tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post1993387071081589877..comments2024-03-14T19:25:05.015+08:00Comments on SAKMONGKOL AK47: UMNO's Quantity Theory of MoneyAriff Sabrihttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04134536173557859031noreply@blogger.comBlogger11125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-33430604993001603412008-10-30T14:48:00.000+08:002008-10-30T14:48:00.000+08:00This comment has been removed by the author.A Tabibhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13262461577595899264noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-86943308312961968382008-10-29T23:34:00.000+08:002008-10-29T23:34:00.000+08:00anon, agree with SK on manipulation of equationP =...anon, agree with SK on manipulation of equation<BR/><BR/>P = M/T * v<BR/><BR/>but i think it's more likely that v is constant whil<BR/><BR/>P varies with Money Supply and VOLUME... ;)<BR/><BR/>Rusty econs....Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-4431603499499526562008-10-29T23:15:00.000+08:002008-10-29T23:15:00.000+08:00i am cleaning up the music videos and will replace...i am cleaning up the music videos and will replace them with revised musical videos that dont intefere with load ups.<BR/>thank you.Ariff Sabrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04134536173557859031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-15647400311454774682008-10-29T23:08:00.000+08:002008-10-29T23:08:00.000+08:00i like the music videos! so cool for an UMNO guy e...i like the music videos! so cool for an UMNO guy esp from Najib's division some more...so cool one meh, umno? kee kee.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-23893335892477012532008-10-29T22:22:00.000+08:002008-10-29T22:22:00.000+08:00Hi,I like reading your blog and use it as a refere...Hi,<BR/>I like reading your blog and use it as a reference to understanding the politics that is umno.<BR/><BR/>I mean no disrespect and this is your blog, but would you consider doing away with the music videos? I think it's making the page load slow.<BR/>Thank youAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-32016075529121824092008-10-29T19:50:00.000+08:002008-10-29T19:50:00.000+08:00anonymous at 16.56. the algebraic equation can be ...anonymous at 16.56. the algebraic equation can be manipulated so as to support one's argument. yours of course is correct, if you hold any of the variables constant. in my case, i wanted to point to the fact, that the more money one receives by way of selling votes, the more one debases himself. hence my q, what do these people care?. <BR/>because p varies proportional with the value- like you Ariff Sabrihttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04134536173557859031noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-26337336975005705182008-10-29T17:32:00.000+08:002008-10-29T17:32:00.000+08:00congrat bro on the "shah rukh khan thingy". ;)congrat bro on the "shah rukh khan thingy". ;)abdullahjoneshttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01638389133561907005noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-3455721774031639692008-10-29T16:56:00.000+08:002008-10-29T16:56:00.000+08:00I do not know where you learn your maths but value...I do not know where you learn your maths but value(if price is an indication) is proportional to V - the speed in which money flows if the volume, T is taken as a constant. This means as V incerases so will P if the money supply, M, is also kept constant. Thus the equation could be re-written as :<BR/><BR/>P = M/T * v<BR/><BR/>or P (proportional to) V.<BR/><BR/>Which is quite interesting and Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-24090250067167061222008-10-29T15:24:00.000+08:002008-10-29T15:24:00.000+08:00Will UMNO elections save the economy?Will UMNO elections save the economy?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-33266711903123440632008-10-29T13:31:00.000+08:002008-10-29T13:31:00.000+08:00walla: 'it is all about chickens.'KJ: 'chickens? w...walla: 'it is all about chickens.'<BR/><BR/>KJ: 'chickens? why chickens? chickens as in kfc?'<BR/><BR/>walla: 'no, just cluck-cluck chickens.'<BR/><BR/>KJ: 'me no capiche, man.'<BR/><BR/>walla: 'look, when you came into the scene, my first impression of you was, well, quite positive. i thought here's something new. New that can lead to change. Change that can take us all out of the quagmire.'<BR/wallahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17580252352785040456noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1604477176521753208.post-45789777565559797082008-10-29T13:05:00.000+08:002008-10-29T13:05:00.000+08:00I think the promissory estoppel principle apllies ...I think the promissory estoppel principle apllies here. delegate who accepted advances is estopped from reneging to vote for the advancer. what if he/she takes advances from two different candidates. shall he/she be estopped from voting the third candidate who does not give anything at all? thus to avoid being sued for promissory estoppel, one should vote for all candidates who give them Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com