Copyright Notice

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the author, at the address below.

Sakmongkol ak 47

ariff.sabri@gmail.com

Saturday 17 February 2024

The Sungai long Caesar and the bad rap. Part 3.


  1. In this part of my essay,we will discuss the bastards at large. Let me begin by reconstituting some of what Christopher Hitchens said .

  2. In part I become a blogger so I don't have to depend on the press, vlogers and YouTubers for my information.

  3. They either lie, misinform or conspire to form a certain public opinion about an issue.

  4. That is asserted without evidence, can also be dismissed without evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Let us hate stupidity especially in its nastiest forms of racism and superstition. And we hate lazy stupidity couched in emotional hyperventilating.

  5. Don't be seduced by irrational pleadings, however transcendental and pious they appear especially if uttered by silver- tongued maverick like mamu Anwar. Never surrender our independent thinking . Dispute and disagree for disagreement sake.

  6. Don't care two hoots if you are regarded as arrogant or disagreeable person. You want to retain a free spirit of inquiry .

  7. Points 2 to 6 are reconstructed sayings of Hitchens. With that we are ready to discuss the ubiquitous bastards in our community. God, there are many of them. Some people's children. Habis camno !

  8. When Najib got convicted for the SRC crime, after 4 to 5 years, it restored somewhat the people's faith in the Malaysian justice system. It also raised people's expectations,, that perhaps mamu Anwar with his Samy vellu mane, will bring good changes.

  9. But when Zahid got DNAAed and now, Najib got his najibfication, it shatters the expectations. Anwar does more of the same .

  10. It has broken people's faith in him. He's not even a reformist, but a conservative and a revisionist. He wants to restore the business as usual ethos. Only it's now flavored by nasi kandaq

  11. Readers must know that I support mamu Anwar; won't throw him under the bus but will not hesitate to criticize him, speak forthrightly and with candour. But he has to tolerate my colorful and at times pejorative description of him. Mamu, BossNon or Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor etc .

  12. I criticize him to make him aware,to point to what I think are the errors of his ways. This is opposed to PNs criticisms of him, the objective of which is to unseat him. That's why they are constantly conniving to oust him by extra parliamentary and undemocratic ways .
  13. There are consequences to the najibfication of the SRC crime. The consequences can't be controlled by mamu Anwar anymore.

  14. First, it shows the inability of Anwar to govern Malaysia as a country ruled by law. If one of the principles of the supremacy of the law is that no one is above the law, that principle is already violated.

  15. By getting a najibfication, it shows that Najib is certainly above the law. He gets an early board hearing, a 50% discount on the jail time and over 70% of the fine imposed . The law varies with the dilation of mamu Anwar's nostrils.

  16. It doesn't matter who has the prerogative to pardon, it is the pardon itself that is contentious. Mamu Anwar seems oblivious to the fact that more people are angry over the pardon. More than the number of UMNO bastards and social media lackeys.

  17. So don't be sidetracked by lawyers argle bargle about who has the prerogative. We, the people, the reasonable man riding the MRT, are not arguing nor interested in who has the prerogative. It's the pardon, stupid!

  18. Anwar appears not to be thinking about this matter seriously. His callous and insensitive remark that Najib got the najibfication was in consideration of the contributions made by the convicted felon, exacerbated people's anger.

  19. That remark was given at the assembly of civil servants in Putrajaya.anwar was too scared to even say it to the public, fearing the backlash from the people.

  20. Remember , it's not the contributions of Najib that are being judged here , but the crimes committed under SRC .

  21. That remark is also a terrible indictment on the justice system administered by the courts, especially the federal court.

  22. Najib's guilt was affirmed by the federal court. That remark makes it appears that the top judges at the apex court, were incapable of appreciating or failed to consider Ali babavum Najib's contributions .

  23. AU contraire, I think enough consideration was given at the apex court. What if Najib's sentence were to run consecutively instead of concurrently? The idiot would have gotten a 72 year jail sentence instead of a watered down 12 years . The 12 years jail time have taken into account his dubious contributions.

  24. 24. There are at least 3 issues here.
    (a). Anwar has broken faith with the people. Or rather people's faith in him is kaput
    (b) his inability to rule a country according to the rule of law
    (c) he has dishonoured, brought the country into infamy and disrepute.

  25. At this juncture, I would like to ask a question not asked by many including the bastard lawyers. Is this najibfication not only retrospective but also prospective? Will it also cover possible felonies under 1MDB?

