What is to done? Let me story you ( biar saya cerita pada you) Contrarian essays no 18.

1. I won't talk about defending the lofty ideals of independence of the judiciary and defending the ideal of judicial appointments. Others more qualified than I, can talk about that .

2. I refuse to weaponise the present judicial uproar to hit at the mamak padukang who on every Friday will be in a well dhobi prayers attire.

3. There are ample grounds with which to wallop Anvar Ebraheem. Breaking the faith of people believing him as a change agent, the many promises not kept, the betrayal of reformasi and so on .

4. The judiciary as an institution isn't worth over defending and protected. It's not the sacred cow as we think it is .

5. Corruption is rampant and the cancer is also ravaging it.

6. I hear the lawyers through their brown shirted organization will do a walk for the judiciary.

7. I'd rather participate in a walk for a corruption free judiciary, or walk for the affirmation of the rule of law and supremacy of the law, or lawyers against house arrest and the like.

8. But as usual, these lawyers who think highly of themselves, will organize a walk in support of some hazy cause and expect the people to support them! Up yours!

9. It will be a circus. After the walk, some will adjourn to the Selangor club and other watering holes , drink copious amounts of beer and engage in table thumping debates.

10. Others will adjourn to some cafes, sipped latte and also engage in animated debates. A lawyers job is done isn't it?

11. That's the conduct of the cafe latte socialists, the Hampstead liberals, the LV and Limousine liberals, the smoked salmon and gauge caviar leftists, the Gucci communists and the Birkin bitches.

12. We don't like the changing of the guards. Since it does not follow a set of rules which WE think it ought to follow it must be wrong. Itu maciam?

13. Type B justice and grade C egg standard judges replace type A justice and grade A egg standard judges, we don't like it. Can that transition be called a judicial crisis?

14. If we don't like it, move a motion of no confidence against Anwar Ibrahim or punish him accordingly in the 16th GE.

15. Its a lot safer for me to stick to the politics of the issue.

16. I have told that PKR can do 2 things. Sack the renegade 9 or does nothing but eat humble pie .

17. What the renegade 9 did amounted to gross insubordination and actually is a revolt.

18. The only option opened to PKR,if it has honour, self pride and amour propre, is to sack the renegade 9 .

19. As it turns out, PKR chose to swallow it's pride and does nothing except strenuously and unconvincingly say, it accepts the conduct of the renegade 9 with an open heart

20. How artificial and farcical this response is. If that conduct was carried out by a stray member, that person would unhesitatingly be kicked out of PKR. This was done by Rafizi and gang, all MPs. So it must be treated gingerly .

21. PKRs reaction confirms me that it is a pondan party. No self respect, no honour and no amour propre.

22. It can only u ashamedly say , we accept with an open heart. We are a party that celebrates difference of opinions. FU la.

23. It's like the victim saying to the rapist. Do whatever you want, but do it gently - I am still a virgin. See, I open up my legs. You will get abused anyway and will be repeatedly.

24. Please forgive that macabre analogy. Please ladies and gentlemen.

25. You will notice a number of things wrong with PKRs response .

26. PKRs response was made by a member of its politburo. By the thuggish and fart faced home minister.

27. Not by any of the VPs or by the newly minted DP.

28. Two things can be read from there. First, Rafizis criticisms are treated as trivial . That being so, Rafizi can respond with more toxic criticisms.

29. Let's see how open hearted and magnanimous PKR is .

30. 2ndly, Saifuddin is so thicky, he doesn't realize he's an expendable material.

31. If anything goes wrong with his response, he will be blamed for it..what if now the component parties of the unity government come out with their criticisms?

32. Would PKR still be open hearted and remains a party that celebrates difference in opinions? Tiu kaw!

33. Eventually and ultimately, PKR would have to sack the renegade 9. It has to do this to show it's a party that has discipline, self respect and amour propre.

34. And Rafizi and gang will not be rushing to join the reactionary parties like UMNO, pas or bersatu. Rafizi once shook hands with me but refused to do so with azmin following that, giving the excuse his hands are dirty. But he just shook hands with me.

35. Rafizi and gang will remain as independent MPs. He won't be curtailed in any way in his criticisms.

36. In the meantime, it would be prudent for Rafizi to ask his friends who are already members of any political party to form a new political party.

37. To get ready a vehicle to participate in the 16th GE.

38. PKR would have to send someone to pacify and persuade Rafizi. Who can it send?

39. It cannot send Kak Wan who will be regarded as guilty by association. Nor can send the new PKR leadership which will be regarded as too antagonistic.

40. PKR cannot send DAP people whom Rafizi does not trust. He has said so previously.

41. It can only send AMANAH people. Not bang mat whom Rafizi regards as a buffoon and a court jester .

42. The only 2 people whom Rafizi respects are possibly Dr dzulkefli and Khalid samad.

43. That's why I say the array of choices available to Rafizi are so numerous that they eclipse the intrigues of a Cao Cao and the brilliance of a Zhuge Liang.