapilay Rishi sunak, that upsets me.

4. The comparison to Rishi sunak is unfair, farcical and even hypocritical.

5. Dei thamby- Rishi ji, is a British Indian, an aney,Macha and a mapilay . The British conservative leaders set aside the question of race and chose Rishi as PM.

6. Here, race is the cornerstone of every decision. The mere mention of non Malay, especially a Chinese and a DAPig occupying an important ministerial post will spark mindless hue and cry from the Malays, especially from UMNO fascists.

7. PKR in particular is really using UMNO to say publicly what it won't. UMNO is the useful idiot, PKR is the string puller.

8. Sunak is the first British Asian, read thamby to become Britain's PM . Since it does not bother Nana Non, he is the first ex con to be PM of our nation. And perhaps Anwar too has Indian DNA. Is his name really is Anwar bin Ebraheem?

9. A lot of people voted for change. Anwar represented a change agent. But apparently not enough people voted for change. A substantial number were weary of UMNOs master race and fascist politics. I said the number wasn't enough, for the decadent and discredited party still remains. What worries us, is that party has wormed itself as part of the government.

10. Anwar's longevity as a symbol of change depends on whether he has broken the faith people have in him and whether he has fulfilled many of the promises he made .

11. To many of the people in Sungai bakap he is just a charlatan. The PN won by more than 4000. 53% of Chinese and 42% Indian voters did not come out to vote. Out of the 70% Malay voters, a majority of them think of him as an auta.

12. Almost half of the 39,000 voters in Sungai bakap were and still are just weary of his cakap tak serupa bikin. They showed that in the vote pattern.

13. The first mistake PH made was to invite the party that symbolizes fascism and corruption, UMNO to campaign in Sungai bakap.and not cognizant of that perception against the party, one fellow said that the reason they lost was because Najib, the embezzler in chief isn't freed.

14. We won't fall for that dirty trick. PN who won majority Malay support didn't campaign on the Najib issue. And because of this annoying regard of the Najib factor will cause PH to lose. People find it obnoxious that justice to Najib means to completely free him. That's balderdash!

15. People will respect PH more if it removes the pardon and rubbish -binned the house arrest request. And restore the 47 charges against the Javanese neanderthal.

16. When people voted for PH, they voted for a renewal of this country and a move away from politics to public service. When the gap between the sacrifices people made and the service given to them by politicians actually widens, people become angry.

17. 30% of the Malays, 42% of the Indians and 53% of the Chinese who did not vote reminded Anwar:- * Not to break the faith people have in him as a real change agent * Fulfill many of the promises you made. * Narrow the gap between public service and the actions of politicians. * Jettison UMNO off PH.

18. Let me remind Nana Non that change requires action not words. The artful rendition, mesmerize and intoxicate people with words about a certain topic and giving it the name Madani, is no substitute for real service.

19. Sure, we know that change is not like putting off and on the switch. It requires time but you must start yesterday. You must be up and running from the word go. No 100 day recess and no honeymoon period.

20. Like a friend used to say, even when you want to take a piss you need time too. You've got to unzip your pants, take our your dick and point it to the bidet and urinals. Except in anwars case, kita yang Kena kencing.
21. Honeymoon period, holidays soirée and jamborees are for the kaki enjoy who will sing their hearts out , the songs Azizah or Kuch Kuch Hota Hai.

22. To avoid ending like Rishi sunak, Nana Non has to re-set the country in many ways.

23. You can do all the introspection you want. You can even used magnifying glasses to see what you have done wrong and be honest admitting them. But I am afraid if you use superpower full magnifying and accidentally look downwards, you may faint.

24. I am afraid if you carry out self introspection, you will not be truthful. You will mistake the woods for the trees. You will tend to over rationalise. Accordingly, you need a person outside looking in. To be brutally frank and tell you candidly and with candour.

25.what is Nana Non's vision for Malaysia?

• To turn Malaysia into a high income country and to carry out fairer income distribution thereafter? *To turn Malaysia into an economic dynamo?
• To lower the cost of living?
• To attain food security and sufficiency?
• To build first class educational, social, build affordable housing for working class people?
• Build excellent health and transport facilities
• Make Malaysia a harmonious and multi racial country with shared prosperity?
• Etc.

26. * Safer streets and secure borders? #excellent public service with efficiency, honesty and integrity?

27. Most importantly, a belief n the people that if they worked hard and play by the rules, this government will make way that they go on . The people who didn't vote in Sungai Bakap didn't think so?

28. The government must build the infrastructure of opportunity and make people believe in that system. The reward system must be based on meritocracy.

29. One politician says we have lost the narrative? Hello towkay, what narrative Lu ciakap? What we heard were unintelligible noises from your and your friends's mouth. Tiu Nia Seng!

30. Can you narrate to the people , the hike in the cost of living, increasing utility rates and the withdrawal of subsidies? You don't have the narrative to begin with. You lost something you yourself didn't understand.

31. Hey towkay, when comrade Lim lip eng announced at a dinner that PN had won, that announcement was met with a thunderous applause from the majority Chinese attendees. Was the significance of that response lost on you?

32. If you don't know the significance, let me tell you. The Chinese in kepong or Jinjang or balakong might as well be in Sungai bakap . They too will probably stay out of the election. Apa pasal?

33. The Chinese are disappointed and don't believe in the political environment. If they worked hard and play by the rules , they still won't get their just dues.

34. Everyday they get demonised, blamed and faulted for any misfortunes that befall others especially the Malays. They want to treated fairly not like a prima Donna like Najib.

35. Hence consider that Chinese who did not vote in Sungai bakap as dispirited, miffed and chagrined at being treated as non Malaysians. The same can happen elsewhere.

36. A principal reason as to why PH lost in Sungai bakap may be due to the presence of UMNO with their blame others for their shortcomings, paranoia ,xenophobic and fascist principles.

37. So for an UMNO fascist a-hole to blame the DAP for failing to encourage the 53% Chinese in Sungai bakap to vote, tell yourself that maybe they did not come out because of the presence of UMNO.

38.. UMNO sirs, is a liability to PH. Blaming the DAP for their losses is simply a stupid reason In the last election they lost heavily without associating with the DAP whatsoever. The reasons for their loss are in themselves really.


39. So for the DAP secgen to say that he welcomed BN's resolve to strengthen PH in the next election is just an exercise in futility. It's just a politically right thing to say and an olive branch offered to UMNO. He will soon discover that his peace overtures is like giving flowers to an ape.

40. UMNO only won 20 seats in Malaya and 6 more seats in Sabah. Yet it pushes its weight around. Perhaps it's time for every party to recognize their place. If UMNO is so full of itself and behaves cockily, maybe they should leave PH. Or perhaps DAP takes stock of itself and recognised that maybe it's better to be on their own and be a conscionable opposition.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No.5

1. Just when we think it's safe to get into the waters, a bull shark lunges out of the water and bit off a chunk of flesh from our thigh. Just as I am thinking to stand down and refrain from writing about Ali babavum Najib, somethings happened preventing I from doing so .

2. First, is a political narrative by an ex UMNO inbred about the addendum issue .

3. Second is the seemingly pompous and triumphant chest beating declaration that Ali babavum Najib is allowed to dispute the bar councils assertion that his pardon is wrong and his quest for house arrest is unconstitutional and therefore unlawful.

4. First we will deal with the expelled UMNO inbred who speaks like a stupid jock and is probably actually stupider.

5. His beef with Zahid is well documented. Perhaps he harbours vindictiveness over his expulsion. Looks like that .

6. Actually we don't care about the politics of UMNO. It's in their nature to quarrel with everyone. When they run out with outside people to quarrel, they quarrel with each other.

7. The going ons in UMNO, who buttfucks who, is a spectator sport for us. They are just out-fascisting each other. To see who is more fascist than the other. Isn't UMNO the United Malay fascists organization?

8. The spin he makes about the addendum is disingenuous. But it is attention engrossing and jaw dropping to some Malays.

9. That's part of his deceitful persona. Embellishing a possible lie. But his incredulous tale appeals to a certain type of Malays.

10. This is the type of Malays resembling the pre-felda settler Malays. Malays who inhabit a world of spirits behind everything, who inhabit a world full of demons, elves, pelesit, polong, penanggal, toyol, hantu Raya etc.

11. This is the gullible type, opened-mourh when told a story by the ex UMNO inbred. They would pull up their blankets to the eyes like the ignorant type

12. Let's expose the chinks in the armor of his story line. He was told by X, an UMNO apparatchik that an addendum existed.

13. What if X lied?. X who is close to wak jahid, repeated the lie to Zahid. And Zahid built on that lie and attested that lie in an affidavit.

14. Here is the chain of lie. The ex UMNO inbred is stupid because by definition he is an inbred. Did he do anything to establish the veracity of the information given to him by X? It shows he has no credibility .

15. X lied twice. He lied to the expelled UMNO inbred. He repeated the lie to jahid. Would he repeat the information under oath and in court? Probably not .

16. Zahid attested to that lie in an affidavit. He has potentially commited a written perjury. He has shown to be a careless leader loved only by Nana Non.

17. For committing a written perjury, Zahid has committed a serious offence. That's probably a jailable offence. He can be sent to jail and it's more than 1 year or is fined more than 1k, he loses his MP status.

18. Then we shall have a welcomed by election in Bagan latoh. It will be our opportunity to correct our mistake in choosing a careless, lying and a not so bright DPM . Ever wondered why Malaysia dropped from 27th to 34th placing in competitiveness ranking?

19. And Ali babavum Najib, an interested party and a man by his own admission, doesn't know anything, is suddenly intelligent enough to ask the court to deliberate on a possible lie. As lawyers are wont to say, that's a vexatious endeavor.

20. The tangled web woven by the expelled UMNO inbred got more bizzare . He went on to say, Zahid invented the addendum as a fiction.

21. To appease the anger of the najibers in UMNO, Zahid invented the existence of an addendum. By creating a story about the existence of a hidden chalice in the form of an addendum and submitting and affidavit therewith, Zahid accomplishes several things.

22. First he manages to calm down the najibers in UMNO. Then by creating a story about an addendum, the hidden chalice Najib drank from and submitting an affidavit therefrom, Zahid demonstrated, that he is doing, any means necessary to exonerate Najib.

23. Can you imagine Zahid in front of the rostrum saying pompously:-

24. " Friends, umno-ans and Malay A- holes, lend me your ears".

25. " I did invent the affidavit to defend Najib. We must not allow the good that Najib does be interred with him during his sojourn in at Kajang Hilton. It's our duty to defend him. Defy the law. Najib's unfair incarceration is the work of the Brutuses among us. Najib is indeed the noblest among us crooks ".

26. Don't you see the ridiculousness of the storyline narrated by the expelled UMNO inbred?

27. On the one hand,he believes that an addendum exists. He believes Mr X . Mr X is an UMNO man. Mr X is close to Zahid. Mr X is a noble man. He said is believable.

28. On the other hand he believes that the addendum is just a creation of Zahid. To appease the najibers and to show everyone that's he's fighting all-out to save Clyde Najib. Which is which? Does he believe an addendum exist or does he not?

29. Which means he has no credibility. He is not to be believed. His story is concocted. It's nonsensical and irrelevant.

30. He might as well do a pee-wee Herman. Stand on a table and masturbate in front of the public. No one cares!

Next. The Bar Council , the pardons board and Najib. Title.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 4

1. The state of our law, as Alice in Wonderland would have said is curiouser and curiouser . I am much surprised, I forgot to speak proper English. I speak some English, truth be told. But not Queen's English.

2. Let's not digress. Our law is like a huge spider's web. Small animals get caught in it, big animals get away. The poor and powerless get un-mercilessly dealt with, the rich and powerful get away and hero-worshipped.

3. Some rich and powerful folks are making us as bloody fools. Not just fools. But bloody.

4. Off with their heads. Disqualify the lawyers. Now it's recuse the judge. 5. The inbred social media journalists are quick to declare this a triumph. Suddenly the judge is pictured as bias and unfit to adjudicate.

