1. In 2019, frank dikotter wrote a book titled dictators. In the book, he outlined the steps taken to build a cult of personality.
2. The steps taken will usually and eventually lead to the creation of dictators.
3. The steps, if I may simplify, are as follows.
A. Wielding the big stick.
B. Image building.
C. Religious validation.
4. I disagree on 2 things. These steps are not intrinsicaly bad. Used positively, they can create a PM with unfettered powers to do the various reforms we badly need.
They do not necessarily lead to dictatorship if there are safeguards.
5. It all began, when the PM issued a headmasterly warning. That he will sack ministers and related personnel if they are corrupt.
6. That statement was a double-edged sword. It instils fear in ministers and public servants. But it gains appreciation, approval and approbation from the people.
7. But the statement is also ambiguous. It is unclear. Why wait until the damage has been done? Corruption has happened?
8. Authorized sprm or relevant bodies to investigate the person of interest's and his immediate family's account.
9. If the account has an extraordinary amount of money, ask him to explain. If he can't, that's prima facie evidence that he stole the money.
10. Don't just sack him. He must go to court. If convicted he must be jailed. The stolen money, every bit of it must be returned. All assets, chattels and moveable assets bought with the stolen money must be seized and returned
11. To carry out the order, we need an honest sprm.perhaps sprm now needs reforming, beginning with the head.
12. All these can be carried out, if we have a legally unfettered leader. The steps mentioned by dikotter, need not necessarily lead to the creation of a dictator. They are necessary to give unfettered powers to the pm.
13. There's a very thin line that divides a potential dictator and a powerful PM. That's why he needs to surround himself with the honest, the ablest and the most un-intimidated ministers to provide the political ballast to keep him on an even keel.
14. That's why I disagreed with the PM, when he included the kleptocratic people and the losers in the election into the cabinet.
15. In one passage, dikotter wrote that Louis 14 was a master at theatre. A great actor. All politicians need an image. The PM too.
16. The PM has assiduously created an image that he's one with the people. The refusal to take a salary, refusal of a Merc, the publicised Friday prayers and the folksy dressing. All designed to identify with the common people.
17. He may be someone acting. In real life he maybe some who likes playboy shades, driven around in a 7 series and likes LV loafers. He is an axe with an iron and wooden components. The iron component cuts and hurts you, but the wooden component got you convinced, he's one of you.
18. People may regard it as farcical and flatulent, but that image endears the PM to the people.
19. People are tired with the lordly image of previous PMs with unacceptable wealth. Anwar represent a breath of fresh air
20. In building up that image, the PM has help from various groups. Photographers, blog writers, cyber army and propaganda minister.
21. Sufficient to elicit smarmy exclamations from puerile websites shouting:-
22. Hooray, yahoo, ya Allah, amithoba,skanda, Vishnu, subrahmanya etc.
23. The last 3 I mentioned, are multi-headed Hindu gods. Therein lies the talent of the PM. The ability to talk different things to a different set of people. Hence, the multi heads.
24. Rather than being looked as something destructive and detrimental, the multi-headed persona is a political asset. It enhances his political longevity.
25. Thus, he's able to talk A to the Malay rednecks ,B to the Chinese, C to the indians, D towa others. To religious people, he's also a holy man.
26. Of course, the PM has to have his own talent. Chief of which is acting. Mussolini for example, regarded himself as Italy's greatest actor. Hitler, as mentioned by dikotter, regarded himself as Europe's greatest performer.
27. The PM can regard himself as MGR, Gemini ganesan, sivaji ganesan or Rajinikanth. Take your pick.
28. People around him must also act. They must exercise self-censorship, feigned obedience, smile on order, shout reformasi on cue etc. All designed to give an illusion of undivided support to the PM.
29. We have given such devotional support to people like Ali babavum Najib, abah cow, why can't we give to PM Anwar? He plans it better. He's got the smarts.
30. Finally, to give the money impression that he is genuinely love, he needs some religious validation. This, he recently, accomplished when he organized a congregation of Muslim ulamaks. Anwar is now a holy man.
31. It seems that Anwar has got all the components not to become a dictator, but a real powerful PM. He can now set about to execute his robust policies.
32. One, he has already done. That's the termination of all political appointees aka leeches in gls, glics, statutory bodies and the like. It is estimated the number can be as high as 17,000.
33. Other than serving as chairmen, directors and board members, they really are dead weights and totem poles.
34. Terminating these suckers, could save us rmbillions. That is part of the anti wastage election slogan PH promises us.
33. He must now tackle the bigger problems of corruption and abuse of power. People have not forgotten that during the 22 months in power, there were no arrests and high profile corruption cases tried. Amuse us with some Earth shaking arrests and trials.
34. The image, Anwar carves, is designed to make him a leader with legally unfettered powers. Do the next part.
35. Grudgingly, I have to say Anwar Ibrahim is our shrewdest PM after all.
Saturday, 24 December 2022
Thursday, 22 December 2022
The Vote of Confidence. Much Ado about Nothing.
1. Was the confidence voting a gimmick and a prelude to a dictatorship?
2. As a rule any party with a questionable majority support of MPs, ought to subject itself to a vote of confidence.
3. Stronger reasons to do one if the government in question is composed of a coalition of parties. The support of these ought to be verified in parliament.
4. Hence, primarily, doing one isn't just a response of being challenged by a sceptical joe. More important, it's an action to affirm and validate a government's claim that it has the confidence of a majority of the MPs.
5. Therefore, (in our case) ignore the grumblings and grouses of a petulant mahiadin. The stronger and more important reason is to validate and to affirm majority support.
6. Doing a vote of confidence and ascertaining support in a physical presence is a surer way of validating support than reliance of SDs.
7. Our government is based on the support of the electorate and a manifestation of that support through the physical demonstration of it by MPs in parliament. Parliament is the appropriate venue to validate that support.
8. Our government must never be founded on the tenderizing of SDs. The fact that the king called each MP to ascertain his or her support, showed an implicit lack of 100% confidence in just a piece of paper.
9. It follows, therefore, a party leader relying on SDs only, ignores the wishes of the people and is arguably less trustworthy himself.
10. We didn't see a vote of confidence done by both mahiadin and Ismail sabri. I would be forgiven then into believing the 2 governments were the biggest scams done to Malaysians.
11. It's a moral imperative then to do a vote of confidence and not just a response to the challenge done by petulant mahiadin.
In politics, we are guided by both legal and moral principles. It's gimmicky only in saying it's a response to the challenge by sourpuss mahiadin.
12. Isn't it laughable to hear people saying the vote of confidence is a gimmick, not necessary, and we don't want to durhaka to the king and saying the submissive ampun tuanku?AFTER the MOA being signed by the Anwar government?
13. Why didn't these charlatans acknowledge that all this while, right from the beginning, Anwar had majority support and that the MOA is superfluous?
14. Instead, they want to belabour and caused stress to everyone by asking a vote of confidence. And when their plan backfired, say disingenuously it's a gimmick, not necessary and don't want to durhaka to the king?
15. It's just verbal semantics and like the uncivilized bung mokhtar said, FU.
16. Let's not overgeneralize the MOA as being a prelude to a dictatorship. I think that's a rushed and rash statement.
17. I think the statement saying it's a dictatorship was first made by mas ermiyatie and then parroted in parliament by Hamzah zainuddin. All the components to a dictatorship are not there, but they insisted on treating the MoA as a pivotal component. They are inviting us to believe that. That's an invitation we shall stoutly refuse.
18. In any case, would you want to establish a dictatorship by publicising the step you are taking? You would do everything by fiat.
19. Does the signing of SDs snuff out the freedom by MPs to say what their conscience dictate? The MOA have the same effects.
20. Rather than saying the MOA signifies lack of support, I would rather say it's just a step taken to fortify support. Just as much as an SD is.
21. If the MOA is regarded as odious, objectionable and unsavoury, the SDs must be similarly regarded
22. Now, the tales told by ermiyatie and Hamzah are really Macbethian in spirit. It's a tale told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
23. Ermiyatie and Hamzah are not idiots, but their tales are idiotic.
2. As a rule any party with a questionable majority support of MPs, ought to subject itself to a vote of confidence.
3. Stronger reasons to do one if the government in question is composed of a coalition of parties. The support of these ought to be verified in parliament.
4. Hence, primarily, doing one isn't just a response of being challenged by a sceptical joe. More important, it's an action to affirm and validate a government's claim that it has the confidence of a majority of the MPs.
5. Therefore, (in our case) ignore the grumblings and grouses of a petulant mahiadin. The stronger and more important reason is to validate and to affirm majority support.
6. Doing a vote of confidence and ascertaining support in a physical presence is a surer way of validating support than reliance of SDs.
7. Our government is based on the support of the electorate and a manifestation of that support through the physical demonstration of it by MPs in parliament. Parliament is the appropriate venue to validate that support.
8. Our government must never be founded on the tenderizing of SDs. The fact that the king called each MP to ascertain his or her support, showed an implicit lack of 100% confidence in just a piece of paper.
9. It follows, therefore, a party leader relying on SDs only, ignores the wishes of the people and is arguably less trustworthy himself.
10. We didn't see a vote of confidence done by both mahiadin and Ismail sabri. I would be forgiven then into believing the 2 governments were the biggest scams done to Malaysians.
11. It's a moral imperative then to do a vote of confidence and not just a response to the challenge done by petulant mahiadin.
In politics, we are guided by both legal and moral principles. It's gimmicky only in saying it's a response to the challenge by sourpuss mahiadin.
12. Isn't it laughable to hear people saying the vote of confidence is a gimmick, not necessary, and we don't want to durhaka to the king and saying the submissive ampun tuanku?AFTER the MOA being signed by the Anwar government?
13. Why didn't these charlatans acknowledge that all this while, right from the beginning, Anwar had majority support and that the MOA is superfluous?
14. Instead, they want to belabour and caused stress to everyone by asking a vote of confidence. And when their plan backfired, say disingenuously it's a gimmick, not necessary and don't want to durhaka to the king?
15. It's just verbal semantics and like the uncivilized bung mokhtar said, FU.
16. Let's not overgeneralize the MOA as being a prelude to a dictatorship. I think that's a rushed and rash statement.
17. I think the statement saying it's a dictatorship was first made by mas ermiyatie and then parroted in parliament by Hamzah zainuddin. All the components to a dictatorship are not there, but they insisted on treating the MoA as a pivotal component. They are inviting us to believe that. That's an invitation we shall stoutly refuse.
18. In any case, would you want to establish a dictatorship by publicising the step you are taking? You would do everything by fiat.
19. Does the signing of SDs snuff out the freedom by MPs to say what their conscience dictate? The MOA have the same effects.
20. Rather than saying the MOA signifies lack of support, I would rather say it's just a step taken to fortify support. Just as much as an SD is.
21. If the MOA is regarded as odious, objectionable and unsavoury, the SDs must be similarly regarded
22. Now, the tales told by ermiyatie and Hamzah are really Macbethian in spirit. It's a tale told by idiots, full of sound and fury, signifying nothing.
23. Ermiyatie and Hamzah are not idiots, but their tales are idiotic.
Sunday, 18 December 2022
Terlajak kata, binasa jadi nya .
1. Saya tergamam dan tercengang bila pm Anwar kata se2orang tidak bersalah sehigga ia didapati bersalah
2. Saya diberitahu, bahawa inilah prinsip yang dipakai oleh ramai peguam, terutama mereka yang mengamal Anglo Saxon law.
3. Ia seolah olah sudah menjadi satu prinsip yang kudus. Tapi tidak semua negara mengamalkan nya.
4. Di negara2 seperti perancis, itali, Iran, Russia dll, kamu dikira bersalah sehigga dibuktikan sebaliknya.
5. Mana satu prinsip bagus, boleh di debatkan sampai urat leher kita tegang, muka membiru dan lembu pulang petang. Pilihan bergantung ikut selera dan citarasa.
6. Prinsip tidak bersalah sehigga dibuktikan sebaliknya tidak ada dalam perlembagaan kita. Yakni tidak ditulis secara explicitly dalam perlembagaan kita.
7. Ia dipakai untuk menegakkan benang basah. Dalam perkara yang kontemporer, Ia digunakan untuk menjustfikasikan kemasukan zahid dalam kabinet.
8. Kalau Kes berprofil tinggi seperti Kes zahid boleh di justifikasikan dengan prinsip lapuk ini,ia nya memberi PM Anwar carte blanche untuk memasukan gerombolan kleptocratic yang lain2 dalam kabinet.
9. Mutakhir yang berlaku ialah bila Ahmad maslan dijadikan timbalan menteri. Bukankah dia telah didenda 1.1m dan telah menerima jutaan ringgit wang 1MDB?
10. Sukalah kita bertanya, mengapa PM Anwar tidak mahu guna prinsip bersalah sehigga dibuktikan sebaliknya?
11. Kerana, pada pendapat saya, Anwar Ibrahim mahu terus kekal menjadi PM. Biarpun terpaksa menggunakan prinsip yang lapuk.
Anwar handal bab itu. Dengan kepetahan nya, dia boleh panggil burung2 yang terbang di awan, makan ditapak tangan nya.
12. Mungkin, dalam keadaan dimana rasuah bermaharajalela dan mengganas seperti sekarang, prinsip bersalah sehigga dibuktikan sebaliknya lebih praktikal.
13. Beranikah Azalina yang cakap berdegar degar itu, mereformasikan prinsip ini atau dia hanya omong kosong?
14. Yang saya khuatiri, mengorbankan janji2 dan prinsip, kita menjadi orang yang sifat2 nya kita benci. Kita benci perasuah, kita pun turut rasuah.
15. Maka jadilah keadaan yang disebut Franz Fanon, kita melawan penindas, last2 kita jadi penindas. Baca the wretched of the earth .
16. Kemudian, tidakkah kita takut akan dosa dan petaka yang akan mendatang, kalau kita guna prinsip ini? Lihat surah HUD, 113.
17. Kita membenci penzalim seperti perasuah, akhirnya kita pun jadi perasuah.
18. Ada 2 lagi pertimbangan PM Anwar yang membimbangkan saya. Dia mengambil kira zahid adalah pengerusi BN dan president umno.
19. Bayangkan, jika orang nombor 1 bertimbangan begini, besar kemungkinan AG yang sentiasa menurut perintah, akan turut bertimbangan demikian.
20. Ini akan bermakna Kes rasuah zahid dan kes2 perasuah yang lain akan digugurkan, disapu bawah permaidani tebal Putrajaya.
21. Saya berharap AG tidak akan mengirai angkubah2 tidak releven ini . The law is the law .
22. Jika lah hakim2 mahkamah persekutuan, menimbang bahawa tertuduh didepan mereka, adalah bekas PM, bekas presiden umno dan bekas pengerusi BN, mampus kita! Na'uzubillah.
23. Inilah yang hamka katakan, alang2 cerdik ,rosak negara.
Saturday, 17 December 2022
Perniagaan buka seperti biasa .
