White Feather in parliament. Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 7

1. The conduct of the speaker over the party hopping issue is ignominious. I thought that total disregard of public odium could never be surpassed until I heard the PM's comment on the issue .

2. When the PM said that it's the fault of Bersatu, that the seats occupied by the 6 Benedict Arnolds could not be declared vacant, I think that that was a not so clever statement.

3. The speaker can insert a white feather in the speakers songkok and Anwar can wear a bandana also with a white feather inserted .

4. The white feather is of course a symbol of cowardice and that is what it represents by the conduct of the ubi kayu speaker and Nana Non.

5. The gol dan gincu and the grandfather bicycle in the office rider can deny all he wants that it's not cowardice, but people can see the farce. It IS cowardice!

6. The idiocy of the statement by the ubi kayu speaker is superseded only by the lunacy of Nana Nons State. To the ordinary man, the literal intention of the anti hopping act is clear .

7. The intention of the act is to ensure that MPs who fundamentally disagree or don't toe party principles must resign their post. That will allow elections to take place

8. If a minister disagrees fundamentally with the PM, he ought to resign doesn't he? That's the principle of cabinet collective responsibility. Similarly if an MP doesn't toe party lines he ought to resign. Let's call it party collective responsibility.

9. It's not for the speaker or PM to frustrate the intention of the Act by verbal gymnastics or manipulations. If the oppose the act as parliamentarians, they ought to be referred to the rights and privileges committee. This is because they do so with malice aforethought

10. The only concussion we can deduce from their contumulious acts , is that want to avoid PH and PKR in particular from suffering a 6 telur trashing.

11. Are you not scornful of their cowardly conduct?

12. It's not the business of the ph government to interfere into the affairs of opposition parties using constitutional constructs. The act ought to be given its intention. It's not there to wash the speakers bottom .

13. If today, the UMNO presideng decides to expel it's maniacal youth head, we wouldn't care would we? Like Napoleon said, if the enemy makes mistakes we wouldn't interrupt. UMNO wants to implode , let's ease them!

14. Hip hip hooray, belts off , pants down, dicks out, isn't life's a scream?

15. If that were to happen to UMNO, I would do the mission impossible thing, walk away from the destructive tape

16. As to the infamous 6, the scoundrels, the urchins don't you be floating. Don't count your chickens before the eggs are hatched. Or the Malays say, don't pour water from the earthen jar upon hearing the thunder .

17. The betrayal to your party reveals your true nature. You are men with no honour, amour-propre and are a distrustful lot.

18. When you don't toe the line of your your party, you cease to be a member of your party. Effectively you have self expelled yourself. We say self expelled to stop these now proven degenerate people from saying they are expelled from the party by others . Stop them from saying they are passive victims .

19. Without the enabling structure which allows you to become MP no longer exists, it behooves you to vacate your position as MP.

20. Vacating their positions as MP is the right thing to do. Even an idiot knows to differentiate between what is right and wrong. Lets not talk about honour and dishonor. For by now, it's obvious that the infamous 6 have none.

21. Don't be saying your betrayal is justified because you put the welfare of the people in your constituency first. That doesn't make your betrayal any nobler. Besides the other MPs will say the same thing

22. Ali baba stole and perhaps helped destitutes. But he stole. Robbin hood stole from the rich and helped the poor. So, that is the myth. But he stole. Najib stole from SRC and claimed he helped orphans, widows and single mothers. The act of stealing does not become virtuous. Similarly he plundered through 1MDB and gave some to UMNO people and BN parties. These doesn't make his plundering any nobler , does it?

23. The same principle applies to the betrayal of the 6 scoundrels. Claiming they did what they do because of some gratuitous care of the people is so farcical. And securing such by declaring support for your opponent which is so fundamentally against your own party, is unconscionable and shameless.

24. In truth, these 6 idiots are privileged and entitled scumbags. They feel entitled to change party as and when they so feel like to. They view the services they provide as MPs as a privilege to the people. Plus they are dishonorable.

25. If they betrayed PN, they can also betray PH. In the end they are trusted by none. The people ought to be weary of them. Their loyalty is fluid, whimsical and ephemeral.

26. The 2 protagonists in the party hopping saga are PH and PN. PH is sending the wrong Message. It's encouraging and celebrating, not pragmatic support but opportunistic support secured through the acts of betrayal

27. The underhanded support for the acts of betrayal, shows that PH is an unprincipled, unscrupulous and an opportunistic political grouping. It shows that PH is an expert in turning over .

28. The party hopping episode is particularly scandalous to PKR in particular. It's not beneath using underhanded means to secure what turns out to be a phyrric victory. It damages the esteem of PKR more.

29. In securing that temporary triumph, pH and in particular PKR, shows its more into form than substance. A party doing that shows its incapable of delivering substantial's and instead focuses on image building to hide it's deficiencies.

30. PN of course will make political capital of PH's political faux pas, telling all sorry of unproven narratives and lies. The solution is to bring the matter to court. Admittedly they will profit from PH's faux pas.

31. The ubi kayu speaker has made an interpretation of the law. He may have erred. The final arbiter is the court. This is where PN should go , instead of gas lighting the public on this issue.

32. I used the term ubi kayu not as a symbol of people's resilience but a symbol bringing derogatory connotations. It means imbecilic, stupid, idiotic , useless and many more.

33. It pains me to speak ill against allies; I have been to ceramah at Sungai petani a few times as I did with the PM on a number of occasions. But this is something wrong I feel PKR has committed and I would be remiss in my duty to not speak honestly about this.

34. They may revile and despise me now but I don't give 2 hoots about it..it's no skin off my nose. In the words of a famous poet:- Aku ini binatang jalang Dari kumpulannya terbuang Biar peluru menembus kulitku Aku tetap neradang menerjang

Luka Dan duka kubawa berlari berlari

Hingga hilang pedih peri

Dan Aku akan lebih tidak peduli

Aku mau hidup seribu tahun lagi!

Tweet

Read more...

Sungai Bakap. PH's shattered dreams. Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 6

1. I interrupt my articles on the Najib issue. Here are my comments on the Sungai bakap election. I hasten to add that I don't give a damn as to how you see the comments. I'll be brutally Frank. The opinions expressed here are my own anyway.

2. Like Lee Kuan Yew said,' I am not interested to be politically correct, I want to be correct.

3. When someone said that Nana Non has got 3 years to avoid ending like mapilay Rishi sunak, that upsets me.

4. The comparison to Rishi sunak is unfair, farcical and even hypocritical.

5. Dei thamby- Rishi ji, is a British Indian, an aney,Macha and a mapilay . The British conservative leaders set aside the question of race and chose Rishi as PM.

6. Here, race is the cornerstone of every decision. The mere mention of non Malay, especially a Chinese and a DAPig occupying an important ministerial post will spark mindless hue and cry from the Malays, especially from UMNO fascists.

7. PKR in particular is really using UMNO to say publicly what it won't. UMNO is the useful idiot, PKR is the string puller.

8. Sunak is the first British Asian, read thamby to become Britain's PM . Since it does not bother Nana Non, he is the first ex con to be PM of our nation. And perhaps Anwar too has Indian DNA. Is his name really is Anwar bin Ebraheem?

9. A lot of people voted for change. Anwar represented a change agent. But apparently not enough people voted for change. A substantial number were weary of UMNOs master race and fascist politics. I said the number wasn't enough, for the decadent and discredited party still remains. What worries us, is that party has wormed itself as part of the government.

10. Anwar's longevity as a symbol of change depends on whether he has broken the faith people have in him and whether he has fulfilled many of the promises he made .

11. To many of the people in Sungai bakap he is just a charlatan. The PN won by more than 4000. 53% of Chinese and 42% Indian voters did not come out to vote. Out of the 70% Malay voters, a majority of them think of him as an auta.

12. Almost half of the 39,000 voters in Sungai bakap were and still are just weary of his cakap tak serupa bikin. They showed that in the vote pattern.

13. The first mistake PH made was to invite the party that symbolizes fascism and corruption, UMNO to campaign in Sungai bakap.and not cognizant of that perception against the party, one fellow said that the reason they lost was because Najib, the embezzler in chief isn't freed.

14. We won't fall for that dirty trick. PN who won majority Malay support didn't campaign on the Najib issue. And because of this annoying regard of the Najib factor will cause PH to lose. People find it obnoxious that justice to Najib means to completely free him. That's balderdash!

15. People will respect PH more if it removes the pardon and rubbish -binned the house arrest request. And restore the 47 charges against the Javanese neanderthal.

16. When people voted for PH, they voted for a renewal of this country and a move away from politics to public service. When the gap between the sacrifices people made and the service given to them by politicians actually widens, people become angry.

17. 30% of the Malays, 42% of the Indians and 53% of the Chinese who did not vote reminded Anwar:- * Not to break the faith people have in him as a real change agent * Fulfill many of the promises you made. * Narrow the gap between public service and the actions of politicians. * Jettison UMNO off PH.

18. Let me remind Nana Non that change requires action not words. The artful rendition, mesmerize and intoxicate people with words about a certain topic and giving it the name Madani, is no substitute for real service.

19. Sure, we know that change is not like putting off and on the switch. It requires time but you must start yesterday. You must be up and running from the word go. No 100 day recess and no honeymoon period.

20. Like a friend used to say, even when you want to take a piss you need time too. You've got to unzip your pants, take our your dick and point it to the bidet and urinals. Except in anwars case, kita yang Kena kencing.
21. Honeymoon period, holidays soirée and jamborees are for the kaki enjoy who will sing their hearts out , the songs Azizah or Kuch Kuch Hota Hai.