  26. This najibfication phenomenon will bring terrible consequences upon Malaysia. They are never envisaged by BossNon.

  27. Any of the factors mentioned in #24 or a combination of them will turn Malaysia into a pariah state. Quality investments will stay away from Malaysia. It will attract investments from sharp business people who believe that the law is a negotiable commodity.
  28. There is a real likelihood that our economy Will contact somewhat. There will be reduction in our gdp growth .

  29. Domestic investments alone are not enough to compensate for the nett loss in FDI. And contrary to what the Economist Magazine said that the najibfication incident will not affect our Ringgit, it will. Our Ringgit will fare worse against uncle Sam's currency. In the next few months, we will breach the 5 Ringgit to the USD mark.

  30. When that happens, we have to grudgingly accept that our economy is managed by an imbecilic government headed by mamu Anwar. Wasn't Anwar the person who said that the reason why our Ringgit fared badly against the USD, was because the government is run by bangangs? It still is..

  31. There is bound to dissension in the ranks. Only UMNO, which is complicit in the contrived pardon supports PKR. I don't think Amanah and DAP fully agree in the pardon.

  32. There will be an upsurge in corruption and a abuse of positions. For instance, PKR has remained silent over the flood mitigation projects. When they were tendered out by Tuan Ibrahim, it costs us 7b. When it was re tendered by a PKR minister the cost goes up to 11b. And there was allegations that up to 1b will be pocketed by someone. Why the silent treatment?

  33. Now that people feel that Anwar's position is precarious because of the najibfication incident, everybody wants to make hay while the Anwar sun shines.

  34. It's a case, the scum rises to the top. The true colors of UMNO or people DNAed by UMNO values come out.

  35. I am afraid that and others will be discussed in another installment of an article or articles.

Read more...

Sunday 11 February 2024

The Sungai long Caesar - Featuring The Inglourious Bastards. Part 2.


