Tong Sam Pah, Poh Kee Mak dan Sheikh Albuntoti.Politik Malaysia Yang Gila.

1. Kita dah dengar pasal surat Wak Jahid ke YDP. Sigendut dan albino Najib pun sain surat tersebut. Dah keluar pun nak klentong jugak. Binawe pembantu Wak Jahid kata surat itu palsu.

2. Walhal sebelum itu Java penerogo tu pergi rumah Abah Jawa di Damansara berikrar menyokong Wak Muhyi.

3. Malah Wak Bagan Datoh tu tanya samada Wak Pagoh nak jadi gabungan ke3 PN. Dia nyanyi Cek Mek Molek lagi.

4. Tapi 48 jam kemudian dia dan lanun Bugis Lipis tu buat surat sokong Anwar al Buntoti sebagai PM ganti Wak Pagoh. Dan menggesa buang 4 menteri UMNO.

5. Suatu masa dahulu Pak Sako menamakan 2 tokoh dalam novel nya Tong Sam Pah dan Poh Kee Mak. Rupa2 nya dua tokoh tersebut dijelmakan oleh Zahid dan Najib. Zahid ialah Encik Tong dan Najib ialah Encik Poh.

6. Tong Sam Pah dan Poh Kee Mak telah mengutus surat menyokong rakan Mat Sabu,Anwar al Buntoti sebagai PM. 

7 . Dalam gelap Poh dan Tong buat deal dengan Sheikh albuntoti. Agaknya kita dianggap tongong menyangka sokongan Poh dan Tong diberi secara percuma.

8. Belum dapat jawatan- sheikh albuntoti, mak dia pun dia jual . Dah dapat dia boleh ubah cerita. Kita bukan tak tahu ahli PKR,ramai political yahoos. Jumpa mesin karaoke dia kepala dang nya.

9. Dalam UMNO ramai tokoh2 seperti Tong Sam Pah dan Poh Kee Mak. Ada Liew See Yal, Wong Chee Bai, Lee Boo Toh, Goh Lan Chow dll.

10. Ada 2 perkara mesti dibahas disini. Pertama, surat Tong Sam Pah dan Poh Kee Mak ke YDP . Kedua, pertemuan antara Wak2 jawa Bagan Datoh dan Pagoh. Encik Tong dan alsembab.

11. Surat dari Encik Tong dan Encik Poh menyokong Sheikh albuntoti jadi PM.

12. Itu maksud surat tersebut. Sukar untuk kita terima sokongan tersebut diberi percuma oleh Tong dan Poh tanpa perniagaan kuda- horse trading yang dasyat .

13. Ke dua2 Tong dan Poh mempunyai puluhan kes mahkamah yang mungkin dipersetujui digugurkan oleh orang yang ketar kepala nak jadi PM. Cakaplah bergegar gegar yang al buntoti tidak akan kompromi mengenai rasuah blah blah, itu semua temberang al taik al kucing.

14. Tong Sam Pah dan Poh Kee Mak mahu menggunakan cara diluar undang2 untuk melepaskan tegkok mereka dan albuntoti mahu kita menyetankan nilai2 yang menyelamatkan negara kita. Sedangkan kita tahu rasuah pecah, amanah dan cabul kuasa adalah malapetaka yang menjahanamkan negara kita.

15. Kepada saya ke3 tiga tokoh sial ini bukan sosok2 yang boleh dipercayai untuk memimpin negara. Memilih mereka bererti kita memilih sosok2 untuk menjahanamkan kita. Kita menjerat leher kita sendiri.

16. Biar kita bikin geger kata orang Indonesia-bikin satu revolusi. Tolak semua tokoh2 musibat ini dari berkuasa. Jangan dengar cakap sesiapa-termasuk saya. Buatlah perkara yang betul dan benar!

17. Yang menjahanamkan kita ialah Melayu jenis ini. Bertahun tahun kita diajar bahawa musuh kita ialah Cina. Sedangkan musuh kita yang asli ialah Melayu2 yang main politik-Tong Sam Pah Poh Kee Mak dan Sheikh Albuntoti.

