A common man's view on the DNAA to NFA. Preliminary views. Sontoloyo series no 74.

1. Let me begin with an axiom. A self evident truth, position taken, a statement which are unprovable, don't require proof. It serves as an unshakeable foundation.

2. In economics, philosophy or maths, it's often termed as a given.

3. My given or axiom is I support Anwar Ibrahim. Our PM.

4. But support doesn't mean to agree in everything he does it's not like giving him carte blanche.

5. Right now the thing that people and I disagree is Zahid being given NFA .

6. Despite the assertions of somebody and anybody for that matter, that the NFA decision was entirely made by the AGC and AG, nobody believe them.

7. The only people who believe the lie are the UMNO people. That specie of Malaysians who believe they are shielded from the rule of law, from the supremacy of parliament and from justice.

8. That specie of Malaysians, who want to use politics to secure a full pardon to the biggest kleptocrat in the world.

9. So why should we lend our support to a party which is no respecter of the law?

10. Compared to the kleptocrat in chief, what the Javanese Neanderthals did was sap sap suey. Deserving of kautim in the form of NFA

11. Very swiftly the Javanese Neanderthals pompously said, the truth( read the lie) has prevailed. He quickly instructed his lawyers to file for full acquittal.

12. Hello tuan, the party that says you are not guilty is the AGC which announcement was made by the now despised AG.

13. I thought the only authority which can pronounce one guilty or innocent is the court .

14. The shyster lawyer in some, using law acts which intimidate common people retorted that the authority to declare NFA and not guilty is statutorily provided.

15. Then to us common people, using common sense and rational logic, that statutory provision is wrong.

16. While the AGC can declare NFA, the power to declare guilty or innocent must vest in the court, ruled by the judge

17. If the AGC has statutory power to recommend NFA, then the court must have the residual power to declare guilt or innocence..

18. The finality of this case can only be determined by the court, not the AGC.

19. Please la, AGC, don't lecture us on finality or closure and don't say to us, further investigations by AGC and SPRM , justified giving the Javanese Neanderthals an NFA and at the same time a proof that our judicial system has integrity .

20. The integrity of our judicial system isn't established by a unitary insistence that's it's so.

21. The integrity must be explained rationally and logically. The AGC has not explained away 1 important thing

22. The much touted further investigations by AGC and sprm have not explained away the initial ruling that there was a prima facie case .

23. Tell us , which part of further investigations erase the prima facie ruling?

24. If there are non, the trial must continue .

25. Whatever it is, the AGC must go back to court to tell the judge he has erred to have based his ruling on incomplete investigations then.

26. Now you see why I disagree with some crucial things under the PMs watch.