1. Ke'gumbiraan' kita terhadap lantikan politik dalam glc, glic, mof inc dll, kena diberhentikan dulu.
2. Orang kelate woyak sementar deh. PM ada budibicara menggantikan yang ditamatkan dengan lahabau yang lain.
3. Harapan kita ialah perlantikan baru oleh PM tertakluk kepada public scrutiny. Adakah sinangoi itu mempunyai kemahiran, kelayakan dan kecekapan yang dikehendaki.
4. Jika perlantikan tersebut tetap atas dasar politik, Maka seperti kata orang terengganu, bong je
5. Jika itu dasarnya, it's back to business as usual bawah PH . Mungkin lebih teruk dibawah pentadbiran mamak padukong ini
6. Jika demikian, reformasi yang dilaungkan hanya omongan kosong dan pancingan undi pilihanraya .
7. Kita dikejutkan dengan perlantikan ini:-
2. Orang kelate woyak sementar deh. PM ada budibicara menggantikan yang ditamatkan dengan lahabau yang lain.
3. Harapan kita ialah perlantikan baru oleh PM tertakluk kepada public scrutiny. Adakah sinangoi itu mempunyai kemahiran, kelayakan dan kecekapan yang dikehendaki.
4. Jika perlantikan tersebut tetap atas dasar politik, Maka seperti kata orang terengganu, bong je
5. Jika itu dasarnya, it's back to business as usual bawah PH . Mungkin lebih teruk dibawah pentadbiran mamak padukong ini
6. Jika demikian, reformasi yang dilaungkan hanya omongan kosong dan pancingan undi pilihanraya .
7. Kita dikejutkan dengan perlantikan ini:-
8. Cer PM story kita kelayakan istimewa apa yang nurjazlan yaakob ada selain make budu dan ikan bakàr tawar. Cer cerita
9. Yang mengherankan, kita diberitahu bahawa yang ada budibicara ialah PM. Kenyataan rasmi sepatutnya datang dari pejabat PM.
10.ini yang buat kenyataan rasmi ialah wak ponorogol.
11. Adakah tpm lebih berbisa dari PM? Adakah Ia nya seperti saya katakan, kerajaan umno MK2?
12. Ini hanya boleh bermakna, tpm dan umno, has got the PM by the balls.
13. Jika perlantikan nurjazlan adalah langkah permula, we can expect more of the same. Pi Mai, pi Mai, dok tang tu jugak.
Friday, 16 December 2022
Mahiadineers and election deniers.
1. I thought only Trump and the Trumpeteers talked about election fraud. That they are the only election deniers.
2. In Malaysia, we actually have a trump. He comes from Pagoh. Eats sambal belacan. His name is mahiadin,'puffy' Yassin.
3. I was wrong. Like the American trump, mahiadin and the mahiadeneers, are election deniers. It is valid if he and his party had won it
4. Mahiadin said the 2022 election was an electoral fraud and the cabinet was a disappointment.
5. I too, had criticized the mismatched cabinet and the marriage of convenience it emits. But I did it for a different reason.
6. I meant it to be better. I resent the Anwarisation of the Malaysian cabinet. In particular, I dislike the inclusion of too many kleptocratic minded goons and the rescuing of people who lost in the election. But I never called the election a fraud.
7. Mahiadin's characterization of the election as a fraud, is an insult to the voters and the untiring election commission. He should apologize to them.
8. Mahiadin had to make the outrageous claim because of 2 reasons.
9. One, is to keep the faith of his party men and two, as a red herring to his host of problems. Of course, there were the petty things like failing to get the majority and not becoming the PM.
10. Mahiadin needed to say something bizarre to unite the PN footsoldiers who are mercenary in spirit
11. They are interested only in victory and the division of the spoils therefrom.
12. Or they are interested in the prospects of victory. That prospects can be achieved, if many do believe, the election is fraudulent. Then PN can take over as government and mahiadin can divide the spoils.
13. On the other hand, the fact that mahiadin had to make the trump-like statement, suggests there is dissension among the PN ranks.
14. The binding effect of a preposterous statement is flimsy. I predict by the 19th of December, many will abandon PN.
15. The claim that the election is a fraud, is used by mahiadin to deflect and distract people's attention from a litany of bigger problems mahiadin is facing.
16. The 600b unaccounted spending, PN being funded possibly by the gaming industry, being sued over his 15 million salary, etc.
17. Mahiadin could well provide proof that the election was a fraud. If he can't, better shut the F up!
18. If I were Anwar, I will not let the issues raised by mahiadin 'crowd out' prime ministerial time. I would just provide documentary proof, and just do whatever is necessary.
19. In one sense, what mahiadin did was seditious. He's instigating people to attack our democratic institutions' ala the American January 6th mob attack on the capitol. The object is to overturn the outcome of the election.
20. Mahiadin would be happy if his unsubstantiated claim causes mindless riot and destabilize the country. Attack the capital, ransack parliament or the PM's office and so on
21. All these can happen as a result of one man being a very sore loser of trumpish proportions. Deny the elections, they are valid only iff he had won (the economist iff).
22. For that, all right-thinking Malaysian should condem and ostracize mahiadin. Let us consign him as a footnote in the an als of history.
2. In Malaysia, we actually have a trump. He comes from Pagoh. Eats sambal belacan. His name is mahiadin,'puffy' Yassin.
3. I was wrong. Like the American trump, mahiadin and the mahiadeneers, are election deniers. It is valid if he and his party had won it
4. Mahiadin said the 2022 election was an electoral fraud and the cabinet was a disappointment.
5. I too, had criticized the mismatched cabinet and the marriage of convenience it emits. But I did it for a different reason.
6. I meant it to be better. I resent the Anwarisation of the Malaysian cabinet. In particular, I dislike the inclusion of too many kleptocratic minded goons and the rescuing of people who lost in the election. But I never called the election a fraud.
7. Mahiadin's characterization of the election as a fraud, is an insult to the voters and the untiring election commission. He should apologize to them.
8. Mahiadin had to make the outrageous claim because of 2 reasons.
9. One, is to keep the faith of his party men and two, as a red herring to his host of problems. Of course, there were the petty things like failing to get the majority and not becoming the PM.
10. Mahiadin needed to say something bizarre to unite the PN footsoldiers who are mercenary in spirit
11. They are interested only in victory and the division of the spoils therefrom.
12. Or they are interested in the prospects of victory. That prospects can be achieved, if many do believe, the election is fraudulent. Then PN can take over as government and mahiadin can divide the spoils.
13. On the other hand, the fact that mahiadin had to make the trump-like statement, suggests there is dissension among the PN ranks.
14. The binding effect of a preposterous statement is flimsy. I predict by the 19th of December, many will abandon PN.
15. The claim that the election is a fraud, is used by mahiadin to deflect and distract people's attention from a litany of bigger problems mahiadin is facing.
16. The 600b unaccounted spending, PN being funded possibly by the gaming industry, being sued over his 15 million salary, etc.
17. Mahiadin could well provide proof that the election was a fraud. If he can't, better shut the F up!
18. If I were Anwar, I will not let the issues raised by mahiadin 'crowd out' prime ministerial time. I would just provide documentary proof, and just do whatever is necessary.
19. In one sense, what mahiadin did was seditious. He's instigating people to attack our democratic institutions' ala the American January 6th mob attack on the capitol. The object is to overturn the outcome of the election.
20. Mahiadin would be happy if his unsubstantiated claim causes mindless riot and destabilize the country. Attack the capital, ransack parliament or the PM's office and so on
21. All these can happen as a result of one man being a very sore loser of trumpish proportions. Deny the elections, they are valid only iff he had won (the economist iff).
22. For that, all right-thinking Malaysian should condem and ostracize mahiadin. Let us consign him as a footnote in the an als of history.
Wednesday, 14 December 2022
Implied interference of the court.
1. I am flabbergasted when Anwar says you are innocent until found guilty.
2. I believed that's a sacrosanct principle in the legal systems of the world.
3. But not all follow the antiquated principle. In France, Italy, Russia and Iran, you are guilty until proven innocent.
4. It doesn't mean the principle of innocent until proven guilty is superior to the other rule.
5. One is chosen over the other is because you want to straighten a wet thread.
6. In this case, Anwar wanted to justify Zahid's inclusion in the cabinet
7. If the highest profile criminal case of Zahid's can be cavalierly justified using an antiquated rule, the same thinking gives Anwar a carte blanche to include the whole gang bang of kleptocratic minded goons.
8. Why doesn't Anwar want to use the rule, guilty until proven innocent? I put it to him, that's because his personal interests override the public's.
9. He wants to stay on as PM at all costs-by any means necessary, even to the extent of using a silver tongued argument.
Anwar is good at that; he can even induce a bird in the sky to come eat from his hands.
10. With the rampant and marauding corruption taking place in Malaysia, perhaps it's good if the rule guilty until proven innocent, is adopted.
11. Will the braggadocios Azalina dare reform this rule? Or she is just talking cock?
12. Acquittal seems to be the legal holy grail. It's pursued energetically by shifty lawyers and is an intentional slip of the tongue by grade 'C' judges.
13. When Zahid was acquitted in his earlier case, I can almost hear his lawyer asking
14. Now that you are acquitted, tell me truthfully, did you steal the money? To which Zahid answered:- after listening to your brilliant arguments, I am beginning to think I didn't.
15. What alarms me, are the 2 other childish arguments used by Anwar.
16. That(a) Zahid is the president of UMNO and (b) Zahid is chairman of BN.
17. If the number 1 man thinks this way, it's probable the pliant AG will also think likewise.
18. Then the charges against Zahid will be dropped. Zahid's case will never see the light of day.
19. I hope the AG will treat these considerations as irrelevant. Imagine if the supreme court judges in Najib's case were to consider, here is a man who is a former pm, umno president and BN chairman. Horrors!
20. Pak sheikh, we are sleeping using the same pillow, but we dream different dreams. You may think Zahid is innocent, but the people think he is guilty as hell!
21. Your line of thinking is tantamount to attempted interference with the court.
2. I believed that's a sacrosanct principle in the legal systems of the world.
3. But not all follow the antiquated principle. In France, Italy, Russia and Iran, you are guilty until proven innocent.
4. It doesn't mean the principle of innocent until proven guilty is superior to the other rule.
5. One is chosen over the other is because you want to straighten a wet thread.
6. In this case, Anwar wanted to justify Zahid's inclusion in the cabinet
7. If the highest profile criminal case of Zahid's can be cavalierly justified using an antiquated rule, the same thinking gives Anwar a carte blanche to include the whole gang bang of kleptocratic minded goons.
8. Why doesn't Anwar want to use the rule, guilty until proven innocent? I put it to him, that's because his personal interests override the public's.
9. He wants to stay on as PM at all costs-by any means necessary, even to the extent of using a silver tongued argument.
Anwar is good at that; he can even induce a bird in the sky to come eat from his hands.
10. With the rampant and marauding corruption taking place in Malaysia, perhaps it's good if the rule guilty until proven innocent, is adopted.
11. Will the braggadocios Azalina dare reform this rule? Or she is just talking cock?
12. Acquittal seems to be the legal holy grail. It's pursued energetically by shifty lawyers and is an intentional slip of the tongue by grade 'C' judges.
13. When Zahid was acquitted in his earlier case, I can almost hear his lawyer asking
14. Now that you are acquitted, tell me truthfully, did you steal the money? To which Zahid answered:- after listening to your brilliant arguments, I am beginning to think I didn't.
15. What alarms me, are the 2 other childish arguments used by Anwar.
16. That(a) Zahid is the president of UMNO and (b) Zahid is chairman of BN.
17. If the number 1 man thinks this way, it's probable the pliant AG will also think likewise.
18. Then the charges against Zahid will be dropped. Zahid's case will never see the light of day.
19. I hope the AG will treat these considerations as irrelevant. Imagine if the supreme court judges in Najib's case were to consider, here is a man who is a former pm, umno president and BN chairman. Horrors!
20. Pak sheikh, we are sleeping using the same pillow, but we dream different dreams. You may think Zahid is innocent, but the people think he is guilty as hell!
21. Your line of thinking is tantamount to attempted interference with the court.
Monday, 12 December 2022
Versions of Anwar
1. sorry for being an incorrigible sceptic. I don't have time to discuss this fine point of my life. Please don't pour out your unrestrained exuberance on mamu Anwar. The jury is still out, lor.
2. So far, it's much thunder, little rain. All I see thus far are
*The gimmicky stuff
*Populist stuff
*Hot air blowing.
3. The gimmicky stuff include not taking the pm salary(perhaps he's rich), rejecting a new Merc, wearing folksy dress, performing publicized Friday prayers etc
4. All of these may be genuine behaviour, but it could also be pompous humility. The real Anwar may be the one who likes LV loafers, use playboy shades, driven around in 7 series BMW etc. The gimmicky stuff is for the consumption of the gullible public.
5. The Malay public, especially, will ululate noisily about the public persona. Here is the real McCoy, representing the people. Hurrah!
6. Cut the BS, please. For instance, I am not at all impressed with asking ministers taking a 20% cut in salary. It may just encourage toll taking.
7. I see a slew of income transfers. BSH, special EPF withdrawals etc. No difference with Ali babavum Najib's BRIM. A rose by another name.
8. I can easily do a stokely Carmichael's version of burn baby burn to spend baby spend. Najib once told me, there's nothing the malays like more than to receive freebies.
Satu Malaysia happy, beb.
9. Will these income transfers be paralleled with policies to increase productivity?
10. Like Clara peller in the Wendy commercial says, where's the beef? Or as James Carville says, it's the economy, stupid!
11. Is mamu Anwar just blowing hot air? The 600b expose, wanting to sue din sembab for claiming Anwar is paid 15 million, suing a pas preacher. Don't talk only, just do it!
12. Unless real action is taken, Anwar is just NATO-no action, talk only.
13. Anwar must now provide leadership to a disparate group of individuals, some of which are working at cross purposes.
14. He must act quickly and swiftly. When he sees a problem, deal with it immediately instead of talking and discussing it.
15. As an aside, with regards to a current issue, Anwar is a bad judge of character. He has chosen a sarawakian as DPM.
16. The donkey has imputed that the 1-month given by Anwar, asking him to prepare the MA63 is not sufficient. Who says he has to prepare it alone? He can have a battalion of advisers to help him, can't he?
17. One of the test of a leader is to put the right person at the right place. If the sarawakian elected pig is whining and complaining, Anwar has failed in judging this character.
18. I am sorry to shatter the glass casing surrounding Anwar. That must disappoint his legion of fans. But I consider myself, his soulmate. Always critical and sceptical.
2. So far, it's much thunder, little rain. All I see thus far are
*The gimmicky stuff
*Populist stuff
*Hot air blowing.
3. The gimmicky stuff include not taking the pm salary(perhaps he's rich), rejecting a new Merc, wearing folksy dress, performing publicized Friday prayers etc
4. All of these may be genuine behaviour, but it could also be pompous humility. The real Anwar may be the one who likes LV loafers, use playboy shades, driven around in 7 series BMW etc. The gimmicky stuff is for the consumption of the gullible public.
5. The Malay public, especially, will ululate noisily about the public persona. Here is the real McCoy, representing the people. Hurrah!