18. Ada perpatah Arab yang berkata:- bertahun tahun kibas takutkan serigala tapi akhirnya dimakan sigembala. Saya ingat pada suatu artikel yang ditulis Chandra Muzaffar-pemimpin Melayu-pelindung atau pemusnah. Tanya soalan sama sekarang.

19 . Bagaimana bangsa Melayu boleh berketuakan 2 penjenayah?. Nilai apa yang dipegang bangsa Melayu yang lemah lembut dan beragama Islam?

20. Sebenarnya Tong Sam Pah dan Poh Kee Mak adalah jelmaan semua yang jelek untuk UMNO-rasuah, pecah amanah, cabul kuasa dan pembohongan bersiri.

21. Kalau lahabau2 ni jujur serta ikhlas dan tidak mahu memperkudakan UMNO mereka patut meninggalkan UMNO sehingga kes2 mereka selesai. Demikian juga matlaon2 lain.

22. Dalam bahagian 2 kita akan bincang mengenai pertemuan antara Wak Pagoh dan Wak Bagan Datoh aka Tong Sam Pah.

Tweet

Read more...

Muhyi's Final Nail On The Coffin.

Heil! Mein Abah!

1. At the time of this writing the Agong has already issued a statement. The most important is, no Emergency is declared. All other advice are ignored.

2. Others have written on the unconstitutionality of such an Emergency. More eloquently I might add. GK Ganeson and former AG Tommy Thomas have done so. They are lawyers and worth listening to. I merely hitch a ride on their writings.

3. To behave responsibly can mean different things to politicians. To PN miscreants it means dissolving parliament.

4. To obstinate PN politicians they want to propose that Muhyi meet the Agong to dissolve parliament.

5. To me that's an exercise in futility. The Agong will consider public health and cost issues.

6. Legally it's settled. The Agong can refuse to listen to the PM's advice.

7. In handling COVID-19 a minister is the last person the Agong need listen to. He should listen to doctors and frontliners. The minister in charge cannot guarantee the safety of the people notwithstanding he has an SOP from the sky.

8. Ayah Pin once had a religion from the sky not just an SOP, yet he cannot escape death.

9. There are really 2 swords of Damocles hanging over Muhyi's head:- a vote of no confidence and a Budget defeat.

10. If the vote of no confidence is disallowed a budget defeat will have the same desired effect .

11. How can a government spends with money not legally approved? That would be illegal. Those who adamantly do so regardless, have committed an illegality. Arrest them and fine them. Those we do not want to see their faces in parliament any more, fine then more than RM2000. They have to be disqualified as MP!

12. You may have plans B and C and all the other plans, but they will involve some forms of chicanery, duplicity and unscrupulous methods. Please do all that because it will reveal your true devilish character.

13. That's behaving irresponsibly for you. Instead of standing down you plan all sorts of devious plans that put the people at risk. The UMNO leaders who countenanced such methods are complicit in putting the people in harm's way.

14. To more than 113 MPs, the whole drama directed by Muhyi, will strengthen their resolve to put into effect the democratic process-remove this PM through parliamentary means. Between that and a forced PRU which is both costlier and unsafe, which methods do you prefer?

15. For Muhyi its the final nail on his own coffin. He reaps what he has sown. The most honourable option he should do is RESIGN. He's delaying the inevitable.

16. What are the signs of a man:

He dies in the ring
He sleeps on the crest of the wave
He eats on the exposed shore
He does not know tears
Head unbowed.
Be a man.

Tweet

Read more...

Muhyi's toilet emergency: He has Diarrhea.

1. A constitutional coup de tat is happening before our eyes. The PM of the day wants the King to declare an Emergency. Or in his words a partial emergency, the real meaning only he knows. Maybe it's a Javanese term translated into English.

2. The unscrupulous way the PM uses to try to get it has attracted harsh opprobrium as it should. Lawyers are agitated.
The UMNO number 2 has said the Coronavirus pandemic must be handled with respect and deference to the Constitution and Democracy be allowed to function normally.

