An elephant can fly.
Between a person dispose of using the services of Altantuya and one who is not, who do we believe to be more likely associated with the murder of the Mongolian woman?
In the first case there is legal proximity. In the 2nd there is none.
The one likely to be associated is obvious. But there is a turpid story telling that want us to believe the second person is involved!
I say turpid because:
(1) Obviously the brain is not engaged when the mouth suffers verbal diarrhoea.
(2) Assumes that Malaysians in general, and Malays in particular are a bunch of imbeciles and gullible people.
I will believe the incredulous story when I see an elephant fly. Clearly this is part of an elaborate exercise to absolve a certain person destined for Bamboo River resort.
Our gullibility has its limits:, its rubbish to believe that Dr Mahathir orchestrated someone to accuse bosku. The person purveying the fairytale is perhaps a moronic mercenary. What's a few hundred thousand ringgit or perhaps a few million to someone maybe having 16 billion somewhere.
There is a subtle attempt to make us believe that bosku is pristine and pure. The fact is he is not. Only a sexual deviant will want to procure the translation services of a Mongolian courtier. She only translates!
There is also an imbecilic story that says RPK asks for forgiveness because he is suddenly fearful of his mortality. Even for RPK, that's an insult to his intelligence. If he has any.
The man does not fear death because every one dies. Even bosku. He's asking forgiveness maybe he just wants to come back to Malaysia. He has as much rights to be here as the moron selling err telling the story.
Again, RPK was told by Mahathir to accuse bosku.
Isn't this story of the same genre as the earlier one?
Both story tellers must be of the same species?
The SDS of many and the admission of many are just dismissed cavalierly. These can only be done by unthinking mercenaries.
0 comments:
Post a Comment