22. To avoid ending like Rishi sunak, Nana Non has to re-set the country in many ways.

23. You can do all the introspection you want. You can even used magnifying glasses to see what you have done wrong and be honest admitting them. But I am afraid if you use superpower full magnifying and accidentally look downwards, you may faint.

24. I am afraid if you carry out self introspection, you will not be truthful. You will mistake the woods for the trees. You will tend to over rationalise. Accordingly, you need a person outside looking in. To be brutally frank and tell you candidly and with candour.

25.what is Nana Non's vision for Malaysia?

• To turn Malaysia into a high income country and to carry out fairer income distribution thereafter? *To turn Malaysia into an economic dynamo?
• To lower the cost of living?
• To attain food security and sufficiency?
• To build first class educational, social, build affordable housing for working class people?
• Build excellent health and transport facilities
• Make Malaysia a harmonious and multi racial country with shared prosperity?
• Etc.

26. * Safer streets and secure borders? #excellent public service with efficiency, honesty and integrity?

27. Most importantly, a belief n the people that if they worked hard and play by the rules, this government will make way that they go on . The people who didn't vote in Sungai Bakap didn't think so?

28. The government must build the infrastructure of opportunity and make people believe in that system. The reward system must be based on meritocracy.

29. One politician says we have lost the narrative? Hello towkay, what narrative Lu ciakap? What we heard were unintelligible noises from your and your friends's mouth. Tiu Nia Seng!

30. Can you narrate to the people , the hike in the cost of living, increasing utility rates and the withdrawal of subsidies? You don't have the narrative to begin with. You lost something you yourself didn't understand.

31. Hey towkay, when comrade Lim lip eng announced at a dinner that PN had won, that announcement was met with a thunderous applause from the majority Chinese attendees. Was the significance of that response lost on you?

32. If you don't know the significance, let me tell you. The Chinese in kepong or Jinjang or balakong might as well be in Sungai bakap . They too will probably stay out of the election. Apa pasal?

33. The Chinese are disappointed and don't believe in the political environment. If they worked hard and play by the rules , they still won't get their just dues.

34. Everyday they get demonised, blamed and faulted for any misfortunes that befall others especially the Malays. They want to treated fairly not like a prima Donna like Najib.

35. Hence consider that Chinese who did not vote in Sungai bakap as dispirited, miffed and chagrined at being treated as non Malaysians. The same can happen elsewhere.

36. A principal reason as to why PH lost in Sungai bakap may be due to the presence of UMNO with their blame others for their shortcomings, paranoia ,xenophobic and fascist principles.

37. So for an UMNO fascist a-hole to blame the DAP for failing to encourage the 53% Chinese in Sungai bakap to vote, tell yourself that maybe they did not come out because of the presence of UMNO.

38.. UMNO sirs, is a liability to PH. Blaming the DAP for their losses is simply a stupid reason In the last election they lost heavily without associating with the DAP whatsoever. The reasons for their loss are in themselves really.


39. So for the DAP secgen to say that he welcomed BN's resolve to strengthen PH in the next election is just an exercise in futility. It's just a politically right thing to say and an olive branch offered to UMNO. He will soon discover that his peace overtures is like giving flowers to an ape.

40. UMNO only won 20 seats in Malaya and 6 more seats in Sabah. Yet it pushes its weight around. Perhaps it's time for every party to recognize their place. If UMNO is so full of itself and behaves cockily, maybe they should leave PH. Or perhaps DAP takes stock of itself and recognised that maybe it's better to be on their own and be a conscionable opposition.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No.5

1. Just when we think it's safe to get into the waters, a bull shark lunges out of the water and bit off a chunk of flesh from our thigh. Just as I am thinking to stand down and refrain from writing about Ali babavum Najib, somethings happened preventing I from doing so .

2. First, is a political narrative by an ex UMNO inbred about the addendum issue .

3. Second is the seemingly pompous and triumphant chest beating declaration that Ali babavum Najib is allowed to dispute the bar councils assertion that his pardon is wrong and his quest for house arrest is unconstitutional and therefore unlawful.

4. First we will deal with the expelled UMNO inbred who speaks like a stupid jock and is probably actually stupider.

5. His beef with Zahid is well documented. Perhaps he harbours vindictiveness over his expulsion. Looks like that .

6. Actually we don't care about the politics of UMNO. It's in their nature to quarrel with everyone. When they run out with outside people to quarrel, they quarrel with each other.

7. The going ons in UMNO, who buttfucks who, is a spectator sport for us. They are just out-fascisting each other. To see who is more fascist than the other. Isn't UMNO the United Malay fascists organization?

8. The spin he makes about the addendum is disingenuous. But it is attention engrossing and jaw dropping to some Malays.

9. That's part of his deceitful persona. Embellishing a possible lie. But his incredulous tale appeals to a certain type of Malays.

10. This is the type of Malays resembling the pre-felda settler Malays. Malays who inhabit a world of spirits behind everything, who inhabit a world full of demons, elves, pelesit, polong, penanggal, toyol, hantu Raya etc.

11. This is the gullible type, opened-mourh when told a story by the ex UMNO inbred. They would pull up their blankets to the eyes like the ignorant type

12. Let's expose the chinks in the armor of his story line. He was told by X, an UMNO apparatchik that an addendum existed.

13. What if X lied?. X who is close to wak jahid, repeated the lie to Zahid. And Zahid built on that lie and attested that lie in an affidavit.

14. Here is the chain of lie. The ex UMNO inbred is stupid because by definition he is an inbred. Did he do anything to establish the veracity of the information given to him by X? It shows he has no credibility .

15. X lied twice. He lied to the expelled UMNO inbred. He repeated the lie to jahid. Would he repeat the information under oath and in court? Probably not .

16. Zahid attested to that lie in an affidavit. He has potentially commited a written perjury. He has shown to be a careless leader loved only by Nana Non.

17. For committing a written perjury, Zahid has committed a serious offence. That's probably a jailable offence. He can be sent to jail and it's more than 1 year or is fined more than 1k, he loses his MP status.

18. Then we shall have a welcomed by election in Bagan latoh. It will be our opportunity to correct our mistake in choosing a careless, lying and a not so bright DPM . Ever wondered why Malaysia dropped from 27th to 34th placing in competitiveness ranking?

19. And Ali babavum Najib, an interested party and a man by his own admission, doesn't know anything, is suddenly intelligent enough to ask the court to deliberate on a possible lie. As lawyers are wont to say, that's a vexatious endeavor.

20. The tangled web woven by the expelled UMNO inbred got more bizzare . He went on to say, Zahid invented the addendum as a fiction.

21. To appease the anger of the najibers in UMNO, Zahid invented the existence of an addendum. By creating a story about the existence of a hidden chalice in the form of an addendum and submitting and affidavit therewith, Zahid accomplishes several things.

22. First he manages to calm down the najibers in UMNO. Then by creating a story about an addendum, the hidden chalice Najib drank from and submitting an affidavit therefrom, Zahid demonstrated, that he is doing, any means necessary to exonerate Najib.

23. Can you imagine Zahid in front of the rostrum saying pompously:-

24. " Friends, umno-ans and Malay A- holes, lend me your ears".

25. " I did invent the affidavit to defend Najib. We must not allow the good that Najib does be interred with him during his sojourn in at Kajang Hilton. It's our duty to defend him. Defy the law. Najib's unfair incarceration is the work of the Brutuses among us. Najib is indeed the noblest among us crooks ".

26. Don't you see the ridiculousness of the storyline narrated by the expelled UMNO inbred?

27. On the one hand,he believes that an addendum exists. He believes Mr X . Mr X is an UMNO man. Mr X is close to Zahid. Mr X is a noble man. He said is believable.

28. On the other hand he believes that the addendum is just a creation of Zahid. To appease the najibers and to show everyone that's he's fighting all-out to save Clyde Najib. Which is which? Does he believe an addendum exist or does he not?

29. Which means he has no credibility. He is not to be believed. His story is concocted. It's nonsensical and irrelevant.

30. He might as well do a pee-wee Herman. Stand on a table and masturbate in front of the public. No one cares!

Next. The Bar Council , the pardons board and Najib. Title.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 4

1. The state of our law, as Alice in Wonderland would have said is curiouser and curiouser . I am much surprised, I forgot to speak proper English. I speak some English, truth be told. But not Queen's English.

2. Let's not digress. Our law is like a huge spider's web. Small animals get caught in it, big animals get away. The poor and powerless get un-mercilessly dealt with, the rich and powerful get away and hero-worshipped.

3. Some rich and powerful folks are making us as bloody fools. Not just fools. But bloody.

4. Off with their heads. Disqualify the lawyers. Now it's recuse the judge. 5. The inbred social media journalists are quick to declare this a triumph. Suddenly the judge is pictured as bias and unfit to adjudicate.

6. The application to recuse, is the typical look down attitude by the rich and powerful upon those who can judge them .

7. But we know the application to recuse, is nothing but a ruse, red herring to delay the trial and the inevitable.

8. The rich and powerful will use every loophole and lacuna in the lay to extend the duration of the trial.

9. It's just a legal filibuster, telling all cock and bull story and inventing the slightest perception of questionability to delay the court trial.


10. But we also know that stupidity and mistakes fill up the time available. The application to recuse will be filled up with assinine mistakes.

11. It will just be an exercise in futility. The servile social media doesn't realised they are made into useful idiots.

12. And being useful idiots to the rich and powerful is just part of the social character of the lower classes especially the naturally subservient Malays. The rich and powerful are entitled to break laws and commit legal infractions. That's alright and shall be accepted as normal and in character of the rich and powerful.

13. The rich and powerful do classy things, the poor people do plebeian things. The rich and powerful clinically copulate, the poor just dirtily breed like rabbits.

