Copyright Notice

All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, distributed, or transmitted in any form or by any means, including photocopying, recording, or other electronic or mechanical methods, without the prior written permission of the author, except in the case of brief quotations embodied in critical reviews and certain other non-commercial uses permitted by copyright law. For permission requests, write to the author, at the address below.

Sakmongkol ak 47

ariff.sabri@gmail.com

Saturday, 13 December 2025

Inconvenient and irritating questions. Sontoloyo series no 59

1. There were many media postings glorifying and celebrating one particular person who was the main figure in a series of bribery scandals, beginning in Sabah.

2. He was recently arrested by the SPRM people. Made a big issue of that and a ruckus

3. He alleged guns were pointed to him. Or put in fear of some bodily harm. Assaulted.

4. During the arrest process, he seemed to be resisting it. And he was heard shouting many things

5. His actions were surprisingly not reported by the partisan media.

6. I didn't know that arrest must be so polite and civil

7. Except for Najib who was gingerly treated, in fact escorted and protected by security people, the rest who is arrested can expect some roughing up.

8. There are many issues raised by this person which need to be treated with utmost circumspect.

9. By his own admission, he bribed some Sabah aduns. Some were brought to court . Some haven't.

10. He even video taped the transactions. Spielberg would be ashamed

11. He added drama to it by having a lady participate in a video saying the video on the aduns was done at the bestest of the PM.

12. The lady was said to be a proxy of shamsul Iskandar, then chief polsec to the PM.

13. How was the behest of the PM communicated? Through shamsul, then the lady?

14. Isn't that 3rd hand information? It can be considered hearsay evidence.

15. Or the person had an audience with the PM over a plate of pasembur

16. Also, by his own admission as reported by the media, he said he gave shamsul 600k plus

17. The social media gleefully splattered a few receipts all.over the place.

18. Which only proved the person is a fastidious collector of receipts or he has malice aforethought.

19. Now he's charged of giving 200k plus, a charge he has denied

20. If he couldn't admit for giving 200k plus, how can he admit to giving a bigger sum?

21. If he has denied giving any monies, what is shamsul guilty of?

22. There's nothing shamsul needs to admit to.

23. The story woven by this person is full of loopholes. A large part of his story is fabricated crap .

24. A rottweiler of a prosecution lawyer would tear his story to pieces

25. By default, his serpentine story, exonerates shamsul of any guilt.

26. It would be interesting to see how his story would be dismembered in court .

27. As to the adulation and celebration of him, he is in a situation of you say potaytoes, I say poetarto, others say patata .

28. Some ragard him as a whistleblower,many will say he is a snitch, a rat .

29 . He will rat on anyone he comes across. Better to avoid him with a 10foot pole.

30. Many of those who hailed and celebrated him,would probably not give him a rats ass look at him . But he is a useful idiot.

31. There's no mention of shamsul even,but this person is a pawn on the political chessboard to discredit the king

32. The king being Mr anvar ebraheem

33. Anything which can be used to discredit him, put him in general contempt ,will be used.

34. In the end,it is like a Trump would say, a crap by the self righteous.

0 comments:

  © Blogger templates Newspaper III by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP