Many years ago,
after an UMNO General Assembly, delegates showed open defiance to Najib. They
found so many things disagreeable after he delivered his presidential speech.
When he spoke
about 1Malaysia, the delegates insisted on Malay Rights. When he spoke about
The New Economic Model, the delegates demanded a stay of the NEP. When I once
asked him about the NEM- he said it is market driven affirmative action. True-
its market driven enrichment of the select few.
In the end,
desperate for believability and acceptance, Najib had nothing he can use to
defend himself- other than by affirming that he is the son of Tun Razak. As though
that is enough to assure success in what he was about to do.
Probably 6 years
down the road, Najib repeats himself silly. When challenged to explain
possible wrongdoings in 1MDB, profligate spending, abuse of power, failure to manage
the economy- Najib pursued the same tired strategy. He offered the achievements
obtained under ETP, GTP, Pemandu and the various NKRA criteria to explain away
the irritable questions. 1.5 million jobs created mainly for the immigrants- Nepalese,
Bangladeshis, Myanmarese who acquire skills. Meanwhile our local boys don’t know
how to turn the screws and bolts at the MRT sites.
The questions
kept coming, he cannot answer.
Finally as if realising
what he said thus far is contentious, he cited the last and bizarre defence and
the craving for believability- that he is after all a Bugis.
In the first
instance, having failed to appease delegates- he affirmed he is Tun Razak’s
son. In the second instance, a few days ago, after realising his storytelling
about ETP, GTP, Pemandu and NKRAs is not believable, he affirms his Bugis
lineage.
Which means
what? Which means to suggest and make others believe, the fact that you are Tun
Razak’s son guarantees and ensures success; the fact that you are a Bugis
ensures success. Success therefore depends on something, some quality, some
genes you inherit that ensure success.
What you can achieve
outside the FACT that you are Tun Razak’s son and Bugis depend on the
education, experience, acquired skills, dexterity, and verve, discipline you
have- all based on merits and voluntarily cultivated.
Now, readers
will at once realise, that is a way to explain things, to offer hope on the
basis of what and who you are. It is totally a different way from explaining
that something, some objectives succeed only because you can contribute
something towards realising them. Such as working hard, such as acquiring
skills, education, etc.
Something which
is reflected in the practical response of a Malay and a Chinese when faced by
reduction in real income as a result if GST since all things are becoming expensive.
The Malay says- no worries I am Malay and I am entitled to BR1m and other
welfare assistance. The Chinese will respond no worry- last time I fried 2
plates of charkoayteow, now I fry 4.
Very practical but different solution.
The Malay offers
a way out by pointing out to who he is. The Chinese offers a way out by
increasing contribution- making more plates of char koayteow.
In the first way,
the person is doomed or defined because of who he is. If he were not a son of
Tun Razak, he cannot offer and guarantee success. If he were not a Bugis, he
cannot succeed. The second way of explaining things depend on acquired traits-
learnable, and expandable that produce possibilities.
Sociologists have
longed recognised ascriptive values
and achieving values as basis for
progress. The backward people, the capacity challenged leader will find excuses
and recourse by referring to their lineage and heritage. Najib just did many
years ago and hasn’t learnt since then.
The progressive an expandable society subscribe
to achievement values- which are values voluntarily acquired and cultivated and
used as driving engines towards forwardness. Progressive peoples and progressive
societies know the way forward depends on the efforts voluntarily and actively
put in. it does not depend on reliance of passive lineage and the distant past.
The last time I checked,
the bugis people in Pahang did not participate in the Pahang Rebellionin the
1880s against the British. My ancestors- non Bugis did.
It’s a
well-known fact that only third world
mentality leaders, a backward country leader will use the defence of ascriptive values and characteristics as
; that successful construction of progress and advancement depend on who they
are and his lineage.
Malays must get
out of that mental rut. Abandon the leader who teaches that the way out
depends on your lineage and your inherited status. Dr Mahathir has already cut the fallacy opened- the fact that Najib is the son of Tun Razak did not prevent
Najib from failing on so many fronts. Your
status and bloodline are irrelevant- what
you can do is more important.