The tale of 47 hot potatoes. The fate of the DNAA. Devil's advocate series no 28.

1. I can already see the drift. Malay supremacists especially the UMNOniks are feigning incredulity that zahids DNAA ruling is remitted to the high court for retrial

2. They feel it is unfair and is a victimisation by non malays.

3. In this case the accusation of unfairness is led Ambiga Sreenevasan.

4. But these people ignore the fact that the remittance of the case has been persuasively argued by the Exeter U law graduate

5. Judges hearing the appeal included Malays so that nobody can argue, a malay like Zahid can't expect justice from non Malays .

6. We must be conscious of 2 things. Zahid was alleged to have stolen money. Create a vehicle for corruption.

7. So don't trivialized the issue by saying that Zahid is victimized by Ambiga and gang or that he, a Malay of Javanese descendants can't expect justice from non Malay judges

8. Don't befuddle the issue by claiming this a case of a Malay being victimized and this provided an excuse to rebel . and invoke Malay recalcitrance.

9. We are greatly incensed by these thieves and robbers creating a vehicle, a yayasan to steal and do corrupt things.

10. What jahid did is the usual plunder done by those holding public office.

11. An organization with intentions to do good for the public is used and manipulated by people like Zahid for his benefits

12. That is an heinous conduct, unforgivable.

13. We can be forgiven into thinking that this a case the robbers defending robbers, the corrupt defending the corrupt and crooks defending crooks

14. The AGC by doing a volte face , ought to do a soul searching and brainstorming session.

15. The public has a right to ask how can what the AGC did can be regarded as conscionable when a prima facie case has already been found?

16. In getting the DNAA,the AGC may have been unduly influenced by non legal reasons when it knows Zahid has done some jiggery-pokery things at yayasan tak ada akal and yilek budi.

17. Mind you, when the high court at first found prima facie for this case which began in 2018, the prosecution called 99 witnesses. 99 people said Zahid stole.

18. Zahid can only managed 5 witnesses. Meaning only 5 people were willing to lie for Zahid

19. The disparity between the number of witnesses of the 2 sides ought to convince the public and the court hopefully, that the accused is guilty as hell

20. Of course zahids rapacious behavior at YAB will be packaged in artful legal argument by his able leàd lawyer.

21. Didn't the lawyer during a PC at the appeal court's premises said the threshold to prove zahids innocence is low?

22. But that would also mean the threshold to prove guilt is correspondingly low

23. Let us hope Ms Ambiga and her team would ably demolish the arguments put up by Zahid's defense team .

24. What happened at yayasan akal budi with Zahid there and what happened to AGC subsequently, mirrors probably at what is happening generally at all public offices.

25. These places become not citadels dispensing economic justice and other forms of justice but are actually hiding places for thieves and robbers dressed smartly.

26. Imagine if someone were to table an RUU for asset seizure if convicted for corruption, these people would vigorously oppose it .

27. The robbers and thieves will not see such RUU as upholding justice but as a guillotine beheading them .

28. As an economist with a bit of knowledge in stats and econometrics, I find it very improbable that out of 47 charges, not a few can stick . Where have they disappeared to? Into zahids ass?

29. Many law abiding Malaysians are fed up at seeing these big shots hiding behind well meaning organizations, smiling while robbing.

30. If the shoes fit, convict!

31. UMNO people are saying that remitting the case back to the high court is not to be taken to mean our 'Presideng' is guilty.

32. That may be true but who gives a rat's ass notice of their opinion ? They aren't the judge in this case.

33. We would like to see Anwar making good his shouts to end sakau2.

34. Or he is just a reconteur and his shouts about eliminating corruption are only la-di-da posturings.