Affidavit vs counter affidavit.The truth is butchered

1. Reading between the lines, T. Zafrul seems to suggest that Zahid lied about the existence of an addendum that allowed Najib to serve the remainder of his jail sentence at home

2. Everyone seems, some of the press included wants to see a criminal freed.

3. Perhaps this eagerness is part of the entitlement mentality of a Bumi -Putera.

4. The Putera in the Bumi term is always entitled to some divine dispensation.

5. On the other hand, any Bumi in the Bumiputera term is subject to the harshness of the law. The counter affidavit by T. Zafrul, if true, is another reason why we should all boycott UMNO.

6. Not only UMNO consists of narcissistic, anarchic and prone to aggression individuals, it's leadership consists of congenital liars. Surely, that is not a party, sacred and honourable to represent right thinking Malays.

7. Unless of course, as Swettenham observed , Malays in general, are naturally untrustworthy.

8. I believed Malays in general do not deserve such reproach and negative description. As practicing Muslims, they observed fairness and truth.

9. Hence if Najib is wrong, he is wrong and deserves all the disapprobation. If Zahid is a liar, he deserves all the rejection or using a current term, boycott. 10. Only UMNO people, ' back roomed ' decency and truth. Never you trust UMNO people or those DNA-ed with UMNO values people.

11. Zafrul's affidavit would affirm that Zahid is a liar.

12. I am puzzled by one thing; why is it that some people are eager to see that what is haram, makan duit haram, harta haram be exonerated? That means all the virtuous values our parents taught us and strengthened by religion are simply discarded.

13. The zealousness to see Najib served house arrest seem to forget that the chap still got 1MDB to answer to. Or is there a conspiracy to let Najib off with another DNAA? That will surely turned Malaysia into a pariah state. Perhaps that also will be shielded behind the excuse, 'the government does not interfere with the judiciary ' ?.

14. Yes, certainly Zahid's affidavit would strain relationship with Nana Non, it would reveal that Zahid is a liar. Have we forgotten about the Zafrul affidavit that politely says Zahid's affidavit is false? Is there a law against a falsified affidavit?

15. This legal imbroglio can be resolved if everything is tabled by the AGC with the courts . Finito!

16. I have learnt this much. Don't listen to the thunder. Wait for the rain. Don't rush to conclusion into accepting what Zahid says is true . Don't say the government is hiding any addendum.

17. When wak jahid was the home minister, he said we don't have a law that provided for house arrest. Has the law been changed now that an UMNO Putera is jailed?

18. We are a constitutional monarchy. It's inconceivable that the king does anything to undermine the constitution and with it, the law .

19. Yes it certainly would strain the relationship between Zahid and Nana Non. It firstly may expose Zahid as a liar not partial to using underhanded machinations. It affirms the fatal mistake Nana Non makes, which is to invite an implacable and incorrigible enemy like UMNO to share power.

Tweet

Read more...

The battle for KKB.

1. Soon the battle of KKB will begin. The by elections take place because the DAP incumbent passed away.

2. Since 1974, KKB has become part of the Selangor State Assembly. The seat has been won by BN and DAP.

3. When BN won the seat, people's thinking was not that sophisticated. You can almost say BN won when voters were more ignorant. They were more moved by immediate gains which moneybags BN offered.

4. When people's thinking became more sophisticated, they think of more long term gains, that all, irrespective of racial groups are all in the same boat, DAP won.

5. You can almost speak of an unspoken rule. When ignorance reigns, when short term gains are more prioritised, where racial and religious bigotry reigns, BN wins. When the opposite take place, DAP wins.

6. You can't avoid some people with a tunnel vision. PAS, because of its religious extremism and conservatism is confident of winning. Those with a racial supremacy complex and suffering from 'the infinite malady' of DAPhylis see their party winning. Those who suffer from perpetual divorce from UMNO disease, think PN could win.

7. They are wrong in their prognoses. Here are my reasons. 8. # political sophistication# the reality of demographics.

9. Reasonable people do not want to rule and conquer others not do they want to impose their racial supremacy as expoused by the Akmals of this world. They don't want to hate and despise one another. They want to help one another. They want to live by others happiness not misery.

10. Those negatives are necessary products of religious extremism and racial supremacy. Exactly the principles expoused by PN( bersatu, pas and gerakan who, what? Meaning PN can never win.

11. Hence the prognoses by religious extremists(pas) the racial supremacists and those suffering from the infinite malady of DAPphylis, and the people who contacted the divorce from UMNO disease are all off the mark.

12. These people ignore the reality of demography of a particular place. Demographics is indeed destiny.

13. As a rule of thumb, evinced from my own personal experience and observation of empirical evidence, is that whenever there is at least 30% of the population of a place is composed of non Malays, where DAP contests, IT will win .

14. Let's look at KKB. It's composed of around 47% Malays which means there is 53% non Malays. Ada faham Lor?

15. If DAP were to contest, it is the incumbent anyway, it only needs 80% of the non malay votes and only 20% of the Malay votes to win

16. So despite the boastful talks of the pas leutenante, the Malay supremacists infected with DAPphylis and those suffering from divorce from UMNO disease, my bet is, DAP will retain KKB.

Tweet

Read more...

Boycott UMNO. The Malaysian Response.

1. We must rid our world of men with emperor like mentality, IE of men who dictate their fellowmen like beasts of burden.

2. The business of emperor minded people is to rule over, conquer, enslaved, subjugate, hold in bondage their fellow humans. They rule over the misery and suffering of others .

3. When people suffer or caused to be in misery, the emperor minded, the feudal lord hold control over the people . The essence of the emperor minded is the creation of an Orwellian society. A society which is controlled in every aspect.

4. This is what people like Akmal are striving for, to exert absolute control over others on account of them being different . Injury to religious sensitivity is just an excuse to exert supremacy. In this case, racial supremacy.

5. As Muslims, we are angry when our religion is made fun of, ridiculed, treated lightly, opened to contempt etc .

6. As angry as we are, feeling hurt, we don't react unhinged and go on with an orgy of destruction . We agree at being aggrieved but we cannot condone Akmal's mindless violence.

7. It's just using the socks issue to regain UMNOs relevancy and validity.

8. Because as decent human beings we ought to be able to help our fellow human beings. That's the way human beings are. We don't validate our existence by coercing others.

9. We want to live with other's happiness not misery. We don't go on hating and despising others because a small reason provides us an excuse to do so.

10. That's what the socks issue provided Akmal and UMNO. To unleash unbridled hate and violence.

11. Thus far from asserting UMNOs relevancy and validity, it gives 1001 reasons to boycott UMNO.

12. Yes, come one and all, let us boycott UMNO.

13. It seems that cleverness and intelligence has made us unnecessarily cynical and overly suspicious. More than intelligence, we need kindness and gentleness.

14. Behind that baby faced appearance (of Akmal) is an unloved person . Malays are made of better stuff .

15. Perhaps Akmal is suffering from an acute bout of paerodolia. Where people see common inkblots, he sees the figure of a Chinaman brandishing a sword .

Tweet

Read more...

Religion as a sword to kill.

1. In case readers are wondering who the hell Adenoid Hynkel is, let me tell you. He is the character played by Charlie Chaplin in the film 'The Great Dictator '.

2. In Malaysia there's room for everyone.malays, Chinese, Indians and people in East malaysia.we want to live harmoniously with one another. We want to help one another. We don't want to hate and despise another because he is different. Our name is Ahmad, the other is ah chai or bala.

3. Hate and despise is what emperor Akmal has done. This fellow has launched hate politics and with it, hate crimes.

4. You think you can undo what your bloody mouth has said. Up to date there were 2 incident of fire bomb at KK mart premises. You can't say there's no link between what you said and what has happened. The Malay says, terlajak perahu boleh di undur, terlajak kata buruk padah nya.

5. Now you say you want the government take stern actions. When you opened your bloody mouth you want the government to support you. You can't have the cake and eat it, bro.

6. Akmal, the fascist dictator is responsible for the hate politics and the hate crimes that follow his immature outbursts. Immature leader begets immature followers .

7. What is puzzling to us is that throughout the whole anarchic episode, the government has been quiet.

8. The government has not been nimble enough to stop the maniacal politics and has been slow to recognise the bad consequences.

9. There is a joke going around that no interference means doesn't know what to do.

10. Notice or not, what was started by Akmal and his garbage underbosses has not attracted universal condemnations from PAS. Could it be that pas people are more mature than the UMNO youths?

11. Islamic politics to UMNO is that different from the Islamic politics of PAS in this issue. Clearly the Allah socks issue has been leveraged by UMNO for its hate politics.

