A common man's view on DNAA, NFA and DAA. Part 2. Apa da? Sontoloyo series 78.

1. When the AGC announces NFA for Zahid komedi, it didn't go down well with the public.

2. Public responses shouldn't be decried upon. People have the right to air their thoughts.

3. People are surprised and asking, why is the AG so spirited in justifying the NFA to Zahid.

4. Doing so, he's politicizing the issue. Entering the realm of politics, the AG displays his amateurism.

5. That shows that intelligence in law does not transfer automatically into politics .

6. He therefore opens himself to varied thoughts from those more well versed in the art of politics.

7. It's as though he needs and uses politics to reinforce his legal decision.

8. Is that extra judicial means?

9. If we didn't allow political pressure from helping out the kleptocrat in chief, why do we allow political pressure to favour the Javanese neantherthal?

10. Let's be consistent. Let law and facts determine the fate of the Javanese neantherthal.

11. Please enlighten us , which part of your exhaustive investigations, nullify the prima facie ruling?

12. Aren't you really saying the judge then, was a thicky?

13. The whole episode, suggests that some fierce horse trading must have been transacted between the powers that be

14. From a purely political cost benefit analysis, if the horse trading entails the Javanese neantherthal becoming 100% pliant to the boss man PM, I am all for it .

15. It would be a waste if the plight of the Javanese neantherthal is not turned into something profitable for the PM and PH.

16. If this issue can make UMNO into a complete useful idiot, why not?

17. I would make sure UMNO remains completely submissive and pliable. Rein in mad dog akmal and other noise makers.

18. Otherwise let these people run amok in UMNO giving them enough rope to hang themselves and destroy UMNO.

19. Come GE16, UMNO is a limped dick which has finished it's biological mission .

20. If the PM thinks along these lines, he is a strategic thinker and an astute politician.

21. Hidup Nana Non!

Tweet

Read more...

A common man's view on DNAA, NFA and DAA. Apa da? Sontoloyo series 77.

1. To a common man such as I, the decision of the AG in giving Zaid an NFA is plainly wrong . 

2. The AG must have relied on a statute. Perhaps article 145(3) of the constitution. 

3. Hence, the AG thinks he has a safety net. He thinks he's safe 

4. The common man, the one one who rides the KL rapid bus, does not think so. He thinks the AG has violated and butchered article 145. 

5. That article gives the AG the discretion to do good, not to do something unconscionable. Giving Zaid an NFA,the common man believes, is unconscionable. 

6. The sadder thing is, judges seemed to countenance the frolic of the AG in the woods. In the end, the AG pisses on you all. And all you can say,mmm, the piss tastes neck licking good. Dammn good! 

7. If judges keep quiet, condoning the violation it would seem all of them partipate in a group sex. 

8. If the AG can fall back on this statute, judges must have a residual right conferred by statute also, to affirm or reject the recommendation 

9. Not because the judge suka2, but because the judge carries the weight of public opinion which says, Zahid is guilty . 

10. In the court of public opinion, the public is saying, up yours Mr AG. 

11. I would very much like to see people from the bar council argue this case before a fearless judge 

12. The AGC nor the SPRM have not explained away, which part of the exhaustive further in vestigations, have erased the earlier finding of the judge then, that there was a prima facie case? 

13 .your legal argle bargle may convince the man on the Clapham omnibus or the man riding the KL rapid, but convincing an inquisitorial minded judge is another matter . 

14. Especially if it's before the same judge you are applying full acquittal. In effect,you are saying he's stupid for basing his prima facie decision on incomplete material 

15. Unless the AG has kau tim the judge to follow what the AGC requests. 

16. If that is so, then what Zaid Ibrahim, himself a lawyer told me once . 

17. Lawyers and judges are like eggs. They come in grades. A to E. E being the lowest. 

18. Let's see what grade, the judge hearing the acquittal application falls into. 

19. The AGC doth protest. We have full ownership of the application for full acquittal. We can do anything with it 

20. Wrong! The DNAA has become and the application for acquittal will become state owned . The AG tak boleh cakap apa. The judge will decide. 

21. It's not up to AG to declare finality or say zaids NFA is over once and for all. Don't rob that prerogative from the judge. 

22. It's not over until the fat lady sings. 

To be continued.,..see? Only I can declare the article's finality.

Tweet

Read more...

A common man's view on the DNAA to NFA. Preliminary views. Sontoloyo series no 74.

1. Let me begin with an axiom. A self evident truth, position taken, a statement which are unprovable, don't require proof. It serves as an unshakeable foundation.

2. In economics, philosophy or maths, it's often termed as a given.

3. My given or axiom is I support Anwar Ibrahim. Our PM.

4. But support doesn't mean to agree in everything he does it's not like giving him carte blanche.

5. Right now the thing that people and I disagree is Zahid being given NFA .

6. Despite the assertions of somebody and anybody for that matter, that the NFA decision was entirely made by the AGC and AG, nobody believe them.

7. The only people who believe the lie are the UMNO people. That specie of Malaysians who believe they are shielded from the rule of law, from the supremacy of parliament and from justice.

8. That specie of Malaysians, who want to use politics to secure a full pardon to the biggest kleptocrat in the world.

9. So why should we lend our support to a party which is no respecter of the law?

10. Compared to the kleptocrat in chief, what the Javanese Neanderthals did was sap sap suey. Deserving of kautim in the form of NFA

11. Very swiftly the Javanese Neanderthals pompously said, the truth( read the lie) has prevailed. He quickly instructed his lawyers to file for full acquittal.

12. Hello tuan, the party that says you are not guilty is the AGC which announcement was made by the now despised AG.

13. I thought the only authority which can pronounce one guilty or innocent is the court .

14. The shyster lawyer in some, using law acts which intimidate common people retorted that the authority to declare NFA and not guilty is statutorily provided.

15. Then to us common people, using common sense and rational logic, that statutory provision is wrong.

16. While the AGC can declare NFA, the power to declare guilty or innocent must vest in the court, ruled by the judge

17. If the AGC has statutory power to recommend NFA, then the court must have the residual power to declare guilt or innocence..

18. The finality of this case can only be determined by the court, not the AGC.

19. Please la, AGC, don't lecture us on finality or closure and don't say to us, further investigations by AGC and SPRM , justified giving the Javanese Neanderthals an NFA and at the same time a proof that our judicial system has integrity .

20. The integrity of our judicial system isn't established by a unitary insistence that's it's so.

21. The integrity must be explained rationally and logically. The AGC has not explained away 1 important thing

22. The much touted further investigations by AGC and sprm have not explained away the initial ruling that there was a prima facie case .

23. Tell us , which part of further investigations erase the prima facie ruling?

24. If there are non, the trial must continue .

25. Whatever it is, the AGC must go back to court to tell the judge he has erred to have based his ruling on incomplete investigations then.

26. Now you see why I disagree with some crucial things under the PMs watch.

Tweet

Read more...