What is to done? Contrarian essays no 17

1. In my previous article, I said I am willing to accept a judicial Phillips curve.

2. That is, type B justice replaces type A justice. Provided type B justice is put to many good use .

3. Such as overruling Najib's pardon. Because the composition of the pardons board does not reflect the 3 branches of government. We cannot allow a pardons board to usurp parliament. Najib does not deserved a pardon.

4. Such as filing fresh suits on those who got DNAA.

5. Such as bringing a finality on the blasted addendum issue.

6. Such as ruling that no house arrest is available for criminal cases. Didn't wak Zahid once said, it's not provided for in the constitution?

7. Such as applying the law on all crooks- UMNO as well as PKR lanuns

8. Suçh as reopening cases like that of Reza Aziz and other dubious cases.

9. Such as making a law that says corruption cases must be wrapped up within 3 years. We don't want a situation described by Keynes ' in the long run, we are all dead'.

10. The federal court must direct the government to build a new detention center for convicted corrupts.

11. Please Nana Non, choose me as contractor. No tenders. 12. If these can be achieved under type B justice, the pragmatist in me am willing to accept the judicial Phillips curve.

13. These shock the system measures may even overwhelm the Yusof rawther case. People may forget the neck licking good case .

14. But comrade Rafizi has widened the issue somewhat wanting us to be concerned with something of a universal principle in nature.

15. He wants a RCI on the appointment of the CJ and other judicial appointments.

16. He fears that some unscrupulous persons will arrange for the appointment of a more compromisable CJ and other judges.

17. But the thing with RCI, working paper or white paper is that they won't achieve anything.

18. It will occupy valuable space on my bookshelves and make for interesting bed time reading.

19. Unless it's an inquiry done by a reputable judge like what lord Denning did in the profumo case.sometime ago.

20. Talking about some jokers messing with judicial appointments, that's correct, correct what you hear, maybe this is something new to comrade Rafizi.

21. A lawyer told me that some lawyers pasang their kakis to negotiate and kautim judges. Or they do it themselves.

22. I think sometime ago I wrote about a friend, an ex mb for that matter , sending me data showing that the incidence of corruption is highest among the judiciary.

23. Maybe a RCI should also include an inquiry of corruption in the judiciary.

24. In addition to a RCI, bring the battle one step further.

25. Why don't Rafizi himself move a motion of no confidence against the PM? That would be humongously shocking! 26. That would certainly entail Rafizi being sacked from PKR. That is definitely neck licking good.Which brings me to the next issue.

27. Given the much ballyhooed PC by Rafizi, what would PKR do to the renegade 9?

28. It's a question once asked by Lenin - what is to be done?

29. The only option opened to the PKR SUA, is to issue a show cause letter leading to eventual sacking of the renegade 9.

30. This is necessary to show that PKR has got self respect, amour propre and has got discipline.

31. Not a political party consisting of the riffraff and bottom feeders.

32. That option has got problems. The SUA can't just kowtow to the demands of the riffraff.

33. If PKR sacks the renegade 9, it would be left only with 22 MPs. Smaller in number than blasted UMNO.

34. UMNO will become more bellicose and petulant. Akmal will be in a state of perpetual non compos mentis. 35. If PKR doesn't sack the renegade 9, it will be in constant upheaval.

36. The choices available to Rafizi are so numerous that they overshadow the intrigues of a Cao Cao and the brilliance of a Zhuge Liang.

37. Read the romance of the three kingdoms or watch the tv series .

38. PKR sacks the renegade 9. They become independent MPs. Who will they join?

39. I will discuss the possibilities in the next chapter of this story.