3. Nobody is going to be fooled into believing that the request for emergency is the COVID-19 pandemic. It's collateral. The real reason is an excuse to stay in power, avoid the motion of no confidence and prevent budget defeat.

4. It's a knee-jerk reaction of a closet dictator. Oh, what a beast that's unleashed from the Sheraton Move.

5. Can you imagine- he can spend as though it's his father's money without being accountable to anyone. Swollen face Muhyi suddenly experiences a bout of diarrhoea that he needs to declare his 'emergency'.

6. It's clear that COVID-19 is not the reason for the Emergency. It's the need to avoid the motion of no confidence.

7. It's imperative for Wak Muhyi to survive the motion. If he ceases to command majority support of MPs he and the entire cabinet must resign.

8. Obviously it also means he is not confident that the Agung will heed his advice to dissolve parliament. What a tangled web has he weaved.

9. Actually Muhyi has smeared charcoal on his Majesty's face. He assumes the king to be so gullible and dim to automatically accede to his request. The king can smell a rat. An elephant's carcass cannot be covered by a leaf

10. I used to think that Mahathir is the political chessboard player. Muhyiddin is really the enfant terrible. He's hitting below the belt. He's using the pandemic to hide the fact that he's losing the majority in parliament. He has only 113 seats.

11. An Emergency is needed to create political stability. That can be obtained if parliament were to be suspended and Muhyi be allowed to rule by fiat.

12. But the political instability is created by Muhyi in the first place because of his stubbornness in holding on to power by the thinnest of majority.

13. The boil should be removed surgically. Muhyi's government will not survive. It has run out of its usefulness.

14. Being told that such an important issue need to be referred first to the rulers' council is a clear indication that the request will likely be denied.

15. Oh, palliatives and face-saving statements will be issued- the rulers have the nominal confidence in Muhyi, the budget is important to fight the pandemic etc. But the most important thing is the request for Emergency will be refused.

16. MPs will be asked to behave responsibly and not to disturb the government of Dear Leader Abah. But that will not prevail. To more than 113 MPs to behave responsibly means to affirm democratic rule. Which is to give voice to the people.

17. You can be sure Muhyi is not going to be quiet too . Indeed, he's taking measures to circumvent the denial request.

18. He knows his days are numbered. If the no confidence motion is not allowed a Budget defeat wiil have the same result . He will have to tender in his resignation.

19. It's not as if the  measures taken by the current government with regards to COVID-19 cannot be done and be done better than an in-coming government.

20. If it comes to that, let Muhyi cries alone. Don't cry together. Think of the mess and political instability he created. It gives a poignant tone to the saying 'you reap what you sow'.

21. If he becomes PM through some duplicity, he will likewise exit through some chicanery. I say that as a mater of factly. Nothing personal, it's just business. That's Karma for you.

22. If you don't like the word 'Karma' how about if God has willed a particular outcome, no one can stop it. Ya Allah Ya Rahman Ya Allah Ya Rahim.

23. It is evident that only the King can declare an Emergency not the administration of Abah. That's why he made a beeline to Kuantan. He emerged sullen face. Cant get everything at once even if you are PM.

24. If I remember correctly, the Agong can only declare an Emergency under article 150 of the Constitution. But only if the Emergency is grave. Grave to me, means very serious. Very threatening. Very dangerous etc.

25. Grave to the nation ya, not to the PM personally. A vote of no confidence and a possible budget defeat are not grave dangers to the nation and hardly qualify for an Emergency. It means that only this particular budget is defeated but a new one can be created by an incoming government.

26. As I understand it, to qualify as an Emergency one of 3 things must happen as a result of an event. An event must-
(a) threaten public security
(b) must threaten public order
(c) threaten economic life

27. Do we see the Moro Liberation Front armies invading our shores? The Thai army, Singapore Arm forces or the Indonesian Army? No. So no grounds of public security.

28. Do we see widespread riots  in the steets? Do we have racial riots and reckless destruction of lives and property? No. Hence, strike 2

29. Do we see thousands of George Soroses and Mike Milkens descending upon Malaysia and sabotaging our economy? Do vindictive Indonesian and Bangladeshi labourers burning our oil palms? Do we see disgruntled persons destroying our oil fields? No! Strike 3 of 3.