6. Cut the BS, please. For instance, I am not at all impressed with asking ministers taking a 20% cut in salary. It may just encourage toll taking.
7. I see a slew of income transfers. BSH, special EPF withdrawals etc. No difference with Ali babavum Najib's BRIM. A rose by another name.
8. I can easily do a stokely Carmichael's version of burn baby burn to spend baby spend. Najib once told me, there's nothing the malays like more than to receive freebies.
Satu Malaysia happy, beb.
9. Will these income transfers be paralleled with policies to increase productivity?
10. Like Clara peller in the Wendy commercial says, where's the beef? Or as James Carville says, it's the economy, stupid!
11. Is mamu Anwar just blowing hot air? The 600b expose, wanting to sue din sembab for claiming Anwar is paid 15 million, suing a pas preacher. Don't talk only, just do it!
12. Unless real action is taken, Anwar is just NATO-no action, talk only.
13. Anwar must now provide leadership to a disparate group of individuals, some of which are working at cross purposes.
14. He must act quickly and swiftly. When he sees a problem, deal with it immediately instead of talking and discussing it.
15. As an aside, with regards to a current issue, Anwar is a bad judge of character. He has chosen a sarawakian as DPM.
16. The donkey has imputed that the 1-month given by Anwar, asking him to prepare the MA63 is not sufficient. Who says he has to prepare it alone? He can have a battalion of advisers to help him, can't he?
17. One of the test of a leader is to put the right person at the right place. If the sarawakian elected pig is whining and complaining, Anwar has failed in judging this character.
18. I am sorry to shatter the glass casing surrounding Anwar. That must disappoint his legion of fans. But I consider myself, his soulmate. Always critical and sceptical.
Saturday, 10 December 2022
The Anwarisation of the Malaysian cabinet.
1. I was watching the Senate run-off between Raphael Warnock and Herschel Walker in Georgia. The journalist said something that reminded me of a very important rule.
2. She said that the representative we choose must reflect the values we cherish greatly.
3. In the end, Walker was defeated because the majority cherishes moral character as a pivotal value.
4. For walker, it was a case of his sordid past catching up with him. In a permissive and loose environment, he sowed his wild oats here and there and later paid for the abortion of his girlfriends.
5. Now, pro-life is his party, the republican (the American umno) official stand. How can anyone reconcile what he did in the past with the current stand?
6. In the end, a society, which jealously guards its core value of good character, defeated Herschel walker.
7. Tweeter Trump supported walker. By way of extension, American society at large, rejected the trumpfication of society. Which is thinking that society can be bullied and stymied by verbal sophistry. Thinking that way, is a character flaw.
8. Walker's candidacy was supported by the whites in general because he is black and a football champion. Some sort like a trophy uncle tom.
9. One cardinal point is driven here; the importance of moral integrity, which constitutes the main element of character.
10. But character, as Lee Kuan Yew says, is tested when you are faced with pressure or put under the firing line. Then, your moral constitution comes to the fore.
11. Walker, when faced with an erroneous perception that society is loose and permissive, took advantage of the situation much as Trump, with lips smirking, bullies the American people.
12. Character then is the ability to be stoic and makes a morally right decision, while conscious of the surrounding circumstances.
13. Walker made a self advantageous decision thinking that Georgians do not assign a high value to moral character.
14. Trivializing character issues, what is happening now is the Anwarisation of the cabinet. What is that?
15. That is, inclusion of kleptocratic minded individuals into the cabinet and rescuing rejected individuals into the cabinet. The DPM even has 47 criminal charges against him. But Anwar is ok with that. Dap and an Amanah can sleep with that. Cavorting with discredited people is ok maa.
16. It's true then, as lky said, judging a person's character is most difficult and requires time. Either you have it or you don't. Anwar seems to have yilek of it.
17. It's not possible to judge a person by watching him on a TV screen, or sitting with him for 1-2hours while drinking latte and eating popcorn or curry puff
18. If the situation persists, I am afraid PH's success (as a government) is temporary, transient and ephemeral.
19. This government, consisting of individuals working at cross purposes, cannot be a stable one. You have at least one gangstrous individual from Sarawak, a slew of kleptocratic individuals and 2 discredited DPMs.
20. I am amazed that some people regard the inclusion of these unsavory individuals in Anwar's cabinet is a brilliant strategy of mamu.
21. That strategy is alleged to buy time for Anwar, don't worry, Anwar is in control overall and key portfolios are held by PKR people.
22. Ah so, it's a political chess board game after all. Yeah, yeah.
23. Anwar must now provide the leadership to these disparate individuals. Which is to rally these people to a cause and policies to achieve the cause .
24. Unfortunately, the signals given off by Anwar are unclear. He's spread too thin, liberal, and too celebratory of differences.
25. that being so, he must surround himself with the ablest, most determined, energetic and sound. These people will make his policies succeed . As it is, the only people who are determined and willing are the dap 'chauvinists'. There are too few of them.
26. The economy and finance portfolios must be merged asap and put Rafizi ramli there pronto!
27. The statement given by Anwar on zahid is worrying me. I hope it does to others too.
28. He said he considered 3 things. Zahid has not been proven guilty. He is BN chairman, and he is president of umno.
29. Imagine if the number 1 honcho considers these things, it is not improbable that a servile AG does not also consider these things too
30. What if the AG were to mysteriously drop the charges against zahid. The charges won't even reach the court.
31. There's nothing the prosecutorial team and the judge can do. Except, cupped their hands over their genitals. Betul tak madam t maimun?
32. As for Anwar, despite the negative things I said of him, DAP, Amanah, the Borneo bloc and umno have chosen him as PM. They must now work hard to ensure he remains PM.
33. I have no doubt, Anwar will sail through the confidence vote on 19th December. Like a knife cutting butter!
2. She said that the representative we choose must reflect the values we cherish greatly.
3. In the end, Walker was defeated because the majority cherishes moral character as a pivotal value.
4. For walker, it was a case of his sordid past catching up with him. In a permissive and loose environment, he sowed his wild oats here and there and later paid for the abortion of his girlfriends.
5. Now, pro-life is his party, the republican (the American umno) official stand. How can anyone reconcile what he did in the past with the current stand?
6. In the end, a society, which jealously guards its core value of good character, defeated Herschel walker.
7. Tweeter Trump supported walker. By way of extension, American society at large, rejected the trumpfication of society. Which is thinking that society can be bullied and stymied by verbal sophistry. Thinking that way, is a character flaw.
8. Walker's candidacy was supported by the whites in general because he is black and a football champion. Some sort like a trophy uncle tom.
9. One cardinal point is driven here; the importance of moral integrity, which constitutes the main element of character.
10. But character, as Lee Kuan Yew says, is tested when you are faced with pressure or put under the firing line. Then, your moral constitution comes to the fore.
11. Walker, when faced with an erroneous perception that society is loose and permissive, took advantage of the situation much as Trump, with lips smirking, bullies the American people.
12. Character then is the ability to be stoic and makes a morally right decision, while conscious of the surrounding circumstances.
13. Walker made a self advantageous decision thinking that Georgians do not assign a high value to moral character.
14. Trivializing character issues, what is happening now is the Anwarisation of the cabinet. What is that?
15. That is, inclusion of kleptocratic minded individuals into the cabinet and rescuing rejected individuals into the cabinet. The DPM even has 47 criminal charges against him. But Anwar is ok with that. Dap and an Amanah can sleep with that. Cavorting with discredited people is ok maa.
16. It's true then, as lky said, judging a person's character is most difficult and requires time. Either you have it or you don't. Anwar seems to have yilek of it.
17. It's not possible to judge a person by watching him on a TV screen, or sitting with him for 1-2hours while drinking latte and eating popcorn or curry puff
18. If the situation persists, I am afraid PH's success (as a government) is temporary, transient and ephemeral.
19. This government, consisting of individuals working at cross purposes, cannot be a stable one. You have at least one gangstrous individual from Sarawak, a slew of kleptocratic individuals and 2 discredited DPMs.
20. I am amazed that some people regard the inclusion of these unsavory individuals in Anwar's cabinet is a brilliant strategy of mamu.
21. That strategy is alleged to buy time for Anwar, don't worry, Anwar is in control overall and key portfolios are held by PKR people.
22. Ah so, it's a political chess board game after all. Yeah, yeah.
23. Anwar must now provide the leadership to these disparate individuals. Which is to rally these people to a cause and policies to achieve the cause .
24. Unfortunately, the signals given off by Anwar are unclear. He's spread too thin, liberal, and too celebratory of differences.
25. that being so, he must surround himself with the ablest, most determined, energetic and sound. These people will make his policies succeed . As it is, the only people who are determined and willing are the dap 'chauvinists'. There are too few of them.
26. The economy and finance portfolios must be merged asap and put Rafizi ramli there pronto!
27. The statement given by Anwar on zahid is worrying me. I hope it does to others too.
28. He said he considered 3 things. Zahid has not been proven guilty. He is BN chairman, and he is president of umno.
29. Imagine if the number 1 honcho considers these things, it is not improbable that a servile AG does not also consider these things too
30. What if the AG were to mysteriously drop the charges against zahid. The charges won't even reach the court.
31. There's nothing the prosecutorial team and the judge can do. Except, cupped their hands over their genitals. Betul tak madam t maimun?
32. As for Anwar, despite the negative things I said of him, DAP, Amanah, the Borneo bloc and umno have chosen him as PM. They must now work hard to ensure he remains PM.
33. I have no doubt, Anwar will sail through the confidence vote on 19th December. Like a knife cutting butter!
Wednesday, 7 December 2022
Readings from an obscure kitab kuning of politics.
1. To Dr Singh, Mr kamadevas, Mr pOH Kee mak, Mr tong Sam pah, encik kuatshahwat, I like a million others prayed that Anwar became our 10th PM.
2. I have written articles supporting him. I lauded him for being a principled fellow.
3. Providence has answered us bountifully. Our intense prayers were not in vain. He indeed became our 10th PM.
4. We prayed really hard. As hard as the achis in Tambun. We prayed until dry in the mouth. Some of us sent out a petition urging friends to support Anwar.
5. When I resent the petition to friends, one came back with the incredulous question, since when does SakmongkolAK47 become a supporter of Anwar?
6. When he appointed Zahid penorogol as DPM, our dry mouths were left with a bitter after-taste
7. When I described him as the 'rock' Anwar, perhaps that was a tad premature. Now, I tend to concur with the PKR mp of pasir gudang, when it was reported he said thus:-
2. I have written articles supporting him. I lauded him for being a principled fellow.
3. Providence has answered us bountifully. Our intense prayers were not in vain. He indeed became our 10th PM.
4. We prayed really hard. As hard as the achis in Tambun. We prayed until dry in the mouth. Some of us sent out a petition urging friends to support Anwar.
5. When I resent the petition to friends, one came back with the incredulous question, since when does SakmongkolAK47 become a supporter of Anwar?
6. When he appointed Zahid penorogol as DPM, our dry mouths were left with a bitter after-taste
7. When I described him as the 'rock' Anwar, perhaps that was a tad premature. Now, I tend to concur with the PKR mp of pasir gudang, when it was reported he said thus:-
8. 3 things that Anwar said to justify Zahid's inclusion, made me sit up.
9. He said Zahid is:-
a. Umno president,
b. He is BN chairman and
c. He hasn't been proven guilty.
Anwar said the 3 things, he considers.
10. Now that the PM considers these factors, will the Appeal and Supreme court judges also consider these?
11. Unless they are stout enough in deciding cases bases on their merits, not on irrelevant exogenous factors.
12. After all, they are not politicians like Anwar is.
13. It seems, principles are overrated things after all. They can be changed and adjusted according to extraordinary circumstances.
14. Why can't as a principle, anyone facing criminal and jailable offences be excluded. Excluded, ab initio, are those who lost in the election and those who did not contest at all.
15. Wouldn't that simplify decision makings, instead of including complicated and difficult to extricate from matters?
16. The rule of innocent until proven guilty has often been used by shyster people to justify horrible things.
17. And by repeatedly saying it, you unconsciously take up ownership of that rule, and you will go all out to defend it. In the end, the innocence becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
18. Perhaps Anwar's principle is to be like water. At once not rigid, formless and shapeless, assuming the shape of the medium it occupies. Filled into a cup, it becomes the cup, filled into a bottle, it's the bottle.
19. Therefore, I suspend my judgement and give mamu Anwar, the benefit of the doubt.
20. That leaves one thing I cannot reconcile and fathom. The fact that t. Zafrul was made a minister. Like Rafidah Aziz said, that's scrapping the barrel.
21. That bourgeois bloke is not an MP, lost the election meaning rejected by the people, has no umno roots, yet he was made a minister.
22. Tell me the yellow kitab you are reading Mr PM sir.
23. As a former finance minister, has Zafrul got anything to do with the 580 or 600 billion spent during the MCO?
10. Now that the PM considers these factors, will the Appeal and Supreme court judges also consider these?
11. Unless they are stout enough in deciding cases bases on their merits, not on irrelevant exogenous factors.
12. After all, they are not politicians like Anwar is.
13. It seems, principles are overrated things after all. They can be changed and adjusted according to extraordinary circumstances.
14. Why can't as a principle, anyone facing criminal and jailable offences be excluded. Excluded, ab initio, are those who lost in the election and those who did not contest at all.
15. Wouldn't that simplify decision makings, instead of including complicated and difficult to extricate from matters?
16. The rule of innocent until proven guilty has often been used by shyster people to justify horrible things.
17. And by repeatedly saying it, you unconsciously take up ownership of that rule, and you will go all out to defend it. In the end, the innocence becomes a self-fulfilling prophecy.
18. Perhaps Anwar's principle is to be like water. At once not rigid, formless and shapeless, assuming the shape of the medium it occupies. Filled into a cup, it becomes the cup, filled into a bottle, it's the bottle.
19. Therefore, I suspend my judgement and give mamu Anwar, the benefit of the doubt.
20. That leaves one thing I cannot reconcile and fathom. The fact that t. Zafrul was made a minister. Like Rafidah Aziz said, that's scrapping the barrel.
21. That bourgeois bloke is not an MP, lost the election meaning rejected by the people, has no umno roots, yet he was made a minister.
22. Tell me the yellow kitab you are reading Mr PM sir.
23. As a former finance minister, has Zafrul got anything to do with the 580 or 600 billion spent during the MCO?
No stones must be left unturned to uncover the truth!
Tuesday, 6 December 2022
Bright promises, perhaps Dismal outcome. Part 2.
1. Now that I have slept it over, I believe I can give a more sedate analysis of the cabinet.
2. If Anwar had wanted a minister advising him on legal matters, I would think Gobind is a more appropriate person. Not shim Azalina.
3. Azalina may be an articulate person, but perhaps she is an SNP signing lawyer. The duties of reforming the necessary institutions maybe over her head.
4. Trusting an umno person doing reforms is like bringing coal to Newcastle. It's futile.
5. Anwar may be eager to forge closer ties with the indian subcontinent. That's why he puts zambry Abdul Kadir there as foreign minister. Coincidentally, we don't see any indians in the cabinet.