6. The application to recuse, is the typical look down attitude by the rich and powerful upon those who can judge them .

7. But we know the application to recuse, is nothing but a ruse, red herring to delay the trial and the inevitable.

8. The rich and powerful will use every loophole and lacuna in the lay to extend the duration of the trial.

9. It's just a legal filibuster, telling all cock and bull story and inventing the slightest perception of questionability to delay the court trial.


10. But we also know that stupidity and mistakes fill up the time available. The application to recuse will be filled up with assinine mistakes.

11. It will just be an exercise in futility. The servile social media doesn't realised they are made into useful idiots.

12. And being useful idiots to the rich and powerful is just part of the social character of the lower classes especially the naturally subservient Malays. The rich and powerful are entitled to break laws and commit legal infractions. That's alright and shall be accepted as normal and in character of the rich and powerful.

13. The rich and powerful do classy things, the poor people do plebeian things. The rich and powerful clinically copulate, the poor just dirtily breed like rabbits.

14. I say it's time we discard the subservient, servile and toadish attitude. If the rich and powerful commit and legal transgressions and infractions let them bear the consequences. Let's not trip over one another and rush to their defense.

15. Instead of casting aspersions on the character of the judge, let's examine exhaustively the motives of the recusal applicant.

16. The character of the applicant may be less than meritorious. When I as a ceramah speaker in Perak, the Perak yeops recited to me some quatrains or pantun 4 rangkap. These were liberally adapted from the pantuns of Hashim Gera.

17. Two of the memorable ones I remember till today are as follows:-

18. Satu dua Tiga empat/one two three four/miss x cincin besor/Rakyat jelata apa dapat?

19. The other one is as follows. Pergi berkelah di Pantai remis/ singgah sebentar membeli roti/miss x beg Hermes/Rakyat jelata bergigit Jari.

20. Of course, I don't fucking know who miss x is. Do you? If you do, it's confirmed. You are smarter than me.

21. A casual acquaintance between the judge and the recusal applicant or an official encounter with the applicant is not a strong reason to have the judge recused.

22. It's also based on the erroneous assumption that the said judge will not be capable of forming objective opinions. That's patently wrong.

23. Our own limitations, subjective perceptions, wisdom and experience are not the the measure by which we judge others

24. So what you say and alleged is not am gospel truth. It will be answered in due course.

25. The reality is the Bonnie and Clyde couple of Malaysia are making bloody fools of us. They mocked our judicial process make fun of it. The time spent ding-donging at the court stage, far outweighs the time actually spent in jail.

26. The situation prompts us to parrot what Mr Bumble said. The law is a ass, a idiot. The people responsible for this judicial comedy are the lawyers. Hence, following what Dick the butcher says, the first thing we do, is kill all the lawyers!

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 3

1. Before I go discussing about the house arrest , there are a few points left to raise in the SRC case.

2. Somebody from Najib's camp, a sycophant, a groveller, a lickspittle fellow started a story line that red lips Najib was framed.

3. Yet some fools and bloody fools believed in this big lie, this prevarication, this porky. It's meant to deceive and throw a monkey wrench in the works preventing everyone from reaching the inevitable conclusion.

4. Which is , that Najib did steal the money, using a legitimate corporate vehicle to siphon the money for his own purposes. To spend merrily, or buy expensive Birkin or Hermes handbags pay girls to blow him etc. while all these take place play the victim and feigned ignorance.

5. Have we ever thought that all the investigative authorities didn't find anybody who framed Roger rabbit? It is incumbent for the rumour mongerer to identify who the framer/s is,/are. And more important proved the bastard framed Najib. If he/they can't, shut the fuck up and shoved the story line to the place where the sun never shines.

6. If Najib had shown remorse and apologized for his crime, who he be let off?

7. We may not be conscious about it. But that's the entitled Malay thinking. The accused person before the apt sentence, because he is Malay, Muslim and horrors, from UMNO is devinely entitled to do what he did and be excused and forgiven for the crime.

8. We must banish that kind of reactionary thinking and accept this fact. If Najib had apologized and recompense the state, those acts DO NOT erase the fact of the crime. The act of the crime still remains.