30. There are therefore no justifiable reasons to declare an Emergency. Its just a smokescreen to hide the fact that Muhyi does not have a majority.

31. In another part, we shall examine the next steps to be taken by the actors in Muhyi's toilet emergency. At the time this article was written, the Agong has refused to declare an Emergency.

Tweet

Read more...

Vote of No confidence. Part 2/2.

1. Before we tear into what the speaker said about Government bills taking precedence, we shall discuss about some other issues.

2. An oft quoted fetter that is placed on the King's appointment to ask for the resignation of a current PM who ceases to command majority support, is that he can invite the king to dissolve parliament.

3. The King must listen to the PM. He's the PM. He who rules on life and death. Moreover, he's the patron of GOLF.

4. Many will die if Muhyi is not the patron of a many golf event. Many more will be walking the streets like zombies. The PM is omnipotent.

5. He can try and indeed he will. But the King is not obliged to follow. He is after all a King.

6. If the king can smell that's it's just a ploy to preserve the position of the PM then he can refuse the PM.

7. There is a provision in our Constitution that says the King shall first appoint as PM someone in his mind would likely command the support of the majority of MPs unless provided otherwise by parliament.

8. Where is it otherwise provided? In our Constitution is the answer. The king may exercise his discretion in the appointment of a PM and to accede to a proposal to dissolve Parliament. It is clear he can refuse the PM.

9. Next are the question of cost and public health not envisaged by the loyar buruks. Is holding a snap election not costly compared to the easier resignation of the PM? And is it wise to hold a country wide election amidst the pandemic COVID-19?

10. A parliament, speaker and mp subservient to a Minister of the Crown is a new law to me. But that is what the made for u tube speaker is talking about.

11. Asking the minister of law to move a motion of no confidence against the PM is like asking the minister to shoot himself in the foot. I don't think the minister has that kind of testicular fortitude in him.

12. Have we forgotten that it's the PM who appoints the law minister? How can we ask somebody to bite the hand that feeds him? Only Muhyi did that to Mahathir.

13. A motion of no confidence is usually moved by the leader of the opposition. If the minister won't do it, it's like asking the leader of the opposition asking permission from the minister.

14. That's making a mockery of parliament and its process. It's making the whole of parliament subservient to the crown minister.

15. When the 222 MPs were voted in, they swore to uphold the constitution, uphold the rule of law, served the people. The people want a PM serving them not golfing and goofing around. They want their voice heard. Their voice is heard loudest when the vote of no confidence is heard.

16. A parliament subservient to a minister in the discharge of their electoral duties is unheard of. Yet this is what the timid speaker wants parliament to be.

17. He wants a straight-jacketed and taped at the mouth parliament. So he strenuously cites the limp excuse that government businesses must take precedence.

18. What do parliamentary practices, say about this? For this we have to look at what Erskine May say about it. Thomas, Erskine May who was a clerk at the House of Commons wrote a book actually, entitled Parliamentary Practices. I have a copy bought online. I assumed the speaker who is a lawyer has one.

19. The speaker shames the office he is in. He is not subservient to a minister. He is the one who presides on the day business of parliament. He is higher ranked than anyone else in parliament. By saying that such a motion must be moved by the law minister or that the leader of the opposition must get his permission (the minister's) the speaker is just passing the buck.

20. He is a timid and timorous soul who runs away from making tough decisions. When he took office, he swore to defend the constitution and uphold the rule of law. Obviously he won't do these things.

21. Erskine May says a confidence vote must be acceded to and a day allocated to it. That is to test whether the sitting PM has majority support or not. It's so important that a day must be allotted it. It is in recognition of the fact that the opposition is a government in potential. Therefore, it justifies an intrusion in the hearing of government bills only.

22. I would also argue for the motion of confidence on account of natural justice. To act without bias and the general duty to act fairly. The motion is so important that to deny it goes against a sense of natural justice.

23. We take note of the following. There are legal reasons that allow the King to not necessarily heed the advice of the PM. There are conventional reasons for the speaker to allow the motion. Finally, there is the reason of natural justice. We shall wait what the speaker does.