6. There are good mapillays in the dap, mamu.
7. Tengku zafrul may be a good bean counter, but he knows nuts about economics and trade. This doesn't bode well for our country.
8. Trade and economics are not like changing motorcycle oil, ya tengku.
2. If Anwar had wanted a minister advising him on legal matters, I would think Gobind is a more appropriate person. Not shim Azalina.
3. Azalina may be an articulate person, but perhaps she is an SNP signing lawyer. The duties of reforming the necessary institutions maybe over her head.
4. Trusting an umno person doing reforms is like bringing coal to Newcastle. It's futile.
5. Anwar may be eager to forge closer ties with the indian subcontinent. That's why he puts zambry Abdul Kadir there as foreign minister. Coincidentally, we don't see any indians in the cabinet.
6. There are good mapillays in the dap, mamu.
7. Tengku zafrul may be a good bean counter, but he knows nuts about economics and trade. This doesn't bode well for our country.
8. Trade and economics are not like changing motorcycle oil, ya tengku.
9. Let's see Khaled nordin as minister of higher education take quick remedial actions. Assign students with very excellent results in the stpm, especially the Chinese students, befitting courses. Don't let them be assigned to improper courses by overzealous Malay firsters, arts graduates or eating proper with fork, spoon and knives MCS officers.
10. With mat Hassan as defence minister, let's hope that Rafizi ramli won't stop exposing the OTHER scandals in the defence ministry. And since mat Hassan has nothing to do with them, he won't object to have them investigated thoroughly, would he?
11. I have no complaint of the PkR footsoldiers given cabinet posts. They are good talents. Rafizi ramli, fahmi fadzil, saifudin nasution are capable people. Fadhlina sidek, whom I believe is a senator last time, is the daughter of Anwar's comrade in arms since the abim days, sidek fadhil. We hope she's chosen for her abilities.
12. The DAP too has provided a pool of talented people. Only, I think, the numbers do not commensurate with the party's strength.
13. I can't help but believe the DAP got the short end of the stick. With 40 mps, more than PKR, umno and the Borneo bloc, DAP is given a few scraps, so to speak.
14. In a sense, this is a reflection of Anthony loke the DAP sec gen . It suggests he may have not negotiated with Anwar hard enough, or he is too besotted with Anwar.
15. He may have inadvertently contributed to the DAP getting the short end of the stick. Or the DAP sacrifices itself for the greater good. The greater good being the formation of a unity government.
16. This cabinet and government looks suspiciously, as an umno government MK 11.
17. We hope that there is no prenuptial pact between zahid penorogol and mamu Anwar. An agreement whereby, if Anwar gets the majority, zahid will support him as PM.
18. In return, Anwar will later recommend a royal pardon for Ali babavum Najib and have the charges against zahid dropped, as well as safe the other umno stalwarts facing court charges .
19. Now, I don't know about you, but I am a very superstitious person. If these things were to happen, I will think that mamu Anwar has a hand in it.
20. I hope I am mostly wrong in my prognoses. Then you can treat what I wrote as something to just excite your brain while sipping a c
21. I am less charitable in my assessment about the cabinet. Sorry for that. For safer analyses, which may be right, listen to the luminaries invited by Awani.
22. Malaysians and countrymen, lend me your ears. I came to bury Caesar, not to praise him.
23. I came to criticize Anwar, not to praise him. I pull no punches. But my criticisms are done sans malice.
Sunday, 4 December 2022
Bright promises, perhaps Dismal outcome . Part 1.
1. Just now at 8:15pm, 2nd of December, our PM announced the much awaited cabinet.
2. My initial reaction, like Milton Friedman said,'bright promises, dismal performance'.
3. My first reaction was, what a let-down. Is this an umno MK2 government?
4. The feller who lost the election in Kuala Selangor is made a minister, while the victor is left clutching his dick.
5. Dap which has more seats than umno, PKR got a few token and uncle tom posts. There's no Guan Eng, there's no Gobind, no Yeo Bee yin and 1 or 2 others.
6. In a sense, I feel vindicated. We respect Anwar, but can never trust him.
7. He's a Faustian creature, this MCGayGay feller. He will be responsible for giving umno a 2nd lease of life. The miserable entity is almost dying, here comes Anwar with arms outstretched.
2. My initial reaction, like Milton Friedman said,'bright promises, dismal performance'.
3. My first reaction was, what a let-down. Is this an umno MK2 government?
4. The feller who lost the election in Kuala Selangor is made a minister, while the victor is left clutching his dick.
5. Dap which has more seats than umno, PKR got a few token and uncle tom posts. There's no Guan Eng, there's no Gobind, no Yeo Bee yin and 1 or 2 others.
6. In a sense, I feel vindicated. We respect Anwar, but can never trust him.
7. He's a Faustian creature, this MCGayGay feller. He will be responsible for giving umno a 2nd lease of life. The miserable entity is almost dying, here comes Anwar with arms outstretched.
8. His first fatal mistake is to take in the wak ponorogol as DPM. Will that lead to the dropping of the other 47 charges proffered to jahid?
9. And he puts the man who sent rm10m through a money changer as defence minister.
10. And yet there are people who say this is a breath of fresh air, new faces, women, and it's good overall.
11. That's the difference between the various brain boxes and analysts called by in by awani and I. These people can't wait to pander to an exigent and greedy pm. Yes, exigent and greedy for praises from dusk to dawn.
12. Don't let Anwar appeal to our credulity and we, on our part, surrender our skepticism.
13. Let us remain sceptical about the cabinet and Anwar's motives.
14. In the first place, do we find comfort in Anwar taking the finance ministry? His infantile arguments, during the sapura debate, do not inspire us. Even though he will have a phalanx of advisers headed by the overrated Hasan marican.
15. Can we have confidence in a person who thinks bringing millions out of the country is by stashing notes in suitcases and ferrying them on planes instead of wire transferring the amount?
16. I would end my initial reaction by quoting T.S. Eliot.
17. I said to my soul be still and wait without hope, for hope is hope for the wrong thing. Wait with without love for love is love of the wrong thing. There is yet faith, but the hope and love are all in the waiting.
So, let us all hope for the right thing.
Saturday, 3 December 2022
Never tell outsiders what you think and keep your friends close, but your enemies closer.
1. Cabinet posts must never be seen as settling debts. The pm does not owe anything to umno. As such, umno is in no position to dictate the number and what posts it shall get.
2. So, don't push your cheeks to make your nose look pointed, by saying such things like appoint according to hierarchy, this is the right size of cabinet, blah, blah.
3. As a friend said , umno ni tak sedar diri, cakap besar, penakut pun ada. Don't put words into the PM's mouth. Stop being patronizing and don't talk from the bully pulpit.
4. Take the size of the cabinet, for instance. Don't say 28 is the correct size. China, which is a much bigger country than ours and whose population, if they urinate, can drown us, has 21 ministers. No one complains he or she can't handle his or her portfolio. It's agriculture and rural ministry is merged, for example.
5. So, if I can be brutally frank, I would say, hey umno, shut the f up! PH has every reason to have high expectations, yet the grouping doesn't say anything.
6. Don't say this person should be the DPM, or that feller should be the finance minister etc.
7. Don't do the speculate shit. If I were to do it, I would say the best person as FM is Rafizi ramli. He's got the smarts, and he's got the experience working here and there.
8. Sure, he hasn't got the experience as FM; but that can be gotten if he were made one .
9. Umno has this ongoing mentality of being preferentially treated and has this entitled to attitude. Well, those halcyon days are over and gone.
10. Umno supported PH because it knows it's the right thing to do. Anwar and PH has 82 seats-he ought to be given the FIRST chance to form a government.
11. Not mahiadin 'puffy' Yassin with 73 seats. Moreover, Anwar is amenable to an inclusive government as opposed to mahiadin's exclusive arrangement.
12.mahiadins politics is the politics of convenience and political power grab by any means necessary.
13. Note the intrigue he did in pahang. He sent his emissaries there and offered the mb a senatorship and to be made a full minister. In return, the mb post will be given to PN.
14. That can be only be a measure of a man consumed with power grab. The man is perilous for Malaysia.
15. In my mind, following the dictates of realpolitik, the pm ought to be guided by 2 principles.
16. First, he should never tell outsiders what he thinks nor allow anyone to determine his thinking. This is self-explanatory.
17. Secondly, which I think is more important, is to keep his friends close, but keep his enemies closer.
18. As between the Borneo bloc and umno, umno is the friendlier enemy. It was they who initiated the sari pacific talks. That shows umno can be a friend to Don Anwar.
19. So, accommodate the Borneo bloc first and give umno enough to wet its beak.
This article was completed on Thursday
Thursday, 1 December 2022
Membentuk kabinet Malaysia. Prinsip2 panduan.
1. Ahli parlimen setiawangsa dan pasir gudang berpendapat bahawa jangan jadikan kluster mahkamah sebagai menteri dalam kabinet Anwar.
2. Timbalan ketua umno Johor menyanggah pendapat ini. Menurut nurjazlan mohd, pendapat seperti ini menyusahkan hubungan BN -PH.
3. Menurut nurjazlan, seorang tidak bersalah sebelum dihukum. Pandangan ini sahih jika kita bersikap teknikal, specific dan legalistic.
4. Maka, ada pertembungan antara pendapat jangan ambil kluster mahkamah sebagai anggota kabinet dengan pandangan se2orang belum salah sebelum ada hukuman. Yang mana satu kita nak pakai?
5. Suasana mengelirukan apabila Anwar Ibrahim menyatakan bahawa seseorang belum bersalah selagi tidak dihukum
6. Kenyataan ini memberi optimism kepada penyokong2 kluster mahkahmah. Ada yang mengatakan Zahid hamidi ada peluang jadi tpm dll
7. Kita harap bila Anwar kata, dia akan dengar pandangan semua pihak, Ia akan menyedarkan semua orang.
8. Umno janganlah get ahead of itself. Jangan besar kepala tuntut itu ini. Jangan anggap diri prima Donna dengan 30 kerusi kamu.
9. Kalau umno ada 3 kerusi itu kira dah bagus. Anwar kena beri priority kepada rakan2 ph dahulu. Dan penyertaan Sabah dan Sarawak harus ada. Bukan nak layan kememe umno saja .
10. Pendapat yang mengatakan Zahid mesti ada dalam kabinet, bukan sesuatu yang terpahat pada batu. Bahawa umno ada monopli undi melayu kini adalah satu metos .
11. Sekarang, undi melayu boleh diperolehi oleh ph sendiri, oleh pas dll. Orang melayu sudah punya kesadaran politik .
12. Dalam membentuk kabinet, pm di pandu oleh banyak faktor. Antara yang penting ialah mengelak daripada cenderung kepada pesalah laku, agar tidak menjadi insane pesalah laku .
13. Banyak Kali dalam sejarah, orang yang komplen pasal penindas, menjadi sang penindas juga. Baca Franz fanon.
14. Yang komplen dan anti rasuah, jadi perasuah sama.
15. Ingatlah pesan Allah, dalam 113 surah HUD. Jangan lah kamu cenderung kepada pesalah laku, kelak kamu disambar API neraka.
16. Yakni, jangan ambil kluster mahkamah, kelak nanti kamu ditimpa bencana.
17. Bukankah orang2 PKR, selalu mengkakaktuakan ayatb113 surah HUD? Kotakan nya!
2. Timbalan ketua umno Johor menyanggah pendapat ini. Menurut nurjazlan mohd, pendapat seperti ini menyusahkan hubungan BN -PH.
3. Menurut nurjazlan, seorang tidak bersalah sebelum dihukum. Pandangan ini sahih jika kita bersikap teknikal, specific dan legalistic.
4. Maka, ada pertembungan antara pendapat jangan ambil kluster mahkamah sebagai anggota kabinet dengan pandangan se2orang belum salah sebelum ada hukuman. Yang mana satu kita nak pakai?
5. Suasana mengelirukan apabila Anwar Ibrahim menyatakan bahawa seseorang belum bersalah selagi tidak dihukum
6. Kenyataan ini memberi optimism kepada penyokong2 kluster mahkahmah. Ada yang mengatakan Zahid hamidi ada peluang jadi tpm dll
7. Kita harap bila Anwar kata, dia akan dengar pandangan semua pihak, Ia akan menyedarkan semua orang.
8. Umno janganlah get ahead of itself. Jangan besar kepala tuntut itu ini. Jangan anggap diri prima Donna dengan 30 kerusi kamu.
9. Kalau umno ada 3 kerusi itu kira dah bagus. Anwar kena beri priority kepada rakan2 ph dahulu. Dan penyertaan Sabah dan Sarawak harus ada. Bukan nak layan kememe umno saja .
10. Pendapat yang mengatakan Zahid mesti ada dalam kabinet, bukan sesuatu yang terpahat pada batu. Bahawa umno ada monopli undi melayu kini adalah satu metos .
11. Sekarang, undi melayu boleh diperolehi oleh ph sendiri, oleh pas dll. Orang melayu sudah punya kesadaran politik .
12. Dalam membentuk kabinet, pm di pandu oleh banyak faktor. Antara yang penting ialah mengelak daripada cenderung kepada pesalah laku, agar tidak menjadi insane pesalah laku .
13. Banyak Kali dalam sejarah, orang yang komplen pasal penindas, menjadi sang penindas juga. Baca Franz fanon.
14. Yang komplen dan anti rasuah, jadi perasuah sama.
15. Ingatlah pesan Allah, dalam 113 surah HUD. Jangan lah kamu cenderung kepada pesalah laku, kelak kamu disambar API neraka.
16. Yakni, jangan ambil kluster mahkamah, kelak nanti kamu ditimpa bencana.
17. Bukankah orang2 PKR, selalu mengkakaktuakan ayatb113 surah HUD? Kotakan nya!
Tuesday, 29 November 2022
Reimagining the DAP
1. It's gratifying to know that umno is going to sing praises for DAP.
2. Let's now see how they are actually going to do it. After years of demonizing Dap, it would be interesting to see how umno is going to break the straight jacket.
3. But I am sorry to tell umno to stop the blame shifting to say, blackened Dap is the result of pn narrative.
4. To be fair, it's true that PN is responsible for maligning, besmirching, disparaging and belittling dap.
5. To the haters in PN, dap is pushing the Christian and Jewish agenda and horrors, it's communist and godless.
6. I have debunked this black propaganda in my earlier article, 'voting DAP'. See the blog article.
7. But umno too is guilty of the black propaganda. At every umno general assembly, the Chinese are blamed for all the ills befalling the Malay community.
8. At every umno general assembly, delegates will not forfeit the opportunity to berate and lambast Chinese greed and rapaciousness for causing the overall backwardness of the malays. And the Chinese behaved that way, because of Dap. For that, DAP is public enemy number one.
9. So while assigning blame to pn, which is but a recent creation, umno must first deconstruct its own racist nationalism.
10. Sure, kill off mahiadin's false claims about Dap christian and Jewish agenda. It's so riculous
11. Pour boiling water over Hadis hallucinations of anti-Malay, anti Islam and lbgt lovers attributed maliciously to Dap.