  1. In the film ' the eagle has landed ' the character Michael Caine says, it's foolproof Hans, I can always see a thorough going bastard when I see one.'
  2. But never you mind.' I am a bastard too. I love bastards. I am a bastard begot. Bastard instructed. Bastard in mind. Bastard in valor . In everything illegitimate.'
  3. Let me begin with the Bastard UMNO or rather the UMNO bastards. They are tricking us really .
  4. Using its right hand, which to Muslims, is used to perform clean tasks,it pompously declares it respects the decision of the king. Really, it's the decision of the pardons board.
  5. But really, it uses the name of the king to protect its evil machinations .
  6. It uses the name of the king to protect itself from universal condemnations. How can we allow UMNO to use the name of the king to straighten a wet thread? Which is the crime committed by Ali babavum Najib? Isn't UMNO exalting a crime?
  7. UMNO makes it seems that it alone is uber loyal to the institution of the monarchy fuyoo, no one is more loyal to the institution of the monarchy than 'oomno'. That's bullshitology. the true loyalists are the the Malay people and peace loving Malaysians.
  8. That claim is just for show, fleeting and ephemeral. In the past, during the constitutional crisis, UMNO people said all sorts of nasty things against the monarchy. Plus, they were willing to do all sorts of nasty and shocking things to the Malay rulers.
  9. During that constitutional crisis, 7 people were hailed as heroes. They were called the magnificent 7. One of them, is our Fuhrer und Reichkanzlor, Anwar Ibrahim.
  10. And as usual, it's left hand is doing all the devious, underhanded and evil machinations.
  11. Immediately after saying it respects the decision of the king, showing off its uber loyalty, it launches a signature campaign. The purpose is to agitate for the overturning of the king's earlier and accepted decision.
  12. It will launch a Nationwide campaign mobilising the UMNO hoi poloi to actually dispute the decision of the king. A decision done by the king, as said by UMNO
  13. That looks suspiciously as sedition to me. Instigating the people to pressure the king to revise his earlier decision. It could lead to enmity towards the institution of the monarchy. The police should investigate UMNO for sedition instead of Tony Pua .
  14. The utterances of some UMNO bastards worsened the issue. These utterances were imbecilic and mindless . It's UMNOspeak , what can you expect ?
  15. By the way , I use the term bastard not to mean issues out of wedlock. I use it as a generic term to describe obnoxious, irritable, disagreeable, objectionable, bad persons.
  16. There was an UMNO bastard who warned others not to let the Najib issue be the cause resulting UMNO to break off from the chapcheung government. Don't talk big. If he has the testicular fortitude, move such a motion at your agm or mkt meeting . See whether it can see the light of day. Perhaps, it will cause the bastard to be expelled from UMNO. Please carry our your threat .
  17. The cocky bastard UMNO still refuses to accept that it is no longer the government. It can't dictate the terms of its presence. It must adjust itself as a 'boil' or 'pimple' within the unity government. If it's not happy, then get out . It's a case of come not called, go not asked to .
  18. Then, there is this sanctimonious UMNO bastard, who has this habit of quarrelling with non UMNO parties especially with DAP over non consequential matters . As if quarrelling makes him to be seen as a hero and therefore he shouts himself coarse till blue in the face .
  19. His behavior is of course reflective of the inherent hubristic and cocky UMNO attitude itself. That is the attitude which causes UMNO to be rejected by the people in the first place . UMNO is not able to see this.
  20. With a bastard like this in UMNO, UMNO doesn't need enemies to see its own demise and extinction. Not only does this chap suffers from non compos mentis, forgetting that UMNO is no longer the government, but also suffers from the Don Quixote mentality, seeing that UMNO is besieged by a non existent Chinese dragon.
  21. So the bastard tells the UMNO fighting cocks to assert their supremacy by way of brutalizing the non UMNO public especially the non Malays. He advises the UMNO fighting cocks not to be cows pulled by the nostrils. What to do if you are cow-brained?
  22. What do you get when you vote UMNO?
    • You get a party that uses all underhanded tactics to subvert the law.
    • You get a party that reverses Dennings statement, ' be ye ever so high, the law is above you. In Malaysia, people like Najib and the selected are above the law . Courtesy of BossNon.
  23. 23. You get a party whose world view is based on everything extreme and dangerous to Malaysia.
    • It is uber nationalist
    • It is uber religious
    • It is uber royalist.
  24. But you know these are hollow claims. It projects itself as uber aggressive to stay in power and gets allegiance of ignorant Malays . It's purpose is always to establish a thievocracy or as you know it, kleptocracy. It reaches the height of infamy under Ali babavum Najib.
  25. You get a party which asserts its supremacy by faulting, blaming and demonizing all other Malaysians, including Malays who don't subscribe to UMNO world views. It asserts it's supremacy not by its achievements, but by entitlement claims and by virtue they are god gifted Malays.
  26. Then there's jolly and Randy Jo, who gives a bizzare advice. He advises all the right mined Malaysians to accept the decision of the pardons board and move on .
  27. 27. That advice applies only to those who object the decision. Strangely, it seems to exclude the UMNO fighting cocks.
  28. Immediately following a special MKT meeting, discussing the najibfication by the pardons board, UMNO launches a signature campaign and will or has now launched a Nationwide campaign to petition the king to modify his decision.
  29. What do you make of these actions? To the reasonable man, these actions are in defiance of the king, dispute his decision and insulting to the king. To me, the police ought to investigate UMNO for insulting the king and not Tony Pua.
  30. And yes, a new phrase has entered our lexicon. Its called najibfication which means getting a discount overall, for a crime proven and committed. The first beneficiary of najibfication is Ali babavum Najib himself. Malaysia boleh, lorr
  31. We must now reject the narrative given by UMNO on how Malaysia works. It's one that subverts the law unless the law confers benefit to UMNO .
  32. The case of Najib represents the obsession of UMNO to bend the law as it were unless the law is below them. Justice to Najib to UMNO is only realised when Najib is completely exonerated. If the law doesn't provide that, it will execute all kinds of evil machinations including getting a criminal pardoned.
  33. What does that tell you? It means Malaysia works according to the law as defined by UMNO. We can't accept that. Its discretionary rule instead of rule by objective law, even if the law has creases here and there .
  34. The narrative UMNO gives as to what works in Malaysia include the following elements:-
    • The law must always be subservient to UMNOs interests
    • Is driven by racial supremacy. Progress is always seen as to whether UMNO Malays dominate other races.
    • Malaysia is driven by ultra religiosity. Islam is used to suppress and discriminate non Muslims.
    • UMNO claims its more loyal to the monarchy than others. Hence our level of monarchism quota determines your Malaysianess.
  35. In short, UMNOs weltanshauung is always laced with defiance of the law, extremism in everything, racism, xenophobia and paranoia. It can only enslaved the Malay people by perpetuating mistrust and adversarial social relations. UMNOs prescription is the sure road to serfdom .
  36. The fatal mistake committed by BossNon is that he forgets one important reminder given by uncle nick Machiavelli.
  37. 'Never bring others to share disproportionate power'. He gives that to UMNO. Fatal mistake , BossNon.
  38. UMNO, the implacable enemy is allowed to recover its power base. UMNO now controls Felda, Risda, mara and a host of federal regional development bodies. Lu Mahu mati ka?
  39. Tiu Nia Seng, cibai .
  40. In the next part of my essay, I will discuss:
    • The bastards in the 4th estate , the press.
    • The bastards in the legal profession
    • The politics of the pardons board.
    • The PKR bastards.
  41. Hey, I told you people, I support BossNon. I won't throw him under the bus, but that won't deter me from speaking frankly, forthrightly and with candour.
  42. Do I care if the UMNO people show me the 2 fingers or call me with unmentionable names? These are no skin off my nose. Like the pontian gnome says, ada Aku kisah?
  43. Aku ini bintang jalang
    Dari kumpulan nya terbuang
    Biarpun peluru menembusi kulitku
    Aku akan tetap meradang menerjang
    Luka Dan duka Ku bawa belari Lari
    Hingga hilang pedih peri...

Read more...

Monday 5 February 2024

The Sungai long Caesar. Part 1


  1. You can never trust lying UMNO. It pompously said it respected the decision of the king. On the same breath it launches a signature campaign. Brainwashed Malays will sign.
  2. The second action negates the 1st one. It actually means UMNO defies the king. It is disloyal. In ancient times a person committing disloyalty was impaled . So, in the next elections, you crucify UMNO punishment
  3. UMNO actually disputes the decision of the King. Therefore it has no moral authority to stop other people from disputing the decision .
  4. What do you expect from double faced and duplicitous UMNO? Now you know the true colors of UMNO .
  5. The agenda of UMNO is clear. Free all crooks
    Exalt the corrupt and the embezzlers.
    Ensure UMNO is led by the elite, the feudalistic minded the decadent.
    Bully all non UMNO people
  6. It is clear that UMNO wants to subvert Justice. Justice for them is when the foremost kleptocracy is completely exonerated
  7. So they are lawbreakers or even criminals in potentia. The government should have a preemptive provision to put them in jail. After they cause trouble, it's no use jailing them .
  8. The existence of the pardons board is an anomaly. If it's created by the constitution , it can also be undone by the constitution. Scrape it .
  9. It is an anomaly in the Islamic sense. If you were a Muslim, if you regularly read the sayyidul istigfar, the last sentence says, none has the power to pardon except You .
  10. So if mere mortals assume the power to pardon, equaling the power of God, that is blasphemous. Isn't it?
  11. Herr oberstleutenant inFahmy Fadzil warned people not to overcomment on the Najib pardon. It may result in punishment. In other words, be quiet, fools .
  12. Can you close the mouth of the earthen jar. Closed, it's no longer a jar idiot! Can you legislate silence?
  13. I assume he is speaking on behalf of the Fuhrer und Reichkanzlor, Herr Anwar, the dictator perpetuo
  14. At this juncture, I would like to repeat something similarly said by Mr Churchill. Never has so much credibility lost by so many over a pardon of a convict .
  15. In asking the people to keep quiet over the pardon of the biggest crook, Anwar has indeed ,like Caesar crossed the Rubicon, the point of no return.
  16. Anwar has committed the unpardonable sin, which can't be pardoned by the pardons board ie break the faith of millions have in him.
  17. It's the Sungai long Bolshevik helping the Bukit Tunku menshevik. A bourgeoisie helping another bourgeoisie.
  18. In crossing the Rubicon, ie breaking faith with the people, BossNon seems to utter the words Caesar did, Alea iacta est, the die is cast. Indeed it is, you have shown you don't need the support of people like us .
  19. And please Lah sir, don't pontificate to us anymore. It's becoming truer , that anything coming out your mouth are half truths and outright lies .
  20. You are fast becoming a case of what is supposed to come out from the rear end of the anatomy, comes out from your mouth .
  21. As to what Herr oberst inFahmy said, I can only say something Churchill again said .
  22. Never give in never give in. Never , never, never, never. Nahi, Nahi Nahi, Nahi. Never-in- nothing . Except to a higher sense or honour
  23. Never yield to force, never give in to the intimidations to a two bit actor. Never succumb to the apparent might of the enemy. Yes sir, inFahmy is now our enemy. People of lembah Pantai, kick him out!

Read more...

Saturday 3 February 2024

The scales of injustice. Part 1

I read this joke. A long time ago. In Readers Digest . Younger people may not know of this magazine. It is good for learning the English language .

 
An engineer, architect and an economist were marooned on an island. They have nothing to eat save for a can of baked beans. With no tools, how to open, Maa?

 
The engineer said. We will build a fire to heat the can . It will expand, burst and spill the beans. The architect says. Yes, but unless we build an enclosure, the beans will spill to the ground. Semua habis Lor.

 
In desperation they turned to the economist . The economist safely says, Assume a can opener!

 
Now let us assume that what's reported about Ali babavum Najib is true. Allow me to give a not so a agreeable view .

 
Remember, it's all Assume !

 
Red lips Najib gets a discount on the jail sentence. From 12 years to 6 years. Better than Lazada discount. He also gets a discount on the fine imposed. Tak Tahu bulapa, Lor!
 

Further, red lips Bijan is eligible for a 30% bumiPutra, err, good behavior discount, Najib, the convicted felon, the embezzler-in-chief will be freed sooner .

 
It is therefore safe to Assume that the law has got a vested interest to perpetuate the dumbing down of all right thinking Malaysians. Hooray, Mali kita yam Seng sampai muntah, Maa .


 

 

Isn't this a cause for celebration? Life is certainly a scream. Belts off, pants down,dicks out. Show what they can do .

In the words of the Indonesian poet, Rendra:-
Prostitutes of Kuala Lumpur city
Unite! Bun up your hair, discard your bras
Flag high your knickers
Let the UMNO Roughnecks ravage you at a discount
Then you regret what needed to be regretted
When the UMNO Roughnecks give you STD.
Sarinah
Katakan kepada mereka
Bargaimana Kau dipanggil ke kantor Menteri
Bargaimana ia bicara panjang lebar soal reformasi
Tiba2 tanpa ujĂșng pangkal
Ia berkata Kau inspirasi reformasi
Sambil tangan nya membuka pakaian mu

 

By now, right thinking Malaysians ought to be aware that the law is like the BN scales, lopsided . Favouring the elite and the feudal bourgeoisie. The ordinary man or woman, caught stealing loafs of bread or tins of Milo, gets sent to jail without mercy
Najib , a member of the decadent aristocracy who stole millions, never showing an iota of remorse and apologising to honest Malaysians gets a ' happy ending '.

Read more...

Wednesday 24 January 2024

Speeches from the legal mandarins.

  1. Her lordship, the CJ said the judiciary was unjustifiably maligned by the inefficiency of others in the legal system.
  2. This was presumably in response to the stringent criticisms against the judiciary given the DNAA given to jahid .
  3. Zahid was proffered with 47 corruption charges but was given a DNAA upon the request of the AGC.
  4. That was a mathematical miracle which can only happen in Malaysia. The outcome of the math varies  with the mood of BossNon. This was a black eye in our judicial history.

