Najibfication and it's effects. Part 2

1. The new word that has entered our lexicon and dictionary or our treasury of words is:-

• A. To najibfy
• B. Najibfication.
• C. Najibfied.

2. To najibfy means to give someone a discount, concession, special treatment, entitlement, privileges etc. najibfication is the process of getting all the above. It can also mean a noun as in being given the above. Najibfied is past perfect and refers to being already given the above.

3. It's now possible for us to talk that the pardons board has najibfied a convicted criminal.

4. It so happens that the person being najibfied and being given a najibfication, a noun is Mohd Najib bin tun Razak.

5. Row row your boat Gently down the stream Belts off, trousers down, dicks out Isn't life a scream

6. Life is certainly a scream - for a neo feudal lords like Najib.

7. For the common reasonable man, the commuter on the KL MRT, on the toon foong omnibus life is a hellish scream.

8. The Terengganu housewife who was caught stealing a few cans of Milo, the man caught stealing money from the surau's donation box and the Penang women convicted for using money not belonging to her but got her account, all got disproportionate jail time.

The sentences they received were regarded fair. They didn't get their sentences reviewed by the pardons board or if their sentences were already completed, did not get any belated apologies from anyone. Certainly their constitutional rights were forgotten.

9. So Where der Fuhrer undt Reichkanzlor.. asked us to accept the decision of the pardons board, we can but we don't agree. So we continue to talk. When Herr oberst inFahmy told us not to discuss the issue in the social was that a Kim Jong UN-esque directive? By what authority was he enabled to do that?

10. To many right thinking people, the king was ill advised. The decision was salacious, smutty and lascivious. It was, because the unwanted child resulting from this lecherous deliberation was the commuted already legally completed conviction by the courts The king was wrongly advised by the 5 other members of the pardons board, the PM or anyone else.

11. Perhaps because the decision by the pardons board generates so much dissension, ill will and unhappiness among many right thinking people, especially lawyers, the Bar Council approved a motion to challenge that decision in court. Hail to the Bar Council in keeping this issue, alive.

12. Mind you, this is a legal challenge against the pardons board. It is not a legal challenge against the king.

13. This reminder is made to forestall the possible spins by the UMNO mother effers .

14. The UMNO people, especially its Laurel and Hardy characters, will likely say that this is a challenge against the person of the king. Or they will turn this into a racial issue saying the action of the Bar Council is a challenge mounted by non Malays against Malay legitimacy.

15. The resolution of the Bar Council to legally challenge the decision of the pardons board, might confuse or be pictured as confusing, especially to the UMNO A-holes, but it is not to the majority of people.

16. To the majority of people, the right thinking people, the Bar Council represents the majority of the public to uphold the sanctity of the law and the principle of supremacy of the law

17. To circumvent that and to pursue their nefarious, wicked and flagitious aims, UMNO will certainly use the institution of the king/agong to shield itself and the gross injustice created against objections and uncomplimentary opposition.

18. That reminds us of what Lord Denning said-the purpose of the law is to protect the weak against the strong and the law must not be used as a sword on the weak.

19. Read into our situation the statements translate into the king or the institution must protect the weak against the strong and not used as a sword to cut down the weak

20. Sly UMNO will use the king and the institution to show that it is more royalist than other royalists. In reality its using the king to intimidate and snuff out valid criticisms and objections .

21. If Samuel Johnson said to Pitt, that nationalism is the last refuge of scoundrels, to UMNO, the king is the last refuge of its scoundrelism.

22. The merit to what the Bar Council is doing, is to keep the najibfication issue alive and allow it to be the subject of continued conversation. Three Cheers to them!

23. The trump card played by UMNO or UMNO DNA-ed people is the assertion and claim, that pardoning, clemency are the absolute privilege of the king. There that status cannot be challenged in court .

24. I find that hard to reconcile. The king sits in session with members of the pardons board and is accordingly advised. He does not sit alone and decide. Where the is the 'Absolute' quality?