24. The king can also summon Parliament within 6 months of the last sitting. In that session he can prorogue or dissolve parliament. Only in this case he can summon parliament to discuss the issue of confidence. On which side will the King stand?

Tweet

Read more...

Vote of No confidence. Part 1

1. I listened to the arguments of the Speaker of the Malaysian parliament. That is the kind of argument which retains the tyranny of the status quo.

2. If that is the way he argues the reason for disallowing a vote of no confidence I am afraid his tenure as speaker will be a short one.

3. His reasons for saying the vote of no confidence will not be possible are
(a) government bills must take precedence and
(b) it must be promoted by a minister.

4. I shall not argue the urgency of such bills purely from a legal outlook per se. The more we get into legal quicksand arguments the farther we get to solve the problem. Legal sophistry only clouds the issue.

5. Because if you were to ask lawyers they will come out with all sorts of answers none of which are right. The speaker is one and his answer is not right. It can always be debated and a bill follows it later.

6. A doctor, an engineer and a lawyer rode a train to Scotland. The doctor looks out the window and saw a black sheep on the hills.

7. The doctor says hey the sheep in Scotland are black. The engineer says you can't say that about sheep in Scotland. You can only say ONE of the sheeps are black. Then the lawyer says. You can't even say that. You can only say one SIDE of the sheep is black!

8. Back to the issue. It's really up to the discretion of the speaker. The Standing Orders and the Constitution are just guidelines. MPs used them to provide locus standi for their protestations.

9. A motion of no confidence is a game changer. The RUU is just a game add-on. The former must be accorded priority.

10. The application of common sense is in order here not a recourse to some archaic legal mumbo jumbo.

11. This is no ordinary motion. It is a litmus test. It's to test whether the PM enjoys support from the majority of MPs. If he does not then he and the entire cabinet must resign.

12. Then the refusal of the speaker to accede to the motion is easily understood. It's an attempt to perpetuate the tyranny of the backdoor government, the demise of the cabinet and to save his own position.

13. These are the logical conclusions otherwise there is no need to bunker up under the nebulous Standing Orders and the Constitution. He's saving the government and his position.

14. So don't take his explanation as a given. As the Malay saying says he's just trying to straighten a wet thread. Or while the index finger is straight, his pinky is hooked.

15. It's illogical to expect a Minister of the Crown to move a motion of no confidence. It won't happen in a million years. We might as well wait until the cat grows horns.

16. It's also ridiculous to think the originator of the motion must first seek permission from the Minister of Law. This is not a judicial review. Did the mover of the RUU motion ask permission from the law minister? No he did not and there was no need to. That would be a blockage on his role as MP. An MP owes a duty to the electorate not to the law minister or even the PM.

17. So if the PM ceases to command support from the majority of MPs, he and the entire cabinet must resign. I have no doubt the current speaker will also lose his job(as speaker)

18. The whole of his arguments were meant to preserve the PMs and his interests which are against the interest of the people.

19. That to me is more cogent than to say it's against the rule of law, Convention, Standing Orders or even the Constitution. The Speaker and Parliament must give voice to the people.

20. An interesting fact is the provision in the constitution that says the King must first appoint someone whom he thinks is LIKELY to command the majority support of the majority of the MPs.

21. To me this is interesting. It means the King may not select the person who claims he has the majority. Secondly the claim is verifiable. It ought to be tested in the dewan rakyat.

22. "Is likely" seems to me is an after the fact thing. Choose first and see whether he has majority support. Muhyiddin has majority support because of the office. Because he was chosen support comes into line.

23. The more preferable choice is to test the claim in the dewan rakyat. This wasn't done in Muhyiddin's case.

Tweet

Read more...

Tengku Razaleigh Hamzah. Beyond the Myths.

1. The house at Bukit Chekati must have been greatly ravaged by the floods some time ago. It is by the river. Needless to say Ku Li must have put it right.

2. The country is now ravaged by political upheavals. TRH maybe the right person to put things right. He's got the right credentials.