12. At the root of the flare up of the issue is simply a desire to restore UMNOs sagging relevancy in Malay politics.

13. The hard truth is, the brand of politics surveyed by UMNO is no longer relevant among the Malays. Its hate politics, chauvinism, xenophobia, paranoia and its Don Quixote syndrome are no longer unquestionably accepted by the Malays. The emergence of a sociopath like Akmal worsens UMNOs irrelevancy.

14. UMNO under the full leadership of Zahid fails to see this . So it shoots itself in the foot.

15. This is the area in which Anwar should not interfere. When the enemy is making mistakes, don't gatal2 to correct them. But where actions threaten the social harmony of the nation you must interfere.

16. Didn't UMNO lose badly in the last GE? That is an indication that'd its brand of politics is no longer relevant.

17. Perhaps, it's dying clutch to grab any semblance of relevancy, is to be part of the unity government.

18. Where it hopes to influence the policy of the government. It seems the actions of a sociopath like Akmal brings disrepute to the government's Madani policies .

19. The fatal mistake that Anwar has made is to invite an implacable and incorrigible enemy like UMNO to share power .

20. Is this the UMNO ,PH is considering to work with in the next GE? I say let it die alone .

21. UMNO may have not realised it, that Akmal's conduct has created irreparable and untold damages to UMNO.

22. The immediate effect is Malaysians in general, law abiding and peace loving will reject UMNO. The non Malays except one Chinaman professor will avoid UMNO because of its inherent hate politics.

23. Mad cow Akmal is really head of the militant arm of UMNO. It's purpose is to intimidate, bully and coerce others into accepting what UMNO defines. If UMNO says black is white, all others must also say it's white. No independent thought is allowed.

24. I now want to introduce the concepts of economic predation and economic terrorism. Predation as is normally understood refers to a situation whereby one organism (predator)hunts and kills of another(prey)

25. The predator kills the prey to eat it or for the need to eliminate competition. The lion kills the gazelle to eat it but kills hyenas to eliminate competition.

26. The predator animal in Akmal kiills the prey KK mart to eliminate competition. So that the vacuum could perhaps be filled by others. Therefore we cannot discount the possibility that Akmal is induced by other Mart's or even be on their payroll. Think about that possibility.

27. Economic predation leads to economic terrorism. This is the willful instigation, calls and incitement to destroy the business infrastructure of the prey , in this case KK mart .

28. While the call to boycott purchase of KK mart products is economic predation, the call to close KK mart branches, IE the destruction of business infrastructure, is economic terrorism.

29. Terrorism in any forms, must be met with the full force of the law. Why should Akmal be exempted from being a ' special guest ' of the government? For those of you who have forgotten or don't know ' special guest ' is the title of a book written by former minister, Aziz Ishak

30. What motivates the sociopath in Akmal? The picture of him brandishing a samurai sword only shows his defiance and recalcitrance. What happens if a picture shows a Chinaman holding a Chinese Dao sword?

To be continued. ....

Tweet

Read more...

The socks, the Great Dictator/Malaysian Adenoid Hynkel and Allah.

1. I look at the Allah sock issue this way. It's all politics and political opportunism. It's racist supremacy. It political bullying. It's economic predation by envious group of Malays. It's an attempt to restore UMNOs relevancy within the Malay community.

2. The forced closure of number of KK mart branches is economic terrorism. The UMNO youth and his sex crazed cabal should be arrested for sabotaging business.

3. The thing in issue is the stock of socks with some written material resembling Allah. Closure of the mini markets caused other businesses to be affected. You are creating negative externalities. You must pay for them. The UMNO youth Mafioso and his underbosses must pay for them.

4. The legally sanctioned coercive forces are extra quick to investigate KK mart, but are painfully slow in investigating economic predation and terrorism. They were also slow in investigating a vigilante group forcing a poor Chinaman in a humiliating confession.

5. The authorities should also investigate the chinese muslim evangelist who first firestoned the UMNO youth Mafioso. To see whether he's motivated by envy at the success of KK mart .

6. His own business closed earlier is not caused by KK mart. He may have badly managed his own business. It's his own funeral, lorr.

7. The deafening silence of the minister in charge of religion is puzzling. It should have been him to have raised fire and brimstone over the socks issue. Instead the UMNO youth is the group overshadowing his lethargy. Apa Lah ente, Ustadz.

8. The government must not think we are sedated and comforted, when it says it doesn't interfere over police investigation of the Allah socks issue.

9. It doesn't do the actual police work, doesn't tell the police how to do their work, but it certainly can express its concerns over the issue. The police then would take the cue, sir.

10. Only an irresponsible government will say it doesn't interfere in managing the issue. All forms of extremism, religious extremism etc, and economic predation must be reined in . Otherwise, the pm doesn't have that iron to rule Malaysia .

11. The DAP has gone to see jahid ( that's how kor Meng pronounced that name) probably to restrain mad cow Akmal. But what the no so bright jahid do? In fact the UMNO mkt has expressed unanimous and undivided support to Akmal.

12. The DAP must now publicly condemn akmals economic predation and economic terrorism. Malaysian Chinese in particular will never feel safe. Whatever they do will be looked at as having sinister motives. In the past what the Chinese did were met, not with verbal repudiation but with threats and aggression.

13. That has happened to Ngeh, Ngar, ngar's aged parents, now to KK mart owners. Next will be the Chinese padi growers in Sekinchan because their productivity is higher(?)

14. I suspect the. Chinese don't mind DAP being part of the chapchai government but won't take it kindly if DAP compromises it's principles. Even worse if it is 'uncle tomming'. One of the most explicitly stated principles is to fight against all forms of social injustice. Isn't what is happening to KK mart one form of social injustice?

15. The Allah socks issue does not diminish the Muslim beliefs in Allah, his Angels, the 4 revealed Books, the prophets, doomsday/akhirat and qada and qadar. The Muslim's Iman is not that flimsy.

16. So don't talk pompously about those who don't feel angry in the way Akmal does, have lower Iman.

17. Wtf is Akmal to judge another person's Iman just because he or she does not NOT believe in the 6 tenets of Islamic Iman, but only does not agree with Akmal's narrative of the Allah socks issue.

18. Indeed Muslims are angered over the insensitive writing of Allah on the socks. KK mart has apologised for its negligence on this as demanded and the issue can easily be diffused by recalling the socks stock . But to seditiously call for a boycott and closure of KK mart nationwide is like asking not only the flesh but also the blood and bone. It's economic terrorism -acts designed to destroy the business infrastructure of KK mart .

19. I won't repeat the basis of the Muslim's anger over the socks issue. Much about it has been too late said by the minister in charge of religious affairs. Too late said because of the 'thicky' quality of ministers chosen by Nana Non.

20. The vehemence and the anger, directed at KK Mart's negligence or carelessness are commendable. Except I didn't see the same intensity, vehemence and anger directed at the support given to the person who makan duit dan harta Haram. We are asked to support something Haram. Now, compare the Allah socks issue with the request to support Ali babavum Najib, which one injures our Islamic- ness more? Which one Al fadhil Al Ustadz Akmal?

21. So don't be a sanctimonious bastard asking us to condemn KK mart but not to denounce the unislamic support for makan duit dan harta haram. That is haram more. It's more gravest.

22. The claim that his (Akmal's) actions were done to defend the honour of Islam is phoney. For if that done towards KK mart is for Islam, all the more Malay Muslim's should be asked not support a haram conduct done by Najib .

23. The claim that what he has done is for the sake of Islam is hogwash. He never explained how the socks injure the 6 tenets of Iman. He thinks that our Iman is so flimsy.

24. If it's not religion that motivates this UMNO gadfly what do?

25. His claim and assertion is done without proofs and evidence, so we can dismiss it the same way.

26. He may be motivated by plain envy and the fondness to coerce and bully. Perhaps he is actually racist and chauvinist and has the desire to terminate the business of non UMNO people . It's just economic predation directed at non Malays in general. Perhaps he has the sour grapes mindset - since that business is not done by UMNO, it brings harm to the people. Or maybe, he's trapped within the ideological obsession of UMNOs fascism which sees people who do not subscribe to UMNO authoritarian rule, paranoia and xenophobia are expendable.

27. It's also economic terrorism as closure of KK mart branches nationwide affects the livelihood of thousands including Malays. The closure also affects the patrons of KK mart of all races. These people patronize KK mart because they can buy cheaper and varied items.

28. Isn't it possible that bloody Akmal speaks on behalf of other mini and supermarkets wishing to remove KK mart? Hey, we can get items at KK mart not available at 7E.

29. Are we going to go around living, thinking that whatever the Chinese do, must have sinister motives. If that is so, the Malays are truly a sad race.