12. Umno should be able to do these. It is no stranger to the black art of verbal sophistry and internet propaganda. Herr Lokman will salivate at that task. The pontian gnome needs only to give his approval.
13. The umno leadership must acknowledge and make it known to the umno hoi polloi, that the general backwardness of the malays is not caused by the Chinese and not instigated by the dap.
14. That really the way forward for the malays rests on endogenous diligence, skill sets and industriousness. Not in blaming others. Envy of others should spur competitiveness.
15. It's easier to blame and berate pn for the negative perception of the dap. It's more difficult for umno to deconstruct its own prejudices on the Dap.
16. Umnos work is made more difficult, because of the fact that out of the 7million first time voters, the majority of them voted for the ecclesiastical dictators.
17. Which means the impressionable young minds believed the lies perpetrated by the mad mullahs.
18. Which suggests that umno, dap and even muda have not paid heed to first time voters.
19. Umno must do many things. First, to deconstruct its own racial bigotry, begining with the coming pau. Second, to attack pn mercilessly. 3rd, to cultivate and engage the 1st time voters
20. Being impressionable can only imply, the minds of the young, the majority of them can be cleansed. The pondok and the madrasah crowd are probably dyed in the wool apparatchiks.
21. The sober truth is, umno can only do so much. Moreover, we cannot believe the pontian gnome completely.
22. It's up to the Dap to say convincing and repeatedly, it's never anti-Malay, anti Islam or anti monarchy. It's no communist. A person's religious denomination and a person's sexual preferences is a personal choice and is not daps business.
23. It needs to carry out field programs to cultivate and engage the young meaningfully.
24. In carrying out its tasks, dap need not change its spots. Its democratic socialism has worked well over the years and will probably endure indefinitely.
25. Dap must remain as the bulwark against social injustices and all wrongdoings. It's democratic socialism must rest in the idea of meritocracy, pragmatic policies and honesty. Leave the BS to others
Tuesday, 22 November 2022
Suara rakyat, bukan SD atau kertas.
1. Dalam keadaan dimana parlimen tergantung, agung patut consider parti yang mempunyai kerusi terbanyak.
2. Bukan panggil kedua dua ph dan pn. Dalam sistem siapa dulu melepasi palang, yang dahulu sekali ialah pH.
3. Maka yang berhak dipanggil dulu ialah Anwar Ibrahim bukan din sembab bersekali.
4. Bukan kita nak tubuh kerajaan melalui tender dimana bidaan dibuka sekali.
5 . Anwar Ibrahim patut dipanggil untuk mengemukakan cadangan kerajaan nya.
6. Jika cadangan nya gagal, Maka pemimpin pn dipanggil.
7. Kejayaan atau kegagalan cadangannya hanya boleh ditentukan bila parliament bersidang kali pertama untuk penggal ini.
8. Tatkala itu, si Anwar boleh mege test cadangan nya dengan mengusul undi tidak percaya .
9. Tidak juga kerajaan dan pm diujudkan melalui cara akuan bersumpah. Kalau hendak pasti, agung kena jumpa mp in person dan bertanya secara bertulis,pendirian mereka .
10. Akuan bersumpah tidak jelas. Ia mesti dilakukan secara berjumpa satu satu atau undi tidak percaya. Sesiapa boleh mendakwa dia ada SD. Itu hearsay evidence saja.
11. Dalam menentukan siapa pm dan menumbuhkan kerajaan, keputusan nya mesti ambil kira kehendak rakyat .
12 . Dalam kes ini, 1.2 juta undi memisahkan pH dan pn . Pandangan dan kehendak mereka tidak boleh diketepikan.
13. Nyata, mereka mahu ph jadi kerajaan dan Anwar Ibrahim pm.
14. Menentukan kerajaan dan siapa pm , bukan diputustkan oleh 4, 5 orang. Mereka membawa suara rakyat dan suara ini harus didengar .
15. Lebih suara rakyat mengumandangkan nama Anwar Ibrahim!
Permutations and Possibilities.
1. The facts, as verified by spr are as follows. PH 82, PN 73, BN 30 and the Borneo bloc 35.
2. The Borneo bloc being grs,gps, warisan, pbm ,kdm bebas etc from east Malaysia
3. If what zahid says is true, that is as umno president, he has the mandate to decide umnos course of action, then what abang Johari said and mahiadin said are premature.
4. If zahids mandate is as per umnos resolution, no pact with either pH or pn, nothing is definite yet .
5. Nothing is definite yet as zahids mandate may depart from umnos resolution. The fate of a coalition government is wide opened.
6. Therefore, what abang Johari said is premature and mahiadin said was untrue.
7. Premature because BN has not discussed anything with the Borneo bloc. Mahiadin said was untrue, because at his PC, he said he has received a letter from the palace.
8. Such a letter, may or may not exist. The purported letter, seems to suggest that mahiadin has been given the go ahead to form a government. Mahiadin wants the public to believe that being so.
9. I am inclined to say such a letter with such purposeful intent and want does not exist. But being full of machinations, intrigue and scheming, mahiadin said that with a poker face and in an as a matter of fact manner.
10. Allow me to say it bluntly, mahiadin is a serial liar. Or maybe even a congenital liar.
11. Why should mahiadin be treated preferentialy as he, the master manipulator inferred? His PN has 73 seats as compare with PH with 82 seats?
12. Calling PH and PN at the same time maybe fair and time saving, but it is not right.
13. The better way in my opinion is to call PH(82) to present it's proposals. If it's not successful then only call PN,(73,).
14. In a first pass the post system, it is PH which pass the passed the post first. If the earlier and the latter are treated the same, then an election race is meaningless.
15. If that is the case, let's call a tender and the bids opened at the same time.
16. Also, our government must never be a government by SD. The better way is, the king calls for a special meeting of parliament to verify the validity of the government. Or the king meets all elected mps in person.
17. This way may not be as time saving as calling PH and PN at the same time, but then the business of forming a government is serious business.
18. It must be deliberate and full of care. Not one to be treated cavalierly
19. Let's get back to the issue of zahids mandate . It may be as per umno resolution. Which means not working with either ph or pn .
20. Or now, depending on circumstances, it's at his discretion on what, in his opinion is best for umnos interest.
21. It cannot be grounded on his personal or court cluster's interests .
22. If personal and court cluster interests are factored in, that means his choice of coalition partners are composed of people who are compromisable, irresolute and unprincipled. Not good for the nation.
23. If he is thinking of the nation first, personal and court cluster interests must not be factored in.
24. Let's assume he chooses to work with pn and the Borneo bloc. He then has 30+73+35=138.
25. He can choose to work with ph alone. He then has 30+82=112.
26. He can't work ALONE with either pn (30+73) or the Borneo bloc (30+35).
27. He doesn't want to work with either ph or pn. He wants umno to be a pure oppositon. Something umno is unaccustomed to. Then pn and ph will do some fierce horse trading with the Borneo bloc.
28. Pn with 73 seats can't bargain with the Borneo bloc (35). PH can. 82 +35.
29. We have to consider the anti-hopping act too. . If support for the proposals of any party is considered hopping, we have another scenario. If it's not considered so, the game is an open one.
31. PH can work with umno and the Borneo bloc. 82+30+35=146. Pn 73+30+35=138.
32. We assume pH and pn are adversaries and will perpetually remain so .it will always be pH vs pn.
33. If mps are free to decide without following party lines, then the issue is open-ended
34. Then both pH and pn can work with some elements in umno, in the Borneo bloc and even within PH. PH can also work with some elements within umno, the Borneo bloc and PN.
35. In that case, I will sit back and ask the parties, quo vadis and eventually say like Doris Day, que sera sera.
2. The Borneo bloc being grs,gps, warisan, pbm ,kdm bebas etc from east Malaysia
3. If what zahid says is true, that is as umno president, he has the mandate to decide umnos course of action, then what abang Johari said and mahiadin said are premature.
4. If zahids mandate is as per umnos resolution, no pact with either pH or pn, nothing is definite yet .
5. Nothing is definite yet as zahids mandate may depart from umnos resolution. The fate of a coalition government is wide opened.
6. Therefore, what abang Johari said is premature and mahiadin said was untrue.
7. Premature because BN has not discussed anything with the Borneo bloc. Mahiadin said was untrue, because at his PC, he said he has received a letter from the palace.
8. Such a letter, may or may not exist. The purported letter, seems to suggest that mahiadin has been given the go ahead to form a government. Mahiadin wants the public to believe that being so.
9. I am inclined to say such a letter with such purposeful intent and want does not exist. But being full of machinations, intrigue and scheming, mahiadin said that with a poker face and in an as a matter of fact manner.
10. Allow me to say it bluntly, mahiadin is a serial liar. Or maybe even a congenital liar.
11. Why should mahiadin be treated preferentialy as he, the master manipulator inferred? His PN has 73 seats as compare with PH with 82 seats?
12. Calling PH and PN at the same time maybe fair and time saving, but it is not right.
13. The better way in my opinion is to call PH(82) to present it's proposals. If it's not successful then only call PN,(73,).
14. In a first pass the post system, it is PH which pass the passed the post first. If the earlier and the latter are treated the same, then an election race is meaningless.
15. If that is the case, let's call a tender and the bids opened at the same time.
16. Also, our government must never be a government by SD. The better way is, the king calls for a special meeting of parliament to verify the validity of the government. Or the king meets all elected mps in person.
17. This way may not be as time saving as calling PH and PN at the same time, but then the business of forming a government is serious business.
18. It must be deliberate and full of care. Not one to be treated cavalierly
19. Let's get back to the issue of zahids mandate . It may be as per umno resolution. Which means not working with either ph or pn .
20. Or now, depending on circumstances, it's at his discretion on what, in his opinion is best for umnos interest.
21. It cannot be grounded on his personal or court cluster's interests .
22. If personal and court cluster interests are factored in, that means his choice of coalition partners are composed of people who are compromisable, irresolute and unprincipled. Not good for the nation.
23. If he is thinking of the nation first, personal and court cluster interests must not be factored in.
24. Let's assume he chooses to work with pn and the Borneo bloc. He then has 30+73+35=138.
25. He can choose to work with ph alone. He then has 30+82=112.
26. He can't work ALONE with either pn (30+73) or the Borneo bloc (30+35).
27. He doesn't want to work with either ph or pn. He wants umno to be a pure oppositon. Something umno is unaccustomed to. Then pn and ph will do some fierce horse trading with the Borneo bloc.
28. Pn with 73 seats can't bargain with the Borneo bloc (35). PH can. 82 +35.
29. We have to consider the anti-hopping act too. . If support for the proposals of any party is considered hopping, we have another scenario. If it's not considered so, the game is an open one.
31. PH can work with umno and the Borneo bloc. 82+30+35=146. Pn 73+30+35=138.
32. We assume pH and pn are adversaries and will perpetually remain so .it will always be pH vs pn.
33. If mps are free to decide without following party lines, then the issue is open-ended
34. Then both pH and pn can work with some elements in umno, in the Borneo bloc and even within PH. PH can also work with some elements within umno, the Borneo bloc and PN.
35. In that case, I will sit back and ask the parties, quo vadis and eventually say like Doris Day, que sera sera.
Thursday, 17 November 2022
Ismail's Big Lie dan keruntuhan umno.
1. Kalau Ismail sabri baca bab 10, the art of war, karya sun tzu, dia tahu pentingnya terrain atau muka atau rupa bumi.
2. Von Clausewitz berkata, war is the extension of politics by other means.
3. PRU adalah perperangan, dimana para aktor nya berinteraksi secara politik dengan rakyat. Untuk mencapai kemenangan dan mengalahkan lawan.
4. Ia tidak boleh didepani secara semberono. Seperti berlagak seperti santa Claus, merasuahi rakyat.
5. Yang kita perlukan ialah vision menumbuhkan ekonomi, mengatasi inflasi, mengujudkan perkerjaan dsb nya .
6. Bukan nya berbelaja sakan, memberi pelbagai bantuan politik, menjanjikan pemberian laptop kepada semua pelajar, janjikan internet 5G dimana ada rakyat yang tiada smartphone dan pendidikab percuma.
7. Nangoi mana yang akan membekalkan laptop dan smartphone kepada kerajaan dan kroni mana pula yang akan dapat komisyen atas projek2 ini?
8.Semua ini akan membuka ruang untuk korapsi dan putaran korapsi tidak akan berkesudahan.
9. Dan siapakah enabler rasuah ini semua? ,Jawab nya umno lah siapa lagi penyangak nya?
10. Itu satu hal. Yang terdekat sekali ialah Ismail sabri ini terlalu bangang untuk memahami rupa bumi.
11. Mengikut sun tzu, terdapat 6 jenis permukaan bumi. Memahami profail muka bumi boleh mendatangkan kemenangan. Kegagalan memahami nya membawa kekalahan.
12. Kepada Ismail 'lembab' sabri, permukaan bumi pru homogeneous. Boleh diratakan dengan pemberian wang pelbagai rupa.. Nyatalah falsafah Ismail tidak berbeza dengan cash is king Ali babavum Najib.
13. Kelainan muka bumi menuntut pendekatan yang berlainan. Kegagalan memahami hakikat ini, adalah petanda awal umno akan kecundang .
14. Maka pada 10 Oktober 2022, seperti robot, Ismail membubarkan parlimen. Adakah tindakan bodoh itu akibat desakan wak jahid?
15. Kegagalan memahami muka bumi menyebabkan Ismail tidak memfaktorkan banjir.
16. Rakyat masih tidak lupa akibat banjir. Sengsara yang dirasakan seperti kayu balak bergelimpangan merosakkan kediaman mereka. Amarah mereka tidak padam.
17. Pengistiharan PRU dibuat tanpa mengendahkan amaran jabatan meteoroloji Malaysia. Tidak juga menghirau protest dari menter2 bersatu dan pas.
18. Tidak syak lagi mereka ini dan rakyat yang sengsara akibat banjir akan membawa amarah mereka ke PRU15. Ia akan diterjemahkan kepada menolak umno.
19. Sekarang banjir sudahpun melanda serata tempat. Ingat, kesusahah kamu semua, akibat kerakusan umno dan wak jahid.
20. Menyedari kesilapan nya, Ismail mengancam untuk membatalkan PRU15. Tapi sudah terlambat.awak dah buka mulut dan wak jahid mahukan nya. Jadi, alang2 celup pekasam, biar sampai ke lengan.
21. Atau seperti kata Lord Denning, having made the bed, you must now lie on it.
22. Kegagalan memahami muka bumi adalah satu kesilapan yang fatal. Ia akan dibayar dengan kekalahan umno.
23. Saya tidak tahu sama ada pembaca perasaan, pembohongan ekonomi yang dilakukan oleh Ismail.
24. Nampak sangat Ismail jahil mengenai ekonomi atau penulis ucapan Ismail, betul2 bangang .
25. Apapun, Ismail telah menampakkan satu catastrophic illiteracy in economics.
26. Kita semua tercengang bila Ismail mengatakan ekonomi kita tumbuh pada Kadar 8%, inflasi terkawal dan pengangguran dikekang .