3. Some people will say a nation is not like a house. But I know of many MPs who cannot walk and chew gum at the same time. Why can't I compare a house and the nation then?

4. Every Friday some close friends would congregate at his house for Friday prayers. Prayers are usually at a mosque in kampung Pandan. He would be driven in an old BMW 2002. He still keeps a black bulletproof Mercedes-Benz given him by the government amidst rumours that the CIA were out to assassinate him for having introduced the PDA.

5. He values the past and is well grounded to the contemporary and is tuned to the spiritual. A person who doesn't forget the past is likely not to repeat the mistakes therein.

6. That means he keeps tradition as long as it is functional. But he also submits to the inevitable, the spiritual omnipotence. If something has outlived its usefulness it is abandoned.

7. Perhaps we need that kind of person who keeps a balance, as PM. We have no need of a person likely to put us on a road of mindless revolution and reformasi. That balance is forged by useful experience and right temperament.

8. Every year during fasting month, without fail invited guests mostly friends, are invited for breaking fast and prayer sessions. Local imams or invited Arab imams lead the prayers. The congregation prays for Ku Li's continued success and health.

9. The presence of these people indirectly accorded Ku Li important lessons in life. Most notably trust because he has been betrayed and played out so many times. Never trust a person who has played you out more than 2 times. The first is a warning, the second is a bitter lesson and the third is just taking advantage. I am sure these observations do not escape the perceptive Ku Li. He has wizened up. He is 83 years old for God's sake.

10. It has taught him to be circumspect of the fickle minded person. This type of people are likely to give in to different opinions. These people are undependable. They have a see-saw character-more specifically the person on the opposite side who will dismount when you are on the way up and let you fall. Didn't Najib dismount when TRH was up and let him fall?

11. Yet in all my meetings with Ku Li, he has not spoken ill of the blasted Najib. Not even once. Or of anyone else for that matter.
Even during the heated issue of 1MDB. It made me wonder whether he has a soft spot on the son of Tun Razak.

12. I am limited in that respect. I will blast Najib or whoever I think deserves it in my blog. But I know to clam up in front of someone else.

13. Because TRH cannot trust someone who speaks ill of someone else in front of him because that fellow is likely to blabber about TRH infront of others.

14. An important lesson one learns from a study of people, is that you can't trust people with competitive streaks. They will seize the first oppurtunity to topple you.

15. TRH cannot trust people like Mustapa Mohamed who thinks he is PM material. He definitely can't trust Anuar Musa who is a legend in his own mind. And Sabery Chik? The nut who forgets its skin.

16. I can write on BMF, decoupling of the Malaysian Ringgit from the Singapore Dollar, his move to the Trade Ministry etc. But that would involve hurting the feelings of someone I respect and that of a close friend. So let others better than I do it.

17. Suffice to say at that time BBMB was under the purview of the then PM. The decoupling needed to be done to avoid spending huge amounts of money to remain on par with the Singapore Dollar. His move to the Trade Ministry was the prerogative of the PM. Furthermore, the then PM wanted to place a more palatable friend at the Finance Ministry. Anyway anything written by the CIA must be taken with a little pinch of salt.

18. The achievements of Ku Li are undisputed. How many know that he is the only Malaysian and Malay to be the chairman of the World Bank and IMF?

Tweet

Read more...

The Common Thief and the Political Thief

This is an article I received from my brother. Its not written by me but the subject matter is a bitter truth worth sharing.




What is the difference between an Ordinary Thief (OT) and a Political Thief (PT)?* ..v

1.The Ordinary Thief steals your money,
bag,
watch,
gold chain etc.
But,
The Political Thief steals your future,
career,
education,
health and business!

2. The hilarious part is: ..
The Ordinary Thief will choose whom to rob.
But, you yourself choose the Political Thief to rob you.

3. The most ironic one: ..
Police will chase and nab the Ordinary Thief.
But,
Police will look after and protect the Political Thief!
That’s the travesty and irony of our current society!
And,
we blindly say we are not blind!
4. The stupid part of the whole issue is that we insult and fight the Ordinary Thief but we Fight each other for the Political Thief.

Tweet

Read more...