9. If I murder someone, and I show remorse and apologized to the family, would those acts make the murdered come back? My virtuous acts do not erase the fact of the murder. So despite the recantations, the crime remains. It's the act that must be punished.

10. Yes , we must moved on. But not by trivialising what Najib did and forgiving him. We move on by having him punished and never to talk about it. What is done, is done. Capiche?

11. Because of these reasons and the earlier ones I gave, I think Najib does not deserve pardon. All the mitigating factors were already accounted for, that Najib is not entitled to another round of minimising the severity of his crime at the pardons board stage.

12. Now, the house arrest. It's an imbroglio, a pickle and mare's nest, isn't it?

13. It's unfortunate we are not able to compare the affidavit submitted by the the Javanese neanderthal with the affidavit submitted by the man who lost in the GE but made a minister by Nana Non

14. Having denied us the liberty to compare the affidavits, the judge has made an error. How can he or she assumed that we, the reasonable man on the Clapham omnibus aren't capable of forming a rational opinion?

15. In the final analysis, it's a question of believability. The affidavit of a man who claimed to have met the invisible Arab donor to Ali babavum Najib and the affidavit of a bean counter who asserted that our economic fundamentals are good. Yet we have dropped from 27th to 34th placing in competitiveness ranking. Where got good econ fundamentals maaa?

16. What if the affidavits contradict each other? Now we won't have that opportunity because the judge rejected zafruls affidavit will we?

17. Isn't relying on a phone message and then recalling from memory constitute hearsay evidence? Knowing Zahid he may have an axe to grind.

18. An accessory to the hearsay evidence and it's subsequent embellishments and fairy tale stories probably concocted is the Pahang MB. Are they liable if the affidavit by Zahid is now found to be untrue?

19. So the existence of the addendum itself is not settled. Was there or wasn't there?

20. We shouldn't even amplify the house arrest issue. It's not provided for in the constitution. Is Najib now entitled to one as a result of some divine intervention?

21.we have been told ad nauseum that Malaysia is a constitutional and not an absolute monarchy. We have also been told that the constitution is above all.

22. Read together ,these principles to me mean that nothing is above the constitution and the king is bounded by the constitution.

23. The inclusion of the house arrest, not provided for in the constitution, constitute a change in the constitution. Any changes to it require 2/3 support in parliament.

24. Aren't we a constitutional monarchy? Not an absolute monarchy? In plain language it means whatever the king does is limited and constrained by the constitution. Right?

25. The king must not be allowed nor encouraged to go on a frolic of his own and does something that undermines and frustrate the constitution.

26. If the king had been given the liberty to frolic on his own, that means the pardons board has not properly advised him. That's a dereliction of its duty .

27. You have therefore a cibai pardons board. Or in the words of the Chinese man, whose elbow I knocked with the handles of my bicycle, puki Lu punya amak!

28. You will have a ridiculous outcome. Why should only Najib avail himself to house arrest? Can the king, as the fountain head of justice refused the application of other prisoners?

29. Let's say he is given the house arrest privilege by the government of Nana Non, then he is found guilty for 1MDB. Will he then be hauled up while enjoying his caramel macchiato courtesy of uncle Sam's Starbucks, to Kajang Hilton or bamboo River resort?

30. You see, Mon Ami, senors, compadre, amigo, paisan...only if you subscribe to the idea that the Putera in the term Bumiputera, the elite, the bourgeoisie and Mary Antoinette are entitled to special privileges, only then you will give effect to the house arrest. Which isn't provided for in the constitution and therefore unconstitutional.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 2

1. In this article, I want to give my 2 cents opinion on the pardon given to Najib. He is a Malay by race but one who swindled millions thru SRC and billions through 1MDB. His race is of no relevance to the crimes he has committed. Nor does his religion.

2. My opinion is, I repeat is enough for me. I reserved the right to have it defended against any majority of opinions, consensus, any nd conventional opinions. I will defend it, as Karpal Singh says, anytime, anyplace, anywhere (if in court).

3. If anyone does not like it, despises and hates it, they can que up to kiss my ass.

4. I feel nauseous when hearing many lawyers explaining why the pardon is justified and then the disgraced robber in chief can be eligible for house arrest. They will cite all the acts that serve only to intimidate us. Then they will regurgitate all the legal argle bargle to sound so intellectual.

5. These are arguments by inbred lawyers to affirm the privileges of the rich and powerful and to maintain the status quo. The point is to overthrow and dismantle the status quo and to fortify the sentence. Not to use sharp arguments to lessen the punishment of the offender more.

6. These arguments only prompt me to cite a famous phrase. These effers have hitherto mechanically interpreted the world, the point is, to change it.

7. Changing it, to my mind is to break away and decouple ourselves from the stranglehold of retaining the status quo and finding clever ideas to maintain the ideas of the bourgeois class.

8. The foremost member of this bourgeois class is of course Najib and we must do everything to save him and save ourselves.

9. Aren't we all are playing a board game supported by kowtowing masses and if they all stand up, it's game over for us?

10. The whole pardons board is a farce. It's composed of 5 individuals from the upper crust of society of individuals who have arrived. They can't be expected to have proletarian sentiments.

11. Not coming from a section of the real community, they can't be expected to give an unbias advice to HRH.

12. The advice the gave to HRH must by necessity reflect their social station in life. And must by necessity be tilted in favour of the criminal in chief . The fault lies partly in us for believing these nobs by definition, must reflect the higher and virtuous values. Thus giving clemency to a known criminal is an accepted bourgeois value.

13. Our trust in the pardons board, whose composition does not reflect a cross section of the community is misplaced. It is a monumental wrong on our part for believing that the upper crust and arrived people have the people's interest at heart .

14. The people want the chief architect of the crime punished and the judgement of the courts affirmed. Yet the decision of the pardons board negated these very interests.

15. To add insult to injury, the spokesman or rather spokeswoman for the board appears to mock our sensitivities by never answering our questions and by exhorting us to accept any decisions of the pardons board . We shall have none of that. We just want our pound of flesh.

16. The unintelligible noises coming out from the spokeswomans mouth confirmed the truth in this observation.

17. That the less intelligent they are, the more vanity, pride and arrogance they exhibit. And they will always find crowd of fools to applaud them.

18. To many of us, the decisions of the pardons board are unconscionable. They are bias. The board does represent a cross section of the community, the decisions went against the findings of the courts and is also objected because we refused to believe that only these denizens are capable of distinguishing rights from wrongs. We the people claim the ultimate and residual rights.

19. We object the decision by the pardons board because we believe Najib does not deserve any clemency. Here are the reasons for our objection.

20. Stealing money, plundering the country's coffers, using a legitimate vehicle to effectively convert monies is an unpardonable crime. The betrayal of the trust of the people by a leader is more damaging.

21. Claiming the monies were used for orphans, widows and single mothers was deceptive and possibly an outright lie. If the intention was to help the unfortunate beings, why not create an official SPV and budget it officially? Najib was the bloody PM what?

22. What is the basis that allowed Najib to jump que and had his request to be pardoned heard first? What about those whose application for pardon dealt with?

23. Is it because Najib is the Putera in the term Bumiputera, that he is naturally entitled for preferential treatment and privileges?

24. This sense of entitlement is only claimed and falsely owned by UMNO inbreds. The pardons board by kowtowing to Najib's demands is only perpetuating the entitlement myth.

25. It's a myth because an entitlement or a right you fought for, worked for and qualifed for. It's not something falling like manna from heaven.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 1

1. One of the nicest books I have read was a book called the autobiography of an unknown Indian. It was written by one N. Chaudhuri. It's a narration of his rites of passage . That's the way I looked at it .

2. It has now inspired me to start a series of article in my blog. Fittingly it is called The Views of an Unknown Malaysian.

3. Let me begin with a legal conundrum, a vexed question,a thumper. I am referring to the unexplainable dropping of the 47 charges proffered to the Javanese neanderthal, Zahid Hamidi.