27. Skrip mana yang Ismail baca? Dari mana sumber pertumbuhan ekonomi kita, harga barang2 dapur naik dan Ismail kata inflasi terkawal? Lepasan kolej dan university tidak dapat kerja, tapi Ismail kata pengangguran ok?
28. Shhhh..nanti orang Pekan dengar. Mereka akan kata, kepala bapok aok!
29. Dilihat dari perspective yang luas, perhatikan ini. Ekonomi UK akan berkembang pada Kadar 2*%, USA kuat2 pada kadar 2.6*%, dan China pada Kadar 4%.
30. Mana mungkin ekonomi kita yang kecil yang bergantung pada ekspot ke negara2 ini, boleh berkembang pada Kadar 8%?
31. Tambah lagi, kita telah melalui tahap COVID. Penghasilan pukul rata menguncup.
32. Tentulah kita tidak dapat ekspot ke negara2 diatas yang akan fokus kepada pemulihan ekonomi mereka terlebih dulu.
33. Siapakah yang hendak beli komoditi dan intermediate goods kita? Ada, tapi tidak mendadak.
34. Sumber pertumbuhan tidak mungkin domestic.pasaran kita terhad. Kuasa beli rakyat kecil. Impot makanan kita mencecah rm60b sekarang.
35. Jadi Kadar tumbuh 8%, adalah bullshit semata mata. Ismail temberang satu negara
36. Al hasil, ada banyak sebab kita terajang umno keluar. Biarlah aku janji wak jahid jadi pm lawak sebelum tidur.
37.
Ayuh, rakyat Malaysia bangkitlah dari the big lie umno.
Kian lama kita mati dalam setia,
Kali ini kita hidup dalam durhaka!
Wednesday, 16 November 2022
Rakyat Sungai Buloh, waspada keberadaan Trojan horse.
1. Khairy jamaludin atau KJ menyifatkan blogger politik sebagai monyet. Bahkan dia menyarankan supaya mereka di Jel kerana menulis bahan2 anti kerajaan.
2. Wah, belum lagi menjadi president umno dan pm, budak macam India mabuk ini, sudah menunjukkan kecenderungan sifat2 kediktatoran.
3. Itu menjadikan KJ, klon Kim jong UN yang akan memenjarai se2orang atas dasar thought crime. Di Jel hanya kerana memikir sesuatu yang kritikal terhadap kerajaan.
4. Well, ada baiknya pembaca mendengar pendapat monyet politik ini
5. Terdapat suara2 orang ber inferiority complex yang berkata bahawa budak geliga KJ ini mesti diselamatkan. Dia berubat dan satu buntat.
6. Saya kata ,cukup2lah smarmy adulation seperti ini. Betapalah geliganya graduan Oxford ini? Dia telah memilih umno bukan?menunjukkan dia tidakkah sebijak yang diandaikan.
7. kalau dia memilih umno, besar kemunkinan dia korap, rasis dan bigoted macam kaldai2 lain dalam umno ok?
8. Maka jika ada orang bamboo river termakan kononnya, KJ dianiayai Zahid, dia buntat yang mesti diselamatkan, tolonglah jangan.
9. Jika dia seekor kaldai yang dihantar ke rumah sembelihan bernama Sungai buloh, biarkan saja. Walaupun dia ada mirip shahrukh khan Dari segi warna kulit. Wanita umno je yang suka jenis ni.
10. Dia mengaku dia reformis, bukan yes man, tidak disayangi Zahid, suka berterus terang, gedebak gedebu g...semua itu bong dan bullshit belaka.
11. Jangan lupa dia juga seorang yang rasis. Menghunus serta menciumi keris, mengancam serta menakut2kan bukan melayu.
12. Dia kata nak jadi pm . Ini bukan nya menunjukkan tidak salah memasang cita2. Sebaliknya, Ia mencerminkan keangkuhan si legam ini.
13. He is already looking past Sungai buloh folks. Rakyat SB hanya batu loncatan KJ je. Tidak lebih dari stone heads aje.
14. Ianya menandakan bahawa keangkuhan dan rasa cocksure mentality budak2 tingkat 4 masih menebal pada diri KJ.
15. Masa dia dibawah payung sleepy Joe Dollah badawi, dia dan kunco2 nya berlagak macam de facto rulers.
16. Sifat2 yang suggest dia akan mewakili SB dengan keangkuhan.
17. KJ ingat dirinya yang terbaik Dan terbersih dalam umno. Itu terjadi kerana mamat2 umno mediocre clueless serta korap. The same hubris akan disajikan kepada penduduk SB .
18. Bukankah KJ ni samdol yang membenarkan syarikat pharmaniaga, repack dan rebottle vaksin sinovac?
19. Yakni kegiatan yang mungkin memudaratkan pengguna vaksin tersebut disamping memberi peluang kepada pharmaniaga buat wang atas sengsara rakyat
20. Bererti dia menyokong aktiviti membuat duit melalui cara Kotor.
21. Rakyat SB beringatlah untuk menyokong KJ. Mengundi KJ bererti mengundi gangster wak jahid.
22. Marilah kita menjadikan SB neraka untuk KJ.
Tuesday, 15 November 2022
Voting for Dap
1. In a telling remark about making choices,a netizen said:- Choosing the dap does not diminish my faith, but choosing corruption certainly does not elevate my faith.
2. That's what an election really is, a choice between parties .parties with a vision of how to run a country.
3. It's a choice between a party representing evil, profligate spending, racial hegemony, corruption and emasculation of democratic institutions.
4. Umno is the embodiment of everything evil. Its Weltanschauung is racial supremacy and hegemony, corruption and pillaging the country. It's current raison detre is to free Ali babavum Najib and overrule the law by might.
5. A spectre is haunting Malaysia. The spectre of umnoism. Its tenets are racial supremacy, religious extremism and absolute monarchism.
6. The reactionary forces are forming an unholy alliance with it. The ecclesiastical dictators, ustazs and ustazahs, kings and thugs. They want to exorcise umnoism and unleashed evil.
7. Which political party that stands in opposition to umnoism has not been branded subversive, racist and chauvinistic and now communist?
8. The dap, a member of PH is one such victim. It's demonised as racist, chauvinist and now, communist.
9. The characterisation is of course patently false. Dap is multiracial and strives for inclusiveness. It aims to promote meritocracy, pursue pragmatic policies and works earnestly to infuse honesty in governance at all levels
10.dap is a danger to umno precisely because it's objectives are so appealing to all right-thinking persons and readily strike a resonance with the people.
11. Isn't that what everyone wants? To co-exist peacefully with each other, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs?
Instead of living in a pressure cooker with mistrust and constant conflict?
12. Because of these universal ideas, dap stands in direct opposite to umno. It is at once anti corruption, anti abuse of power and anti wastage. Fundamentally, it believes everyone progresses by his own bootstraps, instead as in umno people are patronized and rise according to heritage. It is undemocratic.
13. Dap is a mortal danger to umno. It must be put down at all cost. What better way, than to label it as racist, chauvinist and communist?
14. Why is the choice between dap and corruption (umno) framed in terms of faith? Precisely because faith does not require reasoning, explaining and rationale. All it needs is blind belief.
15. Just believe that dap is racist. Just believe it is communist. Well, that is no longer that way.
16. That is the only way of the umno Goebbelsian propagandists. That is the way of the ecclesiastical dictators.
17. Umno is a product of 1940s. Dap is the product of the 60s. It was a reaction product of the reactionary umno politics.
18. Dap is not racist because it speaks out for legitimate Chinese interests. Umno speaks for legitimate Malay interests. If each speaks for the legitimate interests of a particular race, isn't it fair? Is it etched in stone, that non malays can't speak of matters affecting them?
19. If any party can be termed as racist, regrettably, it must be umno. Because it institutionalized Malay rights in its constitution. Then, Malay first is translated into various policies of the government. Education, public employment, economic policies etc. For example, when tun Razak says is penuh, it never meant is with idiots
20. Dap is not racist because it disagrees with your imbecilic ideas. Take out the racial component of the disagreement. The crux is the disagreement, not the racial originator.
21. A person cannot be faulted for his racial origins. You can't choose to be what race. Therefore, if that non-Malay stands in opposition to your ideas, you cannot fault his ethnic origins and termed him racist.
22. It may mean you can't reason or out argue the other person, and your only recourse is to besmirch the other person's ethnicity.
22. In the 1960s, white Americans wanting to rid black Americans instead of providing cogent arguments would just label the irritable black as mad and commit him to the asylum.
23. That is the tool in trade of the supremacist. Is tajuddin a supremacist?
24. Give us the reasoning as to why the dap is racist. Is it racist for speaking out for Chinese interests, for speaking out for any wrongdoings and disagreeing, or just being Chinese? Which? Or just being irritable and, therefore, can be committed to the asylum?
25. Then, there is this mad mullah who claimed to have dreamt meeting the holy prophet of Islam repeatedly, labelling dap as communist.
26. Fuyoo, that's a next level argument. May we ask his holiness, did the prophet ask him to pronounce dap as communist?
27. I am sure in labeling dap as communist, Hadi wasn't talking about the Marxian labor theory of value or the communist manifesto or the 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.
28. The only thing that matters to him, is the racial component of his argument. Since China is communist, and dap being Chinese, it too must be communist! All Chinese who refuses him, must be communists.
29. Being ungodly is not unique among the Chinese in dap. Those who commit all kinds of wrong, pillage the country are also ungodly. Thus, a Malay who commits all these regard God as irrelevant.
30. Allow me to quote a para from the poem 'sidang ruh'by the late kassim Ahmad, who himself was labelled an apostate by some men of God.
31.
Nanti akan padamlah dengan sendiri
Lampu Dari menara tinggi
Karena dibawahnya orang Kian mabuk
Dan tuhan sudah mati.
32. To people who commit all kinds of wrong, to the court cluster in umno,to Ali babavum Najib, God no longer exist.
33. I have been an umno member, Ajk bahagian and it's adun. I am now with dap and was given a chance to serve as it's mp. I am in position to compare the two.
34. But first, let me begin with the religious hypocrisy that confronts you for being a dap member.
35. Many years ago I was with a cousin. During our meet, a member of the pahang royal family called him.
36. My cousin told the caller that he was a dap mp. To which the caller exclaimed. What happened to him? Dah murtad ke?
37. Notice how skewed is the thinking of some people. Choosing a political party is equated with religion. If you are a Muslim, being dap means you are blasphemous and an apostate.
38. Be ready to face all sorts of deprave name callings. Pembelot bangsa lah, anjing Lim kit Siang lah , dapig lah, etc.
39.
To all which I answer with a quatrain or pantun.
Antan dan lesung lagi bertingkah
Suami isteri bertikam lidah
Saya tukar wadah bukan aqidah
Kepada Allah jua yang saya sembah.
40. When I attended my first dap congress in December 2012, I got a shocker during lunch. Everyone ate the same halal nasi bungkus. Leaders and ordinary members get their own food. No special treatment.
41. This maybe insignificant. But compare it to what occurs in umno.
The darjat system is entrenched in umno. Delegates would eat in a hall, while mkt members eat in a separate room.
42. All proceedings in dap congress is conducted entirely in Malay. That should answer dap critics that it doesn't respect bm. Many years later, even Dr Mahathir was surprised that dap congress is in Malay. Leaders and delegates spoke in Malay.
43. While umno celebrates mediocrity, dap values excellence. Umno will bring your intelligence to the level of below average while dap will push your intelligence to above average. In umno, those with better learning are almost always prejudiced. Soon umno will be composed of dullards and the mediocre .
44. In my years as a dap member, I have never anyone who is from team red bean army. Clearly, the red bean army is just the imagination of a Hitler worshiper like bung mokhtar.
45. Nor have I ever met dap leaders and members who are racists or speak about Chinese triumphalism. The love, affection and respect showed to me is deeply appreciated.
46. Know that people like tajuddin is a morbid nationalist and a bully, while Hadi really is a religious nationalist. Both are actually racists.
47. While umno and pas embellish corruption and other depravities, dap is the opposite.
48. Dap stands for uprightness, doing the right things correctly. For that I urge readers to vote dap. Long live Malaysia.
2. That's what an election really is, a choice between parties .parties with a vision of how to run a country.
3. It's a choice between a party representing evil, profligate spending, racial hegemony, corruption and emasculation of democratic institutions.
4. Umno is the embodiment of everything evil. Its Weltanschauung is racial supremacy and hegemony, corruption and pillaging the country. It's current raison detre is to free Ali babavum Najib and overrule the law by might.
5. A spectre is haunting Malaysia. The spectre of umnoism. Its tenets are racial supremacy, religious extremism and absolute monarchism.
6. The reactionary forces are forming an unholy alliance with it. The ecclesiastical dictators, ustazs and ustazahs, kings and thugs. They want to exorcise umnoism and unleashed evil.
7. Which political party that stands in opposition to umnoism has not been branded subversive, racist and chauvinistic and now communist?
8. The dap, a member of PH is one such victim. It's demonised as racist, chauvinist and now, communist.
9. The characterisation is of course patently false. Dap is multiracial and strives for inclusiveness. It aims to promote meritocracy, pursue pragmatic policies and works earnestly to infuse honesty in governance at all levels
10.dap is a danger to umno precisely because it's objectives are so appealing to all right-thinking persons and readily strike a resonance with the people.
11. Isn't that what everyone wants? To co-exist peacefully with each other, from each according to his ability, to each according to his needs?
Instead of living in a pressure cooker with mistrust and constant conflict?
12. Because of these universal ideas, dap stands in direct opposite to umno. It is at once anti corruption, anti abuse of power and anti wastage. Fundamentally, it believes everyone progresses by his own bootstraps, instead as in umno people are patronized and rise according to heritage. It is undemocratic.
13. Dap is a mortal danger to umno. It must be put down at all cost. What better way, than to label it as racist, chauvinist and communist?
14. Why is the choice between dap and corruption (umno) framed in terms of faith? Precisely because faith does not require reasoning, explaining and rationale. All it needs is blind belief.
15. Just believe that dap is racist. Just believe it is communist. Well, that is no longer that way.
16. That is the only way of the umno Goebbelsian propagandists. That is the way of the ecclesiastical dictators.
17. Umno is a product of 1940s. Dap is the product of the 60s. It was a reaction product of the reactionary umno politics.
18. Dap is not racist because it speaks out for legitimate Chinese interests. Umno speaks for legitimate Malay interests. If each speaks for the legitimate interests of a particular race, isn't it fair? Is it etched in stone, that non malays can't speak of matters affecting them?
19. If any party can be termed as racist, regrettably, it must be umno. Because it institutionalized Malay rights in its constitution. Then, Malay first is translated into various policies of the government. Education, public employment, economic policies etc. For example, when tun Razak says is penuh, it never meant is with idiots
20. Dap is not racist because it disagrees with your imbecilic ideas. Take out the racial component of the disagreement. The crux is the disagreement, not the racial originator.