25. If the king sits in session with members of the pardons board, I would argue that the King loses his 'absolute' stature. Thus any decisions emanating from the pardons board are, in theory challenge-able in court

26. The claim and assertion that the king has absolute privilege or has absolute conduct in general to be untenable. Here are my arguments.

27. If I remember correctly, the late karpal Singh filed a suit against the then agong and another suit against another ruler. The suits failed I think, but the fact that the suits were heard at all, mean that precedents have been created which allow such suits to heard. Don't that mean the absolute privilege stature has been broken?

28. The absolute privilege stature of conduct in any form whatsoever, has also been broken, when special courts to try rulers were created. If I am not mistaken, the Negeri Sembilan ruler was tried by such court and found guilty.

29. Which means that the absolute privilege stature is just a legal fiction. Finally, I think there is the constitutional monarchy argument. Our king's are subject to the constitution right? So where got absolute privilege stature one?

30. Those are my non legal arguments. Lawyers may have more cogent legal argle bargle. If my arguments are found deficient, please argue them out .

31. To me then, those people who insist on absolute privilege stature, especially UMNO apparatchiks and UMNO DNA-ied people all have fascist tendencies or self entitlement mindset.

32. I.e .only Malays are naturally entitled to break the law and not be accountable for them. Or in this case Najib is natural entitled to discounts, special privileges and treatment .

33. What is most shocking to us, is that the PM asked us to accept the decision of the pardons board. And his major domo, the gol and gincu actor asked us not to discuss the issue in social media .

34. Sirs, those are invitations we must politely refuse. The requests are the height of hypocrisy.

35. You realised or not Maa, they are actually defending, supporting and enabling kleptocracy. Steal baby steal!

36. The najibfication incident (our Nanking incident) where justice is massacred,has exposed many chinks in mamu Anwar's armour. It has de-fanged him of his many venomous rhetoric .

37. It showed that he has broken faith with the people , the people no longer trust him as a change agent, he fails to build a Negara hukum and worse of all,through the pardons board, encourage more kleptocracy and abuse of power.

38. Its reformasi alright - more of the same, not change. Reformasi is like eating pasembor, grilled fish or serenading deaf-toned audience with the song 'Azizah'.

39. The ways Anwar can restore public trust and confidence are-try Zahid again. He got a DNAA, which actually means he's guilty but for reasons of expediency, got off the hook, ensure that Najib got his real not discounted comeuppance in the 1MDB case. Unless of course, Anwar wants us to believe that monies can fly or walked on their own into Najib's account. Then Najib can do a MAD's Alfie, ' what me know?' mad comic used to be a favorite of mine. Hope, yours too.

40. I can't help but think of the presence of the pardons board as an anomaly in the law. It becomes a me mechanism to frustrate the finality in the court's decision. It's just a upscaled version of a prisoner review board.

41. At a review board, the board will find ways to reduce a prisoner's jail time. The prisoner will display remorse over the crime, admits the crime, apologizes for it and promises not to repeat the crime. All of which Najib does not do .

42. Yet our pardons board, in absentia seems to acknowledge that Najib does all that and therefore deserves some dispensation, courtesy of Nana Non.

43. I now want to look at this najibfication issue from an Islamic point of view. I regard the decision by the pardons board to be un Islamic.

44. The pardons board has usurped the power of Allah to pardon and forgive. That is the sole unchallengeable prerogative of Allah. By confering upon themselves the power of Allah, they have committed Shirik. Muslim members must bertaubat. Non Muslim members must go to the church, temple or kovil to make confessions and ask for forgiveness.

45. When Muslims read the sayyidul istighfar or numerous other istighfars, what do they find?

46. Among others, they acknowledged they have sinned, they have been unkind to themselves, they have shortcomings etc. They acknowledged that Allah is ever forgiving, they asked Allah to forgive them and they affirmed that Allah is the only One who can forgive and pardon. So readers, how do you reconcile the conduct of the pardons board with the prerogative of Allah?

In the next part, I will discuss the najibfication effects on failure to defend the country against the scourge of corruption, failure to prosper the country, failure to create political stability and bringing disrepute to the country .