30. Akmal has only revealed the true character and what UMNO will become. An extremist, racist, morbid, constantly quarrelsome, paranoid, xenophobic and has the Don Quixote syndrome, always under siege by the Chinese dragon. Sheesh!

31. Those are reasons to justify us rejecting UMNO wholesale. Let us all eulogize and read the talqin over UMNO dead body.

32. I want to now discuss the issue under the headings of political opportunism, polical bullying and coercion, economic predation and terrorism and UMNO attempt to regain relevancy.

33. Many years ago,Ghazali Shafie, then the home minister and UMNO mkt member, during its PAU held up high the Muslim prayer mat/sejadah. He pointed out to a difficult to see a drawing of the Cross.

34. That, he pointed out, a subtle way for non Muslims to undermine the iman of the Muslims.

35. Wah, the delegates clapped and roared at the drama. It satisfied their primordial militant and pugilistic urges. They were ready to mengamuk.

36. But the drama was done at a time when UMNO was strong. It's purpose was to bind the doltish Malays under the stranglehold of UMNO .

37. The present socks drama is done by its main actor, 'bully beef' Akmal Salleh. However it's done at a time when UMNO is a spent force . It's purpose is to restore the past glory of UMNO.

38. It's politics and political opportunism at its best.

39. That political opportunism needs a punching bag. KK mart and it's carelessness over the socks issue provided Akmal with a godsend. It allowed the bully in him to be applied. KK mart was fo
rced into doing things against its will. I am not sure forced apology is valid. It's also forced to close its stores. For good measure young man Akmal, demand the government to revoke KK Mart's license. Best tu .

40. It's the imposition of racial supremacy over KK mart. The Ku Klux Klan section of the UMNO youth can impose it's master race ideology over a subservient race. That's what the Allah socks issue accomplishes .

41. It's also economic predation. The predator hunts the prey to devour it. Calling for the closure of KK mart infrastructure is tantamount to devouring it . The socks issue which is embellished with gusto by Herr leutenante Akmal is also an assertion of the master race on a subject race. It reminds the non Malays, who are Malaysians who is master. As a subject race Akmal wants them to be subservient , obsequious, toadish, kiss-ass and arse kissing race .

42. The point proven by Akmal and UMNO is UMNO is a detestable party. Let all right thinking Malaysians bury UMNO once and for all

Tweet

Read more...

Najibfication and it's effects. Part 2

1. The new word that has entered our lexicon and dictionary or our treasury of words is:-

• A. To najibfy
• B. Najibfication.
• C. Najibfied.

2. To najibfy means to give someone a discount, concession, special treatment, entitlement, privileges etc. najibfication is the process of getting all the above. It can also mean a noun as in being given the above. Najibfied is past perfect and refers to being already given the above.

3. It's now possible for us to talk that the pardons board has najibfied a convicted criminal.

4. It so happens that the person being najibfied and being given a najibfication, a noun is Mohd Najib bin tun Razak.

5. Row row your boat Gently down the stream Belts off, trousers down, dicks out Isn't life a scream

6. Life is certainly a scream - for a neo feudal lords like Najib.

7. For the common reasonable man, the commuter on the KL MRT, on the toon foong omnibus life is a hellish scream.

8. The Terengganu housewife who was caught stealing a few cans of Milo, the man caught stealing money from the surau's donation box and the Penang women convicted for using money not belonging to her but got her account, all got disproportionate jail time.

The sentences they received were regarded fair. They didn't get their sentences reviewed by the pardons board or if their sentences were already completed, did not get any belated apologies from anyone. Certainly their constitutional rights were forgotten.

9. So Where der Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor.. asked us to accept the decision of the pardons board, we can but we don't agree. So we continue to talk. When Herr oberst inFahmy told us not to discuss the issue in the social was that a Kim Jong UN-esque directive? By what authority was he enabled to do that?

10. To many right thinking people, the king was ill advised. The decision was salacious, smutty and lascivious. It was, because the unwanted child resulting from this lecherous deliberation was the commuted already legally completed conviction by the courts The king was wrongly advised by the 5 other members of the pardons board, the PM or anyone else.

11. Perhaps because the decision by the pardons board generates so much dissension, ill will and unhappiness among many right thinking people, especially lawyers, the Bar Council approved a motion to challenge that decision in court. Hail to the Bar Council in keeping this issue, alive.

12. Mind you, this is a legal challenge against the pardons board. It is not a legal challenge against the king.

13. This reminder is made to forestall the possible spins by the UMNO mother effers .

14. The UMNO people, especially its Laurel and Hardy characters, will likely say that this is a challenge against the person of the king. Or they will turn this into a racial issue saying the action of the Bar Council is a challenge mounted by non Malays against Malay legitimacy.

15. The resolution of the Bar Council to legally challenge the decision of the pardons board, might confuse or be pictured as confusing, especially to the UMNO A-holes, but it is not to the majority of people.

16. To the majority of people, the right thinking people, the Bar Council represents the majority of the public to uphold the sanctity of the law and the principle of supremacy of the law

17. To circumvent that and to pursue their nefarious, wicked and flagitious aims, UMNO will certainly use the institution of the king/agong to shield itself and the gross injustice created against objections and uncomplimentary opposition.

18. That reminds us of what Lord Denning said-the purpose of the law is to protect the weak against the strong and the law must not be used as a sword on the weak.

19. Read into our situation the statements translate into the king or the institution must protect the weak against the strong and not used as a sword to cut down the weak

20. Sly UMNO will use the king and the institution to show that it is more royalist than other royalists. In reality its using the king to intimidate and snuff out valid criticisms and objections .

21. If Samuel Johnson said to Pitt, that nationalism is the last refuge of scoundrels, to UMNO, the king is the last refuge of its scoundrelism.

22. The merit to what the Bar Council is doing, is to keep the najibfication issue alive and allow it to be the subject of continued conversation. Three Cheers to them!

23. The trump card played by UMNO or UMNO DNA-ed people is the assertion and claim, that pardoning, clemency are the absolute privilege of the king. There that status cannot be challenged in court .

24. I find that hard to reconcile. The king sits in session with members of the pardons board and is accordingly advised. He does not sit alone and decide. Where the is the 'Absolute' quality?

25. If the king sits in session with members of the pardons board, I would argue that the King loses his 'absolute' stature. Thus any decisions emanating from the pardons board are, in theory challenge-able in court

26. The claim and assertion that the king has absolute privilege or has absolute conduct in general to be untenable. Here are my arguments.

27. If I remember correctly, the late karpal Singh filed a suit against the then agong and another suit against another ruler. The suits failed I think, but the fact that the suits were heard at all, mean that precedents have been created which allow such suits to heard. Don't that mean the absolute privilege stature has been broken?

28. The absolute privilege stature of conduct in any form whatsoever, has also been broken, when special courts to try rulers were created. If I am not mistaken, the Negeri Sembilan ruler was tried by such court and found guilty.

29. Which means that the absolute privilege stature is just a legal fiction. Finally, I think there is the constitutional monarchy argument. Our king's are subject to the constitution right? So where got absolute privilege stature one?

30. Those are my non legal arguments. Lawyers may have more cogent legal argle bargle. If my arguments are found deficient, please argue them out .

31. To me then, those people who insist on absolute privilege stature, especially UMNO apparatchiks and UMNO DNA-ied people all have fascist tendencies or self entitlement mindset.

32. I.e .only Malays are naturally entitled to break the law and not be accountable for them. Or in this case Najib is natural entitled to discounts, special privileges and treatment .

33. What is most shocking to us, is that the PM asked us to accept the decision of the pardons board. And his major domo, the gol and gincu actor asked us not to discuss the issue in social media .

34. Sirs, those are invitations we must politely refuse. The requests are the height of hypocrisy.

35. You realised or not Maa, they are actually defending, supporting and enabling kleptocracy. Steal baby steal!

36. The najibfication incident (our Nanking incident) where justice is massacred,has exposed many chinks in mamu Anwar's armour. It has de-fanged him of his many venomous rhetoric .

37. It showed that he has broken faith with the people , the people no longer trust him as a change agent, he fails to build a Negara hukum and worse of all,through the pardons board, encourage more kleptocracy and abuse of power.

38. Its reformasi alright - more of the same, not change. Reformasi is like eating pasembor, grilled fish or serenading deaf-toned audience with the song 'Azizah'.

39. The ways Anwar can restore public trust and confidence are-try Zahid again. He got a DNAA, which actually means he's guilty but for reasons of expediency, got off the hook, ensure that Najib got his real not discounted comeuppance in the 1MDB case. Unless of course, Anwar wants us to believe that monies can fly or walked on their own into Najib's account. Then Najib can do a MAD's Alfie, ' what me know?' mad comic used to be a favorite of mine. Hope, yours too.