4. He may have been a student and taught by our present PM at Yayasan Anda, the school for 2nd chancers. But that won't stop me from describing him in the most despicable of terms. Hey, whenever he appears on TV explaining the need for healthy living, I change channel. Fearing it can cause me nightmares later. If his posters are strategically placed in the padi fields, they can scare away pests.

5. Whenever the PM says he or his government does not interfere in the judicial process, that statement sent shivers down my spine . There are dark linings in the silver clouds , not noticed by many.

6. Laissez faire in the judicial system? Anwar may have been influenced by a heavily perfumed french A hole who asked a group of industrialists - what can the government do to help them prosper?

7. The answer the industrialists gave was leave us alone- translated into meaning allow them to do as they please. The term in French literally means, allow to do .

8 . It's an economic doctrine that opposes intervention by the government in any forms except intervention in the natural monopolies.

9. The PM applies the same principles to our judicial system, which often leads to absurd and ridiculous results .

10. Well, Mein Fuhrer, there is no absolute non interference. Judicious interference is necessary to correct the wrongs, to moderate the excessive-ness etc.

11. When Lee Kuan Yew was asked whether he believes in the economic isms, he replied no. To him, one should always answer does this particular work? If it does, accept it.

12. Anwar's pompous declaration of wholesale non interference leads to absurd results. First of course it freed the Javanese neanderthal from culpability. It opened a can of worms. It also showed the PM didn't show leadership when it is required. He's a political invertebrate really blowing where the winds blow .

13. It opened a can of worms. Remember, the AG said he does not have to give reasons for the DNAA. Wow, that's a good value to teach the public. You can defiantly say, you are not accountable for anything. That's an axiom of the entitled inbreds .

14. Lawyers, looking out for one another are quick to say, you can't blame the judge, you can't blame the government... ad nauseum

15. What lawyers say are not etched in stone. They are opened to disputations and disagreements. Besides, a predator will generally not attack one of its own kind. That's professional courtesy.

16. We, the public don't care two hoots what lawyer say. We say all is to blame. Including the judge.

17. If one charge is found to be faulty and causes a domino effect on the other 46 charges, the same principle applies to the justice system.

18. If one law practitioner in this case is rougish, the whole gangbang including the judge is.

19. To us, the reasonable man on the Clapham omnibus, the judge should have harshly reprimanded the lawyers from the AGC.

20. Having found that Zahid had a prima facie case to answer, the AGC lawyers did a volte face and gifted the Javanese neanderthal with a DNAA . The judge concurred.sheesh!

21. The conduct of all the judges presiding zahid's cases are hardly commendable. Indeed the deserved disapprobation and opprobrium.

22. The judge at Shah Alam for instance dismissed zahid's case on account of the half past six job done by the prosecution team and on technical grounds.

23. Perhaps that particular judge has not heard of A4 sized envelopes and couldn't count past one .

24. Wasn't there a possibility that more than one A4 sized envelopes were used? And the money denominated in thousand USD or Singapore dollars?

25 . The judge in the 47 charges case froze and acquiesced at the request of the prosecution team. He did not have the testicular fortitude. Sorry sir!

26. That was the time when we expect him to indulge in some judicial activism. That was required to correct the wrongs and mend things. But he did not and his conduct can hardly be said to be blameless. No siree!

27. Many of you think of judges as being priggish, sanctimonious, sacred cows and endowed with superior intellect more than they actually have. Other judges and respectful lawyers refrain from criticizing them. But some members of the public such as I, like Rhett Butler said, don't give a damn.

28. If I think you err or are defficient somewhat, the postman will ring the door. Sorry you cannot reply us publicly, but you know how some of us think of you . You too eat belacan.

29.lets look at the 47 charges. It's mathematically impossible for at least some of the charges to stick. They must be practising some strange maths in the courts .

30. If the prosecution team discovers some charges were flimsy, why not expunge them. Retain the robust ones which can stand assault by the defense team.

31. Finally, it's a case of believability. Do you believe Zahid? Look, here's the man who said he met the invisible Arab donor to najib.if it's proven he lied there, his whole credibility is flushed down the toilet.

32. But here's the man UMNO wants as it's leader. We can only be perplexed. And to exclaim, some people's children. God have mercy on us!

Tweet

Read more...