A common man's view on DNAA, NFA and DAA. Apa da? Sontoloyo series 77.

1. To a common man such as I, the decision of the AG in giving Zaid an NFA is plainly wrong . 

2. The AG must have relied on a statute. Perhaps article 145(3) of the constitution. 

3. Hence, the AG thinks he has a safety net. He thinks he's safe 

4. The common man, the one one who rides the KL rapid bus, does not think so. He thinks the AG has violated and butchered article 145. 

5. That article gives the AG the discretion to do good, not to do something unconscionable. Giving Zaid an NFA,the common man believes, is unconscionable. 

6. The sadder thing is, judges seemed to countenance the frolic of the AG in the woods. In the end, the AG pisses on you all. And all you can say,mmm, the piss tastes neck licking good. Dammn good! 

7. If judges keep quiet, condoning the violation it would seem all of them partipate in a group sex. 

8. If the AG can fall back on this statute, judges must have a residual right conferred by statute also, to affirm or reject the recommendation 

9. Not because the judge suka2, but because the judge carries the weight of public opinion which says, Zahid is guilty . 

10. In the court of public opinion, the public is saying, up yours Mr AG. 

11. I would very much like to see people from the bar council argue this case before a fearless judge 

12. The AGC nor the SPRM have not explained away, which part of the exhaustive further in vestigations, have erased the earlier finding of the judge then, that there was a prima facie case? 

13 .your legal argle bargle may convince the man on the Clapham omnibus or the man riding the KL rapid, but convincing an inquisitorial minded judge is another matter . 

14. Especially if it's before the same judge you are applying full acquittal. In effect,you are saying he's stupid for basing his prima facie decision on incomplete material 

15. Unless the AG has kau tim the judge to follow what the AGC requests. 

16. If that is so, then what Zaid Ibrahim, himself a lawyer told me once . 

17. Lawyers and judges are like eggs. They come in grades. A to E. E being the lowest. 

18. Let's see what grade, the judge hearing the acquittal application falls into. 

19. The AGC doth protest. We have full ownership of the application for full acquittal. We can do anything with it 

20. Wrong! The DNAA has become and the application for acquittal will become state owned . The AG tak boleh cakap apa. The judge will decide. 

21. It's not up to AG to declare finality or say zaids NFA is over once and for all. Don't rob that prerogative from the judge. 

22. It's not over until the fat lady sings. 

To be continued.,..see? Only I can declare the article's finality.