Debate of Cons.

1. After the nondescript and overhyped debate between alibabavum najib and mamu anwar, the latter was seen cutting up and dividing a cake. It could have been a huge vadai cake.

2. We didn't hear about the former CEO earning gargantuan remunerations of 70 to 90 m a year and gallivanting around in the companys private jet. Can we expect the suckers at seb to be prudent with our money? Mamu didn't mention these.

3. Nor did we hear about how Sapura caused pertronas to forfeit, USD 400m in Vietnam. Now, allow me to use an expletive. Having being fucked by sapura, petronas is now asked to nursemaid seb.

4. The imbecilic idea of using petronas to nursemaid sapura came from the ignoramus najib alibabavum razak. The idea was relished with gusto, by najibs thirudargalum and his internet dickheads who wrote his internet portals.

5. The dirty secret is out. So this is how the bn leaders treat our reserves and our money. To help companies belonging to cronies in distress. Confound them, especially najib alibabavum Razak.

6. Just so people know, reserves such as those in petronas or khazanah are to be applied for the development of states or public benefits. They are not to help out private companies belonging to cronies. Certainly not for umno.

7. Instead, people like ali babavum najib applies public money mindlessly, including bailing out crony companies and paying sycophants millions Of ringgit a month.

8. Ali babavum najib treats petronas as a willing willy, bowl cleaner and blind chinaman. But petronas which itself is very less sanguine, will be a stooge.

9. Unfortunately, the idiotic mamu anwar did not object vociferously to ali babavum najibs scandalous remarks. He could only retort with the lame but catch-all phrase, forensic accounting.

10. That too, we don't know what he meant by it. To do forensic accounting means to treat sapura with kid gloves. For it is obvios that sapura finds itself in dire straits is the result of its own weaknesses.

11. To even countenance a forensic accounting is belaboring the obvious. The market punishes the entity that makes mistakes. It weeds out the poorly managed company.

12. The rule of the market is clear. An inefficiently run company should be allowed to disintegrate.

13. Therefore, the proposal of doing a forensic auditing on sapura may sound intellectually formidable, but it's like bringing coal to Newcastle. The idea of putting preconditions as cause to help sapura will produce the same effect too-futile.

14. The point is, sapura, should not now use public money to stay afloat. When it enjoyed profits, did it care two hoots about the public? Did its shareholders care about the public?

15. The debate on sapura went off tangent, devolving into a discussion about the general management of the economy. Though important, it's not relevant.

16. How the debate went off-topic, is beyond many of us. But is not surprising because the debate is a debate between two nincompoopish convicts.

17. Like Rhett Buttler, in Gone With the Wind, said, I don't give a damn. I don't give a damn if the debate detour was started by ali babavum najib or chorused by mamu anwar, who knbows nuts about economics reasoning.

18. But what really surprises me is that the audience, comprising social and political luminaries and attended too by not a few kangkung proffesors, tolerated and acquiesce in the sham debate.

19. TV watchers waited impatiently for the debate, which turned out to be an anticlimax. It was just a debate between 2 convicts.

20. It's a debate between one fellow whose right hand doesn't know what his left hand is doing and another fellow who has a penchant of reading a few lines of a book but pretends as though he has read the whole book. Yet we called him the renaissance man.

21. One went to school and a university for thieves in the fish and chips imperialist country. The other, a product of the bourgeois and elitist MCGayGay. The outcome of the debate is predictable. It is just a debate between 2 latte liberals and members of the chattering class.

22. Reference to an enlarged cake and sharing it by ali babavum najib is unfortunate and misplaced. That it was said by Tun Razak doesn't make it sacrosanct. It was a stupid reference.

23. Mamu anwar responded meekly by saying, don't eat the cake alone. Of course, the pkr yahoo boys and girls treat that as a messianic remark.

24. Don't the two idiots know that the cake analogy has become a symbol of repression, insensitivity and injustice? Wasn't Mary Antoinette alleged to have said qi'ils mangent de la brioche?

25. When told that the people have no bread to eat, the queen was alleged to have said, let them eat cake.

26. But never to miss a chance for theatrics, after the dry debate anwar demonstrated his cake cutting skills. This is how najib divides the cake and this is how we divide it, said he. Needless to say, the pkr yahoo crowd volubly ululated him.

27. Ali babavum najib feigned indignance and incredulity that the ph goverment did not exhaustively investigate the forex scandal. Najib too did not. I am reminded of the maxim that one who comes into equity must come with clean hands.

28. To which sivaji the boss, anwar said emphatically that he won't compromise on any forms of corruption and abuses of power. Nahi nahi. Illai illai!

29. Except that when mamu anwar said it, he did it as though he's constipating. Which makes his assertion less believable.

30. Many of us are dismayed and dissappointed that mamu did not berate ali babavum najib, when the latter mention cash is king. That makes me suspect that anwar actually is a limousine liberal.

31. Eleven out of ten people know what najib meant. He means that all the people have a price and are buyable.

32. RM 200 for the people of melaka and johor. Perhaps more for the people of sarawak and sabah.

33. I am not denigrating my east malaysian brethren. But when i was in umno 1990-2011,east malaysian delegates would demand 1st class hotels and more than 200 pocket money. Res ipso loquitor.

34. There's nothing to shout about the debate. It went off-topic. Its sapura, idiots. While najib spoke like a brainless jock, condescending and patronising mamu was fluid, collegiate in the sense of treating you as equals and articulate. In terms of substance, both are wanting.

35. Anwar won only in terms of being more articulate. Itu saja.

36. To ali babavum najib and sivaji the boss anwar, I dedicate the following song.