21. A person cannot be faulted for his racial origins. You can't choose to be what race. Therefore, if that non-Malay stands in opposition to your ideas, you cannot fault his ethnic origins and termed him racist.
22. It may mean you can't reason or out argue the other person, and your only recourse is to besmirch the other person's ethnicity.
22. In the 1960s, white Americans wanting to rid black Americans instead of providing cogent arguments would just label the irritable black as mad and commit him to the asylum.
23. That is the tool in trade of the supremacist. Is tajuddin a supremacist?
24. Give us the reasoning as to why the dap is racist. Is it racist for speaking out for Chinese interests, for speaking out for any wrongdoings and disagreeing, or just being Chinese? Which? Or just being irritable and, therefore, can be committed to the asylum?
25. Then, there is this mad mullah who claimed to have dreamt meeting the holy prophet of Islam repeatedly, labelling dap as communist.
26. Fuyoo, that's a next level argument. May we ask his holiness, did the prophet ask him to pronounce dap as communist?
27. I am sure in labeling dap as communist, Hadi wasn't talking about the Marxian labor theory of value or the communist manifesto or the 18th Brumaire of Louis Bonaparte.
28. The only thing that matters to him, is the racial component of his argument. Since China is communist, and dap being Chinese, it too must be communist! All Chinese who refuses him, must be communists.
29. Being ungodly is not unique among the Chinese in dap. Those who commit all kinds of wrong, pillage the country are also ungodly. Thus, a Malay who commits all these regard God as irrelevant.
30. Allow me to quote a para from the poem 'sidang ruh'by the late kassim Ahmad, who himself was labelled an apostate by some men of God.
31.
Nanti akan padamlah dengan sendiri
Lampu Dari menara tinggi
Karena dibawahnya orang Kian mabuk
Dan tuhan sudah mati.
32. To people who commit all kinds of wrong, to the court cluster in umno,to Ali babavum Najib, God no longer exist.
33. I have been an umno member, Ajk bahagian and it's adun. I am now with dap and was given a chance to serve as it's mp. I am in position to compare the two.
34. But first, let me begin with the religious hypocrisy that confronts you for being a dap member.
35. Many years ago I was with a cousin. During our meet, a member of the pahang royal family called him.
36. My cousin told the caller that he was a dap mp. To which the caller exclaimed. What happened to him? Dah murtad ke?
37. Notice how skewed is the thinking of some people. Choosing a political party is equated with religion. If you are a Muslim, being dap means you are blasphemous and an apostate.
38. Be ready to face all sorts of deprave name callings. Pembelot bangsa lah, anjing Lim kit Siang lah , dapig lah, etc.
39.
To all which I answer with a quatrain or pantun.
Antan dan lesung lagi bertingkah
Suami isteri bertikam lidah
Saya tukar wadah bukan aqidah
Kepada Allah jua yang saya sembah.
40. When I attended my first dap congress in December 2012, I got a shocker during lunch. Everyone ate the same halal nasi bungkus. Leaders and ordinary members get their own food. No special treatment.
41. This maybe insignificant. But compare it to what occurs in umno.
The darjat system is entrenched in umno. Delegates would eat in a hall, while mkt members eat in a separate room.
42. All proceedings in dap congress is conducted entirely in Malay. That should answer dap critics that it doesn't respect bm. Many years later, even Dr Mahathir was surprised that dap congress is in Malay. Leaders and delegates spoke in Malay.
43. While umno celebrates mediocrity, dap values excellence. Umno will bring your intelligence to the level of below average while dap will push your intelligence to above average. In umno, those with better learning are almost always prejudiced. Soon umno will be composed of dullards and the mediocre .
44. In my years as a dap member, I have never anyone who is from team red bean army. Clearly, the red bean army is just the imagination of a Hitler worshiper like bung mokhtar.
45. Nor have I ever met dap leaders and members who are racists or speak about Chinese triumphalism. The love, affection and respect showed to me is deeply appreciated.
46. Know that people like tajuddin is a morbid nationalist and a bully, while Hadi really is a religious nationalist. Both are actually racists.
47. While umno and pas embellish corruption and other depravities, dap is the opposite.
48. Dap stands for uprightness, doing the right things correctly. For that I urge readers to vote dap. Long live Malaysia.
Sunday, 6 November 2022
Vote Anwar 'The Rock' Ibrahim.
1. I don't agree with Anwar on several things. As I see it, he's prone to being drowned in his own rhetoric. His debate on the sapura issue was wanting.
2. But the things that I agree with him far outweigh those that I don't .
3. The things that I don't serve as a hurdle preventing me from giving unconditional support. If he has persuasive arguments it's mad if I don't support him.
4. His unflinching adherence to principles is very commendable.
5. Wasn't it Thomas Jefferson who said:on matters of style, swim with the current.on matters of principle stand like rock
6. He could have become the pm had he agreed to the conditions put by Ali babavum Najib.
7. Had he succumbed to the pleadings of Najib, Anwar would have become just a stooge. At once manipulated and pliable.
8. He stands like a rock ,unmoved by the seductive persuasions of Mr red lips
9. Who do we choose? The corrupt and corruptible or people like Anwar? Do like John Quincy Adams said. Vote for principles, though you may vote alone.
10. His motto of being anti corruption, anti abuse of power and anti wastage,strikes a resonance with many us. Allow him to actually do them
11.let us see beyond personalities and outward appearance. Anwar has showed substance. What maters to us are principles. And these are free enterprise, rule of law and treating everyone as equals before the law
12. We now want his vision for Malaysia. Other than the above, is he ready to appoint people based on merit. Will he eliminate positioning people using the ascribed status? That one's professional destiny is preordained by race, sex and familial ties,?
13. Let us hope he is determined to implement pragmatic policies. Not the ones tied to particular ideologies or theories or even irrational racist theory, but policies whose acid test is only-does this policy work and produce the desired results?
14. For example, bumiputraism, which rears its ugly head in many of our policies are actually counterproductive, abandon them . Choose another policy .
15. Finally, let us desire of him, to place HONESTY as the underlying principle behind every decision. Let's put honest leadership at every level in our society.
16. Dishonest people, who are proven by law, no matter who they are, ex pm,ministers, judges, heads of department etc, will be jailed
17. In a sermon by one Frederick Lewis Donaldson at Westminster Abbey in 1925, mentioned 7 deadly social sins.
18. One of the 7 principles he mentioned was-politics without principles.
19. Now, Anwar Ibrahim, Pak sheikh, brother Anwar,abg nun, is a man of principle. Choose him!
Friday, 4 November 2022
Langkah yang membawa padah.
1. Pada tanggal 10.10 pm mengistiharkan parlimen bubar. PRU akan dijalankan dalam masa 60 hari.
2. Rakyat nak berenang ke, nak berperahu ke, nak basah kuyup ke , tidak dihiraukan oleh pm dan umno.
3. Yang pentingnya, kita beraya, walaupun ianya pilihan raya. Raya maksudnya hari gembira. Ber 'gumbira' itu mengatasi segala gala nya.
4. Keperitan rakyat di persetankan. Rakyat tengah susah, barang2 keperluan harganya meninggi, ekonomi menguncup, pengangguran meningkat dll angka tunjuk ekonomi tidak mengembirakan .
5. Peduli apa itu semua kan? Asal saja kepentingan chief power grabber dan groper, yakni umno diutamakan.
6. Kita tahu apa maunya umno. Antaranya ialah membebaskan embezzler in chief, Ali babavum Najib. Yang sekarang beristirehat di kajang Hilton selama 12 tahun .
7. Setakat ini 12 tahun. Kalau dia didapati bersalah dalam Kes 1MDB, santainya di kajang Hilton akan bertambah.
8. Harap perhatian para Hakim tidak terpesong dari memberikan pengadilan lantaran pru15.
9. Dan umno mahu menang untuk memastikan kelompok mahkamah tidak masuk penjara. Kita tahu muka2 penyamun ini .
10.umno mahu menang untuk memastikan kelompok kleptokrat terus berkuasa.
11.ia tidak ada kaitan dengan slogan bangsa,agama Dan negara. ianya kuasa, lebih kuasa dan kuasa mutlak . Itu saja. Kuasa untuk menyamun dan merompak .
12. Kepada saya, pengistiharan pembubaran itu adalah langkah yang akan membawa padah. Musnah umno .
13. Keberadaan atau existence Ismail adalah satu anomaly yang menjengkilkan. Ini bukan seorang pm yang dipilih rakyat. Dia bukan diamond menang pilihanraya betul, tapi parti nya kalah. Rakyat tak pilih umno. Jadi dia jadi pm bagaimana? Parti yang kalah jadi pm?
14. Dia dipilih oleh gerombolan power grabbers, election deniers yang merakusi kuasa. Yakni pas, bersatu Dan sahabat2 crime families Dari Malaysia timur
15 . Ismail dan umno are all too willing untuk menjadi penyubahat kepada coup d'etat ini asal dapat berkuasa dan jadi pm. Maka jadilah mail pm. Who has achieved nothing.
16. Kerajaan mail adalah hasil satu marriage of convenience yang disatukan bukan oleh ideology atau vision tapi oleh nafsu sarakah berkuasa atau lust of power .
17. Kerajaan mail adalah seperti pasangan yang berkesedudukan, yang diijab kabulkan oleh pas dll.
18. Jadi jangan kita lupa cara lihai dan jijik mail jadi pm. Dibolehkan oleh mafia2 politik. Bagaimana mereka tidak naik, begitulah cara mereka jatuh. Mereka akan tuai apa yang mereka semai.
19. Ia adalah union of losers. Dan seperti kata cao cao dalam battle of red cliffs, when losers combine, what can they achieve?
20. Maka apabila Ismail berkata tidak pernah dan tidak perlu bincang di kabinet untuk bubar parlimen, itu salah dari segi politik.
21. Kerana ini bukan nya kerajaan dia dan umno seorang. Ia adalah kerajaan campuran pn .
22. Jadi keputusan untuk bubar mesti dibincang dalam kabinet dan apa2 keputusan disampaikan melalui pm sebagai wadah dan posmen.
23. Dengan membuat perkara yang semberono seperti yang Ismail lakukan, Ismail telah melakukan treachery pada 2 tahap
24. Pertama kepada pn, yang bukan concern saya, dan kedua, kepada rakyat yang memilih ph.
25. Pada pru14, rakyat telah memilih ph sebagai pemenang dan ph harus kekal kerajaan jika tidak angkara Mahathir. Mahathir hanya mahu mukhriz menjadi pm dan dia resign kerana nak gagalkan Anwar . Jadi sekarang Anwar tidak mahu layan Mahathir, Ia nya bagus
26. Ismail telah mengkhianati rakyat sebab bukan dia dan party kalah lain yang mereka pilih. Ismail bertanggung jawab menjatuhkan kerajaan yang legitimate .
27. Ismail, umno,pas dan bersatu adalah ancaman kepada demokrasi
28. Rakyat pernah menolak umno Maka tidak mustahil ini kali pun boleh. Sokong PH.
29. Jangan kita gempar dengan gegak gempita bila umno mengistiharkan calun. Bukan nya mereka menang lagi
30. Jadikan sorakan mereka berakhir dengan tangisan. Ayuh, tolak umno !
Bersambung.,..
Wednesday, 26 October 2022
Off to a bad start. The perils of a pm with a catastrophic illiteracy in economics.
1. On 10th October, the pm dissolved parliament. Let's put the fear of God into the hearts of these umno people
2. Fear of god means real and genuine, deep-seated fear. They should be fearful, because ultimately, it's we, the people, who exercise power.
3. We, the people, have the ultimate power to change things, rectify mistakes and remove deadwoods. Kick out umno.
4. Purge them and together with them the racist and supremacist indoctrination, the corrosive corruption, the opportunistic exploitation of the royalty and the fake religiosity.
5.we will continue with that theme later. I don't know if people notice it or not, before announcing the dissolution of parliament, the pm spoke about economics.
6. Let me be brutal about this. Much like anything else, the pm doesn't know what he's talking about. Or his speechwriter is an idiot.
7. He claimed that our economy is growing at 8%, unemployment is down, inflation is down etc.
8. I will not touch on our strategy of combating the covid pandemic. We haven't grilled the health minister as vigorously as we should. The strategy is in the pits. Big pharma, especially those which are umno linked, are making tons of money and people in the health ministry are mired in corruption. We don't ask inconvenient questions, because all we are interested in is to be safe from the pandemic. So, some of us are willing to cope up with the financial duggery.
9. Where does the pm get his figures? Is he on ketum?
10. The UK is growing at 2%, china at 4%, USA at around 3%, Europe is not faring that well. The world is heading to a recession and, touch wood, not stagflation.
11. And here, insignificant Malaysia is growing at an incredulous 8%? Jeepers! The pm was lying.
12. Where are the sources of economic growth? If the advanced economies reduce their imports of our intermediate and finished goods, where do get the 8%?
13. The sources cannot be domestic. These depend on external imports .
14. Our food import may now be 60 to 65b a year, our commodities exports are dampened by worldwide economic downturn. Our export of oil is restricted by OPEC quota, we can't sell at a price we simply want. Our export of exhaustible minerals is also constrained. So where is the 8% growth?
15. Hasn't the pm heard of the department of statistics?
16. His brief but preposterous economic claims, reflect his utter, catastrophic illiteracy in economics.
17. If he had familiarized himself, he would have said something ridiculous about inflation. The cost of everyday goods, foodstuffs and groceries is soaring. Therefore, his claims about inflation being under control are absurd.
18. Likewise, he would not have made imbecilic claims about reduced unemployment. That's hurtful to the millions seeking jobs, unless like regarding 10 people looking after 1 cow as being gainfully employed. That way, as my old professor, the late Harcharan Singh Khera says, there's no unemployment
19. So, as James Carville says, it's the economy, stupid. Every leader of any country direct a large part of their energy to improving their economies. Not about where KJ is contesting or about busying ourselves about the fate of Faisal Azumu or about creating 3 DPMs. By the way, that's stark bribery. That's the cerebral quality of wak jahid. Stupid is what stupid does.
20. So when umno rushes in when angels dare not tread, the pm was off to a bad start. That's an ominous sign for umno. Like bossakau, umno rushes to its peril.
21. Like Fred Flintstone says, yabedabedoo!
2. Fear of god means real and genuine, deep-seated fear. They should be fearful, because ultimately, it's we, the people, who exercise power.
3. We, the people, have the ultimate power to change things, rectify mistakes and remove deadwoods. Kick out umno.
4. Purge them and together with them the racist and supremacist indoctrination, the corrosive corruption, the opportunistic exploitation of the royalty and the fake religiosity.
5.we will continue with that theme later. I don't know if people notice it or not, before announcing the dissolution of parliament, the pm spoke about economics.
6. Let me be brutal about this. Much like anything else, the pm doesn't know what he's talking about. Or his speechwriter is an idiot.
7. He claimed that our economy is growing at 8%, unemployment is down, inflation is down etc.
8. I will not touch on our strategy of combating the covid pandemic. We haven't grilled the health minister as vigorously as we should. The strategy is in the pits. Big pharma, especially those which are umno linked, are making tons of money and people in the health ministry are mired in corruption. We don't ask inconvenient questions, because all we are interested in is to be safe from the pandemic. So, some of us are willing to cope up with the financial duggery.