  5.  
  6. Like it or not, the dropping of the 47 charges will forever be our DNAAgate.
  7. We must allow the monologue statement from the CJ to go unchallenged. That statement, from the view of the public seems unduly over sensitive.
  8. From the viewpoint of the public, the statement is self serving. It's designed and meant to protect and to preserve the perceived infallibility of the judiciary.
  9. Because it's perceived infallibility, any criticisms towards it, are by definition, considered as unjustified. What more if the perceived infallibility is supported by legal acts that preclude any criticisms.
  10. You know immediately, that those who like to justify something by acts, are actually intolerant of disagreements and difference in opinions. So, the shut out any dissent, by referring to this or that out. Really their purpose is to keep their turf protected. They are territorial after all.acts, are the refuge of intolerant people.
  11. I am inclined to say refuge for scoundrels, as dr. Samuel Johnson did
  12. In this 21st century, we should be more tolerant and accomodate dissent not stifle them by some acts or some judicial views.
  13. The views attributed to mdm CJ assume the force of law and effectively serve as fetters to difference of views.
  14. In America, the 1st amendment provided for criticisms and disagreements through protest. Therefore if some judicial decisions are met with strident criticisms even from noisy and boisterous MPs or from busybodies like I, the dissent comes with the territory .
  15. Instead of having recourse to some archaic acts, we should have provisions like the 1st amendment.
  16. The speech by madam CJ, surrounded by her regally robed judges is objectionable on the following grounds.
  17. First, it confers upon itself the quality of infallibility, it is intolerant of criticisms, it hides behind acts drafted by mortals and probably inherited from the fish and chips imperialist.
  18. As long as the people in the judicial fraternity fart, fornicate and menstruate, the judiciary can never be infallible. So, chill, mdm CJ.
  19. Nevertheless, the succinct speech by mdm CJ, is like the Chinese cheongsam worn by seductive waitresses in Chinese restaurants. Of course the mp from Kuantan cannot go there as he would be extra gatal.
  20. Before we discuss the revealing aspect of the speech, we want to tell the CJ, that the public is keen to know the rationale behind the dropping of the 47 hot potatoes.
  21. The dropping of the 47 charges seemed arbitrary, indicating lapses in due diligence,lack of thoroughness and lack of transparency in dealing with high profile cases.
  22. May we remind the public that leaders are expected to hold higher ethical standards. The charges initially proffered against wak jahid simply means he has no standards. Yet these are the qualities preferred by UMNO supporters. It must mean that leaders like these and UMNO must be rejected in the next elections. As I have said, let us perform the last rites on the political dinosaur.
  23. May we remind the CJ, the public looks at the DNAA issue differently. Not only they are keen to know the rationale behind the dropping of the charges, the issue can undermine public trust in the impartiality of the judicial process and it's transparency.
  24. So, despite her consternation about public disquiet, the public has the residual and inalienable right to know the rationale behind the DNAA.
  25. So that she gets down from her moral high horse, know that public distrust in the impartiality of the judicial process is increasing.
  26. Wasn't it Lord Denning who said that the law is not a technical game to be played only by technical experts, but is a living force to be treated with compassion and wisdom.
  27. Dismissing public disquiet and criticisms and doing so by some judicial practice acts, the public is not aware of is neither compassionate nor wise. Indeed, it is disingenuous and hitting below the belt .
  28. From the CJ's speech, who the f is the institution which caused the stiff necked judiciary to be maligned and vilified? Confound it!
  29. It cannot be the disdainful, contemptuous and held in low esteem SPRM. Somehow they managed to put up investigation material which the judge and the AGC then agreed that there was a prosecutable case.
  30. Suddenly and inexplicably, the AGC did a volte face. They went back on their words and applied for a DNAA. An abortion done at a late stage is very perilous to the health of the judiciary. The DNAA for Zahid, is the height of absurdity.
  31. The one to blame is the AGC. Going back on its own words, is a sign of a sign of absence of amour propre, a sign of capricious and whimsical conduct. It certainly indicates a lack of due diligence on the part of the AGC.
  32. At this juncture, I must share with you what my friend, Zaid Ibrahim once told me. 'Judges and lawyer are like eggs. We have grade A, B and C'. With the DNAA against Zahid, I see many egg heads in the AGC.
  33. They are good- in the standards of grade C eggs
  34. As if in defiance or feeling guilty, the AG said the AGC is under no obligation to explain to anyone, it's decision to withdraw its case. He cited some acts to that effect. 
  35. Perhaps that is your prerogative. But Mr smart Alec AG and Mr little Napoleon, that is a wrong message to the public.
  36. The message to the public is, you are not accountable for your actions. That cannot be. We are not hooligans, knaves or irresponsible fellows  . The law,bit seems assists in a fundamental mischief. There must be something wrong with the law .
  37. The usage of law acts to justify, preserve your status quo or to benefit you , is generally unconscionable.  To me, you just cannot argue your case. Often acts are the refuge of scoundrels. It really reveals you are a closet freedom hater .
  38. The point is, ' let a thousand flowers bloom'. 
How the public sees the process of justice is depicted as follows:-

Under these circumstances, they won't be silenced.

Read more...

Sunday 14 January 2024

To ban Netflix's man on the run or not to ban. That is the question for BossNon.