14. I say it's time we discard the subservient, servile and toadish attitude. If the rich and powerful commit and legal transgressions and infractions let them bear the consequences. Let's not trip over one another and rush to their defense.

15. Instead of casting aspersions on the character of the judge, let's examine exhaustively the motives of the recusal applicant.

16. The character of the applicant may be less than meritorious. When I as a ceramah speaker in Perak, the Perak yeops recited to me some quatrains or pantun 4 rangkap. These were liberally adapted from the pantuns of Hashim Gera.

17. Two of the memorable ones I remember till today are as follows:-

18. Satu dua Tiga empat/one two three four/miss x cincin besor/Rakyat jelata apa dapat?

19. The other one is as follows. Pergi berkelah di Pantai remis/ singgah sebentar membeli roti/miss x beg Hermes/Rakyat jelata bergigit Jari.

20. Of course, I don't fucking know who miss x is. Do you? If you do, it's confirmed. You are smarter than me.

21. A casual acquaintance between the judge and the recusal applicant or an official encounter with the applicant is not a strong reason to have the judge recused.

22. It's also based on the erroneous assumption that the said judge will not be capable of forming objective opinions. That's patently wrong.

23. Our own limitations, subjective perceptions, wisdom and experience are not the the measure by which we judge others

24. So what you say and alleged is not am gospel truth. It will be answered in due course.

25. The reality is the Bonnie and Clyde couple of Malaysia are making bloody fools of us. They mocked our judicial process make fun of it. The time spent ding-donging at the court stage, far outweighs the time actually spent in jail.

26. The situation prompts us to parrot what Mr Bumble said. The law is a ass, a idiot. The people responsible for this judicial comedy are the lawyers. Hence, following what Dick the butcher says, the first thing we do, is kill all the lawyers!

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 3

1. Before I go discussing about the house arrest , there are a few points left to raise in the SRC case.

2. Somebody from Najib's camp, a sycophant, a groveller, a lickspittle fellow started a story line that red lips Najib was framed.

3. Yet some fools and bloody fools believed in this big lie, this prevarication, this porky. It's meant to deceive and throw a monkey wrench in the works preventing everyone from reaching the inevitable conclusion.

4. Which is , that Najib did steal the money, using a legitimate corporate vehicle to siphon the money for his own purposes. To spend merrily, or buy expensive Birkin or Hermes handbags pay girls to blow him etc. while all these take place play the victim and feigned ignorance.

5. Have we ever thought that all the investigative authorities didn't find anybody who framed Roger rabbit? It is incumbent for the rumour mongerer to identify who the framer/s is,/are. And more important proved the bastard framed Najib. If he/they can't, shut the fuck up and shoved the story line to the place where the sun never shines.

6. If Najib had shown remorse and apologized for his crime, who he be let off?

7. We may not be conscious about it. But that's the entitled Malay thinking. The accused person before the apt sentence, because he is Malay, Muslim and horrors, from UMNO is devinely entitled to do what he did and be excused and forgiven for the crime.

8. We must banish that kind of reactionary thinking and accept this fact. If Najib had apologized and recompense the state, those acts DO NOT erase the fact of the crime. The act of the crime still remains.

9. If I murder someone, and I show remorse and apologized to the family, would those acts make the murdered come back? My virtuous acts do not erase the fact of the murder. So despite the recantations, the crime remains. It's the act that must be punished.

10. Yes , we must moved on. But not by trivialising what Najib did and forgiving him. We move on by having him punished and never to talk about it. What is done, is done. Capiche?

11. Because of these reasons and the earlier ones I gave, I think Najib does not deserve pardon. All the mitigating factors were already accounted for, that Najib is not entitled to another round of minimising the severity of his crime at the pardons board stage.

12. Now, the house arrest. It's an imbroglio, a pickle and mare's nest, isn't it?

13. It's unfortunate we are not able to compare the affidavit submitted by the the Javanese neanderthal with the affidavit submitted by the man who lost in the GE but made a minister by Nana Non

14. Having denied us the liberty to compare the affidavits, the judge has made an error. How can he or she assumed that we, the reasonable man on the Clapham omnibus aren't capable of forming a rational opinion?

15. In the final analysis, it's a question of believability. The affidavit of a man who claimed to have met the invisible Arab donor to Ali babavum Najib and the affidavit of a bean counter who asserted that our economic fundamentals are good. Yet we have dropped from 27th to 34th placing in competitiveness ranking. Where got good econ fundamentals maaa?

16. What if the affidavits contradict each other? Now we won't have that opportunity because the judge rejected zafruls affidavit will we?

17. Isn't relying on a phone message and then recalling from memory constitute hearsay evidence? Knowing Zahid he may have an axe to grind.

18. An accessory to the hearsay evidence and it's subsequent embellishments and fairy tale stories probably concocted is the Pahang MB. Are they liable if the affidavit by Zahid is now found to be untrue?

19. So the existence of the addendum itself is not settled. Was there or wasn't there?

20. We shouldn't even amplify the house arrest issue. It's not provided for in the constitution. Is Najib now entitled to one as a result of some divine intervention?

21.we have been told ad nauseum that Malaysia is a constitutional and not an absolute monarchy. We have also been told that the constitution is above all.

22. Read together ,these principles to me mean that nothing is above the constitution and the king is bounded by the constitution.

23. The inclusion of the house arrest, not provided for in the constitution, constitute a change in the constitution. Any changes to it require 2/3 support in parliament.

24. Aren't we a constitutional monarchy? Not an absolute monarchy? In plain language it means whatever the king does is limited and constrained by the constitution. Right?

25. The king must not be allowed nor encouraged to go on a frolic of his own and does something that undermines and frustrate the constitution.

26. If the king had been given the liberty to frolic on his own, that means the pardons board has not properly advised him. That's a dereliction of its duty .

27. You have therefore a cibai pardons board. Or in the words of the Chinese man, whose elbow I knocked with the handles of my bicycle, puki Lu punya amak!

28. You will have a ridiculous outcome. Why should only Najib avail himself to house arrest? Can the king, as the fountain head of justice refused the application of other prisoners?

29. Let's say he is given the house arrest privilege by the government of Nana Non, then he is found guilty for 1MDB. Will he then be hauled up while enjoying his caramel macchiato courtesy of uncle Sam's Starbucks, to Kajang Hilton or bamboo River resort?

30. You see, Mon Ami, senors, compadre, amigo, paisan...only if you subscribe to the idea that the Putera in the term Bumiputera, the elite, the bourgeoisie and Mary Antoinette are entitled to special privileges, only then you will give effect to the house arrest. Which isn't provided for in the constitution and therefore unconstitutional.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 2

1. In this article, I want to give my 2 cents opinion on the pardon given to Najib. He is a Malay by race but one who swindled millions thru SRC and billions through 1MDB. His race is of no relevance to the crimes he has committed. Nor does his religion.

2. My opinion is, I repeat is enough for me. I reserved the right to have it defended against any majority of opinions, consensus, any nd conventional opinions. I will defend it, as Karpal Singh says, anytime, anyplace, anywhere (if in court).

3. If anyone does not like it, despises and hates it, they can que up to kiss my ass.

4. I feel nauseous when hearing many lawyers explaining why the pardon is justified and then the disgraced robber in chief can be eligible for house arrest. They will cite all the acts that serve only to intimidate us. Then they will regurgitate all the legal argle bargle to sound so intellectual.

5. These are arguments by inbred lawyers to affirm the privileges of the rich and powerful and to maintain the status quo. The point is to overthrow and dismantle the status quo and to fortify the sentence. Not to use sharp arguments to lessen the punishment of the offender more.

6. These arguments only prompt me to cite a famous phrase. These effers have hitherto mechanically interpreted the world, the point is, to change it.

7. Changing it, to my mind is to break away and decouple ourselves from the stranglehold of retaining the status quo and finding clever ideas to maintain the ideas of the bourgeois class.

8. The foremost member of this bourgeois class is of course Najib and we must do everything to save him and save ourselves.

9. Aren't we all are playing a board game supported by kowtowing masses and if they all stand up, it's game over for us?

10. The whole pardons board is a farce. It's composed of 5 individuals from the upper crust of society of individuals who have arrived. They can't be expected to have proletarian sentiments.

11. Not coming from a section of the real community, they can't be expected to give an unbias advice to HRH.

12. The advice the gave to HRH must by necessity reflect their social station in life. And must by necessity be tilted in favour of the criminal in chief . The fault lies partly in us for believing these nobs by definition, must reflect the higher and virtuous values. Thus giving clemency to a known criminal is an accepted bourgeois value.

13. Our trust in the pardons board, whose composition does not reflect a cross section of the community is misplaced. It is a monumental wrong on our part for believing that the upper crust and arrived people have the people's interest at heart .

14. The people want the chief architect of the crime punished and the judgement of the courts affirmed. Yet the decision of the pardons board negated these very interests.

15. To add insult to injury, the spokesman or rather spokeswoman for the board appears to mock our sensitivities by never answering our questions and by exhorting us to accept any decisions of the pardons board . We shall have none of that. We just want our pound of flesh.

16. The unintelligible noises coming out from the spokeswomans mouth confirmed the truth in this observation.

17. That the less intelligent they are, the more vanity, pride and arrogance they exhibit. And they will always find crowd of fools to applaud them.

18. To many of us, the decisions of the pardons board are unconscionable. They are bias. The board does represent a cross section of the community, the decisions went against the findings of the courts and is also objected because we refused to believe that only these denizens are capable of distinguishing rights from wrongs. We the people claim the ultimate and residual rights.

19. We object the decision by the pardons board because we believe Najib does not deserve any clemency. Here are the reasons for our objection.

20. Stealing money, plundering the country's coffers, using a legitimate vehicle to effectively convert monies is an unpardonable crime. The betrayal of the trust of the people by a leader is more damaging.

21. Claiming the monies were used for orphans, widows and single mothers was deceptive and possibly an outright lie. If the intention was to help the unfortunate beings, why not create an official SPV and budget it officially? Najib was the bloody PM what?

22. What is the basis that allowed Najib to jump que and had his request to be pardoned heard first? What about those whose application for pardon dealt with?

23. Is it because Najib is the Putera in the term Bumiputera, that he is naturally entitled for preferential treatment and privileges?

24. This sense of entitlement is only claimed and falsely owned by UMNO inbreds. The pardons board by kowtowing to Najib's demands is only perpetuating the entitlement myth.

25. It's a myth because an entitlement or a right you fought for, worked for and qualifed for. It's not something falling like manna from heaven.

Tweet

Read more...

Tales by an unknown Malaysian. No. 1

1. One of the nicest books I have read was a book called the autobiography of an unknown Indian. It was written by one N. Chaudhuri. It's a narration of his rites of passage . That's the way I looked at it .

2. It has now inspired me to start a series of article in my blog. Fittingly it is called The Views of an Unknown Malaysian.

3. Let me begin with a legal conundrum, a vexed question,a thumper. I am referring to the unexplainable dropping of the 47 charges proffered to the Javanese neanderthal, Zahid Hamidi.

4. He may have been a student and taught by our present PM at Yayasan Anda, the school for 2nd chancers. But that won't stop me from describing him in the most despicable of terms. Hey, whenever he appears on TV explaining the need for healthy living, I change channel. Fearing it can cause me nightmares later. If his posters are strategically placed in the padi fields, they can scare away pests.

5. Whenever the PM says he or his government does not interfere in the judicial process, that statement sent shivers down my spine . There are dark linings in the silver clouds , not noticed by many.

6. Laissez faire in the judicial system? Anwar may have been influenced by a heavily perfumed french A hole who asked a group of industrialists - what can the government do to help them prosper?

7. The answer the industrialists gave was leave us alone- translated into meaning allow them to do as they please. The term in French literally means, allow to do .

8 . It's an economic doctrine that opposes intervention by the government in any forms except intervention in the natural monopolies.

9. The PM applies the same principles to our judicial system, which often leads to absurd and ridiculous results .

10. Well, Mein Fuhrer, there is no absolute non interference. Judicious interference is necessary to correct the wrongs, to moderate the excessive-ness etc.

11. When Lee Kuan Yew was asked whether he believes in the economic isms, he replied no. To him, one should always answer does this particular work? If it does, accept it.

12. Anwar's pompous declaration of wholesale non interference leads to absurd results. First of course it freed the Javanese neanderthal from culpability. It opened a can of worms. It also showed the PM didn't show leadership when it is required. He's a political invertebrate really blowing where the winds blow .

13. It opened a can of worms. Remember, the AG said he does not have to give reasons for the DNAA. Wow, that's a good value to teach the public. You can defiantly say, you are not accountable for anything. That's an axiom of the entitled inbreds .

14. Lawyers, looking out for one another are quick to say, you can't blame the judge, you can't blame the government... ad nauseum

15. What lawyers say are not etched in stone. They are opened to disputations and disagreements. Besides, a predator will generally not attack one of its own kind. That's professional courtesy.

16. We, the public don't care two hoots what lawyer say. We say all is to blame. Including the judge.

17. If one charge is found to be faulty and causes a domino effect on the other 46 charges, the same principle applies to the justice system.

18. If one law practitioner in this case is rougish, the whole gangbang including the judge is.

19. To us, the reasonable man on the Clapham omnibus, the judge should have harshly reprimanded the lawyers from the AGC.

20. Having found that Zahid had a prima facie case to answer, the AGC lawyers did a volte face and gifted the Javanese neanderthal with a DNAA . The judge concurred.sheesh!

21. The conduct of all the judges presiding zahid's cases are hardly commendable. Indeed the deserved disapprobation and opprobrium.

22. The judge at Shah Alam for instance dismissed zahid's case on account of the half past six job done by the prosecution team and on technical grounds.

23. Perhaps that particular judge has not heard of A4 sized envelopes and couldn't count past one .

24. Wasn't there a possibility that more than one A4 sized envelopes were used? And the money denominated in thousand USD or Singapore dollars?

25 . The judge in the 47 charges case froze and acquiesced at the request of the prosecution team. He did not have the testicular fortitude. Sorry sir!

26. That was the time when we expect him to indulge in some judicial activism. That was required to correct the wrongs and mend things. But he did not and his conduct can hardly be said to be blameless. No siree!

27. Many of you think of judges as being priggish, sanctimonious, sacred cows and endowed with superior intellect more than they actually have. Other judges and respectful lawyers refrain from criticizing them. But some members of the public such as I, like Rhett Butler said, don't give a damn.

28. If I think you err or are defficient somewhat, the postman will ring the door. Sorry you cannot reply us publicly, but you know how some of us think of you . You too eat belacan.

29.lets look at the 47 charges. It's mathematically impossible for at least some of the charges to stick. They must be practising some strange maths in the courts .

30. If the prosecution team discovers some charges were flimsy, why not expunge them. Retain the robust ones which can stand assault by the defense team.

31. Finally, it's a case of believability. Do you believe Zahid? Look, here's the man who said he met the invisible Arab donor to najib.if it's proven he lied there, his whole credibility is flushed down the toilet.

32. But here's the man UMNO wants as it's leader. We can only be perplexed. And to exclaim, some people's children. God have mercy on us!

Tweet

Read more...

Views of a non-lawyer.

1. I think it was lord Denning who said that the law is not a technical game left to technicians only to administer it.

2. I think the import of the statement means, if left to the technicians only, the law in the hands of tricky lawyers, will turn into a grotesque uncontrollable being.

3. That's where the judges must intervene to prevent the law becoming an enemy to public interests.

4. Public interest at the moment, demand that whomsoever breaks the law must be punished and those who plunder this country must meet the force of the law.

5. With reference to the monies in the 1MDB case, the public would simply ask, how did the billions get into Najib's account or the accounts in which Najib has controlling interests?

6. Did the monies walked on their own there, flew there, brisk walked there, jog or get there by some effing serpentine ways?

7. The answer to that simple question, would demolish any artful , obfuscating and intended to confuse arguments by artful talking and shyster lawyers.

8. Judges can humour the strained and overstretched arguments of these artful lawyer but must remain steadfast in preserving the purpose of the law in this instance, to punish the wrongdoer.

9. So when Najib's lawyers warned the courts that this 1MDB case will spillover to 2026, that self serving assertion raises in us the public, much emotions of despair and utter disbelief. It is capable of making us loose faith in our justice system .

10. First of all, right thinking persons in our society, will take such statement, as blackmailing or holding the Court at ransom. It's saying if you call Najib to enter defense, the case might continue till 2026. So the prudent thing to do, is to drop the charges against najib. if that happens, then the monies walked, jog and flew on their own. Then, it will become a case, an elephant can fly because it's determined so by the courts.

11. Taxpayers time and money have been extraordinarily expended such that an incremental expenditure of time and money is no longer relevant. The law must never lose its purpose, which is to punish the wrongdoers.

12. If the court countenances the assertion of Najib's crafty lawyers, then its giving a wide berth to the rich and powerful while being harshly punitive to the lumpenproletariat .

13. The Court must never take lightly this kind of soft blackmailing and arm twisting. It must be met with the most robust objection by the Court.

14. It will be a crying shame that because of some alarmist assertions, the court will capitulate and does something unjustifiable and non-justiciable. If the price to punish the author of a most heinous crime, the Heist of the century is time overrun, so be it .

15. The lawyer for Ali babavum Najib has chosen to publicize his assertions, so it invites an equal counter assertion. It's the working of Newton's 3rd law of motion my friend, an action invites an equal reaction .

16. Except the manner of the riposte cannot be predetermined by the author of the action. It maybe supportive of his assertion or it maybe not. Roll the dice and see the outcome, brother .

17. The entitled inbred social media, the sychophantic social media and the UMNO DNA-ed busybodies are working overtime to create public opinion that Najib is pristine and super clean.

18. These toady, bootlicking and smarmy online social medias are overzealous in asserting that as the putera in the term Bumiputera, red lips Najib is naturally entitled to special privileges. And his minders are quick to embellish that.

19. Fortunately the number of these obsequious degenerates is few. The majority of the people are law abiding citizens who want to see the full force of the law is judicially applied. Without fear or favour.

20. We, the common people, the reasonable men must stop thinking that only lawyers understand the concept of justice. We the people will always be the reality check on unobstructive and most often self serving legal narratives.

Tweet

Read more...

Reading KKB ex post.

1. I believe I have the bragging rights in predicting DAP victory in KKB. In arriving at that conclusion , i didn't read chicken entrails or read tea leaves.
2. Nor did I cut green lemon over a basin of water and decipher the hidden messages therefrom. And proclaim that those who cannot read the messages will have a shortened life .
3. I gave reasons for my opinion. It is a perfectly rationalised opinion if I may say so.
4. My opinion, as Hitchens said, is enough for me. And I reserve the right to have it defended against any consensus, majority opinion any time any place anywhere. those who disagree with me can go and fly kite or better still, kiss my ass.
5. I heard an interview between a Malay centric , entitled inbred online media and Zaid Ibrahim, the Hampstead liberal. Therein is the main problem in our society.
6. It was an ensemble of master race persons singing the song of unmistakably racial supremacy. Disguised by nervous laughter.
7. The online paper , probably consisting of SPM 3rd graders and just reached puberty journalists was overeager to suggest that KKB will be better served by a Malay, albeit mediocre, as long as a Malay.
8. Hence they eagerly prods the DAP to field a Malay candidate.
9. Zaid Ibrahim, on the other hand slyly remarked, that it's a candidate from DAP, it must be a Chinese. And because of that it can win KKB, at the most by 500 votes .
10. Remember, Zaid was the person who said ' I am also a malay'. He disavows the UMNO route of becoming a Malay, but actually wants to be a better ' UMNO Malay '.
11. In a strange way, that's a Frantz Fanon logic. You condemned the oppressor but eventually become one yourself
12. Zaid Ibrahim is my personal friend. I compliment readily but will unhesitatingly criticize him. Like many others, I was and am shocked that he is on the side of the embezzler in chief . Now he is even agitating for the mother effer to be under house arrest. As I understand it, there is no law for it under the constitution. Also, we are a constitutional monarchy. The king does not override the constitution.
13. In discussing KKB, his hypocrisy as a non racist and liberal is exposed. In the final analysis, the man perceived to be a liberal and non racist, regrets that it wasn't a Malay fielded by DAP. His master race politics comes to the fore finally. Sheesh!
14. The voters in KKB refuse to be pigeonholed into racial stereotypes and must therefore be at odds with one another. Tension isn't the way to build a country.
15. As I said earlier, the people in KKB voted for what is good for business. And what's good for business is to vote in a party that propagates inclusion, promises to fight against all forms of social injustices, preaches mutual respect, shared happiness, shared prosperity and most importantly shared responsibility. The last being the awareness that ALL of us, all race, culture and religion are collectively responsible for creating a society that we all want.
16. That means deciding what kind of society we want should not be decided by the politicians alone. As long as they served as our mouthpieces, they are relevant to us. Once they are against us, we the people, reject them .
17. 17. Clearly, with that mindset, the people in KKB reject parties that preach religious bigotry, racial supremacy, social anarchy as a devisive tool etc.
18. The ecclesiastical mullah, aka the spiritual, that he actually is a closet dictator, Hadi of marang spoke like an entitled idiot n that he actually is when he said that a DAP victory in KKB will turn KKB into a Singapore and KKB Malays into Singapore Malays.
19. He is an idiot for wanting us to believe that a DAP victory in KKB will turn Malaysia into a Singapore, which by the way, is a 1st world country. A DAP victory in KKB is like pouring salt in the ocean. Has he not heard of one swallow does not a summer make?
20. But we get it. He is warning the KKB Malays that they will be like the Malays in Singapore.
21. He's got a sad vision of the Malays forever being a sad race. He wants the Malays continue to be freeloaders . A race entitled to having special rights, entitled to preferential treatment, entitled to being stupid and mediocre, entitled to break the law, to steal and to serve time at home and to have breakfast in bed.
22. As progressive Malays, we find this paternalistic and patronizing treatment, abhorrent and repulsive. He can go fly kite off the coast of Rusila .
23. I am glad that his divisive and antiquated argument was rejected by the KKB Malays save for some Malay rednecks and UMNO DNA-ed inbreds.
24. Al fadhil Hadi can continue cavorting with Bersatu and UMNO Ku Klux clan people.
25. Part of being not stupid, as said by one of Malaysia's podcast 2 ronnies, isn't confined only to be able to read through Nga Koh meng's gift but also includes the following:-
26. Empowerment. The threat to manipulative politics is empowerment. With empowerment , people are capable of independent thinking.
27. With independent thinking people can read through and laughed off outrageous claims and manipulative narrations. Such as the outrageous claim by a ecclesiastical clown that a DAP win KKB will start Malaysia becoming a Singapore. Or manipulative statements which are vindictive in nature harping on government adminstrative shortcomings which require time to solve. Hey, even if you want to piss, you have to unzip your pants
28. 28. People don't care two hoots about name calling. You can display photos of the pm or Agung, people just don't care. They have independently decided. The photos are materials of interest to the police only.
29. You are accountable for your deeds or misdeeds. If you sow seeds of deceit and dissension, these will catch up with you. If you steal and plunder from the country you will get the proper comeuppance. There's no such thing as house arrest where you can indulge in your conjugal rights . Only entitled inbreds and their shyster spokesmen think you deserved so .
30. People are protective of their religions and do not take kindly of anyone group mocking, ridiculing or disparaging his religion. Intentionally or not. Take the case of the KK mart socks issue. But they will not respond in the way stormfuhrer Akmal wants. The people responding in the way baby face Nelson Akmal wants are the UMNO inbreds and those spoiling for a fight.
31. People care about food security, about having affordable homes and about preserving racial harmony. Master race politics is out
32. They take the following as given and must be provided by a good government. Health services, security and social amenities including good transport system.
33. What do all these things mean? Collectively it means that voter profile and "ordinal' preferences have changed. Only some parties stick to their ' carnal' utility curve .
34. That should be an object lesson for those parties pursuing ecclesiastical dictatorship and pushing for the creation of an Orwellian society. It's an object lesson too for parties pursuing master race politics. It is particularly of interest to UMNO with its swashbuckling politics. Akmal may think himself as an Erol Flynn at the moment. UMNO that doesn't know how to adapt won't know what hits them.
35. To me, what happened in KKB is a watershed in Malaysian politics. It points to the future of our politics. Certainly the parties that do not adapt will perish. Let's pray it's UMNO.

Tweet

Read more...

The battle for KKB -part 2

1. One of the podcast two Ronnies, derided minister NGA Kor Meng . He said the people are not stupid.

2. Nga had announced a few million allocation for KKB . He said, the allocation was on account of KKB being an 'ong' place. It wasn't given because of the impending by election .

3. Its unavoidable. Nga can foam at the mouth saying that the allocation wasn't an election allocation. The people in KKB in particular, will insist that it was an election "grease' .

4. That's because people are smart. They do read in between the lines. They are not just commuters on the toon foong omnibus.

5. That's the state of mind the people possess as they go into the KKB polls. People getting smart is the Achilles heel of any party that propagates extremism in all forms, racial supremacy and religious bigotry.

6. Because people are not stupid, IE because they are smarter enables them to reject extreme right wing political parties like UMNO and the successor of UMNO, PN. Smartness and fair-mindedness is actually a boon for pragmatic political parties

7. There is an inverse relationship between smartness and the fortunes of political parties at least now, in Malaysia. The smarter people are, the more politically aware, more informed, more enlightened, the less acceptable parties that expound extremism in all forms, racial supremacy and religious bigotism , become .

8. So when one of a popular podcast 2 ronnies say people are not stupid, that's actually a boon to PH especially DAP.

9. Clearly as the intelligence and wisdom of the people increases, fortunes of parties like UMNO travel south . The same will happen to PN.

10. Then, they will looked askance, puzzled at what happened. Their conceit and arrogance will prevent them from discovering the causes

11. Look at what happened to UMNO. The recent anarchy created by one Akmal will hasten the demise of UMNO. The same will befall PN .

12. The people 'not stupid' IE politically sophisticated, aware etc., is the state of mind with which they go to the polls in KKB.

13. The voters of KKB, as do many people in the country are tired of the scorched earth politics of PN .

14. Because people are not stupid and are politically aware, the will enter KKB and vote according according to what is good for business.

15. And what's good for business is to vote in a party that supports inclusiveness, mutual racial respect, shared prosperity and happiness. They will shun a party that preaches divisiveness, perpetual racial tensions, religious bigotry and racial supremacy.

16. They will also vote in the party that promises to fight against all forms of social injustice and will not compromise against corruption and abuse of power.

17. Does the PN publicized these principles? It hardly talk about these intransigences

18. The pas mother-effers are quiet on the warnings of Allah in Al Maidah 78-79 on the children of Israel.

19. The people in that community were cursed by God through the pronouncements of David and Jesus. This was because they kept quiet when their brothers commit corruption, abuse of power, excesses and other intransigence.

20. The same refusal to correct wrongdoings will be perpetuated if people choose the PN candidate.

21. What can you expect from a candidate , who at first proudly published his so so a academic results. Getting into University in Pahang is nothing to shout about.

22. I said at first, because the seemingly misogynists PN people especially the actually sex crazed PAS people thought their candidate's academic results cant possibly be bested by a woman .

23. They were shocked to see Pang's excellent academic credentials. To now compare apple to apple, why not publish the PN's candidate UPSR, PMR and SPM results. Ada berani? The PN already lost here . It's the harbinger of ultimate defeat.


24. To control the damage done and embarrassment felt, PN questioned Pang's vernacular education.

25. The keen mind can see the ecclesiastical and racial supremacist principles at work here . The ecclesiastical dictator and the racism in them couldn't countenance differentiation in educational pathways except that permitted by them .

26. So beware, voting in one vermin even at state level will be the start of establishing an Orwellian society. Our freedom is at stake voting in the PN candidate.

27. The UMNO people, at least those who helped in the election will have no trouble in debunking these underlying extreme right wing principles. For over 60 years they have been drilling the very same principles on right thinking Malaysians. Snuffing them out will be easy-peasy to them .

28. PN can't hide its religious bigotry and racial supremacy principles behind issues which concerned ALL of us and are not unique to KKB alone.

29. Things like the cost of living, economic direction of the country, the exchange rate of the ringgit, rice issue, free supply of water etc. All problems associated with these will not disappear over night by giving a WIN to PN in KKB.

30. Assuredly, these things are tackled in earnest and given a sense of urgency. But it takes time to produce the desired results, encik!

31. We can't get instant results as demanded by such anarchists like papagomos, YBs viral, cikgu bards, the various tik-tokers and so on. If I plant a rambutan tree it takes 3 to 5 years to mature and grow fruits. If you take a piss, you have to unzip your pants and take your dicks out. Ada butot?