40. I can't help but think of the presence of the pardons board as an anomaly in the law. It becomes a me mechanism to frustrate the finality in the court's decision. It's just a upscaled version of a prisoner review board.

41. At a review board, the board will find ways to reduce a prisoner's jail time. The prisoner will display remorse over the crime, admits the crime, apologizes for it and promises not to repeat the crime. All of which Najib does not do .

42. Yet our pardons board, in absentia seems to acknowledge that Najib does all that and therefore deserves some dispensation, courtesy of Nana Non.

43. I now want to look at this najibfication issue from an Islamic point of view. I regard the decision by the pardons board to be un Islamic.

44. The pardons board has usurped the power of Allah to pardon and forgive. That is the sole unchallengeable prerogative of Allah. By confering upon themselves the power of Allah, they have committed Shirik. Muslim members must bertaubat. Non Muslim members must go to the church, temple or kovil to make confessions and ask for forgiveness.

45. When Muslims read the sayyidul istighfar or numerous other istighfars, what do they find?

46. Among others, they acknowledged they have sinned, they have been unkind to themselves, they have shortcomings etc. They acknowledged that Allah is ever forgiving, they asked Allah to forgive them and they affirmed that Allah is the only One who can forgive and pardon. So readers, how do you reconcile the conduct of the pardons board with the prerogative of Allah?

In the next part, I will discuss the najibfication effects on failure to defend the country against the scourge of corruption, failure to prosper the country, failure to create political stability and bringing disrepute to the country .

Tweet

Read more...

A Dangerous Man in Parliament.

1. The PH government especially those from PKR, Amanah and DAP must be ready for my acerbic criticisms .

2. I tend to speak with candour but with no malicious intent. I support the PH government but will not hold back my criticisms. They are not necessarily correct, but come forward with your arguments.

3. In this essay, we will discuss what many are slow to recognise the near fascist idea of Herr oberst inFahmy.

4. Many are surprised that many MPs have not protested the dangerous idea floated by this fellow. The speaker too has not been sufficiently vigilant to correct Fahmi's erroneous idea .

5. The dangerous idea is this. The cabinet will instruct MPs not lo mislead or deceive parliament. In effect, parliament is a subordinate department of the cabinet.

6. Fahmi does not understand parliament. The business of parliament is conducted by the speaker though house rules. The speaker does not receive instructions from the cabinet. We don't have to read Irskine May to know that. Fahmi , of course doesn't know who the bloke is .

7. An MP enjoys immunity when speaking in parliament. That right is accorded by law. If the speaker fees the mp has deceive, not tell the truth or mislead parliament, he can have that mp referred to the rights and privileges committee. That, after such a motion to refer has been moved by another mp .

8. Speaking of which, why doesn't someone moved a motion to have the Selayang mp referred to the rights and privileges committee for misleading or lying to parliament?

9. Didn't he say that his committee will call the former and present AG to explain the dubious Jahid DNAA?

10. At the close of 2023 parliament business the 2 jokers have not been called. The jokes on us. The Selayang mp lied.

11. Back to the Fahmi business. This young man, who is more interested to see that his hair is combed in place, possibly ensuring his dick is on the go, is a control freak .

12. This young cikku, who's wet behind the ears and only now probably knows how to wipe clean when he pisses , has lately been obsessed with finding all sort of ways to obliterate and silence critics.

13. Which means you can be convicted for thought crimes. Have you thought about what kind of society is compatible with that kind of paternalistic control?

14. It's a kind of George Orwellian society supervised by a committee of temporal dictators. Headed of course by Herr oberst inFahmy.

15. This is the price you get when you have the inclination to appoint young people as ministers. They tend to think more with their dicks than their grey matter. Intelligence is there but wisdom is not .

16. We know, the future belongs to the young but it's not now. It's a case of too much too fast .

17. It does not matter he has since retracted the idea by the usual meandering State. He has shown his Kim Jong Unesque hand. God has mercy on us!

Tweet

Read more...

Initial notes on the acquittal of the masak lomak cili api bozo.

1. In the film 'Godfather 2', the character Hyman Roth said to the character Michael Corleone:- "one by one, our friends have died. Some from natural cause, some despatched of."

2. In a case of life imitating art, in Malaysia, we can say, one by one, the kleptocratic are exonerated. Some got full acquittal, some got DNAAed, some got najibfied.

3. The masak lomak chili API man, Isa Padang mahsyar Samad is the latest to join the gallery of rouges.

4. He has good company. Azeez Rahim, former Sabah CM, bung Mokhtar, Ali babavum Najib, wak jahid and so on.

5. Most of these unjusticiable acts occurred under the watch of the Sungai long Bolshevik, mamu Anwar, Nana Non, the LV liberal and Herr Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor. Is Anwar really a closet umnophile?

6. These events showed that Anwar is really incapable of forging a country ruled by law, where the principle of supremacy of the law is sacrosanct. It is indestructable

7. The full acquittal of the habitually eye twitching bozo, shows that Anwar's claim to build a Negara hukum is a whole load of bs.

8. The judge must have not looked at the mischief at the end, rm1b gone. The monies must have walked or fly into someone's account on their own . That's a first. Money with wings or legs. Only in Anwar's Malaysia.

9. Instead of a Negara hukum, we have a frontier country, where John Gotti Anwar's law reigns. Where the Malaysian Jesse James, Billy the kid , the penyanmun tarbus are let off the hook.

10. This emasculation of the law together with the other things like breaking faith with the people, promises unfulfilled, failure to defend the country against the ravages of corruption, failure to prosper the country and bringing the country into disrepute will certainly affect the PM's political longevity in office.

11. If it concerns only his and pkr's future we don't give a damn. But he is bringing down Amanah and DAP.umno and Barisan nak senang is already a basket case. Not worth to print on paper.

12. If UMNO enters the possible the 6 parliamentary by elections, it's carrying a luggage with tons of bricks. UMNO has 2 chances- slim and none.

Tweet

Read more...

The najibfication episode and the effects on our economy.

1. In this essay, we shall discuss the dis-economic effects of the najibfication incident. There is no such term I think, but it refers to adverse economic effects of the najibfication incident.

2. With the najibfication incident, Anwar achieved these dubious ' failures '.

3. ' najibfication ' is a term in our lexicon which refers to the general discount or waiver or flexibility given to you as a result of your misfeasance, non- feasance or your actions.

4. With the najibfication incident, Anwar has achieved the following unenviable 'honors':- * Breaks faith with the people or rather the people's faith in him to change things is broken. * shows he is unable to rule the country according to law * brings the country dishonour and disrepute * can't stabilise the country * Can't prosper the country

5. This najibfication incident has caused people to lose faith in Anwar Ibrahim as a person who can change. It reminds us of the slogan by the Ragin Cajun, James Carville who famously coined the phrase, change or more of the same. Mamu Anwar seems to fall in the latter category.

6. Or as the great economist, Milton Friedman says, most of the time, the good intentions mouthed by someone will produce the opposite results. That appears to be the case with mamu Anwar.

7. The najibfication incident represents the height in the miscarriage of justice. Of course we have also not forgotten when the 47 charges against Zahid were mysteriously dropped . These 2 black eyes of justice pushes Malaysia into the corridors of infamy.

8. Which leads us to the question of implementing the law, more specifically, the supremacy of the law.

9. It shows that the PM is just inept at implementing the law. His bombastic claims that he wants Malaysia to be a country ruled by law, are just rhetorical and empty talks. The fabled law which is blind as justice is, seems to be the law as defined by the PM. It is determined among other things by the flavour at the moment. The law varies not according to the bishop's nose but by the dilation of mamu's nostrils .

10. If an important principle of supremacy of the law is that no one is above the law, that principle is violated already . Obviously Najib is more equal than the reasonable man on the KL MRT.

11. The convict Najib who stole and makan duit and harta Haram jumps the que and gets an early hearing for his appeal. Ordinary felons get to snail-pace to even get their appeal read.

12. Najib, the PUTERA of the bumis( notice that in the word Bumiputera, PUTERA always appear in front of Bumi) is entitled to get special and privileged treatment. He gets a 'happy ending' after a massaged session by the pardons board. That's orgasmic, man!

13. Probably, as a beneficiary of a pardon himself, pmx ( the x not being a 10 but a name for someone who forgets his ideological roots) the Sungai long Bolshevik and the LV liberal feels compelled to help a fellow bourgeoisie.

14. And as if to mollify public anger, rage and fury over the najibfication incident, the pm says sanctimoniously, that even a convict has a constitutional right to appeal. Sure, every citizen has that right, but that doesn't explain Najib jumps the que and has a better right .

15. Further, PM shockingly says that the decision by the pardons board is fair. That statement deserves an expletive, don't you think?

16. In saying this, PM is showing that he is both irresponsible and insensitive to the judiciary . This is a terrible indictment on the implementation of justice in our country .

17. He implies that the courts have not been fair when remitting sentence to bloody Najib the embezzler-in-chief. The courts especially the court at first instance have not considered the many(sic) contributions of Ali babavum Najib .

18. Patting himself on the back, only him and the uncharacteristically compliant pardons board are capable of doing that. The courts, he implies, are not capable.

19. This is patently untrue. The courts have indeed been too fair to Najib. Some people say, the courts favoured the rich and powerful. Mamu Anwar fortifies that favouritism.

20. The courts, especially the court of first instance have been fair and have taken into consideration, the contributions of the felon. The courts could have tried Najib consecutively instead of concurrently. Then he would have gotten 72 years instead of 12 years jail time. Then even if the pardons board gave a 50% discount on the jail sentence, he would kena 36 years. He would have languished in jail as a wilted old man .

21. There is another thing. By his own admission, the pardons board and he, in the capacity as PM, advised the king. Meaning, the King decided upon the advice of the pardons board including the PM.

22. That debunked and repudiated the spirited assertion by Najib's lead counsel, that the king acted alone.

23. The fact is, the king decided upon the advice of the pardons board and not unilaterally decided. The whole episode would then make the opinion by the bar Council President to be more reasonable.

24. More reasonable than the assertion by Najib's lead counsel. So if many people feel angry about the najibfication episode, don't fault them. They feel the decision by the pardons board is both unjustifiable and unjusticiable.

25. Betrayal of the trust of the people and his inability to forge a country ruled by law with its supre of the law principle and the many promises butchered, will certainly shorten the PM's political longevity. We can discuss that elsewhere though .

26. Betrayal of the people's faith and trust and the confused motion of law will turn Malaysia into an economic pariah . This now, is the subject of our second part of our discussion.

27. The immediate result is to turn Malaysia into an investment -hostile country. We do not need a Moody's like rating to know that Malaysia is rated 'c' for for investments.

28. As a result, the country is able and will only attract the 2nd rate investments. These can be seen if we looked at the undoctored and unspun figures on FDI, on our exports, on cost of living index and inflation etc.

29. By the way, I often wondered as to what kind of goods are included in the basket of goods used to calculate inflation by the authorities? The rate of inflation doesn't match at all with the rise in general price level at all. It makes doubt the official inflation rate of 1 to 2%. Why doesn't the authorities say what kind of goods are included in the basket of goods so that we all can calculate?

30. To top the absurdity, we are regarded as bloody fools by DPM fadzilah , who claimed that investments are highest but cannot be seen. So the fabled investments are invisible and can only be seen by the extraordinary sight of the DPM is it?

31. Then the investments are will o the wisp or jack lantern investments. Their flickering lights seen only by the DPM over the swampy investment terrain crafted by Pakatan hipokrasi, eh Pakatan harapan. Led by PKR -parti kencing Rakyat of course.

32. Malaysia is turning into an economic pariah partly due to historical inheritance. But it's pariah-ness accentuated by many mishandling of the economy by mamu Anwar/Nana Non.

33. The deficit in investor confidence is due partly by the scourge of 1MDB. How so?

34. I have not reached the level of sophisticated thinking that links 1MDB to the falling ringgit, but certainly the adverse effects on the general economy, I can understand.

35. There's a real danger that a successor government such as that helmed by mamu Anwar may also inherit the kleptocratic legacy of 1MDB. Sadly the indications are there.

36. Its already happening. It requires only the existence of 20% bad hats to spoil the broth. Or it takes only a dollop of indigo die to spoil the whole cauldron of coconut milk .

37. Anwar has been dragging his feet investigating or hoping people will forget the alleged corruption levelled against PKR people .

38. Consider the following allegations:- A. The alleged corruption over the award of flood mitigation project from 7b to 11b. And 1b rumoured to end up in some people's pockets.
B. The siphoning of monies meant for NGOs or using the name of NGOs.
C. The controversy surrounding the rushed award of HSR project.

39. Ironically these despicable acts are carried out by parti kencing Rakyat helmed by Nana Non.

40. It's the 20% rule mentioned by Murphy's or Parkinson's law. It only needs 20% bad hats to characterize the organization.

41. If a successor government inherits also the kleptocratic and thieving mentality, then the energies and drive of the government are directed at machinations to enrich people in power instead of enriching the country.

42. That the country is idiotically managed is evident now. The ghost of saying the same thing to the government then, is now haunting mamu Anwar.

43. The deficit in investor confidence is caused by the inheritance of 1MDB- like kleptocratic. mentality. It is further made worse by betrayal of the trust of the people, by many promises unfulfilled. The height of investor deficit is reached by 2 mortal sins commited by Nana Non - the DNAA given to the dumbass Zahid and the najibfication episode.

44. Imagine these unenviable achievements were secured within 1 year's of mamu's rule. If more time were given to mamu, more idiotic achievements will take place

45. All these lend credence to a gloss on Parkinson's law - more idiotic work expands so as to fill the time given.

In the next article, I will discuss the effects of the najibfication episode. Herr Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor and Herr oberst inFahmy told us to accept the decision of najibfication episode and not to discuss the sordid episode. Both invitations we have to politely decline.

Tweet

Read more...

The Sungai long Caesar and the bad rap. Part 3.

1. In this part of my essay,we will discuss the bastards at large. Let me begin by reconstituting some of what Christopher Hitchens said .
   
   
2. In part I become a blogger so I don't have to depend on the press, vlogers and YouTubers for my information.
   
   
3. They either lie, misinform or conspire to form a certain public opinion about an issue.
   
   
4. That is asserted without evidence, can also be dismissed without evidence. Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence. Let us hate stupidity especially in its nastiest forms of racism and superstition. And we hate lazy stupidity couched in emotional hyperventilating.
   
   
5. Don't be seduced by irrational pleadings, however transcendental and pious they appear especially if uttered by silver- tongued maverick like mamu Anwar. Never surrender our independent thinking . Dispute and disagree for disagreement sake.
   
   
6. Don't care two hoots if you are regarded as arrogant or disagreeable person. You want to retain a free spirit of inquiry .
   
   
7. Points 2 to 6 are reconstructed sayings of Hitchens. With that we are ready to discuss the ubiquitous bastards in our community. God, there are many of them. Some people's children. Habis camno !
   
   
8. When Najib got convicted for the SRC crime, after 4 to 5 years, it restored somewhat the people's faith in the Malaysian justice system. It also raised people's expectations,, that perhaps mamu Anwar with his Samy vellu mane, will bring good changes.
   
   
9. But when Zahid got DNAAed and now, Najib got his najibfication, it shatters the expectations. Anwar does more of the same .
   
   
10. It has broken people's faith in him. He's not even a reformist, but a conservative and a revisionist. He wants to restore the business as usual ethos. Only it's now flavored by nasi kandaq
    
    
11. Readers must know that I support mamu Anwar; won't throw him under the bus but will not hesitate to criticize him, speak forthrightly and with candour. But he has to tolerate my colorful and at times pejorative description of him. Mamu, BossNon or Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor etc .
    
    
12. I criticize him to make him aware,to point to what I think are the errors of his ways. This is opposed to PNs criticisms of him, the objective of which is to unseat him. That's why they are constantly conniving to oust him by extra parliamentary and undemocratic ways .
13. There are consequences to the najibfication of the SRC crime. The consequences can't be controlled by mamu Anwar anymore.
    
    
14. First, it shows the inability of Anwar to govern Malaysia as a country ruled by law. If one of the principles of the supremacy of the law is that no one is above the law, that principle is already violated.
    
    
15. By getting a najibfication, it shows that Najib is certainly above the law. He gets an early board hearing, a 50% discount on the jail time and over 70% of the fine imposed . The law varies with the dilation of mamu Anwar's nostrils.
    
    
16. It doesn't matter who has the prerogative to pardon, it is the pardon itself that is contentious. Mamu Anwar seems oblivious to the fact that more people are angry over the pardon. More than the number of UMNO bastards and social media lackeys.
    
    
17. So don't be sidetracked by lawyers argle bargle about who has the prerogative. We, the people, the reasonable man riding the MRT, are not arguing nor interested in who has the prerogative. It's the pardon, stupid!
    
    
18. Anwar appears not to be thinking about this matter seriously. His callous and insensitive remark that Najib got the najibfication was in consideration of the contributions made by the convicted felon, exacerbated people's anger.
    
    
19. That remark was given at the assembly of civil servants in Putrajaya.anwar was too scared to even say it to the public, fearing the backlash from the people.
    
    
20. Remember , it's not the contributions of Najib that are being judged here , but the crimes committed under SRC .
    
    
21. That remark is also a terrible indictment on the justice system administered by the courts, especially the federal court.
    
    
22. Najib's guilt was affirmed by the federal court. That remark makes it appears that the top judges at the apex court, were incapable of appreciating or failed to consider Ali babavum Najib's contributions .
    
    
23. AU contraire, I think enough consideration was given at the apex court. What if Najib's sentence were to run consecutively instead of concurrently? The idiot would have gotten a 72 year jail sentence instead of a watered down 12 years . The 12 years jail time have taken into account his dubious contributions.
    
    
24. 24. There are at least 3 issues here.
    (a). Anwar has broken faith with the people. Or rather people's faith in him is kaput
    (b) his inability to rule a country according to the rule of law
    (c) he has dishonoured, brought the country into infamy and disrepute.
    
    
25. At this juncture, I would like to ask a question not asked by many including the bastard lawyers. Is this najibfication not only retrospective but also prospective? Will it also cover possible felonies under 1MDB?
    
    
26. This najibfication phenomenon will bring terrible consequences upon Malaysia. They are never envisaged by BossNon.
    
    
27. Any of the factors mentioned in #24 or a combination of them will turn Malaysia into a pariah state. Quality investments will stay away from Malaysia. It will attract investments from sharp business people who believe that the law is a negotiable commodity.
28. There is a real likelihood that our economy Will contact somewhat. There will be reduction in our gdp growth .
    
    
29. Domestic investments alone are not enough to compensate for the nett loss in FDI. And contrary to what the Economist Magazine said that the najibfication incident will not affect our Ringgit, it will. Our Ringgit will fare worse against uncle Sam's currency. In the next few months, we will breach the 5 Ringgit to the USD mark.
    
    
30. When that happens, we have to grudgingly accept that our economy is managed by an imbecilic government headed by mamu Anwar. Wasn't Anwar the person who said that the reason why our Ringgit fared badly against the USD, was because the government is run by bangangs? It still is..
    
    
31. There is bound to dissension in the ranks. Only UMNO, which is complicit in the contrived pardon supports PKR. I don't think Amanah and DAP fully agree in the pardon.
    
    
32. There will be an upsurge in corruption and a abuse of positions. For instance, PKR has remained silent over the flood mitigation projects. When they were tendered out by Tuan Ibrahim, it costs us 7b. When it was re tendered by a PKR minister the cost goes up to 11b. And there was allegations that up to 1b will be pocketed by someone. Why the silent treatment?
    
    
33. Now that people feel that Anwar's position is precarious because of the najibfication incident, everybody wants to make hay while the Anwar sun shines.
    
    
34. It's a case, the scum rises to the top. The true colors of UMNO or people DNAed by UMNO values come out.
    
    
35. I am afraid that and others will be discussed in another installment of an article or articles.

Tweet

Read more...

The Sungai long Caesar - Featuring The Inglourious Bastards. Part 2.

1. In the film ' the eagle has landed ' the character Michael Caine says, it's foolproof Hans, I can always see a thorough going bastard when I see one.'
2. But never you mind.' I am a bastard too. I love bastards. I am a bastard begot. Bastard instructed. Bastard in mind. Bastard in valor . In everything illegitimate.'
3. Let me begin with the Bastard UMNO or rather the UMNO bastards. They are tricking us really .
4. Using its right hand, which to Muslims, is used to perform clean tasks,it pompously declares it respects the decision of the king. Really, it's the decision of the pardons board.
5. But really, it uses the name of the king to protect its evil machinations .
6. It uses the name of the king to protect itself from universal condemnations. How can we allow UMNO to use the name of the king to straighten a wet thread? Which is the crime committed by Ali babavum Najib? Isn't UMNO exalting a crime?
7. UMNO makes it seems that it alone is uber loyal to the institution of the monarchy fuyoo, no one is more loyal to the institution of the monarchy than 'oomno'. That's bullshitology. the true loyalists are the the Malay people and peace loving Malaysians.
8. That claim is just for show, fleeting and ephemeral. In the past, during the constitutional crisis, UMNO people said all sorts of nasty things against the monarchy. Plus, they were willing to do all sorts of nasty and shocking things to the Malay rulers.
9. During that constitutional crisis, 7 people were hailed as heroes. They were called the magnificent 7. One of them, is our Fuhrer und Reichkanzlor, Anwar Ibrahim.
10. And as usual, it's left hand is doing all the devious, underhanded and evil machinations.
11. Immediately after saying it respects the decision of the king, showing off its uber loyalty, it launches a signature campaign. The purpose is to agitate for the overturning of the king's earlier and accepted decision.
12. It will launch a Nationwide campaign mobilising the UMNO hoi poloi to actually dispute the decision of the king. A decision done by the king, as said by UMNO
13. That looks suspiciously as sedition to me. Instigating the people to pressure the king to revise his earlier decision. It could lead to enmity towards the institution of the monarchy. The police should investigate UMNO for sedition instead of Tony Pua .
14. The utterances of some UMNO bastards worsened the issue. These utterances were imbecilic and mindless . It's UMNOspeak , what can you expect ?
15. By the way , I use the term bastard not to mean issues out of wedlock. I use it as a generic term to describe obnoxious, irritable, disagreeable, objectionable, bad persons.
16. There was an UMNO bastard who warned others not to let the Najib issue be the cause resulting UMNO to break off from the chapcheung government. Don't talk big. If he has the testicular fortitude, move such a motion at your agm or mkt meeting . See whether it can see the light of day. Perhaps, it will cause the bastard to be expelled from UMNO. Please carry our your threat .
17. The cocky bastard UMNO still refuses to accept that it is no longer the government. It can't dictate the terms of its presence. It must adjust itself as a 'boil' or 'pimple' within the unity government. If it's not happy, then get out . It's a case of come not called, go not asked to .
18. Then, there is this sanctimonious UMNO bastard, who has this habit of quarrelling with non UMNO parties especially with DAP over non consequential matters . As if quarrelling makes him to be seen as a hero and therefore he shouts himself coarse till blue in the face .
19. His behavior is of course reflective of the inherent hubristic and cocky UMNO attitude itself. That is the attitude which causes UMNO to be rejected by the people in the first place . UMNO is not able to see this.
20. With a bastard like this in UMNO, UMNO doesn't need enemies to see its own demise and extinction. Not only does this chap suffers from non compos mentis, forgetting that UMNO is no longer the government, but also suffers from the Don Quixote mentality, seeing that UMNO is besieged by a non existent Chinese dragon.
21. So the bastard tells the UMNO fighting cocks to assert their supremacy by way of brutalizing the non UMNO public especially the non Malays. He advises the UMNO fighting cocks not to be cows pulled by the nostrils. What to do if you are cow-brained?
22. What do you get when you vote UMNO?
    
    • You get a party that uses all underhanded tactics to subvert the law.
    • You get a party that reverses Dennings statement, ' be ye ever so high, the law is above you. In Malaysia, people like Najib and the selected are above the law . Courtesy of BossNon.
23. 23. You get a party whose world view is based on everything extreme and dangerous to Malaysia.
    
    • It is uber nationalist
    • It is uber religious
    • It is uber royalist.
24. But you know these are hollow claims. It projects itself as uber aggressive to stay in power and gets allegiance of ignorant Malays . It's purpose is always to establish a thievocracy or as you know it, kleptocracy. It reaches the height of infamy under Ali babavum Najib.
25. You get a party which asserts its supremacy by faulting, blaming and demonizing all other Malaysians, including Malays who don't subscribe to UMNO world views. It asserts it's supremacy not by its achievements, but by entitlement claims and by virtue they are god gifted Malays.
26. Then there's jolly and Randy Jo, who gives a bizzare advice. He advises all the right mined Malaysians to accept the decision of the pardons board and move on .
27. 27. That advice applies only to those who object the decision. Strangely, it seems to exclude the UMNO fighting cocks.
28. Immediately following a special MKT meeting, discussing the najibfication by the pardons board, UMNO launches a signature campaign and will or has now launched a Nationwide campaign to petition the king to modify his decision.
29. What do you make of these actions? To the reasonable man, these actions are in defiance of the king, dispute his decision and insulting to the king. To me, the police ought to investigate UMNO for insulting the king and not Tony Pua.
30. And yes, a new phrase has entered our lexicon. Its called najibfication which means getting a discount overall, for a crime proven and committed. The first beneficiary of najibfication is Ali babavum Najib himself. Malaysia boleh, lorr
31. We must now reject the narrative given by UMNO on how Malaysia works. It's one that subverts the law unless the law confers benefit to UMNO .
32. The case of Najib represents the obsession of UMNO to bend the law as it were unless the law is below them. Justice to Najib to UMNO is only realised when Najib is completely exonerated. If the law doesn't provide that, it will execute all kinds of evil machinations including getting a criminal pardoned.
33. What does that tell you? It means Malaysia works according to the law as defined by UMNO. We can't accept that. Its discretionary rule instead of rule by objective law, even if the law has creases here and there .
34. The narrative UMNO gives as to what works in Malaysia include the following elements:-
    
    • The law must always be subservient to UMNOs interests
    • Is driven by racial supremacy. Progress is always seen as to whether UMNO Malays dominate other races.
    • Malaysia is driven by ultra religiosity. Islam is used to suppress and discriminate non Muslims.
    • UMNO claims its more loyal to the monarchy than others. Hence our level of monarchism quota determines your Malaysianess.
35. In short, UMNOs weltanshauung is always laced with defiance of the law, extremism in everything, racism, xenophobia and paranoia. It can only enslaved the Malay people by perpetuating mistrust and adversarial social relations. UMNOs prescription is the sure road to serfdom .
36. The fatal mistake committed by BossNon is that he forgets one important reminder given by uncle nick Machiavelli.
37. 'Never bring others to share disproportionate power'. He gives that to UMNO. Fatal mistake , BossNon.
38. UMNO, the implacable enemy is allowed to recover its power base. UMNO now controls Felda, Risda, mara and a host of federal regional development bodies. Lu Mahu mati ka?
39. Tiu Nia Seng, cibai .
40. In the next part of my essay, I will discuss:
    
    • The bastards in the 4th estate , the press.
    • The bastards in the legal profession
    • The politics of the pardons board.
    • The PKR bastards.
41. Hey, I told you people, I support BossNon. I won't throw him under the bus, but that won't deter me from speaking frankly, forthrightly and with candour.
42. Do I care if the UMNO people show me the 2 fingers or call me with unmentionable names? These are no skin off my nose. Like the pontian gnome says, ada Aku kisah?
43. Aku ini bintang jalang
    Dari kumpulan nya terbuang
    Biarpun peluru menembusi kulitku
    Aku akan tetap meradang menerjang
    Luka Dan duka Ku bawa belari Lari
    Hingga hilang pedih peri...

Tweet

Read more...

The Sungai long Caesar. Part 1

1. You can never trust lying UMNO. It pompously said it respected the decision of the king. On the same breath it launches a signature campaign. Brainwashed Malays will sign.
2. The second action negates the 1st one. It actually means UMNO defies the king. It is disloyal. In ancient times a person committing disloyalty was impaled . So, in the next elections, you crucify UMNO punishment
3. UMNO actually disputes the decision of the King. Therefore it has no moral authority to stop other people from disputing the decision .
4. What do you expect from double faced and duplicitous UMNO? Now you know the true colors of UMNO .
5. The agenda of UMNO is clear. Free all crooks
   Exalt the corrupt and the embezzlers.
   Ensure UMNO is led by the elite, the feudalistic minded the decadent.
   Bully all non UMNO people
6. It is clear that UMNO wants to subvert Justice. Justice for them is when the foremost kleptocracy is completely exonerated
7. So they are lawbreakers or even criminals in potentia. The government should have a preemptive provision to put them in jail. After they cause trouble, it's no use jailing them .
8. The existence of the pardons board is an anomaly. If it's created by the constitution , it can also be undone by the constitution. Scrape it .
9. It is an anomaly in the Islamic sense. If you were a Muslim, if you regularly read the sayyidul istigfar, the last sentence says, none has the power to pardon except You .
10. So if mere mortals assume the power to pardon, equaling the power of God, that is blasphemous. Isn't it?
11. Herr oberstleutenant inFahmy Fadzil warned people not to overcomment on the Najib pardon. It may result in punishment. In other words, be quiet, fools .
12. Can you close the mouth of the earthen jar. Closed, it's no longer a jar idiot! Can you legislate silence?
13. I assume he is speaking on behalf of the Fuhrer und Reichkanzlor, Herr Anwar, the dictator perpetuo
14. At this juncture, I would like to repeat something similarly said by Mr Churchill. Never has so much credibility lost by so many over a pardon of a convict .
15. In asking the people to keep quiet over the pardon of the biggest crook, Anwar has indeed ,like Caesar crossed the Rubicon, the point of no return.
16. Anwar has committed the unpardonable sin, which can't be pardoned by the pardons board ie break the faith of millions have in him.
17. It's the Sungai long Bolshevik helping the Bukit Tunku menshevik. A bourgeoisie helping another bourgeoisie.
18. In crossing the Rubicon, ie breaking faith with the people, BossNon seems to utter the words Caesar did, Alea iacta est, the die is cast. Indeed it is, you have shown you don't need the support of people like us .
19. And please Lah sir, don't pontificate to us anymore. It's becoming truer , that anything coming out your mouth are half truths and outright lies .
20. You are fast becoming a case of what is supposed to come out from the rear end of the anatomy, comes out from your mouth .
21. As to what Herr oberst inFahmy said, I can only say something Churchill again said .
22. Never give in never give in. Never , never, never, never. Nahi, Nahi Nahi, Nahi. Never-in- nothing . Except to a higher sense or honour
23. Never yield to force, never give in to the intimidations to a two bit actor. Never succumb to the apparent might of the enemy. Yes sir, inFahmy is now our enemy. People of lembah Pantai, kick him out!

Tweet

Read more...

The scales of injustice. Part 1

I read this joke. A long time ago. In Readers Digest . Younger people may not know of this magazine. It is good for learning the English language .

 
An engineer, architect and an economist were marooned on an island. They have nothing to eat save for a can of baked beans. With no tools, how to open, Maa?

 
The engineer said. We will build a fire to heat the can . It will expand, burst and spill the beans. The architect says. Yes, but unless we build an enclosure, the beans will spill to the ground. Semua habis Lor.

 
In desperation they turned to the economist . The economist safely says, Assume a can opener!

 
Now let us assume that what's reported about Ali babavum Najib is true. Allow me to give a not so a agreeable view .

 
Remember, it's all Assume !

 
Red lips Najib gets a discount on the jail sentence. From 12 years to 6 years. Better than Lazada discount. He also gets a discount on the fine imposed. Tak Tahu bulapa, Lor!
 

Further, red lips Bijan is eligible for a 30% bumiPutra, err, good behavior discount, Najib, the convicted felon, the embezzler-in-chief will be freed sooner .

 
It is therefore safe to Assume that the law has got a vested interest to perpetuate the dumbing down of all right thinking Malaysians. Hooray, Mali kita yam Seng sampai muntah, Maa .

 

 

Isn't this a cause for celebration? Life is certainly a scream. Belts off, pants down,dicks out. Show what they can do .

In the words of the Indonesian poet, Rendra:-
Prostitutes of Kuala Lumpur city
Unite! Bun up your hair, discard your bras
Flag high your knickers
Let the UMNO Roughnecks ravage you at a discount
Then you regret what needed to be regretted
When the UMNO Roughnecks give you STD.
Sarinah
Katakan kepada mereka
Bargaimana Kau dipanggil ke kantor Menteri
Bargaimana ia bicara panjang lebar soal reformasi
Tiba2 tanpa ujúng pangkal
Ia berkata Kau inspirasi reformasi
Sambil tangan nya membuka pakaian mu

 

By now, right thinking Malaysians ought to be aware that the law is like the BN scales, lopsided . Favouring the elite and the feudal bourgeoisie. The ordinary man or woman, caught stealing loafs of bread or tins of Milo, gets sent to jail without mercy
Najib , a member of the decadent aristocracy who stole millions, never showing an iota of remorse and apologising to honest Malaysians gets a ' happy ending '.

Tweet

Read more...

Speeches from the legal mandarins.

1. Her lordship, the CJ said the judiciary was unjustifiably maligned by the inefficiency of others in the legal system.
2. This was presumably in response to the stringent criticisms against the judiciary given the DNAA given to jahid .
3. Zahid was proffered with 47 corruption charges but was given a DNAA upon the request of the AGC.
4. That was a mathematical miracle which can only happen in Malaysia. The outcome of the math varies  with the mood of BossNon. This was a black eye in our judicial history.
5. 
    
   
6. Like it or not, the dropping of the 47 charges will forever be our DNAAgate.
7. We must allow the monologue statement from the CJ to go unchallenged. That statement, from the view of the public seems unduly over sensitive.
8. From the viewpoint of the public, the statement is self serving. It's designed and meant to protect and to preserve the perceived infallibility of the judiciary.
9. Because it's perceived infallibility, any criticisms towards it, are by definition, considered as unjustified. What more if the perceived infallibility is supported by legal acts that preclude any criticisms.
10. You know immediately, that those who like to justify something by acts, are actually intolerant of disagreements and difference in opinions. So, the shut out any dissent, by referring to this or that out. Really their purpose is to keep their turf protected. They are territorial after all.acts, are the refuge of intolerant people.
11. I am inclined to say refuge for scoundrels, as dr. Samuel Johnson did
12. In this 21st century, we should be more tolerant and accomodate dissent not stifle them by some acts or some judicial views.
13. The views attributed to mdm CJ assume the force of law and effectively serve as fetters to difference of views.
14. In America, the 1st amendment provided for criticisms and disagreements through protest. Therefore if some judicial decisions are met with strident criticisms even from noisy and boisterous MPs or from busybodies like I, the dissent comes with the territory .
15. Instead of having recourse to some archaic acts, we should have provisions like the 1st amendment.
16. The speech by madam CJ, surrounded by her regally robed judges is objectionable on the following grounds.
17. First, it confers upon itself the quality of infallibility, it is intolerant of criticisms, it hides behind acts drafted by mortals and probably inherited from the fish and chips imperialist.
18. As long as the people in the judicial fraternity fart, fornicate and menstruate, the judiciary can never be infallible. So, chill, mdm CJ.
19. Nevertheless, the succinct speech by mdm CJ, is like the Chinese cheongsam worn by seductive waitresses in Chinese restaurants. Of course the mp from Kuantan cannot go there as he would be extra gatal.
20. Before we discuss the revealing aspect of the speech, we want to tell the CJ, that the public is keen to know the rationale behind the dropping of the 47 hot potatoes.
21. The dropping of the 47 charges seemed arbitrary, indicating lapses in due diligence,lack of thoroughness and lack of transparency in dealing with high profile cases.
22. May we remind the public that leaders are expected to hold higher ethical standards. The charges initially proffered against wak jahid simply means he has no standards. Yet these are the qualities preferred by UMNO supporters. It must mean that leaders like these and UMNO must be rejected in the next elections. As I have said, let us perform the last rites on the political dinosaur.
23. May we remind the CJ, the public looks at the DNAA issue differently. Not only they are keen to know the rationale behind the dropping of the charges, the issue can undermine public trust in the impartiality of the judicial process and it's transparency.
24. So, despite her consternation about public disquiet, the public has the residual and inalienable right to know the rationale behind the DNAA.
25. So that she gets down from her moral high horse, know that public distrust in the impartiality of the judicial process is increasing.
26. Wasn't it Lord Denning who said that the law is not a technical game to be played only by technical experts, but is a living force to be treated with compassion and wisdom.
27. Dismissing public disquiet and criticisms and doing so by some judicial practice acts, the public is not aware of is neither compassionate nor wise. Indeed, it is disingenuous and hitting below the belt .
28. From the CJ's speech, who the f is the institution which caused the stiff necked judiciary to be maligned and vilified? Confound it!
29. It cannot be the disdainful, contemptuous and held in low esteem SPRM. Somehow they managed to put up investigation material which the judge and the AGC then agreed that there was a prosecutable case.
30. Suddenly and inexplicably, the AGC did a volte face. They went back on their words and applied for a DNAA. An abortion done at a late stage is very perilous to the health of the judiciary. The DNAA for Zahid, is the height of absurdity.
31. The one to blame is the AGC. Going back on its own words, is a sign of a sign of absence of amour propre, a sign of capricious and whimsical conduct. It certainly indicates a lack of due diligence on the part of the AGC.
32. At this juncture, I must share with you what my friend, Zaid Ibrahim once told me. 'Judges and lawyer are like eggs. We have grade A, B and C'. With the DNAA against Zahid, I see many egg heads in the AGC.
33. They are good- in the standards of grade C eggs
34. As if in defiance or feeling guilty, the AG said the AGC is under no obligation to explain to anyone, it's decision to withdraw its case. He cited some acts to that effect. 
35. Perhaps that is your prerogative. But Mr smart Alec AG and Mr little Napoleon, that is a wrong message to the public.
36. The message to the public is, you are not accountable for your actions. That cannot be. We are not hooligans, knaves or irresponsible fellows  . The law,bit seems assists in a fundamental mischief. There must be something wrong with the law .
37. The usage of law acts to justify, preserve your status quo or to benefit you , is generally unconscionable.  To me, you just cannot argue your case. Often acts are the refuge of scoundrels. It really reveals you are a closet freedom hater .
38. The point is, ' let a thousand flowers bloom'. 

How the public sees the process of justice is depicted as follows:-

Under these circumstances, they won't be silenced.

Tweet

Read more...

To ban Netflix's man on the run or not to ban. That is the question for BossNon.

1. Businessmen who have monopolies, licences, concessions are in the main enemies of the free market. Yes, they are all for the free market, except they don't want the ethos of the free market applied to them
2. They rush to Putrajaya to get special tax rebated, they want cheaper loans and government assistance, they want to preserve their monopolies.
3. When sapura is in trouble, it wants the government to help them. Nobody touches the monopoly on rice while saying publicly, we want to sort out the rice problem.
4. Bossnon doesn't really want to dismantle the monopolies, even when saying loudly he wants to break up the monopolies.
5. Bossku is all for freedom to compete for all party positions, except don't challenge the ketua bahagian2 post. If possible he wants the position till eternity.
6. Bossku, his lawyers, his psycophants and his major domos are all for freedom of information, freedom of the press etc. Except when they affect his interests.
7. So they pester and petition BossNon and the authorities to have Netflix's 'man on the run' be taken off from being communicated in any form.
8. The lawyers say pompously, the documentary is prejudicial to the interests of bossKu Ali babavum Najib. If the documentary were complimentary of Najib, his psycophants and majordomos, would embellish it with unbridled gusto and lustful appetite.
9. In fact, the nextflix rendition is boring and make it out that UMNO is composed of heroic and righteous people.
10. So, BossNon and the bungling and inept communications minister should not pay heed to the pleadings of bossKu's lawyers and other psycophants to unfree the nextflix documentary. Nahi, Machas.
11. Indeed, if the communications minister were politically savvy, he would air the stories about SRC international and 1MDB so as to inform the people.
12. Instead, he is more interested to ensure his hair is combed properly and his hair is in place, tries to look more handsome and perhaps make sure his 'dick' is ever ready.
13. In the meantime, he announces his big data project to hide the fact that he is doing a lousy job as Malaysia's Joseph Goebbels.
14. So, BossNon, see the quality of your people. I must admit that he is my friend, but won't treat him with kids gloves.
15. Sorry for the digression, back to the nextflix issue. There is absolutely no justification to ban the documentary, unless it harms 3rd party .
16. In this case, only the interests of Ali babavum Najib are affected. No harm is cause to the public at large. And some UMNO apparatchiks may be offended but they are few in number. Ignore them .
17. This follow the principle laid down by J.S. Mill( the economist), not a lawyer I am afraid lawyers may not know who Mill is .
18. The principle is this. There is no justification to use power against a person's own will, unless the use of that power is to prevent harm the issue causes to 3rd parties. The negative externalities argument.
19. Najib's private interests, moral or emotional are none of our concern. But the interests of the public at large, save for a few UMNO psycophants, are. The public wants to know what is going on . That need shall not be denied by an intolerable executive ban on the nextflix documentary.
20. That freedom of information must include access to any media publications, however obnoxious they may be regarded.
21. Lawyers for Najib say the publication of the Netflix documentary is prejudicial to Najib's defence. Let's take them on this issue.
22. Isn't that kind of argument an insult to the intelligence of the judges? It means, they are not capable of forming objective decisions. That they are easily swayed and easily influenced by some bitchy stories.
23. This issue really is a litmus test to show whether the people articulating the issue believe in freedom or not . Clearly the lawyers for Najib and UMNO psycophants, like the monopolist businessmen, want freedom for every one. But when their interests are not favourably accounted, they want special treatment.
24. The government must show whether they are on the side of private bourgeois interests OR on the side of the interests of the mustadafin/lumpenproletariat.
25. In a sense, how the Netflix issue is being played out, it is the manifestation of where the entitlement mentality is being challenged.
26. The Malay elite and bourgeoisie believe they are entitled naturally for special treatment and privileges, entitled to their demands etc. These are being challenged by the unhindered airing of Netflix's man on the run.
27. If the government accedds to the requests of these reactionary buggers, it's affirming the self entitlement mentality.
28. As to the documentary itself, it's a very boring film, yawn-worthy and only makes the ang-mohs heroes .

Tweet

Read more...