9. Where does the pm get his figures? Is he on ketum?
10. The UK is growing at 2%, china at 4%, USA at around 3%, Europe is not faring that well. The world is heading to a recession and, touch wood, not stagflation.
11. And here, insignificant Malaysia is growing at an incredulous 8%? Jeepers! The pm was lying.
12. Where are the sources of economic growth? If the advanced economies reduce their imports of our intermediate and finished goods, where do get the 8%?
13. The sources cannot be domestic. These depend on external imports .
14. Our food import may now be 60 to 65b a year, our commodities exports are dampened by worldwide economic downturn. Our export of oil is restricted by OPEC quota, we can't sell at a price we simply want. Our export of exhaustible minerals is also constrained. So where is the 8% growth?
15. Hasn't the pm heard of the department of statistics?
16. His brief but preposterous economic claims, reflect his utter, catastrophic illiteracy in economics.
17. If he had familiarized himself, he would have said something ridiculous about inflation. The cost of everyday goods, foodstuffs and groceries is soaring. Therefore, his claims about inflation being under control are absurd.
18. Likewise, he would not have made imbecilic claims about reduced unemployment. That's hurtful to the millions seeking jobs, unless like regarding 10 people looking after 1 cow as being gainfully employed. That way, as my old professor, the late Harcharan Singh Khera says, there's no unemployment
19. So, as James Carville says, it's the economy, stupid. Every leader of any country direct a large part of their energy to improving their economies. Not about where KJ is contesting or about busying ourselves about the fate of Faisal Azumu or about creating 3 DPMs. By the way, that's stark bribery. That's the cerebral quality of wak jahid. Stupid is what stupid does.
20. So when umno rushes in when angels dare not tread, the pm was off to a bad start. That's an ominous sign for umno. Like bossakau, umno rushes to its peril.
21. Like Fred Flintstone says, yabedabedoo!
Saturday, 22 October 2022
Pencerahan pada artikel Sdra. Sukudhev Singh
1. Saya sedang menyiapkan satu artikel mengenai pembubaran parlimen, berhenti dan akan sambung semula.
2. Saya berhenti sebentar kerana seorang kawan menhantar satu artikel yang ditulis oleh Mr Sukudhev Singh. Dia adalah bekas timbalan gabenor bank negara Malaysia.
3. Ada beberapa perkara yang tersirat dalam artikel ringkas tersebut . Berikut adalah beberapa tafsiran saya.
4. Pertama, ialah kebimbangan En Sukudhev yang rakyat akan terus mengundi parti perompak dan parti yang menunggang agama .
5. Tidak syak lagi, parti2 yang saya maksudkan ialah umno dan anjing2 larian nya MCA Dan mic serta beberapa parti Sabah dan Sarawak.
6. Umno parti sebagian orang melayu yang membudidayakan rasuah, yang mebudidayakan perkauman melampau dan jumud, memperkudakan sentimentalism orang melayu kepada institusi raja, pseudo agama.
7. Yang terakhir itu kita jawab bagaimana kita nak percaya umno itu ikhlas pada ugama bila berbuih Ustaz dan ustazah berceramah pasal akhlak dan budi perkerti, sedangkan rasuah itu seolah2 halal?kalau riba itu Haram, rasuah yang hampir sama dengan riba, ok?
8. Pernah kita lihat umno menjadikan pembasmian rasuah satu dari manifesto nya?
9. Asas2 diatas mana umno dibina adalah rosak sebermula dan akan membawa kepada kehancuran.
10. Saya ulangi asas2 tersebut:-bangsa, negara raja Dan agama. Saya sengaja letakkan agama sebagai asas yang terakhir.
11. Ini kerana agama tidak pernah menjadi pedoman dominen umno. Kalau ia, tentu umno menentang korapsi, salah guna kuasa dan pembaziran . Tentu mereka menolak dipimpin oleh crook.
12.yang menjadi pedoman utama umno ialah hate crime, yakni menjadikan kebencian kepada bangsa bukan melayu, terutama bangsa cina .
13. Bangsa cina itu adalah jembalang yang akan menganggu gugat dan mencederakan bangsa melayu. Bangsa cina akan mencuri kekayaan bangsa melayu dan negara melayu ini.
14. Realiti nya, bangsa melayu itu memerlukan bangsa cina. Kita berniaga bersama mereka, mengharapkan kerajinan mereka dan mereka adalah sumber cukai yang besar .
15. Naratif yang diterapkan umno ialah umno itu melindungi bangsa melayu. Dibawah umno melayu mencapai par excellence dan racial triumphalism.
16. Tapi kejayaan apa yang melayu boleh banggakan dibawah umno? Melayu tetap tertinggal dibelakang dalam banyak segi. Sedangkan negara,dari pm, mb, DO, penghulu dan ketua kampung adalah bangsa melayu?
17. Jadi naratif bahawa umno itu melindungi bangsa melayu adalah naratif yang basi. Ia nya rekod lama yang diputarkan pada pau setiap tahun.
18. Maka janganlah kita masuk penghujjahan rabbit hole segini. Kita sendiri melindungi diri kita bukan umno.
19. Mengundi umno bererti mengekalkan keterbelakang bangsa melayu melalui hate crime bermusuhan dengan bangsa lain .
20. Mengembelingkan sokongan melalui menakut nakutkan orang melayu bahawa kedudukan mereka diancam oleh bangsa lain, adalah pembohongan.
21. Tidak lain dan tidak bukan, falsafah Malay supremacist ini adalah suatu weapon of mass delusion. Ia telah brain wash minda bangsa melayu untuk mempercayai bahawa keujudan mereka diancam oleh bangsa bukan melayu. Tujuan nya tidak lain supaya pemimpin2 umno diberi mandat untuk 'melindungi' bangsa melayu yang lemah .
22. Amat menjengkilkan apabila pemimpin2 lapuk umno menganggap segala kritikan2 sahih terhadap dasar2 racist umno sebagai rasis .
23. Jadi apabila anjing gila, tajuddin ramli, mengatan kritikan2 Lim guan eng sebagai perkauman, ianya sangat melucukan. Mengapa tajuddin membisu apa bila jabatan immigration Johor, menghalang cina yang berkerja di Singapore dari pulang untuk mengundi?
24. Atau mengkritik dasar2 umno yang terang2 rasis? Seperti dasar employment dengan jabatan2 kerajaan yang tidak lansung mencerminkan kemajmukan masyarakat Malaysia?
25. Jeritan tajuddin, tidak lebih dari mengata dulang paku serpih, mengata orang aku yang lebih .
26. Demikian juga , mengundi umno akan menggalakkan umno terus memperkudakan agama. Agama akan terus digunakan untuk memasung dan mencandui minda orang melayu.
27. Dan kita tahu sikap hipokrasi umno terhadap institusi raja2 melayu. Umno mengambil kesempatan daripada kesetiaan general orang melayu kepada raja mereka. Itu saja .
28. Faktanya, umno bukan setia kepada raja, tapi hanya setia kepada kepentingan2 nya. Terutama kekal berkuasa.
29. Namun disebalik kebimbangan En Sukudhev, ada pengharapan untuk selamatkan negara ini.
30. Yakni kita semua mempunyai senjata yang paling ditakuti umno. Kita mengundi untuk perubahan .
31. Satu daripada hukuman enggan berpolik, ialah kita akhirnya diperintah oleh orang yang inferior dari kita.
Orang bijak yang tidak mahu memerintah akan menderita diperintah oleh si baghal .
Orang yang mengundi politikus yang korap, pendusta, perompak dan pembelot bukan nya mangsa,..tapi bersubahat.
32. Sekarang saya akan menyiarkan artikel en Sukudhev Singh . Segala kekurangan, saya yang empunya
33. "Zaman pemerintahan oleh mereka yang jujur sudah berakhir. Ia nya diganti oleh pemerintahan sijahat dan penipu.
34. Ketika negara ini diselubungi kegelapan,mereka yang menjalankan tugas secara bermaruah ditekan manakala mereka yang merosak dan mereka yang menolong pencurian dan menyamun khazanah negara ini, di kurniai dengan segala penghormatan . Mereka yang jujur dan berintegriti tidak ada tempat berlindung dalam negara ini . Mereka akan diburui dan dianiayai supaya mereka tidak dapat muncul untuk mencabar penjahat2. Tidak ada siapa yang akan membela mereka dan kalau ada, jumlah mereka terlalu kecil.
35. Mahkamah telah menjadi medan permainan untuk penjahat2 ini. Mereka yang tertunduk tunduk dan menyembah di kaki2 penyamun ini sibuk membelai pingat2 gelaran mereka, setiap waktu membisik "oh sayangku". Mereka tidak memperdulikan nasib rakyat biasa, atau masa depan negara ini. Mereka tidak akan bangun membela golongan yang berintegriti kerana mereka tidak lagi memahami erti integriti. Mereka bertopengkan agama seperti pingat2 gelaran mereka dan roh mereka ketandusan apa2 moraliti.
36. Alat2 kerajaan yang asalnya bertujuan melindungi orang2 yang jujur bertukar menjadi alat2 penganiayaan untuk membantu penjahat2 mendapatkan dan mengekalkan kuasa . Siapakah yang akan melindungi dan membela orang2 yang jujur?
37. Sudah tentu bukan rakyat biasa. Lena mereka tidak terganggu. Mereka terus memimpikan kemakmuran yang berterusan dan pemberian wang percuma yang tak ada batas. Mimpi mereka tidak terganggu oleh treachery dan khianat yang meletakkan negara kita pada jalan yang penuh ranjau .
38. Zaman pemerintahan oleh orang yang jujur serta ikhlas sudah berakhir dan tak ada yang memperdulikan nya . Sungguh2 malang negara tercinta kita. "
39. Perkara 33 hingga 38 adalah terjemahan saya kepada artikel saudara Sukudhev Singh, bekas timbalan gabenor bank negara Malaysia.
Saturday, 8 October 2022
The curious acquittal of Zahid.
1. When I was working for an international oil company, they had a method of estimating your CEP-current estimated potential. What they think now, what you can become at the end offyour career.
2. Your cep changes off and on. Depending on your performance, professional development, good or bad decisions you make.
3. When you make a bad decision, you regress. Your cep is revised downwards. Unless and until you redeem yourself.
4. That's how I see the cep of the judge deciding zahids case. He amounts to nothing. Right now, he's a ten to a penny. The CJ will perhaps evaluate him accordingly.
5. The bad decision he made not only retard his own professional development but more adversely, the judiciary's good reputation. People's trust and respect for the judiciary, goes southwards.
6. He gives a new meaning to the idiom, one bad apple spoils the whole barrel. He will be mentioned en passant or in legal speak, orbiter dicta, in loose conversation among the talking crowd at the Selangor club or any lawyer's watering hole.
7. At the end of his career, people will just say, he's a retired high court judge with an LLB or bar. That's all.
8. The method which I suggest is called the HAIR method .it's used by large corporations like shell.
9. It's also used by leaders like Lee Kuan yew in assessing leaders for Singapore. Evaluated in the parameters, it's clear the particular judge has no hair.
10. The H stands for helicopter view-the ability to see the big picture from the small. To see the forest instead of the trees.
11. The judge should have asked this question. Is my decision going to elevate trust and respect for the judiciary, or diminish it? Is the acquittal of one crook going to destroy the reputation of the judiciary? I am sorry, the judge has no H
12. The A stands for analytical abilities. The judge ought to have this ability to be able to plough through the serpentine money trail created by zahid. Unfortunately, not enough. As the sumatran say, alang2 tukang, membazir kayu. Half baked intelligence is useless after all.
13. Obviously, the judge has not got the next ability. It's the I or imagination. He asked a stupid question which elicit an inane answer.
14. He asked how can you put sd600 thousand in an envelope?
15. Of course, you cannot in a 4x9"envelope. But have he heard of an A4 sized envelope?
16. Can't he imagine spreading the dough in piles and putting them in an A4 sized envelope? Ask your son or daughter to do it.
17. Definitely, the judge lacks the last quality of the quartet acronym. -realistic, the R making HAIR.
18. Was it realistic to acquit Zahid, when the whole world knows the bloody crook became wealthy by corrupt means. Was the acquittal of wak jahid realistic in the context of reducing corruption? I say reducing, not eliminating, unless you bring the death penalty when convicted for corruption.
19. My friend, Zaid Ibrahim once told me lawyers are like eggs. They are graded into A to C.
21. Madam YAA, I am afraid you have a grade C high court judge.
2. Your cep changes off and on. Depending on your performance, professional development, good or bad decisions you make.
3. When you make a bad decision, you regress. Your cep is revised downwards. Unless and until you redeem yourself.
4. That's how I see the cep of the judge deciding zahids case. He amounts to nothing. Right now, he's a ten to a penny. The CJ will perhaps evaluate him accordingly.
5. The bad decision he made not only retard his own professional development but more adversely, the judiciary's good reputation. People's trust and respect for the judiciary, goes southwards.
6. He gives a new meaning to the idiom, one bad apple spoils the whole barrel. He will be mentioned en passant or in legal speak, orbiter dicta, in loose conversation among the talking crowd at the Selangor club or any lawyer's watering hole.
7. At the end of his career, people will just say, he's a retired high court judge with an LLB or bar. That's all.
8. The method which I suggest is called the HAIR method .it's used by large corporations like shell.
9. It's also used by leaders like Lee Kuan yew in assessing leaders for Singapore. Evaluated in the parameters, it's clear the particular judge has no hair.
10. The H stands for helicopter view-the ability to see the big picture from the small. To see the forest instead of the trees.
11. The judge should have asked this question. Is my decision going to elevate trust and respect for the judiciary, or diminish it? Is the acquittal of one crook going to destroy the reputation of the judiciary? I am sorry, the judge has no H
12. The A stands for analytical abilities. The judge ought to have this ability to be able to plough through the serpentine money trail created by zahid. Unfortunately, not enough. As the sumatran say, alang2 tukang, membazir kayu. Half baked intelligence is useless after all.
13. Obviously, the judge has not got the next ability. It's the I or imagination. He asked a stupid question which elicit an inane answer.
14. He asked how can you put sd600 thousand in an envelope?
15. Of course, you cannot in a 4x9"envelope. But have he heard of an A4 sized envelope?
16. Can't he imagine spreading the dough in piles and putting them in an A4 sized envelope? Ask your son or daughter to do it.
17. Definitely, the judge lacks the last quality of the quartet acronym. -realistic, the R making HAIR.
18. Was it realistic to acquit Zahid, when the whole world knows the bloody crook became wealthy by corrupt means. Was the acquittal of wak jahid realistic in the context of reducing corruption? I say reducing, not eliminating, unless you bring the death penalty when convicted for corruption.
19. My friend, Zaid Ibrahim once told me lawyers are like eggs. They are graded into A to C.
21. Madam YAA, I am afraid you have a grade C high court judge.