32. The people in KKB will also look at the candidate. Clearly Ms. Pang is superior. Choosing a person with better academic excellence is a no brainer. You will also want to choose a person with humility and approachable by all races. The Ah Moi has that. She is also ready to serve with dedication and is EVEN willing to physically move to KKB.

33. Apa lagi PN Mau? Nang bohtee Nang, kui bohtee kui!

34. Finally I want to address this issue. Which is the obsession by many Malay centric on line media to insist that KKB is better off with a Malay candidate. And with the same insistence by a certain Tropicana ' Hampstead liberal, sarcastically wanting a Malay candidate from DAP. Because of not choosing a Malay, PH can only win by 500 votes.

35. As though lah, choosing a Malay candidate, KKB would immediately turn into a miraculous economic enclave. Tiu Sama lu!

36. There's simply no guarantee to that. For years we have heard this-indoctrinated by UMNO. Kau tak membelit bukan India, Kau tak nenipu bukan cina. But what we have not heard is, kalau tak korap dan tak menepati waktu, bukan Melayu .

37. Many of us and I are simply dismissive of that obsession. We don't care whether the cat is black or white as long as it catches mice!

38. Given these exogenous and endogenous reasons, Ms. Pang will win by more than 500 votes. Indeed given the state of mind of the people in KKB, as opined by one of Malaysia's 2 ronnies, ms Pang can even win by a bigger majority than previously.

Tweet

Read more...

Affidavit vs counter affidavit.The truth is butchered

1. Reading between the lines, T. Zafrul seems to suggest that Zahid lied about the existence of an addendum that allowed Najib to serve the remainder of his jail sentence at home

2. Everyone seems, some of the press included wants to see a criminal freed.

3. Perhaps this eagerness is part of the entitlement mentality of a Bumi -Putera.

4. The Putera in the Bumi term is always entitled to some divine dispensation.

5. On the other hand, any Bumi in the Bumiputera term is subject to the harshness of the law. The counter affidavit by T. Zafrul, if true, is another reason why we should all boycott UMNO.

6. Not only UMNO consists of narcissistic, anarchic and prone to aggression individuals, it's leadership consists of congenital liars. Surely, that is not a party, sacred and honourable to represent right thinking Malays.

7. Unless of course, as Swettenham observed , Malays in general, are naturally untrustworthy.

8. I believed Malays in general do not deserve such reproach and negative description. As practicing Muslims, they observed fairness and truth.

9. Hence if Najib is wrong, he is wrong and deserves all the disapprobation. If Zahid is a liar, he deserves all the rejection or using a current term, boycott. 10. Only UMNO people, ' back roomed ' decency and truth. Never you trust UMNO people or those DNA-ed with UMNO values people.

11. Zafrul's affidavit would affirm that Zahid is a liar.

12. I am puzzled by one thing; why is it that some people are eager to see that what is haram, makan duit haram, harta haram be exonerated? That means all the virtuous values our parents taught us and strengthened by religion are simply discarded.

13. The zealousness to see Najib served house arrest seem to forget that the chap still got 1MDB to answer to. Or is there a conspiracy to let Najib off with another DNAA? That will surely turned Malaysia into a pariah state. Perhaps that also will be shielded behind the excuse, 'the government does not interfere with the judiciary ' ?.

14. Yes, certainly Zahid's affidavit would strain relationship with Nana Non, it would reveal that Zahid is a liar. Have we forgotten about the Zafrul affidavit that politely says Zahid's affidavit is false? Is there a law against a falsified affidavit?

15. This legal imbroglio can be resolved if everything is tabled by the AGC with the courts . Finito!

16. I have learnt this much. Don't listen to the thunder. Wait for the rain. Don't rush to conclusion into accepting what Zahid says is true . Don't say the government is hiding any addendum.

17. When wak jahid was the home minister, he said we don't have a law that provided for house arrest. Has the law been changed now that an UMNO Putera is jailed?

18. We are a constitutional monarchy. It's inconceivable that the king does anything to undermine the constitution and with it, the law .

19. Yes it certainly would strain the relationship between Zahid and Nana Non. It firstly may expose Zahid as a liar not partial to using underhanded machinations. It affirms the fatal mistake Nana Non makes, which is to invite an implacable and incorrigible enemy like UMNO to share power.

Tweet

Read more...

The battle for KKB.

1. Soon the battle of KKB will begin. The by elections take place because the DAP incumbent passed away.

2. Since 1974, KKB has become part of the Selangor State Assembly. The seat has been won by BN and DAP.

3. When BN won the seat, people's thinking was not that sophisticated. You can almost say BN won when voters were more ignorant. They were more moved by immediate gains which moneybags BN offered.

4. When people's thinking became more sophisticated, they think of more long term gains, that all, irrespective of racial groups are all in the same boat, DAP won.

5. You can almost speak of an unspoken rule. When ignorance reigns, when short term gains are more prioritised, where racial and religious bigotry reigns, BN wins. When the opposite take place, DAP wins.

6. You can't avoid some people with a tunnel vision. PAS, because of its religious extremism and conservatism is confident of winning. Those with a racial supremacy complex and suffering from 'the infinite malady' of DAPhylis see their party winning. Those who suffer from perpetual divorce from UMNO disease, think PN could win.

7. They are wrong in their prognoses. Here are my reasons. 8. # political sophistication# the reality of demographics.

9. Reasonable people do not want to rule and conquer others not do they want to impose their racial supremacy as expoused by the Akmals of this world. They don't want to hate and despise one another. They want to help one another. They want to live by others happiness not misery.

10. Those negatives are necessary products of religious extremism and racial supremacy. Exactly the principles expoused by PN( bersatu, pas and gerakan who, what? Meaning PN can never win.

11. Hence the prognoses by religious extremists(pas) the racial supremacists and those suffering from the infinite malady of DAPphylis, and the people who contacted the divorce from UMNO disease are all off the mark.

12. These people ignore the reality of demography of a particular place. Demographics is indeed destiny.

13. As a rule of thumb, evinced from my own personal experience and observation of empirical evidence, is that whenever there is at least 30% of the population of a place is composed of non Malays, where DAP contests, IT will win .

14. Let's look at KKB. It's composed of around 47% Malays which means there is 53% non Malays. Ada faham Lor?

15. If DAP were to contest, it is the incumbent anyway, it only needs 80% of the non malay votes and only 20% of the Malay votes to win

16. So despite the boastful talks of the pas leutenante, the Malay supremacists infected with DAPphylis and those suffering from divorce from UMNO disease, my bet is, DAP will retain KKB.

Tweet

Read more...

Boycott UMNO. The Malaysian Response.

1. We must rid our world of men with emperor like mentality, IE of men who dictate their fellowmen like beasts of burden.

2. The business of emperor minded people is to rule over, conquer, enslaved, subjugate, hold in bondage their fellow humans. They rule over the misery and suffering of others .

3. When people suffer or caused to be in misery, the emperor minded, the feudal lord hold control over the people . The essence of the emperor minded is the creation of an Orwellian society. A society which is controlled in every aspect.

4. This is what people like Akmal are striving for, to exert absolute control over others on account of them being different . Injury to religious sensitivity is just an excuse to exert supremacy. In this case, racial supremacy.

5. As Muslims, we are angry when our religion is made fun of, ridiculed, treated lightly, opened to contempt etc .

6. As angry as we are, feeling hurt, we don't react unhinged and go on with an orgy of destruction . We agree at being aggrieved but we cannot condone Akmal's mindless violence.

7. It's just using the socks issue to regain UMNOs relevancy and validity.

8. Because as decent human beings we ought to be able to help our fellow human beings. That's the way human beings are. We don't validate our existence by coercing others.

9. We want to live with other's happiness not misery. We don't go on hating and despising others because a small reason provides us an excuse to do so.

10. That's what the socks issue provided Akmal and UMNO. To unleash unbridled hate and violence.

11. Thus far from asserting UMNOs relevancy and validity, it gives 1001 reasons to boycott UMNO.

12. Yes, come one and all, let us boycott UMNO.

13. It seems that cleverness and intelligence has made us unnecessarily cynical and overly suspicious. More than intelligence, we need kindness and gentleness.

14. Behind that baby faced appearance (of Akmal) is an unloved person . Malays are made of better stuff .

15. Perhaps Akmal is suffering from an acute bout of paerodolia. Where people see common inkblots, he sees the figure of a Chinaman brandishing a sword .

Tweet

Read more...

Religion as a sword to kill.

1. In case readers are wondering who the hell Adenoid Hynkel is, let me tell you. He is the character played by Charlie Chaplin in the film 'The Great Dictator '.

2. In Malaysia there's room for everyone.malays, Chinese, Indians and people in East malaysia.we want to live harmoniously with one another. We want to help one another. We don't want to hate and despise another because he is different. Our name is Ahmad, the other is ah chai or bala.

3. Hate and despise is what emperor Akmal has done. This fellow has launched hate politics and with it, hate crimes.

4. You think you can undo what your bloody mouth has said. Up to date there were 2 incident of fire bomb at KK mart premises. You can't say there's no link between what you said and what has happened. The Malay says, terlajak perahu boleh di undur, terlajak kata buruk padah nya.

5. Now you say you want the government take stern actions. When you opened your bloody mouth you want the government to support you. You can't have the cake and eat it, bro.

6. Akmal, the fascist dictator is responsible for the hate politics and the hate crimes that follow his immature outbursts. Immature leader begets immature followers .

7. What is puzzling to us is that throughout the whole anarchic episode, the government has been quiet.

8. The government has not been nimble enough to stop the maniacal politics and has been slow to recognise the bad consequences.

9. There is a joke going around that no interference means doesn't know what to do.

10. Notice or not, what was started by Akmal and his garbage underbosses has not attracted universal condemnations from PAS. Could it be that pas people are more mature than the UMNO youths?

11. Islamic politics to UMNO is that different from the Islamic politics of PAS in this issue. Clearly the Allah socks issue has been leveraged by UMNO for its hate politics.

12. At the root of the flare up of the issue is simply a desire to restore UMNOs sagging relevancy in Malay politics.

13. The hard truth is, the brand of politics surveyed by UMNO is no longer relevant among the Malays. Its hate politics, chauvinism, xenophobia, paranoia and its Don Quixote syndrome are no longer unquestionably accepted by the Malays. The emergence of a sociopath like Akmal worsens UMNOs irrelevancy.

14. UMNO under the full leadership of Zahid fails to see this . So it shoots itself in the foot.

15. This is the area in which Anwar should not interfere. When the enemy is making mistakes, don't gatal2 to correct them. But where actions threaten the social harmony of the nation you must interfere.

16. Didn't UMNO lose badly in the last GE? That is an indication that'd its brand of politics is no longer relevant.

17. Perhaps, it's dying clutch to grab any semblance of relevancy, is to be part of the unity government.

18. Where it hopes to influence the policy of the government. It seems the actions of a sociopath like Akmal brings disrepute to the government's Madani policies .

19. The fatal mistake that Anwar has made is to invite an implacable and incorrigible enemy like UMNO to share power .

20. Is this the UMNO ,PH is considering to work with in the next GE? I say let it die alone .

21. UMNO may have not realised it, that Akmal's conduct has created irreparable and untold damages to UMNO.

22. The immediate effect is Malaysians in general, law abiding and peace loving will reject UMNO. The non Malays except one Chinaman professor will avoid UMNO because of its inherent hate politics.

23. Mad cow Akmal is really head of the militant arm of UMNO. It's purpose is to intimidate, bully and coerce others into accepting what UMNO defines. If UMNO says black is white, all others must also say it's white. No independent thought is allowed.

24. I now want to introduce the concepts of economic predation and economic terrorism. Predation as is normally understood refers to a situation whereby one organism (predator)hunts and kills of another(prey)

25. The predator kills the prey to eat it or for the need to eliminate competition. The lion kills the gazelle to eat it but kills hyenas to eliminate competition.

26. The predator animal in Akmal kiills the prey KK mart to eliminate competition. So that the vacuum could perhaps be filled by others. Therefore we cannot discount the possibility that Akmal is induced by other Mart's or even be on their payroll. Think about that possibility.

27. Economic predation leads to economic terrorism. This is the willful instigation, calls and incitement to destroy the business infrastructure of the prey , in this case KK mart .

28. While the call to boycott purchase of KK mart products is economic predation, the call to close KK mart branches, IE the destruction of business infrastructure, is economic terrorism.

29. Terrorism in any forms, must be met with the full force of the law. Why should Akmal be exempted from being a ' special guest ' of the government? For those of you who have forgotten or don't know ' special guest ' is the title of a book written by former minister, Aziz Ishak

30. What motivates the sociopath in Akmal? The picture of him brandishing a samurai sword only shows his defiance and recalcitrance. What happens if a picture shows a Chinaman holding a Chinese Dao sword?

To be continued. ....

Tweet

Read more...

The socks, the Great Dictator/Malaysian Adenoid Hynkel and Allah.

1. I look at the Allah sock issue this way. It's all politics and political opportunism. It's racist supremacy. It political bullying. It's economic predation by envious group of Malays. It's an attempt to restore UMNOs relevancy within the Malay community.

2. The forced closure of number of KK mart branches is economic terrorism. The UMNO youth and his sex crazed cabal should be arrested for sabotaging business.

3. The thing in issue is the stock of socks with some written material resembling Allah. Closure of the mini markets caused other businesses to be affected. You are creating negative externalities. You must pay for them. The UMNO youth Mafioso and his underbosses must pay for them.

4. The legally sanctioned coercive forces are extra quick to investigate KK mart, but are painfully slow in investigating economic predation and terrorism. They were also slow in investigating a vigilante group forcing a poor Chinaman in a humiliating confession.

5. The authorities should also investigate the chinese muslim evangelist who first firestoned the UMNO youth Mafioso. To see whether he's motivated by envy at the success of KK mart .

6. His own business closed earlier is not caused by KK mart. He may have badly managed his own business. It's his own funeral, lorr.

7. The deafening silence of the minister in charge of religion is puzzling. It should have been him to have raised fire and brimstone over the socks issue. Instead the UMNO youth is the group overshadowing his lethargy. Apa Lah ente, Ustadz.

8. The government must not think we are sedated and comforted, when it says it doesn't interfere over police investigation of the Allah socks issue.

9. It doesn't do the actual police work, doesn't tell the police how to do their work, but it certainly can express its concerns over the issue. The police then would take the cue, sir.

10. Only an irresponsible government will say it doesn't interfere in managing the issue. All forms of extremism, religious extremism etc, and economic predation must be reined in . Otherwise, the pm doesn't have that iron to rule Malaysia .

11. The DAP has gone to see jahid ( that's how kor Meng pronounced that name) probably to restrain mad cow Akmal. But what the no so bright jahid do? In fact the UMNO mkt has expressed unanimous and undivided support to Akmal.

12. The DAP must now publicly condemn akmals economic predation and economic terrorism. Malaysian Chinese in particular will never feel safe. Whatever they do will be looked at as having sinister motives. In the past what the Chinese did were met, not with verbal repudiation but with threats and aggression.

13. That has happened to Ngeh, Ngar, ngar's aged parents, now to KK mart owners. Next will be the Chinese padi growers in Sekinchan because their productivity is higher(?)

14. I suspect the. Chinese don't mind DAP being part of the chapchai government but won't take it kindly if DAP compromises it's principles. Even worse if it is 'uncle tomming'. One of the most explicitly stated principles is to fight against all forms of social injustice. Isn't what is happening to KK mart one form of social injustice?

15. The Allah socks issue does not diminish the Muslim beliefs in Allah, his Angels, the 4 revealed Books, the prophets, doomsday/akhirat and qada and qadar. The Muslim's Iman is not that flimsy.

16. So don't talk pompously about those who don't feel angry in the way Akmal does, have lower Iman.

17. Wtf is Akmal to judge another person's Iman just because he or she does not NOT believe in the 6 tenets of Islamic Iman, but only does not agree with Akmal's narrative of the Allah socks issue.

18. Indeed Muslims are angered over the insensitive writing of Allah on the socks. KK mart has apologised for its negligence on this as demanded and the issue can easily be diffused by recalling the socks stock . But to seditiously call for a boycott and closure of KK mart nationwide is like asking not only the flesh but also the blood and bone. It's economic terrorism -acts designed to destroy the business infrastructure of KK mart .

19. I won't repeat the basis of the Muslim's anger over the socks issue. Much about it has been too late said by the minister in charge of religious affairs. Too late said because of the 'thicky' quality of ministers chosen by Nana Non.

20. The vehemence and the anger, directed at KK Mart's negligence or carelessness are commendable. Except I didn't see the same intensity, vehemence and anger directed at the support given to the person who makan duit dan harta Haram. We are asked to support something Haram. Now, compare the Allah socks issue with the request to support Ali babavum Najib, which one injures our Islamic- ness more? Which one Al fadhil Al Ustadz Akmal?

21. So don't be a sanctimonious bastard asking us to condemn KK mart but not to denounce the unislamic support for makan duit dan harta haram. That is haram more. It's more gravest.

22. The claim that his (Akmal's) actions were done to defend the honour of Islam is phoney. For if that done towards KK mart is for Islam, all the more Malay Muslim's should be asked not support a haram conduct done by Najib .

23. The claim that what he has done is for the sake of Islam is hogwash. He never explained how the socks injure the 6 tenets of Iman. He thinks that our Iman is so flimsy.

24. If it's not religion that motivates this UMNO gadfly what do?

25. His claim and assertion is done without proofs and evidence, so we can dismiss it the same way.

26. He may be motivated by plain envy and the fondness to coerce and bully. Perhaps he is actually racist and chauvinist and has the desire to terminate the business of non UMNO people . It's just economic predation directed at non Malays in general. Perhaps he has the sour grapes mindset - since that business is not done by UMNO, it brings harm to the people. Or maybe, he's trapped within the ideological obsession of UMNOs fascism which sees people who do not subscribe to UMNO authoritarian rule, paranoia and xenophobia are expendable.

27. It's also economic terrorism as closure of KK mart branches nationwide affects the livelihood of thousands including Malays. The closure also affects the patrons of KK mart of all races. These people patronize KK mart because they can buy cheaper and varied items.

28. Isn't it possible that bloody Akmal speaks on behalf of other mini and supermarkets wishing to remove KK mart? Hey, we can get items at KK mart not available at 7E.

29. Are we going to go around living, thinking that whatever the Chinese do, must have sinister motives. If that is so, the Malays are truly a sad race.

30. Akmal has only revealed the true character and what UMNO will become. An extremist, racist, morbid, constantly quarrelsome, paranoid, xenophobic and has the Don Quixote syndrome, always under siege by the Chinese dragon. Sheesh!

31. Those are reasons to justify us rejecting UMNO wholesale. Let us all eulogize and read the talqin over UMNO dead body.

32. I want to now discuss the issue under the headings of political opportunism, polical bullying and coercion, economic predation and terrorism and UMNO attempt to regain relevancy.

33. Many years ago,Ghazali Shafie, then the home minister and UMNO mkt member, during its PAU held up high the Muslim prayer mat/sejadah. He pointed out to a difficult to see a drawing of the Cross.

34. That, he pointed out, a subtle way for non Muslims to undermine the iman of the Muslims.

35. Wah, the delegates clapped and roared at the drama. It satisfied their primordial militant and pugilistic urges. They were ready to mengamuk.

36. But the drama was done at a time when UMNO was strong. It's purpose was to bind the doltish Malays under the stranglehold of UMNO .

37. The present socks drama is done by its main actor, 'bully beef' Akmal Salleh. However it's done at a time when UMNO is a spent force . It's purpose is to restore the past glory of UMNO.

38. It's politics and political opportunism at its best.

39. That political opportunism needs a punching bag. KK mart and it's carelessness over the socks issue provided Akmal with a godsend. It allowed the bully in him to be applied. KK mart was fo
rced into doing things against its will. I am not sure forced apology is valid. It's also forced to close its stores. For good measure young man Akmal, demand the government to revoke KK Mart's license. Best tu .

40. It's the imposition of racial supremacy over KK mart. The Ku Klux Klan section of the UMNO youth can impose it's master race ideology over a subservient race. That's what the Allah socks issue accomplishes .

41. It's also economic predation. The predator hunts the prey to devour it. Calling for the closure of KK mart infrastructure is tantamount to devouring it . The socks issue which is embellished with gusto by Herr leutenante Akmal is also an assertion of the master race on a subject race. It reminds the non Malays, who are Malaysians who is master. As a subject race Akmal wants them to be subservient , obsequious, toadish, kiss-ass and arse kissing race .

42. The point proven by Akmal and UMNO is UMNO is a detestable party. Let all right thinking Malaysians bury UMNO once and for all

Tweet

Read more...

Najibfication and it's effects. Part 2

1. The new word that has entered our lexicon and dictionary or our treasury of words is:-

• A. To najibfy
• B. Najibfication.
• C. Najibfied.

2. To najibfy means to give someone a discount, concession, special treatment, entitlement, privileges etc. najibfication is the process of getting all the above. It can also mean a noun as in being given the above. Najibfied is past perfect and refers to being already given the above.

3. It's now possible for us to talk that the pardons board has najibfied a convicted criminal.

4. It so happens that the person being najibfied and being given a najibfication, a noun is Mohd Najib bin tun Razak.

5. Row row your boat Gently down the stream Belts off, trousers down, dicks out Isn't life a scream

6. Life is certainly a scream - for a neo feudal lords like Najib.

7. For the common reasonable man, the commuter on the KL MRT, on the toon foong omnibus life is a hellish scream.

8. The Terengganu housewife who was caught stealing a few cans of Milo, the man caught stealing money from the surau's donation box and the Penang women convicted for using money not belonging to her but got her account, all got disproportionate jail time.

The sentences they received were regarded fair. They didn't get their sentences reviewed by the pardons board or if their sentences were already completed, did not get any belated apologies from anyone. Certainly their constitutional rights were forgotten.

9. So Where der Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor.. asked us to accept the decision of the pardons board, we can but we don't agree. So we continue to talk. When Herr oberst inFahmy told us not to discuss the issue in the social was that a Kim Jong UN-esque directive? By what authority was he enabled to do that?

10. To many right thinking people, the king was ill advised. The decision was salacious, smutty and lascivious. It was, because the unwanted child resulting from this lecherous deliberation was the commuted already legally completed conviction by the courts The king was wrongly advised by the 5 other members of the pardons board, the PM or anyone else.

11. Perhaps because the decision by the pardons board generates so much dissension, ill will and unhappiness among many right thinking people, especially lawyers, the Bar Council approved a motion to challenge that decision in court. Hail to the Bar Council in keeping this issue, alive.

12. Mind you, this is a legal challenge against the pardons board. It is not a legal challenge against the king.

13. This reminder is made to forestall the possible spins by the UMNO mother effers .

14. The UMNO people, especially its Laurel and Hardy characters, will likely say that this is a challenge against the person of the king. Or they will turn this into a racial issue saying the action of the Bar Council is a challenge mounted by non Malays against Malay legitimacy.

15. The resolution of the Bar Council to legally challenge the decision of the pardons board, might confuse or be pictured as confusing, especially to the UMNO A-holes, but it is not to the majority of people.

16. To the majority of people, the right thinking people, the Bar Council represents the majority of the public to uphold the sanctity of the law and the principle of supremacy of the law

17. To circumvent that and to pursue their nefarious, wicked and flagitious aims, UMNO will certainly use the institution of the king/agong to shield itself and the gross injustice created against objections and uncomplimentary opposition.

18. That reminds us of what Lord Denning said-the purpose of the law is to protect the weak against the strong and the law must not be used as a sword on the weak.

19. Read into our situation the statements translate into the king or the institution must protect the weak against the strong and not used as a sword to cut down the weak

20. Sly UMNO will use the king and the institution to show that it is more royalist than other royalists. In reality its using the king to intimidate and snuff out valid criticisms and objections .

21. If Samuel Johnson said to Pitt, that nationalism is the last refuge of scoundrels, to UMNO, the king is the last refuge of its scoundrelism.

22. The merit to what the Bar Council is doing, is to keep the najibfication issue alive and allow it to be the subject of continued conversation. Three Cheers to them!

23. The trump card played by UMNO or UMNO DNA-ed people is the assertion and claim, that pardoning, clemency are the absolute privilege of the king. There that status cannot be challenged in court .

24. I find that hard to reconcile. The king sits in session with members of the pardons board and is accordingly advised. He does not sit alone and decide. Where the is the 'Absolute' quality?

25. If the king sits in session with members of the pardons board, I would argue that the King loses his 'absolute' stature. Thus any decisions emanating from the pardons board are, in theory challenge-able in court

26. The claim and assertion that the king has absolute privilege or has absolute conduct in general to be untenable. Here are my arguments.

27. If I remember correctly, the late karpal Singh filed a suit against the then agong and another suit against another ruler. The suits failed I think, but the fact that the suits were heard at all, mean that precedents have been created which allow such suits to heard. Don't that mean the absolute privilege stature has been broken?

28. The absolute privilege stature of conduct in any form whatsoever, has also been broken, when special courts to try rulers were created. If I am not mistaken, the Negeri Sembilan ruler was tried by such court and found guilty.

29. Which means that the absolute privilege stature is just a legal fiction. Finally, I think there is the constitutional monarchy argument. Our king's are subject to the constitution right? So where got absolute privilege stature one?

30. Those are my non legal arguments. Lawyers may have more cogent legal argle bargle. If my arguments are found deficient, please argue them out .

31. To me then, those people who insist on absolute privilege stature, especially UMNO apparatchiks and UMNO DNA-ied people all have fascist tendencies or self entitlement mindset.

32. I.e .only Malays are naturally entitled to break the law and not be accountable for them. Or in this case Najib is natural entitled to discounts, special privileges and treatment .

33. What is most shocking to us, is that the PM asked us to accept the decision of the pardons board. And his major domo, the gol and gincu actor asked us not to discuss the issue in social media .

34. Sirs, those are invitations we must politely refuse. The requests are the height of hypocrisy.

35. You realised or not Maa, they are actually defending, supporting and enabling kleptocracy. Steal baby steal!

36. The najibfication incident (our Nanking incident) where justice is massacred,has exposed many chinks in mamu Anwar's armour. It has de-fanged him of his many venomous rhetoric .

37. It showed that he has broken faith with the people , the people no longer trust him as a change agent, he fails to build a Negara hukum and worse of all,through the pardons board, encourage more kleptocracy and abuse of power.

38. Its reformasi alright - more of the same, not change. Reformasi is like eating pasembor, grilled fish or serenading deaf-toned audience with the song 'Azizah'.

39. The ways Anwar can restore public trust and confidence are-try Zahid again. He got a DNAA, which actually means he's guilty but for reasons of expediency, got off the hook, ensure that Najib got his real not discounted comeuppance in the 1MDB case. Unless of course, Anwar wants us to believe that monies can fly or walked on their own into Najib's account. Then Najib can do a MAD's Alfie, ' what me know?' mad comic used to be a favorite of mine. Hope, yours too.

40. I can't help but think of the presence of the pardons board as an anomaly in the law. It becomes a me mechanism to frustrate the finality in the court's decision. It's just a upscaled version of a prisoner review board.

41. At a review board, the board will find ways to reduce a prisoner's jail time. The prisoner will display remorse over the crime, admits the crime, apologizes for it and promises not to repeat the crime. All of which Najib does not do .

42. Yet our pardons board, in absentia seems to acknowledge that Najib does all that and therefore deserves some dispensation, courtesy of Nana Non.

43. I now want to look at this najibfication issue from an Islamic point of view. I regard the decision by the pardons board to be un Islamic.

44. The pardons board has usurped the power of Allah to pardon and forgive. That is the sole unchallengeable prerogative of Allah. By confering upon themselves the power of Allah, they have committed Shirik. Muslim members must bertaubat. Non Muslim members must go to the church, temple or kovil to make confessions and ask for forgiveness.

45. When Muslims read the sayyidul istighfar or numerous other istighfars, what do they find?

46. Among others, they acknowledged they have sinned, they have been unkind to themselves, they have shortcomings etc. They acknowledged that Allah is ever forgiving, they asked Allah to forgive them and they affirmed that Allah is the only One who can forgive and pardon. So readers, how do you reconcile the conduct of the pardons board with the prerogative of Allah?

In the next part, I will discuss the najibfication effects on failure to defend the country against the scourge of corruption, failure to prosper the country, failure to create political stability and bringing disrepute to the country .

Tweet

Read more...