The midget tattoo says, it's an addendum, it's an addendum, it's a titah. Contrarian essays no 21.

1. If all the UMNO divisions were to press the government to implement the substance of the addendum, it must say no.

2. How can the government be complicit in the furtherance of a crime? How can the court does so?

3. As for UMNO, who cares! It has shown it has total disregard for the law. Unless it profits them .

4. Let umno digs its own grave. We will happily give it the last rites .

5. Mari kita ramai2 talqinkan UMNO!

6. In writing about the judiciary issue, I said I am prepared to accept a judicial Phillips curve.

7. Type B judiciary replaces type A judiciary.

8. The quality of judiciary decreases( it's a matter of subjective perception) but the conviction of high profile cases increases .

9. I can buy that. Dealing with mischiefs is better than being caught in philosophical arguments about judicial independence. Over cups of latte, ok la .

10. But I must quickly hasten to say that's it's a matter of subjective perception that the new judicial team is a type B team .

11. The new team headed by the new CJ, PCA and chief judge of Sabah and Sarawak maybe equally competent as the previous one .

12. The acid test will be how will they handle the high profile cases I mentioned in previous articles.

13. I have a few issues in mind. Will we see a quick refiling on the cases of those given DNAA, which the public see as unjust .

14. Can we see a robust and revolutionary over ruling of the ruling of the pardons board? I will give my reasons later

15. Can we see an inglorious end to the damn addendum issue?

16. Or horror of horrors, do we see the CJ having to recuse himself whenever cases involving UMNO people come up before him?

17. After all, he was an UMNO deputy minister once . Definitely there will be suspicions of biasness.

18. Let's start from the beginning. Start with the pardon by the pardons board. It's not quite constitutional. Here are my reasons.

19. It's legally incorporated yes but not enough constitutional.

20. It doesn't comprised of a number of federal court judges, the executive and a number of the legislature, excluding the idiotic FT minister.

21. It's not a microcosm of the 3 branches of government - the executive, legislature and the judiciary.

22. It's an inferior body and being such is subject to the oversight of the federal court. The FC can overrule or confirm its proceedings. Better to overrule them.

23. That means the pardon of the object causing the cause celebre is not quite valid!

24. But hold on feller, didn't the pardons board created by the constitution itself?

25. Yes, but surely the constitution does not intend to create a body that shoots it in the foot. Right?

26. If the legal stature of the pardons board is arguable, then it follows its proceedings and findings are also arguable.

27. It's careless to give this particular chap a pardon.

27(b). Further, we can't allow a body like the pardons board to usurp the powers of the executive legislature and judiciary. The federal court must stop this trespass.

27(c)..I would also like to ask this question. Pardon my ignorance. Does the authority of the pardons board extend to determining the place of incarceration?.

28. If there's none, the pardons board may be acting ultra vires.

29. The stature of the addendum is even more precarious. The stature of the pardons board it itself disputable, the stature of the addendum more fragile.

30. The addendum is a product of a contestable board. It's a separate, distinct and altogether another adjunct document.

31. It ought not be given the same legal stature as the main pardons board document. It wasn't done contemporaneously furthermore.

32. The stature of the addendum is not settled yet.

33. The najibers and UMNO are asking the government to implement a subject matter in a document not yet settled in law. Tablay itu maciam tamby!

34. The government too faces a serious believability problem

35. I was sure Saifuddin showed the minutes of the pardons board to all and sundry. There was no mention of an addendum.

36. When did he realize, aik ada addendum. If so, why didn't he make another PC? Very careless of him .

37. But what are we to do? Anwar likes to surround himself with idiots and morons. Perhaps to make him appear most intelligent.

38. Yes, the signs are clear to the government and the UMNO president.

39. That UMNO is full of shit- people who will disregard the law, unless it profits them.

40. If UMNO disregards the law, speak for itself, not for all Malaysians .

41. Because of these reasons, the government ought to ignore the addendum.

42. Don't you see the ridiculousness of the proposition? Let's assume the chap is placed under house arrest. Then he is found guilty of the charges of IMDb. Will he then be unceremoniously hauled back to Kajang spa resort?

43. The najibers and UMNO harken to the days when you cut open a lady's tummy to retrieve pieces of jackfruit taken from the sultan's orchard. Puhleez.