2. The court has already decided that this is case in which a defense is required. In legal jargon, there is a prima facie case.
3. This is case that is valid against the whole world. Ownership of the case is the state's.
4. It's no longer ownership between private parties such as the case involving the health minister an a convicted certain kleptocrat in chief.
5. In the DNAA case, the prosecution is to be carried out by the state
6. It is not opened to the AGC to discontinue with the case without the concurrence of the court.
7. The court may not agree or affirmed the 'proposal 'from the AG.
8. The court has the final authority to decide to continue with a case in a prima facie status has been found .
9. By deciding to discontinue the case without the concurrence of the court, the AG and the AGC have misapprioprated that authority from the court .
10. In common language,that is insolence and contempt of court
11. Contempt in the form of not only in words but also in conduct.
12. For snatching and robbing and usurping the authority of the court alone, the AG must be punished appropriately.
13. The AG said he wished to discontinue the case as more evidence and information is required. But a prima facie case has already been found
14. The judge then should have stopped the AGs incompetence then
15. Wasn't that an open admission of incompetence and lack of meticulousness on the part of the AG?
16. That confirms my belief that some lawyers and judges are like eggs which come in various grades .
17. Grades A to C where C is the lousiest.
18. This is a comedy of stupidities. The first round of stupidity was committed by the AGC. It was further fortified by the carelessness of the judge then. By countenancing the 1st round of imbecility.
19. Therefore, in my opinion the bar council's objection to the application of DNAA by the AG is correct.
20. It is asking the court to reinstate the 47 charges and to declare the application for DNAA as null and void.
21. It's also asking the court to slap an act of mandamus on the part of the AG
22. An act of mandamus, if I remember correctly is asking the AG to act according to specific articles of various statutes. What these are,the clever lawyers will know la .
23. If an act of mandamus is applied for, doesn't that mean the AG has violated some provisions in appropriate statues?
24. Is that misfeasance or non feasance? The tuan Pegu can answer that .
25. Since when can the AGC, an inferior body in relation to the court unilaterally decide to grant a DNAA?
26. It also seems to suggest that what manner of legal action is chosen varies with the stature of the person of interest?
27. Is the DNAA chosen because the person is the DPM?
28. Isn't it true, that the court recognizes only a litigant and no DPM, tan Sri, Dato Seri etc?
29. In applying to the court for various remedies, the Bar Council must remain stout and steely resolved.
30. It must not capitulate to the objections of various Malay supremacists.
31. Some say the actions of the bar council is an attempt to frustrate the DPM in various ways
32. To criminalize him, to discredit him , envious of him etc. Worse, the bar council's action is anti Malay.
33. I am especially annoyed when some idiots say, because the judges and bar council's members are non malays, they will never give justice to Malays.
34. Idiots will say that. They don't understand the meaning of fair play and professionalism.
35. I believe, in a body like the bar council, professionalism and fair play will prevail.
No comments:
Post a Comment