  1. Businessmen who have monopolies, licences, concessions are in the main enemies of the free market. Yes, they are all for the free market, except they don't want the ethos of the free market applied to them
  2. They rush to Putrajaya to get special tax rebated, they want cheaper loans and government assistance, they want to preserve their monopolies.
  3. When sapura is in trouble, it wants the government to help them. Nobody touches the monopoly on rice while saying publicly, we want to sort out the rice problem.
  4. Bossnon doesn't really want to dismantle the monopolies, even when saying loudly he wants to break up the monopolies.
  5. Bossku is all for freedom to compete for all party positions, except don't challenge the ketua bahagian2 post. If possible he wants the position till eternity.
  6. Bossku, his lawyers, his psycophants and his major domos are all for freedom of information, freedom of the press etc. Except when they affect his interests.
  7. So they pester and petition BossNon and the authorities to have Netflix's 'man on the run' be taken off from being communicated in any form.
  8. The lawyers say pompously, the documentary is prejudicial to the interests of bossKu Ali babavum Najib. If the documentary were complimentary of Najib, his psycophants and majordomos, would embellish it with unbridled gusto and lustful appetite.
  9. In fact, the nextflix rendition is boring and make it out that UMNO is composed of heroic and righteous people.
  10. So, BossNon and the bungling and inept communications minister should not pay heed to the pleadings of bossKu's lawyers and other psycophants to unfree the nextflix documentary. Nahi, Machas.
  11. Indeed, if the communications minister were politically savvy, he would air the stories about SRC international and 1MDB so as to inform the people.
  12. Instead, he is more interested to ensure his hair is combed properly and his hair is in place, tries to look more handsome and perhaps make sure his 'dick' is ever ready.
  13. In the meantime, he announces his big data project to hide the fact that he is doing a lousy job as Malaysia's Joseph Goebbels.
  14. So, BossNon, see the quality of your people. I must admit that he is my friend, but won't treat him with kids gloves.
  15. Sorry for the digression, back to the nextflix issue. There is absolutely no justification to ban the documentary, unless it harms 3rd party .
  16. In this case, only the interests of Ali babavum Najib are affected. No harm is cause to the public at large. And some UMNO apparatchiks may be offended but they are few in number. Ignore them .
  17. This follow the principle laid down by J.S. Mill( the economist), not a lawyer I am afraid lawyers may not know who Mill is .
  18. The principle is this. There is no justification to use power against a person's own will, unless the use of that power is to prevent harm the issue causes to 3rd parties. The negative externalities argument.
  19. Najib's private interests, moral or emotional are none of our concern. But the interests of the public at large, save for a few UMNO psycophants, are. The public wants to know what is going on . That need shall not be denied by an intolerable executive ban on the nextflix documentary.
  20. That freedom of information must include access to any media publications, however obnoxious they may be regarded.
  21. Lawyers for Najib say the publication of the Netflix documentary is prejudicial to Najib's defence. Let's take them on this issue.
  22. Isn't that kind of argument an insult to the intelligence of the judges? It means, they are not capable of forming objective decisions. That they are easily swayed and easily influenced by some bitchy stories.
  23. This issue really is a litmus test to show whether the people articulating the issue believe in freedom or not . Clearly the lawyers for Najib and UMNO psycophants, like the monopolist businessmen, want freedom for every one. But when their interests are not favourably accounted, they want special treatment.
  24. The government must show whether they are on the side of private bourgeois interests OR on the side of the interests of the mustadafin/lumpenproletariat.
  25. In a sense, how the Netflix issue is being played out, it is the manifestation of where the entitlement mentality is being challenged.
  26. The Malay elite and bourgeoisie believe they are entitled naturally for special treatment and privileges, entitled to their demands etc. These are being challenged by the unhindered airing of Netflix's man on the run.
  27. If the government accedds to the requests of these reactionary buggers, it's affirming the self entitlement mentality.
  28. As to the documentary itself, it's a very boring film, yawn-worthy and only makes the ang-mohs heroes .

Read more...

Sunday 17 December 2023

UMNO's fatal conceit: part 1

  1. Umno has got an unexcisable problem. It thinks when it enters any elections, it must win. It thinks it's etched in stone.
  2. Hence, when it entered the kemaman by- elections, it's a fait acompli, it's written in the stars. It must surely win.
  3. When they lost, it starts blaming others but itself. Some reputable newspaper blamed for example, low voter turnout as a cause for UMNOs loss.
  4. Wait a minute, weren't we were told repeatedly, That low voter turnout was advantageous to UMNO? Why the change in story? The liar must have a good memory. Obviously the people at that newspaper don't
  5. Then there are the ignoramuses who fall back on the tiresome story, that UMNO lost and is rejected by the Malays because they are pimps or Barua to DAP.
  6. Let's put our thinking caps for a while. What these people are saying, is that they do NOT need the non Malays to keep UMNO in power. If they don't need, why must the nons support them? The nose is flat, you push your cheeks to make the nose looked sharp.
  7. Even if UMNO needs non Malay support, UMNO is not willing to give the rights that accompany non Malay support. So don't support them
  8. Apply the same logic. If UMNO loses Malay support because it becomes DAPs Barua , it follows that PH , in particular the DAP is injured when associating with UMNO.
  9. UMNO is the sickman in the unity government. It's the leper, no one wants to touch. Or to use a more earthy comparison, its the person with contagious STD.
  10. So treat UMNO as one. Stay away from it
  11. Put them in their proper place. Not by ditching them out, since they want to be part of the unity government and they have not insulted the unity government.
  12. The strength of UMNO lies with the Malay base and its ability to indoctrinate and lie to them. Cut them off, there.
  13. Limit their access through MARA, Felda, Risda and other glcs giving them access to the Malay base .
  14. Mamu Anwar doesn't have to be sentimental about UMNO. Don't allow them recover their deficit. Ease their eventual demise. Remember what Napoleon said, when your enemies are making mistakes, don't interrupt them . By giving them Mara, Felda, Risda etc, mamu Anwar is interrupting them. What la
  15. Meanwhile the UMNO 'extras' are busy coming up with cock and bull excuses as to why UMNO lost in the kemaman by-election. They do not erase the fact that UMNO lost, can't deliver and fast becoming irrelevant.
  16. Too much analysis does indeed lead to paralysis.umno first doesn't know what to do despite the shriling and shrieking Quranic incantations of its secretary general. UMNO is in a state of rigor mortis, a bodily condition following death. That is what is happening to UMNO .
  17. Even dr Mahathir, who has nothing to do with UMNO now, warned that UMNO risks being wiped out in the 16thh GE. Why should he be concerned about UMNO?
  18. Unless, UMNO he says go back to its constricting and choking ethic extremism and chauvinistic proclamations. Which is a sure prescription for racial implosion.
  19. The way forward for Malaysia is an acknowledgement of racial pluralism and harmony capitalising on the races best merits. Not the reactionary prescriptions of the doctor.
  20. The hard truth on the ground is, racial harmony and accommodation is the norm and not incessant racial confrontation.
  21. All the reasons given and rationalised by UMNO people, UMNO 'extras',UMNO deviants who got sacked and even busybody Dr Mahathir,share one common denominator
  22. That one common denominator is that UMNO has a natural entitlement to rule. When UMNO loses the entitlement they , UMNO people go mad .
  23. They become irrational, blamed others and choose to close their minds.
  24. That they become irrational, lose their minds, enter into a state of non compos mentis, should not surprise us. Whom the gods would destroy, they first make mad .
  25. With all the happenings in UMNO, it is indeed going mad. The election results deniers, cock and bull excuses , blaming others and intensification of chauvinistic proclamations, it is indeed going mad .
  26. What will eventually follow is the destruction of UMNO. I am afraid, that part of dr Mahathir's prognosis that UMNO will be anihilated in the 16th GE, will be true. Hehe.
  27. The only thing that surprises me is that dr Mahathir, who has nothing to do with UMNO,should be concerned over its fate. Why Maa?
  28. UMNO does not represent ALL Malays, only the extremists, chauvinistic and right wing Malays. So the only reason dr Mahathir is concerned about UMNO could only be because he is actually a closet umnoist.
  29. Perhaps eventually he hopes to be reinstated by UMNO as a person who continuously stirs up cause celebre. Then UMNO can say a wilted sireh pulang ke gagang.
  30. How was it possible that UMNO who believes that's it is entitled to rule, has the mandate from heaven, lost badly in the kemaman by-election?
  31. Some of the reasons, I have pointed out in my article, written a week before voting. See my article UMNO has 2 chances in the kemaman by-election, slim and none. I am sure other 'analysts have other reasons not thought of by me .
  32. I look at the UMNO Now from different perspectives. Mamu Anwar may want to look at UMNO differently too.
  33. The diminished majority in Pelangai and the embarassing loss in kemaman, showed that UMNO can't enter elections without the help of PH. It's a shell of its former self. Just a paper tiger
  34. From afar, it looks manacing, when near we all say, ' cilaka it's only a paper tiger' meant to be burnt before the altar .
  35. The UMNO Now,must necessarily force us to look at UMNO in the context of politics.
  36. If we define politics to be the art of struggling, achieving and maintaining power, the present UMNO must be treated accordingly.
  37. That is to treat UMNO as a diminished power, a shell of its former self and just a paper tiger. Not to elevate UMNO to prominence as if it has the Devine right to govern.
  38. The reality is , UMNO is barely surviving on a respiratory machine provided by PH. Let us ease its passing and not give it more oxygen .

Read more...

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP